Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to ovarian cystectomy

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy(vNOTESTEP): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Tubal ectopic pregnancy is a life-threatening condition in early pregnancy. Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used for the treatment of this disease. Retrospective studies suggest that Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) offers lower perioperative complications, faster recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes compared to other approaches. However, the lack of comprehensive perioperative and long-term postoperative data limits its widespread adoption in gynecology.

METHODS

The vNOTESTEP study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling 72 patients requiring laparoendoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy. After obtaining informed consent, preoperative assessments will be conducted. Following randomization, salpingectomy will be performed using either vNOTES or TU-LESS approach. The postoperative assessment and a structured 5-year follow-up, including eight visits, will be conducted. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical data will be collected from the Hospital Information System and patient interviews. Outcomes will be assessed perioperatively and postoperatively at designated time points (1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative day; 1st, 3rd, and 6th month; 1st-5th year). Key long-term outcomes include sexual function, pregnancy, vaginal delivery, and incisional hernia.

DISCUSSION

This RCT aims to provide robust clinical evidence on the perioperative and long-term outcomes of vNOTES versus TU-LESS for tubal ectopic pregnancy, focusing on key reproductive and surgical outcomes. The study seeks to refine patient selection criteria and contribute to guideline development for gynecologic vNOTES.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400082909 (registered on April 10th, 2024).

Gasless vNOTES vs. traditional vNOTES for benign gynecological disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gasless transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (G-vNOTES) can avoid complications related to pneumoperitoneum, but there is limited research on G-vNOTES. Here, we aimed to compare the hemodynamic profiles and outcomes of G-vNOTES with traditional vNOTES (T-vNOTES) in the treatment of patients with benign gynecologic disease.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with benign gynecologic disease were randomly assigned to G-vNOTES (n = 60) or traditional vNOTES (n = 60). The primary outcome was vital sign at different time points. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, surgical time, anesthesia time, the usage of anesthetics, estimated intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for abdominal and shoulder pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) at 2 and 24 h, intraoperative and postoperative complications, time to first anal exhaust, eating, and getting out of bed after surgery, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Multi-level model analysis was used for intraoperative hemodynamic indicators.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups at the baseline level. The results of the multilevel model indicate that there is no difference in intraoperative hemodynamic performance between the G-vNOTE group and the T-vNOTES group. The conversion rate in the G-vNOTES group was higher than that in the T-vNOTES group (16.95% vs. 5.26%, p = 0.046). No significant differences were observed in other areas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find advantages of gasless vNOTES in intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations. The surgical conversion rate of the G-vNOTES group is higher than that of the T-vNOTES group, which may be related to poor surgical field exposure in the G-vNOTES group, making it more suitable for experienced and confident surgeons.

vNOTES chromopertubation: a new method for assessing tubal patency and peritubal anatomy

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with suspected tubal factor infertility who underwent vaginal natural orifice endoluminal surgery (vNOTES) chromopertubation and adnexal anatomy assessment at a large referral hospital.

METHODS

Twelve women aged between 29 and 38 years with suspected tubal factor infertility who underwent vNOTES chromopertubation were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, as well as clinical and surgical characteristics, were reviewed and the surgical technique was defined.

RESULTS

The mean BMI was 34.2 ± 7.12 kg/m2 (range 24.7-42.6). No conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy was required. The median operative time was 39 (26.5-42) minutes. The median VAS scores at six and 12 h postoperatively were 3.5 (3-4) and 2 (1-2), respectively. There were no complications and all patients were discharged at the 12th postoperative hour.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the increased risk of surgical morbidity and mortality associated with increasing BMI and the difficulty in gaining access to the abdominal cavity not only in obese women but also in cases with previous extensive midline incisions, where dense intra-abdominal adhesions are likely, or in cases where esthetic considerations are important, vNOTES appears to be a useful alternative to assess tubal patency and adnexal anatomy and even to perform concomitant adnexal surgery.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Benign Gynaecology: A Systematic Review of Adnexal, Myomectomy and Prolapse Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is utilised for gynecological procedures globally, however evidence to support its application aside from hysterectomy is lacking. A systematic review to determine feasibility and safety profile of vNOTES for benign gynaecology was conducted.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL was conducted, including all types of studies reporting vNOTES for gynecological indications. After excluding cases with concurrent hysterectomy, the review focuses on procedures for benign indications and oncological procedures are reported separately. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were reported, with pooled analysis for sufficiently powered categories.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Fifty-four articles were analyzed, including 7 comparative studies (n = 439) and 1 RCT (n = 34), reporting 2469 cases of vNOTES, including adnexal (tubal and/or ovarian) (43 articles, n = 2261), myomectomy (10 articles, n = 136) and prolapse repair (6 articles, n = 72) in predominantly premenopausal women with BMI <30 kg/m2 on pooled analysis.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

The overall conversion rate was low (1.38%, n = 34) with procedure specific conversion rates of 0.45 to 6.8% for adnexal procedures, 1.47% for myomectomy and none reported for prolapse repair. Overall complication rates were low (3.44%, n = 85) with no associated mortality. Five (0.20%) adhesion-related rectal injuries at colpotomy were noted, all repaired intraoperatively without long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

vNOTES appears feasible based on limited evidence, for uterine-sparing gynecological indications, despite a notable rate of rectal injury at colpotomy. There is a negligible risk of rectal injury observed at conventional laparoscopy and robotically assisted surgery, but similar rate of entry-related gastrointestinal injury. This may be due to the learning-curve or suboptimal case selection, necessitating careful training, assessment, and appropriate patient selection. Surgeons should continue registering prospective vNOTES cases via iNOTESs, to evaluate emerging perioperative trends with global uptake of this novel technique.

