Effectiveness of cetrorelix for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surge during controlled ovarian stimulation using letrozole and gonadotropins: a randomized trial

The cumulative live birth rate and cost-effectiveness of the clomiphene and gonadotropin cotreatment protocol versus the mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol in women over 35 years old

The decrease in assisted reproductive technology success among older women, attributed to decreased oocyte quantity and quality, poses a significant challenge. Currently, no consensus on the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for older women undergoing IVF exists. This retrospectively registered cohort study aimed to compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), time to live birth (TTLB), and cost-effectiveness among women older than 35 years who were receiving either the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin cotreatment with ovarian stimulation (CC cotreatment) protocol. To compare treatment outcomes, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) on 2871 IVF cycles in women older than 35 years who received either the GnRHa or CC cotreatment protocol, resulting in 375 cycles in each group. Additionally, a decision tree model was utilized to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two protocols. Following PSM, both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The CC cotreatment protocol resulted in a greater rate of cycle cancellation (13.07% vs. 8.00%, p = 0.032), but the groups maintained comparable fertilization rates and embryo quality. Although the TTLB was longer in the CC cotreatment group, the CLBR per initial cycle (41.07% vs. 45.33%, p = 0.269) and delivery outcomes were similar between the two groups at the 24 months follow-up. Additionally, the average cost per live birth in the CC cotreatment group was 21.27% lower than in the GnRHa group (¥32,301.42 vs. ¥39,174.22). In conclusion, for women older than 35 years undergoing IVF, the CC cotreatment protocol offered a comparable CLBR to the GnRHa protocol but with reduced costs, indicating its potential as a viable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation option.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier [ChiCTR2300076537].

Evolving strategies and application of proteins and peptide therapeutics in cancer treatment

Several proteins and peptides have therapeutic potential and can be used for cancer therapy. By binding to cell surface receptors and other indicators uniquely linked with or overexpressed on tumors compared to healthy tissue, protein biologics enhance the active targeting of cancer cells, as opposed to the passive targeting of cells by conventional small-molecule chemotherapeutics. This study focuses on peptide medications that exist to slow or stop tumor growth and the spread of cancer, demonstrating the therapeutic potential of peptides in cancer treatment. As an alternative to standard chemotherapy, peptides that selectively kill cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue are developing. A mountain of clinical evidence supports the efficacy of peptide-based cancer vaccines. Since a single treatment technique may not be sufficient to produce favourable results in the fight against cancer, combination therapy is emerging as an effective option to generate synergistic benefits. One example of this new area is the use of anticancer peptides in combination with nonpeptidic cytotoxic drugs or the combination of immunotherapy with conventional therapies like radiation and chemotherapy. This review focuses on the different natural and synthetic peptides obtained and researched. Discoveries, manufacture, and modifications of peptide drugs, as well as their contemporary applications, are summarized in this review. We also discuss the benefits and difficulties of potential advances in therapeutic peptides.

Peptide-based diagnostic and therapeutic agents: Where we are and where we are heading?

Peptides are increasingly present in all branches of medicine as innovative drugs, imaging agents, theragnostic, and constituent moieties of other sophisticated drugs such as peptide-drug conjugates. Due to new developments in chemical synthesis strategies, computational biology, recombinant technology, and chemical biology, peptide drug development has made a great progress in the last decade. Numerous natural peptides and peptide mimics have been obtained and studied, covering multiple therapeutic areas. Even though peptides have been investigated across the wide therapeutic spectrum, oncology, metabolism, and endocrinology are the most frequent medical indications of them. This review summarizes the current use of and the emerging new opportunities of peptides for diagnosis and treatment of various diseases.

Chronic Estrus Disrupts Uterine Gland Development and Homeostasis

Female mice homozygous for an engineered Gnrhr E90K mutation have reduced gonadotropin-releasing hormone signaling, leading to infertility. Their ovaries have numerous antral follicles but no corpora lutea, indicating a block to ovulation. These mutants have high levels of circulating estradiol and low progesterone, indicating a state of persistent estrus. This mouse model provided a unique opportunity to examine the lack of cyclic levels of ovarian hormones on uterine gland biology. Although uterine gland development appeared similar to controls during prepubertal development, it was compromised during adolescence in the mutants. By age 20 weeks, uterine gland development was comparable to controls, but pathologies, including cribriform glandular structures, were observed. Induction of ovulations by periodic human chorionic gonadotropin treatment did not rescue postpubertal uterine gland development. Interestingly, progesterone receptor knockout mice, which lack progesterone signaling, also have defects in postpubertal uterine gland development. However, progesterone treatment did not rescue postpubertal uterine gland development. These studies indicate that chronically elevated levels of estradiol with low progesterone and therefore an absence of cyclic ovarian hormone secretion disrupts postpubertal uterine gland development and homeostasis.

Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa in PCOS women effectively prevents LH surge and reduces injection burden compared to GnRH antagonist protocol

Utilizing corifollitropin alfa in GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) protocol in conjunction with GnRH agonist trigger/freeze-all strategy (corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant protocol) was reported to have satisfactory outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Although lessening in gonadotropin injections, GnRHant were still needed. In addition to using corifollitropin alfa, GnRHant was replaced with an oral progestin as in progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) to further reduce the injection burden in this study. We try to investigate whether this regimen (corifollitropin alfa/PPOS protocol) could effectively reduce GnRHant injections and prevent premature LH surge in PCOS patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. This is a retrospective cohort study recruiting 333 women with PCOS, with body weight between 50 and 70 kg, undergoing first IVF/ICSI cycle between August 2015 and July 2018. We used corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant protocol prior to Jan 2017 (n = 160), then changed to corifollitropin alfa/PPOS protocol (n = 173). All patients received corifollitropin alfa 100 μg on menstruation day 2/3 (S1). Additional rFSH was administered daily from S8. In corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant group, cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day was administered from S5 till the trigger day. In corifollitropin alfa/PPOS group, dydrogesterone 20 mg/day was given from S1 till the trigger day. GnRH agonist was used to trigger maturation of oocyte. All good quality day 5/6 embryos were frozen, and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was performed on subsequent cycle. A comparison of clinical outcomes was made between the two protocols. The primary endpoint was the incidence of premature LH surge and none of the patients occurred. Dydrogesterone successfully replace GnRHant to block LH surge while an average of 6.8 days of GnRHant injections were needed in the corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant group. No patients suffered from ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The other clinical outcomes including additional duration/dose of daily gonadotropin administration, number of oocytes retrieved, and fertilization rate were similar between the two groups. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate in the first FET cycle were also similar between the two groups. In women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, corifollitropin alfa/PPOS protocol could minimize the injections burden with comparable outcomes to corifollitropin alfa/GnRHant protocol.

Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine insemination (IUI), combined with ovarian stimulation (OS), has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Several agents for ovarian stimulation, combined with IUI, have been proposed, but it is still not clear which agents for stimulation are the most effective. This is an update of the review, first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination in infertile ovulatory women.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two trial registers from their inception to November 2020. We performed reference checking and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included truly randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different agents for ovarian stimulation combined with IUI for infertile ovulatory women concerning couples with unexplained infertility. mild male factor infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, we have included a total of 82 studies, involving 12,614 women. Due to the multitude of comparisons between different agents for ovarian stimulation, we highlight the seven most often reported here. Gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens (13 studies) For live birth, the results of five studies were pooled and showed a probable improvement in the cumulative live birth rate for gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.79; I² = 30%; 5 studies, 1924 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is assumed to be 22.8%, the chance following gonadotropins would be between 23.7% and 34.6%. The pooled effect of seven studies revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.17; I² = 58%; 7 studies, 2139 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus anti-oestrogens (8 studies) One study reported live birth rates for this comparison. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 0.75, CI 95% 0.51 to 1.11; 1 study, 599 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is 23.4%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.5% and 25.3%. The results of pooling four studies revealed that we are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.28, CI 95% 0.61 to 2.68; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 1000 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Gonadotropins with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonist versus gonadotropins alone (4 studies) No data were available for live birth. The pooled effect of two studies  revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH agonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared to gonadotropins alone (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.82 to 7.86; I² = 0; 2 studies, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist versus gonadotropins alone (14 studies) Three studies reported live birth rate per couple, and we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist improve live birth rate compared to gonadotropins (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.52 to 4.39; I² = 81%; 3 studies, 419 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 25.7%, the chance following gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist would be between 15.2% and 60.3%. We are also uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.28; I² = 0%; 10 studies, 2095 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins with anti-oestrogens versus gonadotropins alone (2 studies) Neither of the studies reported data for live birth rate. We are uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone, based on one study (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.1; 1 study, 230 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus gonadotropins (6 studies) Two studies  revealed that aromatase inhibitors may decrease live birth rate compared with gonadotropins (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.71; I²=0%; 2 studies, 651 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 31.9%,  the chance of live birth following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.7% and 25%. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.06 to 8.17; I²=77%; 3 studies, 731 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens with gonadotropins (8 studies) We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.3 8 to 2.54;  I² = 69%; 3 studies, 708 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins is 13.8%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors plus gonadotropins would be between 5.7% and 28.9%. We are uncertain of the effect of aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens combined with gonadotropins on multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.37;  I² = 0%; 5 studies, 901 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available results, gonadotropins probably improve cumulative live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins may also improve cumulative live birth rate when compared with aromatase inhibitors (low-certainty evidence). From the available data, there is no convincing evidence that aromatase inhibitors lead to higher live birth rates compared to anti-oestrogens. None of the agents compared lead to significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates. Based on low-certainty evidence, there does not seem to be a role for different combined therapies, nor for adding GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists in IUI programs.

