Management of the Malunited Triple Arthrodesis

Patient Reported Outcomes Following Triple Arthrodesis for Adult Acquired Flat Foot Deformity: Minimum Two Year Follow Up

The aim of this study is to analyze patient-reported outcomes following this procedure as well as any demographics that may confer prognostic capability. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent Triple Arthrodesis at our facility from 2014-2021. Patients were selected if they underwent an isolated triple arthrodesis. All cases included either a gastrocnemius recession versus a percutaneous tendo-achilles lengthening depending on the patient's Silverskiold examination. The electronic medical record was utilized to collect basic patient demographics, previous foot and ankle surgeries, hardware failures, additional procedures, and surgical complications. To evaluate outcomes, we compared patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) survey scores with the general population and preoperative versus postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Foot function index (FFI) scores and scores were utilized as a validation tool for our results. A total of 132 patients met the criteria for our study with a total of 50 participants completing the PROMIS and FFI surveys. The average time point at which the outcomes were collected was 5.50 y postoperatively, ranging from 1.65 to 7.57 y. The average PROMIS physical function was 38.35, pain interference was 61.52, and depression was 49.82 for this population. The mean FFI scores were 58.56 for pain, 60.07 for disability, and 48.07 for activity limitation. There was a significant decrease in preoperative and postoperative VAS scores from 5.4 to 2.55 (p < .001). Three patients experienced wound complications related to decreased sensation. Our results indicated that only PROMIS depression scores were within one standard deviation of the population mean following a triple arthrodesis procedure. PROMIS physical function and pain interference were both outside of one standard deviation for the population.

Association of Smokeless Tobacco and Complications Following Ankle and Hindfoot Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the rates of postoperative complications following ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis among current smokeless tobacco users and people who smoke compared to matched controls, and (2) compare rates of postoperative complications in current smokeless tobacco users vs people who smoke tobacco cigarettes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large national database. For patients who underwent ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users (n = 131) and people who smoke (n = 1948) were matched 1:4 with controls, and smokeless tobacco users (n = 131) were matched 1:4 with people who smoke tobacco cigarettes (n = 524). Orthopaedic complications within 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years were compared using multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Within 90 days of ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly higher rates of hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] 5.01, 95% CI 1.65-15.20), wound disruption or dehiscence (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.21-7.44), and pooled complications (16.0% vs 5.9%, OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.50-5.38) compared with tobacco-naïve controls. The rates of hardware removal, wound disruption and dehiscence, and pooled complications remained significant in the smokeless tobacco cohort at 1 and 2 years. At 2 years following ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users additionally demonstrated significantly higher rates of infection (OR 6.08, 95% CI 1.15-32.05) and nonunion (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.31-4.20) compared with tobacco-naïve controls. Within 90 days of ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated significantly lower rates of malunion or nonunion than patients who smoke tobacco cigarettes (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.97), whereas all other complications were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Smokeless tobacco use is associated with higher rates of complications following ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis compared with tobacco-naïve controls, and physicians should screen for smokeless tobacco use specifically and encourage cessation before operating electively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Triple Arthrodesis: How to Manage Failures, Malunion, and Nonunion

Nonunions are managed by general principles that govern other bone healing sites; however, when confounding with malunion, additional attention must be given. Malunited triple arthrodesis requires a thorough understanding of biomechanical and surgical principles for adequate revision surgery. Due to the rigid nature of arthrodesis surgery on a weight-bearing surface, malunited fusions have very low patient tolerance. The lack of joints leads to a block of bone that can be corrected via derotational osteotomies with wedge supplementation. However, even if a rectus foot is achieved, compensatory motion via the ankle joint commonly causes arthritic long-term sequelae.

Double and Triple Tarsal Fusions in the Severe Rigid Flatfoot Deformity

A flatfoot deformity is a multiplanar foot deformity characterized by forefoot abduction and supination and hindfoot valgus. With progressive pathology, a rigid deformity may develop. In the setting of a rigid deformity, the appropriate procedure to use is not without controversy. The extent of joints to involve in the arthrodesis depends on the ability to obtain a plantigrade foot. Both double and triple arthrodesis have been suggested. Care must be taken to avoid lateral column shortening and loss of foot reduction when fusing the CC joint. The concerns about lateral skin breakdown led some surgeons to describe a single medial incision for a triple or modified double arthrodesis. The necessity of bone grafting has been controversial. Implant selection is essential to achieve solid stabilization of the arthrodesis sites. To decrease the risk of overcorrection and malunion, the surgeon should be familiar with the hindfoot biomechanics and generate, based on the clinical examination and imaging, a meticulous preoperative plan to address and balance both the soft tissue and bony deformity.

Failed Cavovarus Reconstruction: Reconstructive Possibilities and a Proposed Treatment Algorithm

This article provides an overview of the techniques and strategies to address a failed cavovarus deformity correction. These problems pose significant challenges to the treating surgeons and should be accurately planned before embarking on surgery.

Managing Complications of Foot and Ankle Surgery: Reconstruction of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Our understanding of the cause and principles of treatment of progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) has significantly evolved in recent decades. The goals of treatment remain improvement in symptoms, correction of deformity, maintenance of joint motion, and return of function. Although notable advancements in understanding the deformity have been made, complications still occur and typically result from (1) poor decision making, (2) technical errors, and (3) patient-related conditions. In this article, we discuss common surgical modalities used in the treatment of PCFD and further highlight the common complications that occur and the techniques that can be used to prevent them.