Clinical efficacy and safety study of vNOTES for benign ovarian tumors in obese patients

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for treating benign ovarian tumors in obese patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 35 obese patients who underwent vNOTES for benign ovarian tumor resection and 41 obese patients who underwent multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) during the same period from January 2021 to June 2024 at Qinghai Red Cross Hospital. Key parameters such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, hospitalization duration, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and SF-36 score were analyzed. No statistical differences were observed between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index (BMI), tumor diameter, parity, and history of pelvic surgery. The vNOTES group exhibited shorter operative times compared to the MPLS group, with no significant differences in tumor pathology, intraoperative blood loss, or tumor rupture rates. Postoperatively, the vNOTES group had shorter hospital stays, fewer postoperative complications, lower 24-hour postoperative VAS scores, and higher three-month postoperative SF-36 scores compared to the MPLS group. No differences were found between the groups concerning anal exhaust time, sexual satisfaction rate, or 24-hour postoperative VAS scores. vNOTES is a safe and feasible surgical method for treating benign ovarian tumors in obese patients, offering advantages such as no abdominal incisions and quicker postoperative recovery.

Analysis of feasibility, effectiveness and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES) of ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

vNOTES has been documented as a viable approach for conducting benign gynecologic surgery; however, its application in ectopic pregnancy cases remains relatively scarce. The principal objective of this investigation was to assess the practicability, effectiveness, and safety of vNOTES in surgical procedures related to ectopic pregnancy.

METHODS

Clinical data pertaining to patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy at Beijing Hospital between January 2018 and August 2023 were retrospectively collected (This study retrospectively registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2100052223 in September 22, 2021.). Based on the surgical technique employed, participants were categorized into two groups: the vNOTES group (29 cases) and the conventional laparoscopy (CL) group (34 cases). The baseline data, including age, body mass index (BMI), parity, and maximum diameter of pregnancy objects, were collected and analyzed, along with intraoperative indicators such as operation time and intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative indicators including postoperative exhaust time, hospital stays after surgery, and postoperative pain score at 24 h.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were included in this study, and all surgeries in both groups were performed according to the assigned procedures. There were no statistically significant differences observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stays between the vNOTES group and the CL group (P > 0.05). However, the vNOTES group exhibited significantly lower postoperative exhaust time and 24-hour VAS scores compared to the CL group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

vNOTES proves to be a safe and effective approach for performing conservative tubal festration or salpingectomy in cases of tubal pregnancy. Furthermore, vNOTES offers a more minimally invasive surgical technique, resulting in reduced postoperative pain in patients.

Feasibility and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) panhysterectomy: a polycentric retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and safety of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) panhysterectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 75 patients who underwent panhysterectomy for hysteromyoma in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Tongxiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital; Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from June 2019 to June 2020. According to the operation mode, the patients were divided into two groups: the traditional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) group (n = 45) and the Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) group (n = 30). The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exsufflation time, postoperative activity time, hospital stay, treatment cost, 6 h activities of daily living (ADL) score after the operation, cosmetic score, visual analog score, and complications were observed in the two groups.

RESULTS

Perioperative period related indicators: Compared with the MPLS group, the total treatment cost and cosmetic score of the V-NOTES group were significantly better than those of the MPLS group, but the operation duration was longer, and the HB decreased more significantly (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exsufflation time, postoperative activity time, 6 h ADL score after the operation, and hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain: The VAS score 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after the operation was lower in the V-NOTES group than in the MPLS group (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications: The complication rate of the V-NOTES group was significantly lower than that of the MPLS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In treating panhysterectomy patients, both V-NOTES and MPLS can achieve satisfactory efficacy and prognosis, and both have advantages and disadvantages. Specifically, the V-NOTES surgery has significant advantages such as a lower treatment cost, lower incidence of postoperative complications, less pain, and more beautiful wounds.

Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign ovarian cysts is safe and feasible in same-day discharge: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Advances in minimally invasive surgery and the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) have favored the spread of day-surgery programs. Even though Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is accepted as an innovative treatment for benign ovarian cysts that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide, the safety and feasibility of same-day surgery (SDS) have yet to be established.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of day surgery compared to inpatient surgery of patients undergoing vNOTES for benign ovarian cysts by determining perioperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of 213 patients who underwent vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy at a single institution from January 2020 to November 2022. Based on the hospital stay, patients were classified into the same-day surgery group (SDSG) and the inpatient surgery group (ISG); after data processing and screening considering the balance of the two groups, SDSG has 83 samples(n = 83), and ISG has 113 samples(n = 113). The patient's demographic characteristics and follow-up data were collected during the perioperative period by doctors and nurses for medical tracking and analysis purposes and 1-month postoperatively by doctors in charge of their operation. Independent sample t-tests were performed to verify if there was any major difference between these two groups for continuous data like age, BMI, and cyst diameter, and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to test whether there was a major difference between these two groups for categorical data like cyst count, abdominal surgery history and whether their cyst is bilateral ovarian cysts or not. The association between exhaust time and postoperative characteristics and the association between levels of pain and postoperative characteristics were further analyzed to unveil the confounding factors contributing to the same-day discharge method's quick recovery nature.