Multiple strategies for the treatment of invasive breast carcinoma: A comprehensive prospective

In this review, we emphasize on evolving therapeutic strategies and advances in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). This includes small-molecule inhibitors under preclinical and clinical investigation, phytoconstituents with antiproliferative potential, targeted therapies as antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), vaccines as immunotherapeutic agents and peptides as a novel approach inhibiting the interaction of oncogenic proteins. We provide an update of molecules under different phases of clinical investigation which aid in the identification of loopholes or shortcomings that can be overcomed with future breast cancer research.

Emerging trends of receptor-mediated tumor targeting peptides: A review with perspective from molecular imaging modalities

Natural peptides extracted from natural components such are known to have a relatively short in-vivo half-life and can readily metabolize by endo- and exo-peptidases. Fortunately, synthetic peptides can be easily manipulated to increase in-vivo stability, membrane permeability and target specificity with some well-known natural families. Many natural as well as synthetic peptides target to their endogenous receptors for diagnosis and therapeutic applications. In order to detect these peptides externally, they must be modified with radionuclides compatible with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET). Although, these techniques mainly rely on physiological changes and have profound diagnostic strength over anatomical modalities such as MRI and CT. However, both SPECT and PET observed to possess lack of anatomical reference frame which is a key weakness of these techniques, and unfortunately, cannot be available freely in most clinical centres especially in under-developing countries. Hence, it is need of the time to design and develop economic, patient friendly and versatile strategies to grapple with existing problems without any hazardous side effects. Optical molecular imaging (OMI) has emerged as a novel technique in field of medical science using fluorescent probes as imaging modality and has ability to couple with organic drugs, small molecules, chemotherapeutics, DNA, RNA, anticancer peptide and protein without adding chelators as necessary for radionuclides. Furthermore, this review focuses on difference in imaging modalities and provides ample knowledge about reliable, economic and patient friendly optical imaging technique rather radionuclide-based imaging techniques.

A Premature Rise of Luteinizing Hormone Is Associated With a Reduced Cumulative Live Birth Rate in Patients ≥37 Years Old Undergoing GnRH Antagonist In Vitro Fertilization Cycles

This is a retrospective cohort study included 1021 patients underwent a flexible GnRH antagonist IVF protocol from January 2017 to December 2017 to explore the effect of a premature rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) level on the cumulative live birth rate. All patients included received the first ovarian stimulation and finished a follow-up for 3 years. A premature rise in LH was defined as an LH level >10 IU/L or >50% rise from baseline during ovarian stimulation. The cumulative live birth rate was calculated as the number of women who achieved a live birth divided by the total number of women who had either delivered a baby or had used up all their embryos received from the first stimulated cycle. In the advanced patients (≥37 years), the cumulative live birth rate was reduced in patients with a premature rise of LH (β: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.88; p=0.03), compared to patients (≥37 years) without the premature LH rise. The incidence of premature LH rise is associated with decreased rates of cumulative live birth rate in patients of advanced age (≥37 years) and aggravated the reduced potential of embryos produced by the advanced age, not the number of embryos.

Diminished Ovarian Reserve Predisposes to Premature Luteinizing Hormone Surges in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Cycles in In vitro Fertilization

Context/Background:

A premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist downregulation, leads to cycle cancellation. Currently, risk factors for the development of premature LH surge remain unknown.

Objective:

The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and identify the contributing factors for premature LH surge in IVF cycles with GnRH antagonist suppression.

Design:

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

IVF-embryo transfer program at a fertility and research center.

Materials and Methods:

The study included all patients undergoing IVF from December 1, 2014, to November 30, 2018, in whom GnRH-antagonist (cetrorelix 0.25 mg/d) flexible protocol was used. The primary outcome measure was the identification of premature LH surges (documented by a 2.5-fold increase in LH from the baseline above a threshold of 17 mIU/mL) with or without a decrease in E₂ and appearance of free fluid on ultrasound.

