Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, reduces endometriosis-associated pain compared with leuprorelin in Japanese women: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study

Pharmacokinetic considerations for gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists to treat endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterized by endometriotic cells implanted outside the uterus triggering a chronic inflammatory state. Estradiol stimulates the endometriotic implants, which overexpress estrogen receptor β. Lowering estradiol levels to a range within 40-50 pg/ml allows antagonizing the growth of endometriotic implants and counteracting its-related disabling symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

By blocking the Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormone (GnRH) receptors, GnRHagonists, peptide GnRHantagonists, non-peptide GnRHantagonists induce hypoestrogenism, due to the suppression of pituitary gonadotropins. This manuscript provides the results of an electronic literature search on pharmacological features of GnRHagonists and GnRHantagonists to treat endometriosis. Hypoestrogenism-dependent side effects can be counteracted by concomitant estrogen and progestin compounds (add-back therapy). GnRHagonists chronic administration induces hypoestrogenism after 10-12 days, since initial administrations stimulate gonadotropin rise (flare-up effect). Peptide GnRHantagonists quickly block GnRH-receptors inducing an immediate hypoestrogenism. Similarly to GnRHagonists, their peptide structure impedes the oral administration. The non-peptide GnRHantagonists have the advantage both of being taken orally and inducing a rapid dose-dependent hypoestrogenism.

EXPERT OPINION

GnRHagonists and peptide GnRHantagonists are effective to treat endometriosis, but require complex ways of administration. Non-peptide GnRHantagonists offer more important prospects in the tailored medical treatment of endometriosis, given their rapid onset of action and their oral way of administration.

Pharmacologic Interventions for Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of various medications for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain through a network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register until July 22, 2024. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov for additional data on recently completed trials or potentially eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but found nothing.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The analysis included randomized RCTs that used pharmacologic interventions for managing endometriosis-related pain. The primary efficacy outcome was endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, which included dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. The analysis adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

A total of 31 RCTs involving 8,665 patients were included in the analysis. In terms of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, four interventions demonstrated significantly greater efficacy compared with placebo: leuprolide combined with combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.40, 95% CI, -2.41 to -0.38), dienogest (SMD -1.20, 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.61), leuprolide alone (SMD -1.05, 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.45), and combined OCP (SMD -0.67, 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.09). Leuprolide combined with combined OCP emerged as the most effective treatment modality. In addition, elagolix and the combination of vitamin C and vitamin E were identified as the most effective interventions for dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. For nonmenstrual pelvic pain, gestrinone demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo and all other interventions.

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis indicates that leuprolide in combination with combined OCP, elagolix, vitamins C and E, and gestrinone may represent the most effective therapeutic options for alleviating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. These findings enhance our understanding of the relative efficacy of treatment strategies for pain associated with endometriosis. Future research should focus on conducting larger-scale and rigorously designed clinical trials within the target patient populations to further validate these results.

Sequential therapy of dienogest following relugolix for adenomyosis and impact on symptoms and serum CA125 levels: a case series

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis, characterized by endometrial tissue within the uterine muscle, often presents with severe pelvic pain and menorrhagia. This case series demonstrates the efficacy of sequential therapy involving relugolix followed by dienogest in managing adenomyosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

In five patients with adenomyosis, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist relugolix initially mitigated symptoms and reduced the levels of serum CA125, a marker associated with disease activity. After six months of relugolix, patients were transitioned to dienogest. This sequential approach maintained symptom relief and further stabilized CA125 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that sequential therapy provides effective symptom management and long-term disease control. Further, CA125 remains a valuable biomarker for monitoring therapeutic success.

Safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapies for pelvic inflammatory disease and endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) are gynecological conditions affecting women of reproductive age and causing pain symptoms. The symptoms caused by these conditions are similar; thus, the differential diagnosis may be challenging. The treatment of these conditions is very different because PID is treated with antibiotic therapy, while endometriosis is treated with hormonal therapies suppressing estrogen levels.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive literature search on endometriosis and PID. The search strategy incorporated relevant keywords and MeSH terms related to these topics.