RESULTS

Upon performing propensity score matching, 196 patients were finally enrolled in this study for the matched comparison, including 83(42.3%) patients in the SDSG and 113(57.7%) patients in the ISG. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of duration of operation (85.0 ± 41.5 min vs. 80.5 ± 33.5 min), estimated blood loss (27.7 ± 28.0 ml vs. 36.3 ± 33.2 ml), preoperative hemoglobin levels (128.8 ± 13.2 g/L vs. 128.6 ± 14.0 g/L), postoperative hemoglobin difference at 24 h (16.5 ± 15.4 g/L vs. 19.3 ± 9.1 g/L), pelvic adhesions (42 (50.6%) vs. 47 (41.6%)), and postoperative complications (7(8.4%) vs. 4(3.5%)). The SDSG group showed less time of feeding/off-bed/exhaust/urination after surgery, shorter hospitalization duration, a lower postoperative 6-hour pain score, and a lower incidence of analgesic drug use. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that advancing the time of postoperative off-bed activity and feeding reduced the postoperative exhaust time by 0.34 (95% CI: 0.185-0.496, 0.34 h, p < 0.001) and 0.299(95% CI: 0.158-0.443, 0.229 h, p = 0.036) hours. In addition, Ordinal logistic regression revealed a correlation between pain scores and bilaterality of cyst, increasing about 25.98 times the risk of pain levels when ovarian cysts are bilateral (OR: 26.98, 95% CI: 1.071-679.859, P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, same-day discharge after vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic ovarian cystectomy is safe and feasible. The vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy combined with the same-day discharge shorten the exhaust time and duration of hospitalization, reduce postoperative pain, and lower the use incidence of analgesic drugs.

Learning curve of ovarian cystectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a cumulative sum analysis

Purpose

To identify the learning curve in ovarian cystectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Methods

Data consist of consecutively ordered patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery between May 2020 and June 2023. The learning curve of ovarian cystectomy via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery was measured in terms of the operating time adjusted by multivariate linear regression. A cumulative sum analysis was performed to establish the learning curve. Patients' characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared based on the inflection points of this curve.

Results

The learning curve was divided into two unique phases: phase 1 (1-26 patients), and phase 2 (27-40 patients). The expected operating time in phase 2 was shorter than in phase 1 (86.4 ± 11.2 min vs. 102.0 ± 22.7 min, p = 0.021). The time to first postoperative flatus was shorter in phase 2 compared with phase 1 (14.6 ± 6.5 h vs. 20.6 ± 6.3 h, respectively, p = 0.008). No significant differences were observed in terms of patient's age, BMI, tumor size, parity, bilateral ovarian tumor, pathological diagnoses, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, or perioperative complications between the two phases.

Conclusion

Proficiency in ovarian cystectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery was achieved after 26 surgeries based on cumulative sum analysis. These findings may provide insight for structured training programs of ovarian cystectomy via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign adnexal disease: a prospective trial

BACKGROUND

There is a scarcity of prospective clinical research evidence regarding the utilization of transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) as a treatment option for ovarian cysts. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of employing vNOTES for the management of ovarian cysts.

METHODS

Our study included women between the ages of 18 and 70 who intended to undergo surgical intervention for benign lesions. Stratified blocked randomization was employed to allocate participants into groups. The main objective was to assess whether the assigned group adhered to the recommended surgical technique for ovarian cystectomy or adnexectomy, without any deviation to alternative surgical methods.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were included in the study, with all surgeries in each group being conducted according to the assigned procedures. Among them, the ovarian cystectomy layer included 58 cases in the vNOTES group and 58 cases in the conventional laparoscopy (CL) groups. The adnexectomy layer included 40 cases in the vNOTES group and 40 cases in the CL group. Utilizing a sensitivity analysis, the two-sided 95% lower confidence limit was determined to be 5.5% for the disparity in proportions between the vNOTES groups and CL groups. These lower limits fell below the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings demonstrate that vNOTES was not inferior to CL in terms of adnexectomy or ovarian cystectomy. vNOTES can be considered a more minimally invasive surgical approach, as it results in reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and absence of visible incisions. Overall, vNOTES proves to be a safe, feasible, and less invasive treatment option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study retrospectively registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2100052223(22-10-2021).

Surgical outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopy in treating ovarian cysts and risk factors for surgical conversions

Objective

This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes and identify the conversion risk factors of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in treating ovarian cyst.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 505 patients who underwent vNO TES for treating ovarian cyst from March 2019 to February 2022 wherein the patients were classified into "converted" or "nonconverted" groups. T-tests, χ2 tests, and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.

Results

There were 16 (3.17 %) surgical conversions and 12 (2.38 %) other surgical complications in our study cohort. Teratomas accounted for 56.8 % of complications in nonconverted cases and 18.8 % in converted cases. Adenocystomas were found in 12.3 % of nonconverted cases and 18.8 % of converted cases. Other types included paraovarian cysts (3.3 % and 0 %), fibroma, granulosa cell tumor, Brenner tumor (1.2 % and 0 %), corpus luteum cysts, follicular cysts (7.6 % and 6.3 %), old abscess (0.2 % and 0 %), and simple cysts (17.6 % and 12.5 %) in the nonconverted and converted groups, respectively. The converted group included more cases of endometriotic cysts (43.8 % vs 12.3 %, p = 0.023), bilateral cysts (37.5 % vs 8.2 %, p < 0.001), severe pelvic adhesion (68.8 % vs 3.3 %, p < 0.001), deep endometriosis (12.5 % vs 0.4 %, p < 0.001), and at least two cysts (37.5 % vs 8.81 %; p < 0.001). Severe pelvic adhesion (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 86.96; range, 18.33-431.77; p < 0.001), bilateral cysts (adjusted OR, 4.75; range, 1.05-21.57, p = 0.043) and endometriotic cysts (adjusted OR, 7.69; range, 3.11-17.08; p < 0.001) were also predictors of surgical conversion.

