Comparison of Demographic Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health Between Adults With Diagnosed HIV and All Adults in the U.S

A Novel Method for Assessing Poor Quality of Life Among People With HIV

BACKGROUND

The US National HIV/AIDS Strategy prioritizes improving quality of life (QoL) among people with HIV (PWH) but co-occurrence of different aspects of QoL is not well described. We developed and applied a novel, multi-item assessment of poor QoL among PWH and examined associations with selected outcomes.

SETTING

2018-2021 CDC Medical Monitoring Project data on 15,855 U.S. PWH.

METHODS

The poor QoL index, measured by the number of indicators of poor QoL experienced included: poor/fair self-rated health, unmet needs for mental health services, and subsistence needs (hunger/food insecurity, unstable housing/homelessness, and unemployment). Score distributions were analyzed alongside data on individual QoL indicators. Associations with selected adverse outcomes were assessed, including not being retained in care, missing ≥1 HIV medical appointments, missing ≥1 ART dose, not having sustained viral suppression, and having ≥1 emergency room visit or ≥1 hospitalization.

RESULTS

Overall, 55.1% of PWH had ≥1 indicator of poor QoL; 8.4% had ≥3 indicators. Over a quarter (26.5%) of people who inject drugs experienced ≥3 indicators of poor QoL. A large percentage of people aged 18-24 years had subsistence needs; 36.4% of Black women had poor/fair self-rated health. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and sex, higher poor QoL index scores-and each indicator of poor QoL-were associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the utility in using the poor QoL index to identify those at higher risk of experiencing health challenges. Expanding national recommendations to include this QoL assessment could help in meeting National HIV/AIDS Strategy goals for improving PWH's well-being.

Social Determinants of Health and Unmet Needs for Services Among Young Adults With HIV: Medical Monitoring Project, 2018-2021

BACKGROUND

Persons aged 13-24 years are a priority population in the National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Young adults with HIV have poorer health outcomes-including not being retained in care, antiretroviral nonadherence, and not being virally suppressed-than other persons with HIV.

SETTING

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Medical Monitoring Project data collected June 2018 through May 2022.

METHODS

We compared demographic characteristics, social determinants of health, and mental health between persons aged 18-24 years with HIV versus persons aged ≥25 years with HIV. Among those aged 18-24 years, we analyzed total and unmet needs for ancillary services, defined as those that support care engagement, viral suppression, and overall health and well-being among people with HIV.

RESULTS

Persons aged 18-24 years were more likely to have a household income <100% of the federal poverty level (48% vs. 39%), and experience unstable housing or homelessness (37% vs. 18%) or hunger/food insecurity (29% vs. 18%) than those aged ≥25 years. Persons aged 18-24 years had higher median HIV stigma scores (40 vs. 29) and were more likely to experience symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (21% vs. 15%) than those aged ≥25 years. Of persons aged 18-24 years, 96% had a need for ≥1 ancillary service, of whom 56% had ≥1 unmet need; unmet needs were highest for subsistence services (53%) and non-HIV medical services (41%).

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing unmet needs for subsistence and non-HIV medical services could help reduce disparities in social determinants of health and mental health that drive inequities in health outcomes among persons with HIV aged 18-24 years.

Surveying the Literature on Implementation Determinants and Strategies for HIV Structural Interventions: A Systematic Review Protocol

Background

Despite improvements in HIV prevention, treatment, and surveillance, vast disparities remain in access, uptake, and adherence of evidence-based interventions. These disparities are most pronounced among racially, sexually, and gender minoritized populations, as well as among those living in poverty and/or who use injectable drugs. Structural interventions, or interventions that target social and structural determinants of health like housing, transportation, or income, are needed to increase access to, use of, and adherence to HIV EBIs to advance the aims of the national Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. However, it is unclear to what extent barriers and facilitators of structural interventions have been identified in the U.S. and what implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions have been developed to enhance their delivery.

Methods

To identify what implementation determinants, implementation strategies, and adjunctive interventions have been identified for HIV structural interventions, we carried out a broad database search between May and July 2024, identifying a total of 8,098 articles. We will use a multi-step process to identify articles to include in the systematic review. We will use natural language processing to identify articles for exclusion, followed by manual text review and extraction using COVIDENCE software. Literature on determinants will be coded according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions will be coded according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, the Theoretical Domains Framework, and COM-B. We will descriptively analyze determinants, implementation strategies, and adjunctive interventions, use natural language processing for thematic analysis of determinants, implementation strategies, and adjunctive interventions, and provide narrative description of implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions.