EXPERT OPINION

The antibiotics used to manage PID have high efficacy and safety profiles. Commonly prescribed regimens include a combination of ceftriaxone, doxycycline, and metronidazole. These antibiotics are generally well-tolerated, with most adverse effects being mild and manageable (gastrointestinal disturbances or hypersensitivity reactions). Hormonal therapies are a cornerstone in the management of endometriosis; they include combined oral contraceptives (COCs), progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and antagonists. COCs and progestins are generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile, though they may cause side effects (breakthrough bleeding and mood changes). Oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as a noteworthy option, offering partial estrogen suppression and thereby overcoming the limitations associated with previously used GnRH agonists.

Non-inferiority study to compare the efficacy of relugolix with dienogest for endometriosis-associated pain and usefulness of administering relugolix prior to dienogest (READY study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis presents as endometrial tissue growths outside the uterine cavity with its major symptoms including dysmenorrhea and infertility. Progestin preparations, such as dienogest, are the first-line therapy for endometriosis symptoms, but may cause abnormal uterine bleeding. A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist may also be used to ease symptoms, but may induce flare-ups. Relugolix is a non-peptide GnRH antagonist that does not induce flare-ups. This study aims to compare the efficacy of relugolix with that of dienogest for reducing endometriosis-associated pain, and to evaluate if relugolix, administered prior to dienogest, decreases abnormal uterine bleeding.

METHODS

A multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, non-inferiority randomized study will be conducted at 11 sites in Japan. A total of 100 premenopausal patients aged ≥ 18 years with endometriosis, a maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score > 30 for endometriosis-associated pain, and dysmenorrhea or pelvic pain of at least moderate severity on the Biberoglu & Behrman (B&B) scale will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a relugolix group or dienogest group. Patients in the relugolix group will receive 40 mg oral relugolix once daily for 16 weeks, followed by 1 mg oral dienogest twice daily for 24 weeks. Patients in the dienogest group will receive oral dienogest 1 mg twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary outcome will be change in maximum VAS score for endometriosis-associated pain from baseline to 13-16 weeks after start of treatment. The secondary outcomes will include VAS score for dyspareunia, B&B score for dysmenorrhea, severity of induration in the pouch of Douglas, restricted uterine mobility, pelvic tenderness, quality of life, analgesic use, and ovarian endometrioma diameter. The safety outcomes will include treatment-emergent adverse events, bone density, bone markers, menstrual status, genital bleeding, and endometrial thickness.

DISCUSSION

This study will determine the efficacy of relugolix for improving endometriosis-associated pain and dienogest-induced abnormal uterine bleeding. The results will support treatment decisions regarding endometriosis-associated pain, and the introduction of new treatments to reduce dienogest-induced abnormal uterine bleeding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID jRCTs061230064. Registered on 29 September 2023.

The oral GnRH antagonists, a new class of drugs in gynecology: from pharmacokinetics to possible clinical applications

INTRODUCTION

In ovarian steroid-dependent diseases such as uterine fibroids, endometriosis and adenomyosis, oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as new therapeutic alternatives. These oral GnRH antagonists offer key advantages, including oral administration, dose-dependent estrogen suppression and rapid reversibility.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the pharmacological, clinical and therapeutic profiles of the latest non-peptide oral GnRH antagonists, through an analysis of clinical evidence and randomized clinical trials, to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of their clinical applications and potential benefits.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical trials examined demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in women with fibroids and pelvic pain in women with endometriosis, with more than 70% of patients achieving primary endpoints. The use of add-back therapy minimized bone mass density loss, ensuring long-term safety. Adverse events were dose-dependent but generally well tolerated. In our opinion, the strength of oral GnRH antagonists lies in their pharmacological properties. Oral administration increases convenience, allows adjustable dosing and ensures a dose-dependent effect. These drugs provide an immediate antagonistic effect without the flare-up phenomenon. Furthermore, they are expected to act on ectopic endometrial and smooth muscle cell receptors, potentially providing additional anti-proliferative effects. However, further research is needed: long term clinical trials must compare them with existing treatments.