Results:

Premature LH surges occurred in 15 (2.16%) of 692 patients undergoing IVF with GnRH-antagonist suppression. Patients with premature surges had significantly lower ovarian reserve as compared to the controls (as seen from their higher age group, higher day 2 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), lower antral follicle counts, and lower anti-Müllerian hormone).

Conclusions:

Premature LH surge in a GnRH-antagonist cycle can lead to cycle cancellation and disappointment. Although this is a rare event, the incidence is higher in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Further studies are needed to determine if giving the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger a day earlier or giving higher doses of GnRH-antagonist can benefit such cases.

Endometrial uNK cell counts do not predict successful implantation in an IVF population

STUDY QUESTION

Are uterine natural killer (uNK) cell numbers and their distribution relative to endometrial arterioles altered in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) compared to women with embryo implantation success (IS)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

uNK cell numbers and their distribution relative to endometrial arterioles are not significantly different in women with RIF compared to women in whom embryo implantation occurs successfully following IVF.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

uNK cells are regulators of decidual angiogenesis and spiral arteriole remodelling during early pregnancy. Although some studies have shown that uNK cell numbers may be altered in women with RIF, the methods used to measure uNK cell numbers have proven inconsistent, making reproduction of these results difficult. It is unclear, therefore, whether the results reported so far are reproducible. Moreover, it is not known how uNK cell numbers may impact IVF outcomes. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, uNK cell numbers are often evaluated as a prognostic criterion in women undergoing assisted reproductive procedures.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Endometrial pipelle biopsies were collected 6-8 days post-LH surge in natural cycles from women with RIF (n = 14), women with IS (n = 11) and women with potential RIF at the time of the study (PRIF; n = 9) from 2013 to 2015.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

uNK cells (i.e. CD56+ and/or CD16+ phenotypes) and their distribution relative to endometrial arterioles were investigated by standard immunohistochemistry protocols and quantified using Aperio ScanScopeXT images digitized by ImageJ and deconvoluted into binary images for single cell quantification using a Gaussian Blur and Yen algorithm.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There was no significant difference in the cell density of CD56+ or CD16+ uNK cells in women with RIF compared to women with IS or PRIF. There was a higher proportion of uNK cells in the distal regions compared to the regions closest to the arterioles in all patient groups. Further, we identified a significant reduction in uNK cell density in women who had a previous pregnancy compared to those who had not, regardless of their current implantation status.

LARGE SCALE DATA

Not applicable.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Spiral arterioles could not always be accurately identified by digital image analysis; therefore, all endometrial arterioles were selected and analysed. Patient numbers for the study were low. However, as the clinical phenotypes of each patient were well defined, and endometrial dating was accurately determined by three independent pathologists, differences between patient groups with respect to the uNK numbers and distribution should have been measurable if uNK cell counts were to be useful as a prognostic marker of RIF.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings demonstrate that CD56+ and CD16+ uNK cell numbers are not significantly different in women with RIF in a typical cohort of women undergoing IVF. Further, prior pregnancy was associated with a significantly reduced number of uNK cells in both the RIF and IS patient groups, suggestive of a long-term pregnancy induced suppression of uNK cells. Combined, these findings do not support the clinical value of using uNK cell numbers as a prognostic indicator of implantation success with IVF treatment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Funding for this work was provided by Royal Women's Hospital Foundation. P.P. was supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [TF 11/14] and W.T.T. was supported by an NHMRC Postgraduate Scholarship [1055814]. The authors do not have any competing interests with this study.

The effect of a transient premature luteinizing hormone surge without elevated serum progesterone on in vitro fertilization outcomes in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist flexible protocol

During controlled ovarian stimulation, the LH rising before triggering can lead to follicular luteinizations. However, LH can be suppressed immediately and no progesterone elevation with GnRH antagonist. This study retrospectively compared fresh IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes in antagonist protocols between the group with and the group without a premature LH surge. Logistic regression models were fitted to reduce the relevant confounders. Compared between premature LH surge group and control group, the implantation rates were 12.9% (30/233) vs 25.0% (141/536), p = .000; clinical pregnancy rates were 21.0% (25/119) vs 41.6% (119/286), p = .000; live birth rates were17.6% (21/119) vs 29.7% (85/286), p = .012. After adjusting for age, BMI, bFSH, and infertility factors, the adverse effects were still as pronounced for the clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.24-0.66) and live birth rates (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.32-0.93. In a GnRH antagonist flexible protocol, a transient premature LH surge which can be suppressed immediately after the initiation of antagonist without elevated serum progesterone, will cause a detrimental effect on the development of the embryo and IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles.