Conclusion

vNOTES demonstrates low complication and conversion rates in treating ovarian cyst compared with TU-LESS. Surgical conversion is associated with severe pelvic adhesions, bilateral cysts, and endometriotic cysts.

Enabling Technologies for Gynecologic Vaginal Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes for technologies that facilitate vaginal surgical procedures.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1990 to May 2022.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Comparative and single-arm studies with data on contemporary tools or technologies facilitating intraoperative performance of vaginal gynecologic surgical procedures for benign indications were included. Citations were independently double screened, and eligible full-text articles were extracted by two reviewers. Data collected included study characteristics, technology, patient demographics, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Risk of bias for comparative studies was assessed using established methods, and restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses were conducted as indicated.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The search yielded 8,658 abstracts, with 116 eligible studies that evaluated pedicle sealing devices (n=32), nonrobotic and robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (n=64), suture capture devices (n=17), loop ligatures (n=2), and table-mounted telescopic cameras (n=1). Based on 19 comparative studies, pedicle sealing devices lowered vaginal hysterectomy operative time by 15.9 minutes (95% CI, -23.3 to -85), blood loss by 36.9 mL (95% CI, -56.9 to -17.0), hospital stay by 0.2 days (95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1), and visual analog scale pain scores by 1.4 points on a subjective 10-point scale (95% CI, -1.7 to -1.1). Three nonrandomized comparative studies and 53 single-arm studies supported the feasibility of nonrobotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy, adnexal surgery, pelvic reconstruction, and myomectomy. Data were limited for robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, suture capture devices, loop ligatures, and table-mounted cameras due to few studies or study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle sealing devices lower operative time and blood loss for vaginal hysterectomy, with modest reductions in hospital stay and pain scores. Although other technologies identified in the literature may have potential to facilitate vaginal surgical procedures and improve outcomes, additional comparative effectiveness research is needed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022327490.

Analysis and suggestions on the complications in 2000 cases of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Can it be a conventional surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To reflect on the complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES), identify the corresponding risk factors, and provide caution to surgeons when performing this novel surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out among 2000 patients in our hospital who underwent vNOTES between May 2019 and May 2022. Perioperative complications were stratified in chronological order and divided into those developed while establishing the vNOTES approach, during surgery, postoperatively, and 1 month after discharge. The complications were classified based on the Modified Clavien-Dindo classifications. The causes of each type III/IV complication were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 2000 patients, 88 (4.4%) experienced complications, which is not higher than that reported in laparoendoscopic surgery in previous studies. Grade I, II, III, IV, and V complications developed in 19 (0.95%), 57 (2.85%), 11 (0.55%), 1 (0.05%), and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. Complications were developed while establishing the approach platform, during the surgery, postoperatively, and within 1 month after discharge in 5 (0.25%), 30 (1.50%), 50 (2.50%), and 3 (0.15%) patients, respectively. Eight patients (0.4%) underwent conversion, including five cases of rectal injury repair.

CONCLUSION

The summarized suggestions were divided into three levels. Considering the security and effectiveness of vNOTES, it can be routinely used in various gynecologic operations. However, surgeons should focus on preoperative evaluation, strictly conduct preoperative disinfection, conform to prompt conversion during surgery, call for the presence of experienced doctors, and have routine use of antibiotics to prevent postoperative infections.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100053483.

Assessment of women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has already proven its non-inferiority to conventional abdominal laparoscopy (CAL) for hysterectomy without conversion. The results in terms of efficacy and safety are promising. However, we note a lack of medical literature and no specific randomised controlled trial assessing women's sexual function after vNOTES for benign adnexal surgery. The aim of this RCT is to confirm the non-inferiority of the vNOTES approach for benign adnexal pathology compared with CAL on women's sexual function. Secondary outcomes will evaluate vNOTES's efficiency, morbidity and postoperative complications compared with CAL for benign adnexal surgery. The relationship between adnexal mass morcellation and the quality of the histological analysis will also be evaluated as secondary outcome.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Women aged 18-70 years undergoing a benign adnexal surgery at the Geneva University Hospitals will be eligible and randomised with a 1:1 ratio to the CAL arm or the vNOTES arm, if inclusion criteria are met. Participants will complete the Female Sexual Function Index, the Couple Satisfaction Index-16 and a self-reported questionnaire on dyspareunia within 4 weeks prior to randomisation and at 3+6 months after surgery. General and clinical data will be collected when the patient is enrolled in the study, during hospitalisation and at 1 month postoperative to assess secondary outcomes.An absence of impairment on sexual function will be confirmed with a stability or an improvement of the evaluated scores in each group at 3 and 6 months postoperative compared with the preoperative scores. We expect to have no statistically significant difference in sexuality questionnaires scores between the two groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Protocol of this study was validated by the Cantonal Research Ethics Commission of Geneva, Switzerland, on 9 August 2022. We aim to publish the study's results in peer-reviewed journals within 3 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05761275.

vNOTEsHC : Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic for large uteri: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Background

In France, 62,000 hysterectomies are performed per year, 70% of which are benign. The choice of approach (laparotomy, laparoscopy or vaginal route) is particularly important in the case of large uterus (> 280g) which are associated with a higher risk of complications. The current data are not sufficient to favour one or other approach. A new medical device, the vNOTES (Natural Vaginal Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy System), offers the advantage of both laparoscopic and vaginal route for pelvic surgery.

Objectives

To demonstrate the superiority in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications of the use of a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy system (vNOTES) versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign pathologies on estimated large volume uteri (>280g).