Comparative Analysis of Medical Interventions to Alleviate Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. Results: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0-100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0-3 following 3 months of treatment. Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results.

A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.

Adverse events analysis of Relugolix (Orgovyx®) for prostate cancer based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Due to the limitations of clinical trials, some delayed and rare adverse events (AEs) may remain undetected, and safety information can be supplemented through post-market data analysis. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the AEs associated with Relugolix (Orgovyx®) using data from the FAERS database, and gain a better understanding of the potential risks and side effects of Relugolix (Orgovyx®) therapy.

METHODS

Data of Relugolix (Orgovyx®) were collected from the FAERS database covering the period from the fourth quarter of 2020 to the third quarter of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian analysis confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) to detect positive signals.

RESULTS

Totally, 5,382,189 reports were collected from the FAERS database, 4,397 reports of Relugolix (Orgovyx®) were identified as the 'primary suspected (PS)' AEs. Relugolix (Orgovyx®) induced AEs occurred in 26 organ systems. 58 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) satisfying with the four algorithms were retained at the same time. Unexpected significant AEs such as Pollakiuria, and Prostatic specific antigen increased also occur. The median time of onset was 60 days. The majority of the AEs occurred within the first 30 days after Relugolix (Orgovyx®) initiation.

CONCLUSION

Common AEs included Hot flush, Fatigue, Asthenia, Constipation, and Myalgia. These AEs should be focused on when using the drug to avoid serious consequences. In addition, the study results also suggested that the drug may exist Pollakiuria, Prostatic specific antigen increased and other AEs not mentioned in the manual, to supplement the AEs in the manual. This study is helpful for clinicians and pharmacists to improve their understanding of Relugolix (Orgovyx®) related AEs, and take timely prevention and treatment measures to ensure drug safety for patients.

Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been demonstrated to reduce endometriosis-associated pain. Because of the hypo-oestrogenic state they induce, however, higher dosages of GnRH antagonists are not recommended for used long term. This unwanted effect may be eliminated by so-called add-back therapy (ABT). This review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of GnRH antagonists, with or without add-back hormonal replacement therapy. Out of the 345 studies selected through the initial search, seven randomized controlled trials were included, comparing different oral GnRH antagonists at varying dosages, from a minimum of 50 mg to a maximum of 200 mg once or twice daily. Women treated with the lowest dose of GnRH antagonists had significantly greater mean pain score reductions from baseline throughout treatment compared with those treated with placebo (odds ratio [OR] -13.12, 95% CI -17.35 to -8.89 and OR -3.08, 95% CI -4.39 to -1.76 for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, respectively). Compatible with the dose-response effect, a positive correlation was found between response rates and adverse event rates. While GnRH antagonists offer an advantage in terms of pain reduction for endometriosis, the more recent literature suggests using GnRH antagonists with ABT, which, while mitigating the hypo-oestrogenic effects of GnRH antagonists, maintain their efficacy, while allowing their long-term use.

The reporting quality and spin of randomized controlled trials of endometriosis pain: Methodological study based on CONSORT extension on abstracts