Dose-Dependent Chlormadinone Acetate Can Suppress Premature LH Surge in Parallel with LH Value Reduction

Background: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol is reported as an alternative method of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge suppression. How much dosage of chlormadinone acetate (CMA), a synthetic progestin, is appropriate treatment for this phenomenon?

Methods: Retrospective case control study was performed at private assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinic in Japan. Collected data was 231 cycles in patients who underwent either PPOS protocol using 12, 6, 4, or 2 mg of CMA, groups 6C, 3C, 2C, and 1C, respectively (total, 113 cycles), or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, groups 6A, 3A, 2A, and 1A, respectively (total, 118 cycles). In the CMA group, CMA and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were administered simultaneously beginning on menstrual cycle day 3. Serum P, E2, and LH were determined on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. Occurrence of premature LH surge was compared between two groups. Pregnancy outcomes were also calculated.

Results: Premature LH surge was completely suppressed in CMA groups 6C, 3C, and 2C. On the other hand, this phenomenon was detected in antagonist method groups (5.9%, 7/118). But spontaneous ovulation was not observed in any group, and clinical outcomes are equal to those of GnRH antagonist treatment.

Conclusions: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) using CMA can be an appropriate alternative progestin for PPOS protocol. Since CMA is an oral medication, this method can be easy to conduct and cost-effective compared with the antagonist method. From our observation, we suggest 4 mg/day of CMA can control the egg retrieval cycle without LH surge occurrence as in other PPOS methods.

[Effects of cetrorelix versus ganirelix in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges and on clinical outcomes of IVF-ET cycles]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of cetrorelix and ganirelix in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) cycles for preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges and on clinical outcomes of IVF-ET cycles.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2572 GnRH-ant cycles of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer from January, 2013 to December, 2016, including 1368 cycles with cetrorelix treatment and 1204 cycles with ganirelix treatment. The baseline characteristics of the patients and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with those receiving ganirelix treatment, the patients with cetrorelix treatment had a significantly younger age (33.10 vs 33.89 years, P < 0.001) and a lower body mass index (21.57 vs 21.84 kg/m², P=0.024). After adjustment for age and body mass index of the patients, no significant differences were found between the two groups in the levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LH, estradiol (E₂), progesterone (P) levels either at the baseline or on the day of hCG triggering, or in the number of oocytes retrieved (P > 0.05). The two groups also had comparable percentages of patients with LH > 10 U/L on the day of hCG triggering (3.7% vs 3.2%) and similar spontaneous ovulation rate (0.6% vs 0.5%), clinical pregnancy rate (47.7% vs 45.9%) and live birth rate (37.5% vs 33.6%) following fresh embryo transfer (P > 0.05). The incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, however, was significantly higher in ganirelix group than in cetrorelix group (0.7% vs 0.1%, P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Cetrorelix and ganirelix can achieve comparable effects for preventing premature LH surges and can achieve similar clinical outcomes of GnRH-ant cycles, but ganirelix is associated with a significantly higher incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Comparison of Two Regimens of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonists in Clomiphene-gonadotropin Induced Controlled Ovulation and Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: Randomized Controlled Study

Context:

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in fixed or flexible regimens are used for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, however, data comparing these regimens in stimulated intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles are lacking.

Aims:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonists in fixed and flexible regimens on the rate of premature luteinization (PL) and ovulation rate in sequential clomiphene-gonadotropin controlled ovulation–IUI cycles.

Settings and Design:

This study was conducted at tertiary care center; this was randomized controlled study.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 45 infertile women randomized into three groups of 15 each received clomiphene citrate + human menopausal gonadotrophin. GnRH antagonist was added according to fixed (n = 15) and flexible (n = 15) protocol. No antagonist in control group (n = 15). PL was defined as LH level ≥10 mIU/ml and progesterone level ≥1.0 ng/ml.

Statistical Analysis:

Mean values compared using the Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance. Categorical variables distribution tested using either Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate.