Materials and Methods

A randomised, double-blind, superiority trial will be performed at five hospital centres. Women with benign uterine pathology requiring hysterectomy and with a large uterus (> 280g) will be randomised to receive either laparoscopic or vNOTES hysterectomy.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome will be the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications within 6 weeks of surgery. Secondary outcomes will be conversion during surgery, duration of surgery and hospitalisation, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, resumption of sexual life and satisfaction with the surgical team.

Results

248 women will be randomised.

Conclusion

This trial will provide a better understanding of the approach to large uteri optimise the care of these thousands of women undergoing hysterectomy.

What’s new?

This trial will evaluate the vNotes for large uteri.

Comparing outcomes of ovarian cystectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the outcomes of ovarian cystectomy (OC) performed by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) vs transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients in our hospital who underwent OC either by vNOTES or LESS between January 2015 and September 2021. Demographic data were collected. The primary outcome was the conversion rate. The secondary outcomes were the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, maximum body temperature within 48 hours after operation, and duration of maximum body temperature (hours), among others. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software.

RESULTS

Exactly 284 patients were screened. The vNOTES and LESS groups consisted of 21 and 47 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the conversion rates between the two groups (0 vs 8.5% in vNOTES and LESS, respectively; p = 0.303). Compared with the vNOTES group, the LESS group had a larger cyst diameter (6.00 ± 2.32 vs 4.69 ± 1.29 cm; p = 0.004), more endometriotic cysts (42.6% vs 9.5%; p < 0.001), and more pelvic adhesions requiring adhesiolysis (57.4% vs 19.0%; p = 0.003). At baseline, there were no other differences between the groups. The secondary outcomes included a shorter duration of surgery (70.14 ± 27.30 vs 99.57 ± 36.26 minutes; p = 0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (64.29 ± 39.19 vs 163.43 ± 251.20 mL; p = 0.011) in the vNOTES group. Regression analysis showed the diameter of the ovarian cyst correlated with surgical time. The complication was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Above all, the advantages of vNOTES include an absence of visible scars, shorter surgical duration, and less blood loss when compared with LESS. Further large-scale prospective trials should confirm the results of our study.

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in a Second-trimester Pregnant Woman with an Ovarian Teratoma

We present the first case of a pregnant woman with teratoma, who underwent vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). Mature ovarian cystic teratomas compromise 20%-30% of all ovarian tumors. The best surgical management is still unclear, especially during pregnancy. A 21-year-old pregnant woman (gravida 1, para 0) at 14 weeks and 3 days of gestational age was admitted with an intermittent mild sharp and dull pain in her right lower abdomen when walking or moving lower limbs. Pelvic ultrasonography revealed a 5.9 cm × 5.4 cm heterogeneous mass that was suspected as a teratoma in the right adnexa. Initially, laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy (OC) was arranged. However, the ovarian tumor was impeded by the enlarged uterus. The OC procedure was changed to vNOTES OC. The vNOTES OC was performed smoothly and the pathology confirmed the mass to be a teratoma. After the operation, she recovered well and was discharged 2 days after the operation without any complication. In conclusion, the application of vNOTES in the second-trimester pregnancy might be considered safe and effective. The vNOTES can be performed safely in selected patients and by an experienced surgeon.

Diagnosing and Treating Infertility via Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in the treatment of female infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study includes 174 female patients with a history of long-standing female infertility. We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who underwent hysterolaparoscopy (HL) via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and 133 patients who underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Demographic data, operation records, and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. The deadline for postoperative follow-up was June 2022. All the included patients were followed up for at least 18 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with the LESS group, the vNOTES group had a shorter postoperative bowel movement time and less pain at 4 and 12 h (p = 0.004 vs. 0.008); no differences were found in other perioperative indicators. The clinical pregnancy rates of the vNOTES and LESS groups were 87.80% and 74.43% (p = 0.073), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

vNOTES represents a new, less invasive approach for infertility diagnosis and treatment that is particularly suitable for women who have special esthetic requirements. vNOTES is safe and practical and may be an ideal choice for scarless infertility surgery.

Applications of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging approach used across surgical disciplines. This review seeks to assess the growing body of literature on experiences and outcomes using vaginal NOTES (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many limitations of vaginal surgery including lack of descensus or restricted vaginal space can be overcome with vNOTES whereas avoiding risks of abdominal incisions in traditional laparoscopy. vNOTES may have superior outcomes in pain, length of stay, and satisfaction for multiple gynecologic indications however additional data is needed to assess cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes. Surgeons implementing this technique should have adequate experience with both traditional vaginal and laparoscopic approaches. The current body of high-quality studies is heavily influenced by single site, single surgeon studies and as such may not be fully applicable to all practices incorporating this novel technique, and adequate training should precede implementation of Vnotes.

SUMMARY

Vaginal surgery is considered the least invasive approach, however, may not be appropriate in all cases. vNOTES presents a novel approach that combines the access and visualization afforded by endoscopy whereas avoiding the risks associated with transabdominal entry and can be considered as a feasible option in gynecologic surgery.

Standardised step by step approach to adnexectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) combines the advantages of vaginal surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Feasibility of vNOTES for other indications such as hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy and myomectomy has been established. In this article, we describe a standardised step by step process to perform adnexal surgery by vNOTES.

Oncological Prognosis and Fertility Outcomes of Different Surgical Extents for Malignant Ovarian Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors: A Narrative Review

Background

Malignant ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors (MOSCSTs) are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5–7% of all ovarian malignancies. The majority (70%) of patients had an early stage; thus, surgery is the predominant treatment. Patients were relatively young at the onset of the tumor. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with this tumor is better than that of malignant epithelial ovarian tumors and tends to recur late with an indolent clinical course. Thus, patients may be more inclined to conservative surgical procedures. There is, however, no objective criterion for selecting a suitable surgical procedure. Clinically, surgical extent depended on the preoperative evaluations, age, and willingness of patients, and gynecologists were relatively subjective when choosing surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents is still controversial. The review aimed to summarize the impacts of different surgical extents on oncological prognosis and fertility outcomes.