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reporting quality of published RCT abstracts regarding patients with endometriosis pelvic pain and investigate the prevalence and characteristics of spin in these abstracts.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched for RCT abstracts addressing endometriosis pelvic pain published from January 1st, 2010 to December 1st, 2023.The reporting quality of RCT abstracts was assessed using the CONSORT statement for abstracts. Additionally, spin was evaluated in the results and conclusions section of the abstracts, defined as the misleading reporting of study findings to emphasize the perceived benefits of an intervention or to confound readers from statistically non-significant results. Assessing factors affecting the reporting quality and spin existence, linear and logistic regression was used, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 47 RCT abstracts were included. Out of 16 checklist items, only three items including objective, intervention and conclusions were sufficiently reported in the most abstracts (more than 95%), and none of the abstracts presented precise data as required by the CONSORT-A guidelines. In the reporting quality of material and method section, trial design, type of randomization, the generation of random allocation sequences, the allocation concealment and blinding were most items identified that were suboptimal. The total score for the quality varied between 5 and 15 (mean: 9.59, SD: 3.03, median: 9, IQR: 5). Word count (beta = 0.015, p-value = 0.005) and publishing in open-accessed journals (beta = 2.023, p-value = 0.023) were the significant factors that affecting the reporting quality. Evaluating spin within each included paper, we found that 18 (51.43%) papers had statistically non-significant results. From these studies, 12 (66.66%) had spin in both results and conclusion sections. Furthermore, the spin intensity increased during 2010-2023 and 38.29% of abstracts had spin in both results and conclusion sections.

CONCLUSION

Overall poor adherence to CONSORT-A was observed, with spin detected in several RCTs featuring non-significant primary endpoints in obstetrics and gynecology literature.

The Effect of Hormonal Treatment on Ovarian Endometriomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of hormonal suppression of endometriosis on the size of endometriotic ovarian cysts.

DATA SOURCES

The authors searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2012 to December 2022.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies of premenopausal women undergoing hormonal treatment of endometriosis for ≥3 months. The authors excluded studies involving surgical intervention in the follow-up period and those using hormones to prevent endometrioma recurrence after endometriosis surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022385612).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The primary outcome was the mean change in endometrioma volume, expressed as a percentage, from baseline to at least 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the change in volume at 3 months and analyses by class of hormonal therapy. The authors included 16 studies (15 cohort studies, 1 randomized controlled trial) of 888 patients treated with dienogest (7 studies), other progestins (4), combined hormonal contraceptives (2), and other suppressive therapy (3). Globally, the decrease in endometrioma volume became statistically significant at 6 months with a mean reduction of 55% (95% confidence interval, -40 to -71; 18 treatment groups; 730 patients; p <.001; I2 = 96%). The reduction was the greatest with dienogest and norethindrone acetate plus letrozole, followed by relugolix and leuprolide acetate. The volume reduction was not statistically significant with combined hormonal contraceptives or other progestins. There was high heterogeneity, and studies were at risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSION

Hormonal suppression can substantially reduce endometrioma size, but there is uncertainty in the exact reduction patients may experience.

An overview and comprehensive analysis of interdisciplinary clinical research in endometriosis based on trial registry

Endometriosis is a chronic multisystem disease associated with immunological, genetic, hormonal, psychological, and neuroscientific factors, leading to a significant socioeconomic impact worldwide. Though multidisciplinary management is the ideal approach, there remains a scarcity of published interdisciplinary clinical trials at present. Here, we have conducted a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics and issues of interdisciplinary trials on endometriosis based on the clinical registration database ClinicalTrials.gov. Among all 387 endometriosis trials, 30% (116) were identified as interdisciplinary, mostly conducted in Europe and North America, and fully funded by non-industrial sources. We documented growth in both patient-centered multidisciplinary comprehensive management and collaboration between fundamental biomedical science and applied medicine. However, compared to traditional obstetric-gynecological trials, interdisciplinary studies exhibited negative characteristics such as less likely to be randomized and less likely to report results. Our study provides insights for future trial investigators and may contribute to fostering greater collaboration in medical research.