Results:

Of a total of 45 women, 58% (n = 26) presented with primary and 42% (n = 19) secondary infertility with mean age of 30.8 ± 3.43 years and BMI 26.57 ± 3.22 kg/m². Fixed regimen (3.7%) showed most reduction in PL compared to flexible (15.38%, P = 0.33) or control (36.67%, P = 0.004). On human chorionic gonadotropin day, mean LH (P = 0.002) and progesterone (P = 0.079) levels in fixed, flexible, and control groups were as follows: 5.04 ± 5.47 mIU/ml, 3.95 ± 4.16 mIU/ml, 9.57 ± 7.91 mIU/ml, and 0.409 ± 0.320 ng/ml, 0.579 ± 0.727 ng/ml, and 1.033 ± 1.022 ng/ml, respectively. Ovulation (P = 0.813) and pregnancy rates (P = 0.99) were 88.9%, 84.6%, and 90% and 22.2%, 19.23%, and 10% in fixed, flexible, and control groups, respectively.

Conclusions:

Addition of antagonist in any regimen appears to lower PL rates and improve pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI cycles.

Pituitary block with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist during intrauterine insemination cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the usefulness of pituitary block with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists during intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles, with conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was to evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist administration as an intervention to improve the success of IUI cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Sciencedirect) and clinical registers were searched from their inception until October 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of infertile women undergoing one or more IUI stimulated cycles with GnRH antagonists compared with a control group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OPR/LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Pooled results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated through sensitivity and subgroups analysis. The body of evidence was rated using GRADE methodology. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plot, Begg's and Egger's tests.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs were included (3253 IUI cycles, 2345 participants). No differences in OPR/LBR (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.82-1.57, P = 0.44) and CPR (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97-1.69, P = 0.08) were found. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses did not provide statistical changes in pooled results. The body of evidence was rated as low (GRADE 2/4). No publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSION

Pituitary block with GnRH antagonists does not improve OPR/LBR and CPR in women undergoing IUI cycles.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Pituitary block with GnRH antagonists does not improve the success of IUI cycles.

Evaluation of Role of GnRH Antagonist in Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Cycles with Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation (MOH): A Prospective Randomised Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of GnRH antagonist in prevention of premature LH surge and increasing pregnancy rates in IUI cycle with mild ovarian hyperstimulation (MOH).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective parallel, randomised controlled study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Couples diagnosed with unexplained, male factor subfertility and with one or both tubes patent were randomised to receive either a GnRH antagonist (study group) or no intervention (control group). All women were treated with clomiphene citrate (D3-D7) followed by HMG. A GnRH antagonist was added when one or more follicles of 16 mm diameter or more were visualised in the study group. When at least one follicle reached a size of ≥18 mm, ovulation was induced by hCG injection. A single IUI was performed 36 h later. The primary outcome was premature LH surge and pregnancy rate. The secondary outcomes were the amount of gonadotropins used, duration of use of GnRH antagonist and incidence and severity of OHSS.

RESULTS

A total of seventy patients attending the infertility clinic in the outpatient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, of a tertiary care centre, were recruited in the study which was carried out from August 2011 to March 2013. The study group included 34 women and 36 in the control arm. The incidence of premature LH surge was significantly lower in the antagonist group as compared to the control group 2.9 vs. 13.9 %, with a p value of <0.001. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both the groups 8.8 vs. 11.1 %, p value being 1.000. The amount of gonadotropins used in GnRH antagonist group was lower than in control group but not statistically significant. Duration of GnRH antagonist was 1.85 ± 0.61 days in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The delayed administration of GnRH antagonists in MOH with IUI cycles when follicle size is ≥16 mm is beneficial in terms of preventing the occurrence of premature LH surge but with no improvement in pregnancy rates.

The Utrogestan and hMG protocol in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF/ICSI treatments

Poor oocyte quality is a main concern for decreased reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). A primary way to improve oocyte quality is to optimize the COH protocol. It was demonstrated that the viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved in the Utrogestan and hMG protocol, a novel regimen based on frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), is statistically higher than that in the short protocol. Thus, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the endocrine characteristics and clinical outcomes in PCOS patients subjected to the Utrogestan and hMG protocol compared with those subjected to the short protocol.One hundred twenty three PCOS patients enrolled in the study group and were simultaneously administered Utrogestan and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) from cycle day 3 until the trigger day. When the dominant follicles matured, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) 0.1 mg was used as the trigger. A short protocol was applied in the control group including 77 PCOS women. Viable embryos were cryopreserved for later transfer in both groups. The primary outcome was the viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved. The secondary outcomes included the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and clinical pregnancy outcomes from FET cycles.The pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) level was suppressed in most patients; however, the LH level in 13 women, whose basic LH level was more than 10 IU/L, surpassed 10 IU/L on menstruation cycle day (MC)9-11 and decreased subsequently. No significant between-group differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved (13.27 ± 7.46 vs 13.1 ± 7.98), number of viable embryos (5.57 ± 3.27 vs 5 ± 2.79), mature oocyte rate (90.14 ± 11.81% vs 93.02 ± 8.95%), and cleavage rate (97.69 ± 6.22% vs 95.89 ± 9.57%). The fertilization rate (76.11 ± 19.04% vs 69.34 ± 21.81%; P < 0.05), viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved (39.85% vs 34.68%; P < 0.05), biochemical pregnancy rate (71.72% vs 56.67%; P < 0.05), clinical pregnancy rate (64.65% vs 51.65%; P < 0.05), and implantation rate (46.46% vs 31.35%; P < 0.05) in the study group were significant higher than those in the control group.This study shows that the Utrogestan and hMG protocol was feasible to improve the oocyte quality, possibly providing a new choice for PCOS patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments in combination with embryo cryopreservation.

