Reprint of: Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization

Microfluidic sperm sorting selects a subpopulation of high-quality sperm with a higher potential for fertilization

STUDY QUESTION

Is a microfluidic sperm sorter (MSS) able to select higher quality sperm compared to conventional methods?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The MSS selects sperm with improved parameters, lower DNA fragmentation, and higher fertilizing potential.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

To date, the few studies that have compared microfluidics sperm selection with conventional methods have used heterogeneous study population and have lacked molecular investigations.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The efficiency of a newly designed MSS in isolating high-quality sperm was compared to the density-gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim-up (SU) methods, using 100 semen samples in two groups, during 2023-2024.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Semen specimens from 50 normozoospermic and 50 non-normozoospermic men were sorted using MSS, DGC, and SU methods to compare parameters related to the quality and fertilizing potential of sperm. The fertilizing potential of sperm was determined by measurement of phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) and post-acrosomal sheath WW domain-binding protein (PAWP) expression using flow cytometry, and the chromatin dispersion test was used to assess sperm DNA damage.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In both normozoospermic and non-normozoospermic groups, the MSS-selected sperm with the highest progressive motility, PLCζ positive expression and PLCζ and PAWP fluorescence intensity the lowest non-progressive motility, and minimal DNA fragmentation, compared to sperm selected by DGC and SU methods (P < 0.05).

LIMITATION, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The major limitations of our study were the low yield of sperm in the MSS chips and intentional exclusion of severe male factor infertility to yield a sufficient sperm count for molecular experiments; thus testing with severe oligozoospermic semen and samples with low count and motility is still required. In addition, due to ethical considerations, at present, it was impossible to use the sperm achieved from MSS in the clinic to assess the fertilization rate and further outcomes.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our research presents new evidence that microfluidic sperm sorting may result in the selection of high-quality sperm from raw semen. This novel technology might be a key to improving clinical outcomes of assisted reproduction in infertile patients.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study is funded by the Iran University of Medical Sciences and no competing interest exists.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

A dietary score representing the overall relation of men's diet with semen quality in relation to outcomes of infertility treatment with assisted reproduction

Objective

To examine the impact of men's diet on outcomes of infertility treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART) using an empirical score representing the relation of diet with semen quality.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Fertility center at an academic medical center.

Patients

We included 296 men (688 semen samples) to identify an empirical dietary pattern and 231 couples (406 ART cycles) to investigate the association of this diet pattern with ART outcomes.

Interventions

Men's diet was assessed at baseline using a validated questionnaire. An empirical dietary pattern reflecting the overall relation of diet with semen quality was identified using reduced rank regression.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was live birth per treatment cycle. The secondary outcomes were fertilization, implantation, and clinical pregnancy.

Results

Men had a median baseline age and body mass index of 36.8 years and 26.9 kg/m², respectively. Although the empirical diet pattern was significantly associated with all semen parameters, the empirical diet score was not related to any clinical outcome of infertility treatment after ART. The adjusted probabilities of relevant clinical outcomes in the lowest and highest quartiles of the empirical score were 0.62 (0.50-0.73) and 0.55 (0.45-0.66) for implantation, 0.57 (0.46-0.69) and 0.50 (0.40-0.61) for clinical pregnancy, and 0.49 (0.37-0.62) and 0.36 (0.25-0.48) for live birth. Analyses excluding couples with a diagnosis of male factor infertility and, separately, excluding intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles yielded similar results.

Conclusions

A dietary score representing the overall association of diet with semen quality parameters was not associated with ART outcomes.

Men's dietary patterns in relation to infertility treatment outcomes among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization

PURPOSE(S)

To evaluate the relationship of men's dietary patterns with outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study including 231 couples with 407 IVF cycles, presented at an academic fertility center from April 2007 to April 2018. We assessed diet with a validated food frequency questionnaire and identified Dietary Pattern 1 and Dietary Pattern 2 using principal component analysis. We evaluated adjusted probability of IVF outcomes across the quartiles of the adherence to two dietary patterns by generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Men had a median age of 36.8 years and BMI of 26.9 kg/m2. Women's median age and BMI were 35.0 years and 23.1 kg/m2, respectively. Adherence to Dietary Pattern 1 (rPearson=0.44) and Dietary Pattern 2 (rPearson=0.54) was positively correlated within couples. Adherence to Dietary Pattern 1 was positively associated with sperm concentration. A 1-unit increase in this pattern was associated with a 13.33 (0.71-25.96) million/mL higher sperm concentration. However, neither Dietary Pattern 1 nor Dietary Pattern 2 was associated with fertilization, implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Data-derived dietary patterns were associated with semen quality but unrelated to the probability of successful IVF outcomes.