Oral GnRH Antagonists in Combination with Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate for Pain Relief Associated with Endometriosis: A Review of Evidence of a Novel Class of Hormonal Agents

Current medical treatment options for endometriosis associated pains are inadequate. Evidence on effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is scarce. Around one third of patients are not responsive to oral contraceptives or progestins due to progesterone resistance. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists can only be used for a short duration because of associated side effects. Oral GnRH antagonists, including elagolix, relugolix, and linzagolix allow oral administration, induce dose dependent reduction of estradiol levels, do not cause initial flare up of endometriosis symptoms, and allow the fast return of ovarian function and menstruation after discontinuation. Elagolix at a low dose of 150 mg once daily, or the higher dose of 200 mg twice daily, significantly increased the proportion of women achieving clinically meaningful decline of dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. Relugolix at an oral dose of 40 mg/day results in improvement in different forms of endometriosis related pelvic pain, with an efficacy and side effect profile similar to that of GnRH agonists. Adding 1 mg of estradiol and 0.5 mg of norethindrone to 40 mg of relugolix (relugolix combination therapy) allows extension of treatment to 24 weeks with maintained efficacy and an improved side effect profile. Linzagolix, in a dose of 75 mg/day, can be used alone to treat endometriosis associated pain. For severe pelvic pain and dyspareunia, linzagolix can be used in a high dose of 200 mg/day with hormonal add-back therapy to preserve bone health.

IVF stimulation protocols and outcomes in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a complex medical condition with a high prevalence in women of reproductive age. Fertility is compromised in patients with endometriosis, and success in IVF treatments has been a challenge leading to evaluation of different stimulation protocols. The long-standing debate between GnRH agonist long protocols and short GnRH antagonist protocols is being resolved in favor of the latter, since in addition to presenting equivalent results with respect to the traditional option, they have the additional benefit of safety. The good results derived from vitrification techniques have led to the development of new stimulation strategies, such as progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS), with a greater degree of approval among patients. None of the stimulation protocols currently applied in women with endometriosis has been shown to be superior, so early intervention with an Assisted Reproduction treatment, regardless of the chosen protocol, can provide these women with good chances of motherhood. Women with endometrioma should be counseled for fertility preservation before planned ovarian endometrioma excision. The number of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos can be increased by repeated cycles.

Medical Management of Ovarian Endometriomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of medical management on the size of ovarian endometriomas.

DATA SOURCE

Online databases were searched from inception to October 2022, including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov , and Web of Science.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we included all English-language, full-text articles that reported on change in endometrioma size (either diameter or volume) after medical interventions. Studies evaluating surgical interventions or postoperative recurrence were excluded. All screening and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Risk of bias assessment was performed with either the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials or a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, 9,332 studies were screened, with 33 full-text articles deemed eligible for inclusion. In the meta-analysis, dienogest showed significant reduction in cyst diameter (reduction 1.32 cm, 95% CI, 0.91-1.73, eight studies, n=418 cysts) and volume (mean difference of log-transformed volume 1.35, 95% CI, 0.87-1.83, seven studies, n=282 cysts). Similarly, significant reductions were seen with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) (1.06 cm, 95% CI, 0.59-1.53, nine studies, n=455), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (1.17 cm, 95% CI, 0.42-1.92, four studies, n=128 cysts), norethindrone acetate (0.6 cm, 95% CI, 0.27-0.94, two studies, n=88 cysts), and danazol (1.95 cm, 95% CI, 1.18-2.73, two studies, n=34 cysts). Norethindrone acetate with aromatase inhibitor was also effective in reducing endometrioma volume (mean difference of log-transformed volume 1.47, 95% CI, 0.16-2.78, two studies, n=34 cysts).

CONCLUSION

Medical management with dienogest, OCPs, GnRH agonists, norethindrone acetate, norethindrone acetate with aromatase inhibitor, or danazol can reduce the size of ovarian endometriomas.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD 42022363319.