Dose-finding study of Leuplin depot for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surge during controlled ovarian stimulation: a pilot study in intrauterine insemination treatment

OBJECTIVE

The standard dose of depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) may be too much to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). The purpose of this study was to find out the minimal effective dose of Leuplin depot to prevent premature LH surge in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2007, unexplained infertile patients who were going to undergo IUI were recruited into the study. They were assigned sequentially to one of the following treatment groups. The first 50 patients received the 1/3-dose of Leuplin depot in the midluteal phase of the cycle preceding COS. If no premature LH surge occurred in the 50 patients, the study was continued with 1/4-dose of Leuplin depot in the subsequent 50 patients. Similarly, if no premature LH surge occurred with 1/4 dose, the study was continued with 1/5-dose of Leuplin depot in the following 50 patients. Ovarian stimulation was started with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) at 112.5 IU/d after downregulation, then IUI was performed 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection.

RESULTS

Premature LH surge was effectively prevented with 1/3-dose and 1/4-dose of Leuplin depot. Premature LH surge occurred in three of the 50 patients (6%) in the 1/5-dose group. The patients in the 1/4-dose group received a significantly lower amount of hMG and fewer days of COS, compared with the 1/3-dose group.

CONCLUSION

The 1/4 dose of Leuplin depot is the minimal effective dose to prevent premature LH surge. Further trial is worthwhile to compare the reducing dose Leuplin depot and daily low-dose leuprolide in in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs.

Impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist addition on pregnancy rates in gonadotropin-stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in improving clinical pregnancy rate in gonadotropin-stimulated intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in patients of unexplained infertility.

STUDY DESIGN:

This was a prospective, randomized case-controlled study.

SETTINGS:

The study was conducted in the infertility clinic of a tertiary care center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Four hundred twenty-seven women undergoing IUI following controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone [r-FSH] 75 IU/day) were randomly divided into two groups. Women in Group I received GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day) in a multiple dose flexible protocol. Women in Group II received r-FSH alone. Ovulatory trigger was given with human chorionic gonadotropin 5000 IU when dominant follicle was ≥18 mm. IUI was performed within 44–48 h. Both groups received similar luteal phase support. Primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate. The trial was powered to detect an absolute increase in clinical pregnancy rate by 13% from an assumed 20% clinical pregnancy rate in the control group, with an alpha error level of 0.05 and a beta error level of 0.20.

RESULTS:

Clinical pregnancy rate in Groups I and II was 27.6% (n = 56) and 26.5% (n = 54), respectively (P=0.800). Ongoing pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates were likewise similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Addition of GnRH antagonist to gonadotropin-stimulated IUI cycles results in no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate.

Cost and safety of assisted reproductive technologies for human immunodeficiency virus-1 discordant couples

Due to significant advances in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1), HIV-1 infection gradually has become a treatable chronic disease. Successfully treated HIV-positive individuals can have a normal life expectancy. Hence, more and more HIV-1 discordant couples in Taiwan and the rest of the world are seeking fertility assistance. Pre-treatment of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) combined with sperm washing and RT-polymerase chain reaction examination for HIV-1 viral load has become the standard procedure to assist them to conceive. However, in order to reduce the transmission risk to the lowest level for the couple and to diminish the cost of health care for the insurance institutes or government, in vitro fertilization (IVF)-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) therapy provides the ideal solution for HIV-1 discordant couples with infected men. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) theoretically introduces more than 10⁷ times of sperm counts or semen volume to uninfected women vs IVF-ICSI. However, since some regimens of HAART may significantly decrease the sperm motility, compared to IVF-ICSI, IUI only produces 1/5 to 1/2 pregnancy rates per cycle. Given the risk of seroconversion of HIV infection which actually happens after successful treatment, IVF-ICSI for these HIV-1 seropositive men is more cost-effective and should be the first line treatment for these cases.

Effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in the management of subfertile couples undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) as an adjuvant treatment to prevent premature luteinization (PL) and improve the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI). However, the results of these studies are conflicting.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials aiming to compare the clinical efficacy of GnRH-ant in COS/IUI cycles. Twelve studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and comprised 2,577 cycles assigned to COS/IUI combined GnRH-ant or COS/IUI alone.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis results suggested that GnRH-ant can significantly increase the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.13-1.78) and decrease the PL rate (OR = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.16-0.30) in COS/IUI cycles. Subgroup analysis results suggested statistically significant improvement in the CPR in non-PCOS patients (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.31) but not in the PCOS population (OR = 1.65; 95% CI, 0.93-2.94) and multiple mature follicle cycles (OR = 1.87; 95% CI, 0.27-12.66). There were no difference in the miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that GnRH-ant can reduce the incidence of PL and increase the CPR when used in COS/IUI cycles, and it was especially useful for non-PCOS patients. However, evidence to support its use in PCOS patients is still insufficient.

Cancer treatment using peptides: current therapies and future prospects

This paper discusses the role of peptides in cancer therapy with special emphasis on peptide drugs which are already approved and those in clinical trials. The potential of peptides in cancer treatment is evident from a variety of different strategies that are available to address the progression of tumor growth and propagation of the disease. Use of peptides that can directly target cancer cells without affecting normal cells (targeted therapy) is evolving as an alternate strategy to conventional chemotherapy. Peptide can be utilized directly as a cytotoxic agent through various mechanisms or can act as a carrier of cytotoxic agents and radioisotopes by specifically targeting cancer cells. Peptide-based hormonal therapy has been extensively studied and utilized for the treatment of breast and prostate cancers. Tremendous amount of clinical data is currently available attesting to the efficiency of peptide-based cancer vaccines. Combination therapy is emerging as an important strategy to achieve synergistic effects in fighting cancer as a single method alone may not be efficient enough to yield positive results. Combining immunotherapy with conventional therapies such as radiation and chemotherapy or combining an anticancer peptide with a nonpeptidic cytotoxic drug is an example of this emerging field.

Prognostic value of serum progesterone and LH values on the day of hCG administration in IUI GnRH antagonist cycles

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effect of LH surge and progesterone rise in IUI cycles under gonadotropin stimulation with GnRH antagonist coadministration on pregnancy rates (PR).

STUDY DESIGN

The population under study consisted of 152 women prospectively studied and subjected to IUI.

RESULTS

The higher the progesterone cutoff value, the lower the PR were 26.5% and 10.9% when the cutoff was 1 ng/mL, 26.0% and 8.6% when the cutoff was 1.2 ng/mL, 25.6% and 7.1% when the cutoff was 1.4 ng/mL and 25.3% and 0% when the cutoff was 1.6 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

In IUI cycles under GnRH antagonist coadministration, serum progesterone levels over 1.0 ng/mL are associated with lower PR, the higher the progesterone levels, the lower the PR.

In vitro fertilization outcomes in patients experiencing a premature rise in luteinizing hormone during a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycle

Patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and pituitary suppression with a GnRH antagonist who experienced a transient premature rise in LH were compared with those who did not have an early surge. Those experiencing a premature LH surge had equivalent clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per ET.

Does premature luteinization or early surge of LH impair cycle outcome? Report of two successful outcomes

PURPOSE

To report two successful antagonist IVF cycles; one ending up with pregnancy despite premature luteinization (case 1, aged 35 years), and the other with the retrieval of high quality oocytes despite premature ovulation (case 2, aged 39 years).

METHODS

Serum LH was 36 and 47 IU/L on cycle day 7 before antagonist administration, which was then brought to 6.94 and 3.92 IU/L by antagonist administration, and kept below these levels throughout the remaining stimulation in case 1 and 2 respectively. Serum progesterone was 1.42 and 5.5 ng/mL on the day of hCG respectively. Ten metaphase II (MII) oocytes were harvested wherein 3 grade A embryos were transferred in case 1, and seven good quality MII oocytes were retrieved wherein six embryos were cryopreserved in case 2.

CONCLUSIONS

More precise cut thresholds for both LH and progesterone are necessary for accurate prediction of the cycle outcomes.