A cooperative jack model of random coil-to-elongation transition of the FH1 domain by profilin binding explains formin motor behavior in actin polymerization

A structural model of the profilin-formin pacemaker system for actin filament elongation

The formins constitute a large class of multi-domain polymerases that catalyze the localization and growth of unbranched actin filaments in cells from yeast to mammals. The conserved FH2 domains form dimers that bind actin at the barbed end of growing filaments and remain attached as new subunits are added. Profilin-actin is recruited and delivered to the barbed end by formin FH1 domains via the binding of profilin to interspersed tracts of poly-L-proline. We present a structural model showing that profilin-actin can bind the FH2 dimer at the barbed end stabilizing a state where profilin prevents its associated actin subunit from directly joining the barbed end. It is only with the dissociation of profilin from the polymerase that an actin subunit rotates and docks into its helical position, consistent with observations that under physiological conditions optimal elongation rates depend on the dissociation rate of profilin, independently of cellular concentrations of actin subunits.

Computational modeling suggests binding-induced expansion of Epsin disordered regions upon association with AP2

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are prevalent in the eukaryotic proteome. Common functional roles of IDRs include forming flexible linkers or undergoing allosteric folding-upon-binding. Recent studies have suggested an additional functional role for IDRs: generating steric pressure on the plasma membrane during endocytosis, via molecular crowding. However, in order to accomplish useful functions, such crowding needs to be regulated in space (e.g., endocytic hotspots) and time (e.g., during vesicle formation). In this work, we explore binding-induced regulation of IDR steric volume. We simulate the IDRs of two proteins from Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) to see if their conformational spaces are regulated via binding-induced expansion. Using Monte-Carlo computational modeling of excluded volumes, we generate large conformational ensembles (3 million) for the IDRs of Epsin and Eps15 and dock the conformers to the alpha subunit of Adaptor Protein 2 (AP2α), their CME binding partner. Our results show that as more molecules of AP2α are bound, the Epsin-derived ensemble shows a significant increase in global dimensions, measured as the radius of Gyration (R_G) and the end-to-end distance (EED). Unlike Epsin, Eps15-derived conformers that permit AP2α binding at one motif were found to be more likely to accommodate binding of AP2α at other motifs, suggesting a tendency toward co-accessibility of binding motifs. Co-accessibility was not observed for any pair of binding motifs in Epsin. Thus, we speculate that the disordered regions of Epsin and Eps15 perform different roles during CME, with accessibility in Eps15 allowing it to act as a recruiter of AP2α molecules, while binding-induced expansion of the Epsin disordered region could impose steric pressure and remodel the plasma membrane during vesicle formation.

Protein functions were originally believed to arise from ordered protein structures. This dogma was later challenged by the identification of intrinsically disordered proteins that lack specific structure. The functional roles of such proteins usually fell in two categories–exploiting the disorder for flexibility (like floppy connector), or imposing order upon binding to an external partner. In this study we explore the possibility of an alternative mechanism that harnesses disorder for function through regulated molecular crowding. Specifically, we use modeling to study two proteins involved in reshaping the cell membrane, Epsin and Eps15. We ask if they undergo binding-induced expansion, where binding of an external partner AP2 causes not a transition toward order, but rather an energetically favorable increase in propensity to occupy larger volumes. Our results show that Epsin tends to occupy a larger volume when bound to AP2, consistent with increased molecular crowding, which could help reshape the cell membrane. Such regulation of disorder via binding (without folding) opens hitherto unexplored avenues that cells might employ to harness disorder.

Competition for delivery of profilin-actin to barbed ends limits the rate of formin-mediated actin filament elongation

Formins direct the elongation of unbranched actin filaments by binding their barbed ends and processively stepping onto incoming actin monomers to incorporate them into the filament. Binding of profilin to actin monomers creates profilin-actin complexes, which then bind polyproline tracts located in formin homology 1 (FH1) domains. Diffusion of these natively disordered domains enables direct delivery of profilin-actin to the barbed end, speeding the rate of filament elongation. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of coordinated actin delivery from the multiple polyproline tracts in formin FH1 domains. We found that each polyproline tract can efficiently mediate polymerization, but that all tracts do not generate the same rate of elongation. In WT FH1 domains, the multiple polyproline tracts compete to deliver profilin-actin to the barbed end. This competition ultimately limits the rate of formin-mediated elongation. We propose that intrinsic properties of the filament-binding FH2 domain tune the efficiency of FH1-mediated elongation by directly regulating the rate of monomer incorporation at the barbed end. A strong correlation between competitive FH1-mediated profilin-actin delivery and FH2-regulated gating of the barbed end effectively limits the elongation rate, thereby obviating the need for evolutionary optimization of FH1 domain sequences.

Cell Biology: Capturing Formin's Mechano-Inhibition

Formins polymerize actin filaments for the cytokinetic contractile ring. Using in vitro reconstitution of fission yeast contractile ring precursor nodes containing formins and myosin, a new study shows that formin-mediated polymerization is strongly inhibited upon the capture and pulling of actin filaments by myosin, a result that has broad implications for cellular mechanosensing.

Computational modeling highlights the role of the disordered Formin Homology 1 domain in profilin-actin transfer

Formins accelerate actin polymerization, assumed to occur through flexible Formin Homology 1 (FH1) domain-mediated transfer of profilin-actin to the barbed end. To study FH1 properties and address sequence effects, including varying length/distribution of profilin-binding proline-rich motifs, we performed all-atom simulations of a set of representative FH1 domains of formins: mouse mDia1 and mDia2, budding yeast Bni1 and Bnr1, and fission yeast Cdc12, For3, and Fus1. We find FH1 has flexible regions between high-propensity polyproline helix regions. A coarse-grained model retaining sequence specificity, assuming rigid polyproline segments, describes their size. Multiple bound profilins or profilin-actin complexes expand mDia1-FH1, which may be important in cells. Simulations of the barbed end bound to Bni1-FH1-FH2 dimer show that the leading FH1 can better transfer profilin or profilin-actin, with decreasing probability as the distance from FH2 increases.

Computational simulation of formin-mediated actin polymerization predicts homologue-dependent mechanosensitivity

Many actin structures are nucleated and assembled by the barbed-end tracking polymerase formin family, including filopodia, focal adhesions, the cytokinetic ring and cell cortex. These structures respond to forces in distinct ways. Formins typically have profilin-actin binding sites embedded in highly flexible disordered FH1 domains, hypothesized to diffusively explore space to rapidly capture actin monomers for delivery to the barbed end. Recent experiments demonstrate that formin-mediated polymerization accelerates when under tension. The acceleration has been attributed to modifying the state of the FH2 domain of formin. Intriguingly, the same acceleration is reported when tension is applied to the FH1 domains, ostensibly pulling monomers away from the barbed end. Here we develop a mesoscale coarse-grain model of formin-mediated actin polymerization, including monomer capture and delivery by FH1, which sterically interacts with actin along its entire length. The binding of actin monomers to their specific sites on FH1 is entropically disfavored by the high disorder. We find that this penalty is attenuated when force is applied to the FH1 domain by revealing the binding site, increasing monomer capture efficiency. Overall polymerization rates can decrease or increase with increasing force, depending on the length of FH1 domain and location of binding site. Our results suggest that the widely varying FH1 lengths and binding site locations found in known formins could be used to differentially respond to force, depending on the actin structure being assembled. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.