A review of phase II and III drugs for the treatment and management of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that gives rise to pelvic pain and infertility. Although estroprogestins and progestins currently stand as the first-line treatments for this condition, demonstrating efficacy in two-thirds of patients, a significant portion of individuals experience only partial relief or symptom recurrence following the cessation of these therapies. The coexistence of superficial, deep endometriosis, and ovarian endometriomas, as three distinct phenotypes with unique pathogenetic and molecular characteristics, may elucidate the current heterogeneous biological response to available therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to furnish the reader with a comprehensive summary pertaining to phase II-III hormonal treatments for endometriosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing research endeavors are directed toward the development of novel hormonal options for this benign yet debilitating disease. Among them, oral GnRH antagonists emerge as a noteworthy option, furnishing rapid therapeutic onset without an initial flare-up; these drugs facilitate partial or complete estrogen suppression, and promote prompt ovarian function recovery upon discontinuation, effectively surmounting the limitations associated with previously employed GnRH agonists. Limited evidence supports the use of selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators. Consequently, further extensive clinical research is imperative to garner a more profound understanding of innovative targets for novel hormonal options.

Update on the management of endometriosis-associated pain in France

The French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) published guidelines for managing endometriosis-associated pain in 2018. Given the development of new pharmacological therapies and a review that was published in 2021, most national and international guidelines now suggest a new therapeutic approach. In addition, a novel validated screening method based on patient questionnaires and analysis of 109-miRNA saliva signatures, which combines biomarkers and artificial intelligence, opens up new avenues for overcoming diagnostic challenges in patients with pelvic pain and for avoiding laparoscopic surgery when sonography and MRI are not conclusive. Dienogest (DNG) 2 mg has been a reimbursable healthcare expense in France since 2020, and, according to recent studies, it is at least as effective as combined hormonal contraception (CHC) and can be used as an alternative to CHC for first-line treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Since 2018, the literature concerning the use of DNG has grown considerably, and the French guidelines should be modified accordingly. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and other available progestins per os, including DNG, or the subcutaneous implant, can be offered as first-line therapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with add-back therapy (ABT) as second-line therapy. Oral GnRH antagonists are promising new medical treatments for women with endometriosis-associated pain. They competitively bind to GnRH receptors in the anterior pituitary, preventing native GnRH from binding to GnRH receptors and from stimulating the secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. Consequently, estradiol and progesterone production is reduced. Oral GnRH antagonists will soon be on the market in France. Given their mode of action, their efficacy is comparable to that of GnRH agonists, with the advantage of oral administration and rapid action with no flare-up effect. Combination therapy with ABT is likely to allow long-term treatment with minimal impact on bone mass. GnRH antagonists with ABT may thus be offered as second-line treatment as an alternative to GnRH agonists with ABT. This article presents an update on the management of endometriosis-associated pain in women who do not have an immediate desire for pregnancy.

A Lifelong Impact on Endometriosis: Pathophysiology and Pharmacological Treatment

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with bothersome symptoms in premenopausal women and is complicated with long-term systemic impacts in the post-menopausal stage. It is generally defined by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, which causes menstrual disorders, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. Endometriotic lesions can also spread and grow in extra-pelvic sites; the chronic inflammatory status can cause systemic effects, including metabolic disorder, immune dysregulation, and cardiovascular diseases. The uncertain etiologies of endometriosis and their diverse presentations limit the treatment efficacy. High recurrence risk and intolerable side effects result in poor compliance. Current studies for endometriosis have paid attention to the advances in hormonal, neurological, and immunological approaches to the pathophysiology and their potential pharmacological intervention. Here we provide an overview of the lifelong impacts of endometriosis and summarize the updated consensus on therapeutic strategies.