Methods

The literature search was performed in PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), and publications between January 2011 and December 2021 in English including clinical cohort studies and case reports were eligible for inclusion.

Results

We finally identified 12 large-sample retrospective studies and 18 cases of MOSCSTs. The primary surgical procedures include fertility-spring surgery (FSS), total hysterectomy with unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-USO/BSO), FSS with complete staging procedure, complete staging surgery (CSS), and debulking surgery. FSS includes cystectomy (CYS), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) with uterine preservation that allows for potential future assisted reproductive approaches. Complete staging procedure includes peritoneal cytologic examinations, inspections of peritoneal surfaces, random peritoneal biopsies and omentectomy. FSS with complete staging procedure means surgical procedure with uterine preservation and complete staging procedure. And, generally, CSS means TAH-BSO with complete staging procedure.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that USO can be done in young, fertility-desired patients with tumors confined to the ovary but avoid CYS. FSS with complete staging procedure is feasible among stage IC-III patients who have fertility desire. Patients can choose to have a complete surgery once their family is complete or without fertility requirements. CSS is recommended for patients with risk factors such as high stage, poor differentiation, and large tumor size and without fertility desire. A close follow-up is essential.

Effect of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with ovarian cyst

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with ovarian cysts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study was performed on 113 women with ovarian cysts in a tertiary referral teaching hospital. All patients underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. Serum levels of antimüllerian hormone (AMH) were measured pre-and, 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the effect of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve based on alterations in serum AMH levels. The secondary outcome of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the number of cauterizations, size and type of cysts, bilaterality (bilateral or unilateral), age, and body mass index (BMI) on the ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic cystectomy reduced the serum AMH levels preoperatively (1.32 ± 4.48 ng/ml) to postoperatively (3.2 ± 1.93 ng/ml) and the difference (- 1.28 ng/ml) was statistically different (0.001 >P). There was a negative significant relationship between the number of cauterizations used and postoperative serum AMH levels (p ≤ 0.001). There was a significant relationship between the location (p ≤ 0.01), type of cyst (p ≤ 0.001) and the serum AMH levels reduction.

CONCLUSION

The number of cauterizations used during surgery, the type of cyst, and bilaterality can affect AMH levels that need to be addressed.

Pregnancy Outcome after Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery, a First Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimal invasive surgical technique allowing a variety of gynecological procedures. The current literature describes improved patient comfort, improved better cosmetic results, and reduced operation time. This is a first study to assess pregnancy outcome after fertility-preserving vNOTES procedures. Design/Participants/Materials/Setting/Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study including 125 patients under 43 years that underwent fertility-preserving vNOTES over a 5-year period (2014-2019). The gynecological surgical procedures included were vNOTES myomectomy, vNOTES salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, vNOTES unilateral adnexectomy, and vNOTES cystectomy. A total of 26 pregnancies in 21 cases were observed, with deliveries between 2015 and 2020.

RESULTS

Retrospective analysis in this patient group showed that 18 pregnancies were diagnosed within 1 year after vNOTES (85.7%). Mean interval between surgery and pregnancy was 6 months. Fertility treatment was performed in 28.6%. In the 26 observed pregnancies, no vNOTES-related complications were observed and delivery was at term in all cases. Mode of delivery was a vaginal delivery in twenty cases (76.9% of total) of which 2 cases vacuum assisted (7.7%) and a Caesarean section in 6 cases (23.1% of total). Two cases of trial of labor after Caesarean are described after vNOTES surgery, both ended in an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. In case of vaginal delivery, the perineum was intact in 15%, a mediolateral episiotomy was performed in 50 and 35% a grade 1-2 perineal rupture was described. No grade 3-4 perineal ruptures are described.

LIMITATIONS

A limitation of this study is the retrospective design which does not correct for confounding factors. Further larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these data.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study describing pregnancy outcome after fertility-preserving vNOTES procedures. vNOTES did not affect the mode of delivery or cause pregnancy-related complications. vNOTES did not increase the risk of extensive perineal tears during vaginal delivery. These preliminary data show no adverse events when vNOTES is performed in women of reproductive age. Posterior colpotomy as performed in all vNOTES procedures is by itself not an indication for an elective Caesarean section.

Consensus on safe implementation of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The first ever report of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynaecological was reported in 2012. There has been an exponential uptake of the number of surgeons performing such procedures worldwide with no official guidance to ensure the safe implementation of this technique into gynaecological practice due its recency. The objective of this study is to report an international consensus-based statement to help guide a basis for adopting vNOTES into clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

The consensus-based statement was developed amongst 39 international experts using the Delphi methodology over three successive rounds. Consensus was pre-defined as an agreement of 80% or more by the experts. Consensus sought over eight key concepts pertaining to vNOTES including patient selection, perioperative management, surgical technique, instruments, anatomy, training, registries and trials and definition of the surgical technique. Recommendations from an expert anaesthetist and urogynaecologist were also sought to give a broader perspective with respect to the implementation of vNOTES.

RESULTS

Fifty nine international surgeons were invited to participate and 39 (66%) agreed to participate based on being involved in a minimum of 20 vNOTES procedures. They were from 13 countries across 5 continents (Europe, North America, South America, Australia and Asia). Participation was 100% on all three rounds. Overall, consensus was reached in 50 of the 56 questions (89%) with the remaining 6 questions where consensus was not reached pertaining to the domain of patient selection.

