Structural basis for recognition of the type VI spike protein VgrG3 by a cognate immunity protein

Toxin-antitoxin systems in pathogenic Vibrio species: a mini review from a structure perspective

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) genetic modules have been found to widely exist in bacterial chromosomes and mobile genetic elements. They are composed of stable toxins and less stable antitoxins that can counteract the toxicity of toxins. The interactions between toxins and antitoxins could play critical roles in the virulence and persistence of pathogenic bacteria. There are at least eight types of TA systems which have been identified in a variety of bacteria. Vibrio, a genus of Gram-negative bacteria, is widespread in aquatic environments and can cause various human diseases, such as epidemic cholera. In this review, we mainly explore the structures and functions of TA modules found in common Vibrio pathogens, mainly V. cholerae, for better understanding of TA action mechanisms in pathogenic bacteria.

The Breadth and Molecular Basis of Hcp-Driven Type VI Secretion System Effector Delivery

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a bacterial nanoscale weapon that delivers toxins into prey ranging from bacteria and fungi to animal hosts. The cytosolic contractile sheath of the system wraps around stacked hexameric rings of Hcp proteins, which form an inner tube. At the tip of this tube is a puncturing device comprising a trimeric VgrG topped by a monomeric PAAR protein. The number of toxins a single system delivers per firing event remains unknown, since effectors can be loaded on diverse sites of the T6SS apparatus, notably the inner tube and the puncturing device. Each VgrG or PAAR can bind one effector, and additional effector cargoes can be carried in the Hcp ring lumen. While many VgrG- and PAAR-bound toxins have been characterized, to date, very few Hcp-bound effectors are known. Here, we used 3 known Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hcp proteins (Hcp1 to -3), each of which associates with one of the three T6SSs in this organism (H1-T6SS, H2-T6SS, and H3-T6SS), to perform in vivo pulldown assays. We confirmed the known interactions of Hcp1 with Tse1 to -4, further copurified a Hcp1-Tse4 complex, and identified potential novel Hcp1-bound effectors. Moreover, we demonstrated that Hcp2 and Hcp3 can shuttle T6SS cargoes toxic to Escherichia coli. Finally, we used a Tse1-Bla chimera to probe the loading strategy for Hcp passengers and found that while large effectors can be loaded onto Hcp, the formed complex jams the system, abrogating T6SS function.

The β-encapsulation cage of rearrangement hotspot (Rhs) effectors is required for type VI secretion

Bacteria deploy rearrangement hotspot (Rhs) proteins as toxic effectors against both prokaryotic and eukaryotic target cells. Rhs proteins are characterized by YD-peptide repeats, which fold into a large β-cage structure that encapsulates the C-terminal toxin domain. Here, we show that Rhs effectors are essential for type VI secretion system (T6SS) activity in Enterobacter cloacae (ECL). ECL rhs ^- mutants do not kill Escherichia coli target bacteria and are defective for T6SS-dependent export of hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp). The RhsA and RhsB effectors of ECL both contain Pro-Ala-Ala-Arg (PAAR) repeat domains, which bind the β-spike of trimeric valine-glycine repeat protein G (VgrG) and are important for T6SS activity in other bacteria. Truncated RhsA that retains the PAAR domain is capable of forming higher-order, thermostable complexes with VgrG, yet these assemblies fail to restore secretion activity to ∆rhsA ∆rhsB mutants. Full T6SS-1 activity requires Rhs that contains N-terminal transmembrane helices, the PAAR domain, and an intact β-cage. Although ∆rhsA ∆rhsB mutants do not kill target bacteria, time-lapse microscopy reveals that they assemble and fire T6SS contractile sheaths at ∼6% of the frequency of rhs ⁺ cells. Therefore, Rhs proteins are not strictly required for T6SS assembly, although they greatly increase secretion efficiency. We propose that PAAR and the β-cage provide distinct structures that promote secretion. PAAR is clearly sufficient to stabilize trimeric VgrG, but efficient assembly of T6SS-1 also depends on an intact β-cage. Together, these domains enforce a quality control checkpoint to ensure that VgrG is loaded with toxic cargo before assembling the secretion apparatus.

Effector⁻Immunity Pairs Provide the T6SS Nanomachine its Offensive and Defensive Capabilities

Type VI protein secretion systems (T6SSs) are specialized transport apparatus which can target both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells and play key roles in host⁻pathogen⁻microbiota interactions. Therefore, T6SSs have attracted much attention as a research topic during the past ten years. In this review, we particularly summarized the T6SS antibacterial function, which involves an interesting offensive and defensive mechanism of the effector⁻immunity (E⁻I) pairs. The three main categories of effectors that target the cell wall, membranes, and nucleic acids during bacterial interaction, along with their corresponding immunity proteins are presented. We also discuss structural analyses of several effectors and E⁻I pairs, which explain the offensive and defensive mechanisms underpinning T6SS function during bacterial competition for niche-space, as well as the bioinformatics, proteomics, and protein⁻protein interaction (PPI) methods used to identify and characterize T6SS mediated E⁻I pairs. Additionally, we described PPI methods for verifying E⁻I pairs.

Chimeric adaptor proteins translocate diverse type VI secretion system effectors in Vibrio cholerae

Vibrio cholerae is a diverse species of Gram-negative bacteria, commonly found in the aquatic environment and the causative agent of the potentially deadly disease cholera. These bacteria employ a type VI secretion system (T6SS) when they encounter prokaryotic and eukaryotic competitors. This contractile puncturing device translocates a set of effector proteins into neighboring cells. Translocated effectors are toxic unless the targeted cell produces immunity proteins that bind and deactivate incoming effectors. Comparison of multiple V. cholerae strains indicates that effectors are encoded in T6SS effector modules on mobile genetic elements. We identified a diverse group of chimeric T6SS adaptor proteins required for the translocation of diverse effectors encoded in modules. An example for a T6SS effector that requires T6SS adaptor protein 1 (Tap-1) is TseL found in pandemic V. cholerae O1 serogroup strains and other clinical isolates. We propose a model in which Tap-1 is required for loading TseL onto the secretion apparatus. After T6SS-mediated TseL export is completed, Tap-1 is retained in the bacterial cell to load other T6SS machines.

The structural basis of the Tle4-Tli4 complex reveals the self-protection mechanism of H2-T6SS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) has recently been demonstrated to mediate interbacterial competition and to discriminate between self and nonself. T6SS(+) bacteria employ toxic effectors to inhibit rival cells and concurrently use effector cognate immunity proteins to protect their sibling cells. The effector and immunity pairs (E-I pairs) endow the bacteria with a great advantage in niche competition. Tle4-Tli4 (PA1510-PA1509) is a newly identified E-I pair that is controlled by H2-T6SS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Tle4 exhibits phospholipase activity, which destroys the cell membrane of rival cells, and the periplasm-located Tli4 in donor cells eliminates this toxic effect of Tle4. In this paper, the structure of the Tle4-Tli4 complex is reported at 1.75 Å resolution. Tle4 consists of two domains: a conserved α/β-hydrolase domain and an unusual cap domain in which two lid regions (lid1 and lid2) display a closed conformation that buries the catalytic triad in a deep funnel. Tli4 also displays a two-domain structure, in which a large lobe and a small lobe form a crab claw-like conformation. Tli4 uses this crab claw to grasp the cap domain of Tle4, especially the lid2 region, which prevents the interfacial activation of Tle4 and thus causes enzymatic dysfunction of Tle4 in sister cells.