Hormonal drugs for the treatment of endometriosis

In the past, the primary approach for the treatment of endometriosis was represented by surgery; however, after the introduction of non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis with the development of imaging technologies, medical treatment became the preferred approach, particularly in young patients. Hormonal drugs, by blocking menstruation, are the most effective for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain, independently of phenotype (ovarian, deep, or superficial endometriosis). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and oral antagonists act on hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis inducing iatrogenic menopause, thus reducing dysmenorrhea and all pain symptoms. The side effects, such as hot flushes and bone loss, may be reduced by an add-back therapy. However, the cost in terms of women's health remains high in view of a long-term treatment. Progestins are considered the first-line treatment, highly effective, and with reduced side effects. In addition to the well-known and largely used Norethisterone acetate and Medroxyprogesterone acetate, recently Dienogest has become one of the most used drugs in all endometriosis phenotypes for long-term treatment. Besides, Intrauterine levornogestrel or subcutaneous etonogestrel are valid alternative for long-term treatment.

Advances in targeting estrogen synthesis and receptors in patients with endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease on the background of progesterone resistance. Increased estrogen production, low estrogen metabolization, and altered estrogen receptors (ERs) expression contribute to the hyperestrogenic milieu within endometriotic lesions. Since estrogens play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease, inhibition of estrogen production is one of the main targets of available and emerging drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Firstly, we described the molecular alterations responsible for estrogen dependence. Secondly, we reviewed available and emerging treatments that interfere, through central (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRH-a), GnRH antagonists) or local mechanisms (aromatase inhibitors (AIs), inhibitors of steroid sulfatase (STS) and hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1)), with estrogen dependence. Finally, we focused on emerging treatments targeting ERs (selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), estrogen receptors agonists, and antagonists).

EXPERT OPINION

Available treatments interfering with estrogen pathways exert a contraceptive effect, have hypoestrogenic side effects, and cannot prevent or definitively treat the disease. Preclinical and animal studies are focusing on emerging drugs targeting ERs in order to overcome limitations of available treatments. These treatments may represent a promising option, as they may produce a more specific inhibition of disease activity within endometriotic implants, avoiding prolonged hypoestrogenic status and limiting systemic side effects.

Current status and challenges of drug development for hormonal treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review of randomized control trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the data obtained from randomized controlled trials looking at new pharmacologic treatments for endometriosis published over the last decade with a focus on hormonal therapeutic options for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP), excluding studies focusing on fertility.

METHODS

We identified relevant original studies in the English language through a search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE (2012 to present) databases using the appropriate MeSH terms and applying the article type filter 'randomized controlled trials'. A total of 219 records were found during the electronic search. After a detailed evaluation and review of the manuscripts, 11 primary articles met the inclusion criteria. A systematic review of the data was conducted.

RESULTS

This review included several emerging drug therapies for EAPP. Randomized control trials showed promising results with several oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (elagolix, relugolix, ASP1707, linzagolix). However, studies of other hormonal agents such as aromatase inhibitors and selective progesterone receptor modulators have not yielded significant or new advantages. Selective estrogen receptor modulators have not been represented in randomized control trials and have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Although numerous novel agents are being investigated for the treatment of endometriosis, there is still no significant progress in the development of curative rather than suppressive drugs. Therefore, further efforts are needed to develop an effective and hopefully curative treatment for this chronic, costly, and overwhelming disease.

Novel pharmacological therapies for the treatment of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent, inflammatory disease associated with pelvic pain, infertility, impaired sexual function, and psychological suffering. Therefore, tailored patient management appears of primary importance to address specific issues and identify the appropriate treatment for each woman. Over the years, abundant research has been carried out with the objective to find new therapeutic approaches for this multifaceted disease.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to present the latest advances in the pharmacological management of endometriosis. In particular, the potential role of GnRH antagonists, selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs), and selective estrogen receptors modulators (SERMs) will be discussed. We performed a literature search in PubMed and Embase, and selected the best quality evidence, giving preference to the most recent and definitive original articles and reviews.

EXPERT OPINION

Medical therapy represents the cornerstone of endometriosis management, although few advances have been made in the last decade. Most studies have focused on the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of GnRH antagonists (plus add-back therapy in cases of prolonged treatment), which should be used as second-line treatment options in selected cases (i.e. non-responders to first-line treatments). Further studies are needed to identify the ideal treatment for women with endometriosis.