CONCLUSION

An international expert based vNOTES statement is presented here to help guide adoption of vNOTES based on the experience of early adopters. Consensus was achieved on most components of this consensus statement. Given the recency of this technique, until high-level evidence becomes available, this statement provides an appropriate guidance to the safe implementation of vNOTES into gynaecological practice.

Resection of vaginal recurrence of granulosa cell tumor by pneumovaginal endoscopic surgery

Vaginal surgery is a classic and unique gynecologic procedure. However, the operation field is narrow, which may make surgery difficult to perform. While vaginoscopy or vaginal endoscopy could be the solution of choice, they are mainly used for diagnosis due to the lack of adequate equipment to perform complicated surgery (Johary et al., 2015). Laparoscopy, especially single-port surgery, has been introduced in gynecologic surgery, and excellent equipment has been developed to perform complex surgical procedures through narrow inlets. And vaginal endoscopy using such single-port surgery devices, so-called vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES), has recently been introduced in the gynecologic field (Li and Hua, 2019 Aug) and allows the easier performance of endoscopic surgery through the vagina for ovarian cystectomy (Baekelandt, 2018 Feb 1), salpingo-oophorectomy (Baekelandt et al., 2018) and hysterectomy (Housmans et al., xxxx) for benign pathology. However, vNOTES has been used mainly as an alternative laparoscopic pathway to reduce abdominal wounds or bypass transabdominal approaches into the abdominal cavity. This report including the surgical video demonstrates the first case, to our knowledge, of successful tumor resection of a rare vaginal recurrence of ovarian granulosa cell tumor (Fujita et al., 2015 May, Levin et al., 2018) by pneumovaginoscopy using single-port surgery devices. A 39-year-old woman with an adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumor had undergone left salpingo-oophorectomy. At 23 years after surgery, a recurrent mass was detected in her left vaginal wall. The patient had no history of pregnancy, and her vagina was too narrow to secure a good field of operation. Therefore, we underwent pneumovaginoscopic surgery. The total operating time was 88 min, and the blood loss volume was minimal. Complete tumor clearance (R0 resection) was achieved microscopically. There were no postoperative complications, and a one-year follow-up revealed no recurrence. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained through our local Ethics Committee of Kansai Medical University (#2019208).

Disseminated ovarian granulosa cell tumor after laparoscopic surgery: Two case reports

RATIONALE

Granulosa cell tumors (GCT) have an incidence of 0.6 to 0.8/100,000. Short-term relapsed ovarian GCT is extremely rare. Herein, this report aims to present 2 rare cases of disseminated ovarian GCT and analyze the causes of recurrence.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The 2 patients presented with abdominal pain.

DIAGNOSIS

Both the patients were diagnosed with relapsed ovarian GCT (IIIc stage) in the adult type.

INTERVENTIONS

The 2 patients had a medical history of surgery for ovarian GCT by using laparoscopic with power morcellators (LPM). They experienced relapsed ovarian GCT postoperatively. Subsequently, they received a repeated operation through a laparotomy approach. Numerous malignant metastasis neoplasms were detected at the port-sites. Then, tumor resection was performed.

OUTCOMES

The postoperative pathologies of both case 1 and case 2 reported ovarian GCT (IIIc stage) in adult type. The 2 patients presented disease-free survival for more than 33 months follow-up period.

LESSONS

The application of LPM may be a risk factor of disseminated ovarian GCT. However, laparoscopic surgery is still an optimal treatment strategy for ovarian tumors. Besides, gynecologists should comply with the tumor-free principle during surgery.

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic versus conventional vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for apical compartment prolapse

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) versus conventional vaginal (CV) uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 135 patients who underwent hysterectomy with USLS via CV (n = 70) or via vNOTES (n = 65). Patients' baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes were retrieved. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes include intra- and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Salpingectomy was performed in all vNOTES procedures and in only 27 % of conventional vaginal procedures (p < 0.005). Compared to the conventional vaginal procedures (n = 65), the vNOTES (n = 70) showed lower mean operative time and mean anesthesia time (101.4 ± 22.3 vs 125.5 ± 27.6 min and 141.4 ± 29.6 vs. 174.0 ± 32.9 min, respectively); and slightly longer median hospital stay (3 [range 2-4] vs. 2 [range 2-4] days, p < 0.05). Compared to women who underwent conventional vaginal hysterectomy with USLS, women who underwent vNOTES hysterectomy with USLS had lower incidences of intraoperative complications (6% vs. 18 %, p < 0.05) and intraoperative ureteral obstruction (0% vs. 8%, p < 0.05); and less estimated blood loss (58 ± 68 ml vs. 143 ± 87 ml, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

vNOTES hysterectomy with USLS is associated with reduced incidence of intraoperative complications, shorter surgical and anesthesia time, and slightly longer hospital stay, compared to the traditional vaginal surgical approach. Post-operative complications during hospital stay were similar and infrequent following the two procedures.

vNOTES for adnexal procedures

This work aims to describe the technique and review all transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for adnexal procedures performed and to acknowledge vNOTES as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. The procedure consisted of an incision in the Pouch of Douglas, insertion of a single port device, laparoscopic surgery through the device, extraction of specimens through the vagina and closure of the vaginal apex with a direct suture. Eighteen procedures have been successfully completed, 1 patient required conversion to conventional abdominal surgery due to intolerance to pneumoperitoneum. Surgeries' length range was 45-210 minutes. The estimated blood loss was less than 100 mL. The patients required minimal analgesia, were discharged the day after and had no postoperative complications. No patients complained of dyspareunia. Two patients conceived after surgery. vNOTES is a safe and desirable approach to the adnexa and a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopy or vaginal surgery.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Natural Orifice Transluminal Surgery (NOTES) is a technique used to access the abdominal cavity through natural orifice. Compared to conventional laparoscopy, it's expected to have fewer complications.What do the results of this study add? This is one of the few works addressing vNOTES adnexal surgery, which appears to be a good alternative to conventional laparoscopy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? vNOTES may be a desirable approach to the adnexa. This work opens a door to new research regarding vNOTES in more complex gynaecologic procedures.

