Do food-related emotional associations differ with socio-economic status? An exploratory qualitative study with Brazilian consumers

Assessment of the attributes that most affect the choice of minced meat and hamburgers

The objectives of this work were to identify the parameters that most influence Spanish consumers' choice of minced meat and hamburgers, and to determine the importance of different extrinsic attributes in meat products. A consumer survey was conducted by combining three methodologies: free listing task, rating the importance of different extrinsic attributes and a conjoint analysis. The free listing task showed that, of all the factors considered when selecting minced meat or hamburgers, price, expiration date, colour and appearance stood out. In the rating test, expiration date obtained the highest average score, followed by price and country of origin. The conjoint analysis showed consumers clearly preferred origin Spain, along with low price and the animal welfare label, which presented higher utility value than the sustainable packaging label. No presented label negatively impacted product choice. The information provided can be very useful for developing and marketing meat products that seek to meet today's consumer demands.

Holistic Framework to Contextualize Dietary Quality Assessment: A Critical Review

Numerous dietary quality indices exist to help quantify overall dietary intake and behaviors associated with positive health outcomes. Most indices focus solely on biomedical factors and nutrient or food intake, and exclude the influence of important social and environmental factors associated with dietary intake. Using the Diet Quality Index- International as one sample index to illustrate our proposed holistic conceptual framework, this critical review seeks to elucidate potential adaptations to dietary quality assessment by considering-in parallel-biomedical, environmental, and social factors. Considering these factors would add context to dietary quality assessment, influencing post-assessment recommendations for use across various populations and circumstances. Additionally, individual and population-level evidence-based practices could be informed by contextual social and environmental factors that influence dietary quality to provide more relevant, reasonable, and beneficial nutritional recommendations.

Can front-of-pack nutrition labeling influence children's emotional associations with unhealthy food products? An experiment using emoji

Food products targeted at children are usually marketed using persuasive elements aimed at creating positive hedonic and emotional associations. For this reason, changes in children's emotional associations with unhealthy food products can discourage their consumption. In this context, the aim of the present study was to compare children's emotional associations with food products featuring different front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling schemes. A total of 492 children (6-12 years old) were randomly divided into three groups, each of which evaluated a series of packages featuring different FOP nutrition labelling schemes: guidelines daily amount (GDA), traffic light system (TLS) and nutritional warnings. For each of the six packages and three unpackaged products, children were asked to select all the emoji from a list that described how they would feel eating the product. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models. FOP nutrition labelling significantly influenced the frequency of use five of the 16 emoji. In general, children who evaluated packages with directive and semi-directive schemes used emoji associated with positive emotions less frequently than those who evaluated packages with the GDA system. The effect of FOP nutrition labelling scheme on emotional associations was moderated by age and type of school. The effect of directive and semi-directive FOP nutritional schemes, in special nutritional warnings, tended to be higher for younger children and children from public schools. These results suggest that FOP nutrition labelling may contribute to discouraging consumption of products with high content of nutrients associated with non-communicable diseases among children.