Discussion

This systematic review will identify key barriers and facilitators for HIV structural intervention implementation strategies, including multi-level approaches to address disparities among marginalized populations. Findings will provide insights for advancing equitable, scalable interventions to support the goals of the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

Systematic review registration

CRD42024554315.

Co-designing a blueprint for spreading person-centered, Whole Health care to HIV specialty care settings: a mixed methods protocol

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has advanced a person-centered, Whole Health (WH) System of Care, a shift from a disease-oriented system to one that prioritizes "what matters most" to patients in their lives. Whole Health is predicated on patient-provider interactions marked by a multi-level understanding of health and trusted relationships that promote well-being. Presently, WH implementation has been focused largely in primary care settings, yet the goal is to effect a system-wide transformation of care so that Veterans receive WH across VHA clinical settings, including specialty care. This sort of system-wide cultural transformation is difficult to implement.

METHODS

This three-aim mixed methods study will result in a co-designed implementation blueprint for spreading WH from primary to specialty care settings. Taking HIV specialty care as an illustrative case- because of its diverse models of relationships to primary care - to explore how to spread WH through specialty care settings. We will use the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to organize quantitative and qualitative data and identify key determinants of WH receipt among Veterans living with HIV. Through a co-design process, we develop an adaptable implementation blueprint that identifies and matches implementation strategies to different HIV specialty care configurations.

DISCUSSION

This study will co-design a flexible implementation blueprint for spreading WH from VHA primary care throughout HIV specialty care settings. This protocol contributes to the science of end-user engagement while also answering calls for greater transparency in how implementation strategies are identified, tailored, and spread.

Progress Toward Achieving National HIV/AIDS Strategy Goals for Quality of Life Among Persons Aged ≥50 Years with Diagnosed HIV - Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2017-2023

Ensuring good quality of life (QoL) among persons with diagnosed HIV (PWH) is a priority of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS), which established 2025 goals for improving QoL. Goals are monitored through five indicators: self-rated health, unmet needs for mental health services, unemployment, hunger or food insecurity, and unstable housing or homelessness. Among the growing population of PWH aged ≥50 years, progress toward these goals has not been assessed. Data collected during the 2017-2022 cycles of the Medical Monitoring Project, an annual complex sample survey of U.S. adults with diagnosed HIV, assessed progress toward NHAS 2025 QoL goals among PWH aged ≥50 years, overall and by age group. The recent estimated annual percentage change from baseline (2017 or 2018) to 2022 was calculated for each indicator. Among PWH aged ≥50 years, the 2025 goal of 95% PWH with good or better self-rated health is 46.2% higher than the 2022 estimate. The 2025 goals of a 50% reduction in the other indicators range from 26.3% to 56.3% lower than the 2022 estimates. Decreasing hunger or food insecurity by 50% among PWH aged ≥65 was the only goal met by 2022. If recent trends continue, other NHAS QoL 2025 goals are unlikely to be met. Multisectoral strategies to improve access to housing, employment, food, and mental health will be needed to meet NHAS 2025 goals for QoL among older PWH.

Life and Disability Insurance for People with or at Risk of HIV: Aligning Policy with Evidence

Antiretroviral medications have substantially improved life expectancy for people with HIV. These medications are also highly effective in preventing HIV acquisition in people who do not have HIV, a strategy known as HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Despite these advances, some life and disability insurers continue to deny or limit coverage for people with HIV, and some have even refused to cover people who are using PrEP to protect themselves. These policies unfairly deny people with HIV, PrEP users, and their families the peace of mind and financial protection that can come with life and disability insurance coverage. This article summarizes the current evidence on HIV treatment and prevention, arguing that underwriting decisions by life and disability insurers should not be made based on HIV status or use of PrEP.

Overview of the Epidemiology and Clinical Care Considerations for Adolescents and Young Adults Living with or at Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus

This article provides an updated examination of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemiologic trends among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in the United States, highlighting the significant public health challenge posed by HIV within this demographic. Despite a notable decline in HIV diagnoses among AYAs, challenges remain, particularly due to 50% of AYAs living with HIV being unaware of their status. The article aims to evaluate current clinical recommendations, identify deficiencies, and propose evidence-based improvements for HIV prevention, diagnosis, and care, with the goal of enhancing health outcomes and reducing HIV prevalence among AYAs.