Comparative analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in ovarian cystectomy

AIM

To objectively assess the safety, feasibility, advantages and disadvantages and health economics benefits of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) in ovarian cystectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of all patients in our hospital who had undergone vNOTES and TU-LESS ovarian cystectomy due to 'unilateral ovarian cyst' from March 2019 to May 2020. Patients were classified into vNOTES group (86) and TU-LESS group (210) based on surgical paths. The patients' general characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

All 296 patients completed surgery with no need to switch to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy procedures. There were no complications of Grade III, IV, V in Clavien-Dindo classification. There were two patients in the vNOTES group and four patients in the TU-LESS group with complications of Grade I, all of whom were treated with antipyretic drugs for postoperative fever. One patient in the TU-LESS group presented the complication of Grade II and was treated with blood transfusion due to postoperative anemia. The two groups had similar general characteristics. Perioperative outcomes: The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores 24 h postoperation were significantly lower in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group. The cosmetic scores were significantly higher in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group. Postoperative stay and time of flatus after surgery were significantly shorter in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group. There was not significant statistical differences between the two groups in operation time, estimated blood loss, Hb decrease at 48 h postoperation, maximum body temperature in 48 h after surgery and hospital costs.

CONCLUSION

It was proved to be safe and feasible in ovarian cystectomy by vNOTES. It worked better than TU-LESS in relieving postoperative pain, shortening postoperative stay and improving cosmetic effects and so on. As an emerging surgical path, large sample multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to further verify its safety and advantages.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for omentectomy - A case series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has been applied massively in the gynecological field in recent years. The aim of the current study is to present the surgical technique of vNOTES omentectomy and to evaluate the feasibility of this procedure.

METHODS

A case series study of the first 5 vNOTES omentectomy procedures performed for surgical staging of suspicious early stage ovarian cancer, at Rambam Health Care Campus (Israel) and Imelda Hospital (Belgium) between November 2018 and August 2019. Sociodemographic and clinical data were retrieved from patients' electronic charts. Primary points of interest included intra-operative bleeding, length of surgery, length of hospitalization, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

The median age was 61 years (range 50-72), and the median BMI was 27 kg/m² (range 23-33). All the operations were carried out to completion through the vaginal GelPOINT, without insertion of an assistant abdominal trocar or conversion to another surgical approach. The median omentectomy time was 45 min (range: 39-52). The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 150 ml (range: 20-200). The median hospital stay was 2 days (range: 1-3).

CONCLUSIONS

vNOTES is a feasible technique for omentectomy in early stage ovarian cancer, with low rates of complications and improved cosmetic results.

Applying the vaginal approach for benign ovarian cystectomy: current evidence and future applications

Vaginal ovarian cystectomy has not gained wide acceptance owing to the potential difficulty in entering the cul-de-sac. We review the current evidence on vaginal approaches to benign ovarian cysts. Outcome measures of interest included time to return to work, patient satisfaction, surgical complications and length of hospital stay. Ten studies were included in this review and involving 525 patients. Vaginal ovarian cystectomy is overall safe and feasible in appropriately selected cases with no evidence of intrapelvic adhesions or endometriosis. These findings will need to be validated in appropriately powered studies, before reliable conclusions can be drawn. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of ultrasound both preoperatively for case selection optimization and intraoperatively, as a means of guidance during posterior culdotomy.

The management of benign ovarian cysts through the vagina (VOC) has not gained wide acceptance by gynecologists worldwide owing to the potential difficulty in accessing the pelvic organs through an incision at the top of the vagina that may cause injury to adjacent structures such as the rectum. This is a review of the literature on the effectiveness of VOC. Various techniques have been described. Overall, VOC is safe and effective in appropriately selected cases. Larger studies will need to be conducted to validate these results. We also emphasize the importance of ultrasound both preoperatively as a tool to select the right patients for VOC as well as during surgery as an adjunct to guide the surgeon.

A Novel Approach to Combined Vaginal and Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

Background and Objectives

In this case series, we propose a novel approach to combined vaginal and laparoscopic surgery in which a posterior colpotomy and 2 5-mm abdominal incisions are used to perform benign gynecological procedures. We seek to assess the safety and feasibility of this technique in difficult surgical candidates such as those with obesity or prior laparotomies, as well as to detail intra- and postoperative complications associated with the procedure.

Methods

We collected demographic, clinical, intra-operative, and postoperative data on 45 women who underwent a combined vaginal and laparoscopic gynecological surgery for benign indications by a single surgeon between February 2013 and August 2017.

Results

From February 2013 through August 2017, 45 women underwent a combined vaginal and laparoscopic surgery at 2 institutions. Procedures included adnexal surgery (n = 32, 71%), and total hysterectomy (n = 13, 29%). Of patients who underwent adnexal surgery, two had minor postoperative complications. No patients had major complications. In addition, no patients had postoperative vaginal infections or pelvic abscesses, and there were no readmissions within 30 days after the procedures.

Conclusion

Our proposed combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach to benign gynecological surgery can be utilized in difficult surgical candidates including those with obesity, nulliparous patients, and those with prior abdominal surgery. Our data has shown that this approach is safe and effective.