Functional bracing is a safe and cost effective treatment for isolated Weber B fracture

Comparative efficacy of cast immobilization versus removable braces in patients with ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An effective and appropriate method to support the ankle joint optimally is particularly important during the healing phase of ankle fractures. The purpose of this review was to assess the functional outcomes, ankle-related quality of life, and associated complications of cast immobilization versus removable braces for the treatment of adult ankle fractures.

METHODS

Studies comparing cast immobilization and removable braces after ankle fracture were included by systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis Statements) guidelines. Primary outcome measures included early to mid-late Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, swelling, pain, time to return to work, calf muscle atrophy, and complications. Subgroup analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed in both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 1485 patients met the eligibility criteria. The fracture types of the study included Weber A/B/C and Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation (SER), supination-adduction (SA), pronation-external rotation (PER) and pronation-abduction (PA). The results of the meta-analysis showed that removable braces had better early (mean difference (MD) -2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.26, 0.00) and mid-term functional outcomes (MD -5.81; 95% CI -10.35, -1.27) after ankle fracture compared with cast immobilization. In addition, removable braces caused significantly more wound breakdown (Odds ratio (OR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.17, 0.90) and wound infections (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17, 0.58) than cast immobilization.

CONCLUSION

Compared with cast immobilization, removable braces had better functional outcomes in the early and mid-term periods after ankle fractures and were less likely to result in deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Overall, the removable brace is a comfortable ankle fracture option that might improve functional outcomes.

Comparison of operatively and nonoperatively treated isolated Weber B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite fractures of Isolated Weber B being prevalent, there is a lack of clarity regarding the relative effectiveness of surgical versus conservative treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinical effects and complications of surgical versus conservative treatment of the Isolated Weber B ankle fractures.

METHODS

This study involved thorough searches across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, to identify all relevant publications on Isolated Weber B ankle fractures repaired through surgical versus conservative treatment. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, several outcomes were evaluated, including post-operative function, complications and reoperation rate.

RESULT

Six articles involving 818 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Among these participants, 350 were male and 636 were female. 651 patients received conservative treatment, while 396 underwent surgical intervention. The findings indicate no significant differences in OMAS, FAOQ, PCS, MCS scores, and return to work between surgical and non-surgical treatments for isolated Weber B ankle fractures. However, compared with surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment has a higher AOFAS score(MD = -5.31, 95% CI = [-9.06, -1.55], P = 0.20, I2 = 39%), lower VAS score(MD = 0.72, 95% CI = [0.33, 1.10], P = 0.69, I2 = 0%), lower complication rate (RR = 3.06, 95% CI = [1.58, 6.01], P = 0.05, I2 = 54%), and lower reoperation rate(RR = 8.40, 95% CI = [1.57, 45.06], P = 0.05, I2 = 67%).

CONCLUSION

Prospective randomized controlled trial: early weight bearing after conservative treatment of Weber B ankle fractures (pancake trial)

PURPOSE

Different studies have shown that weightbearing is safe in stable transsyndesmotic, isolated lateral simple ankle fractures. Despite this evidence, AO guidelines still recommend immobilization with above-the-knee cast for 4-6 weeks for these fractures. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of mobilization and weightbearing to those of immobilization and non-weightbearing in patients with stable transsyndesmotic, lateral isolated simple ankle fractures.

METHODS

Fifty patients were randomly assigned to permissive weightbearing in a walking boot or non-weightbearing immobilization using a below-the-knee cast. Primary outcome was ankle functionality as scored by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were radiological displacement of fracture, range of motion (ROM), calf circumference, and RAND 36-item health survey. Patients were in follow-up for 24 months.

RESULTS

Ankle functionality after six and twelve weeks was significantly higher for the intervention group, with respectively 30 points (p = 0.001) and 10 points (p = 0.015) of difference. ROM improved significantly in the intervention group after six weeks. All fractures showed radiological progression of fracture healing. RAND 36-item showed differences in both physical (60.3 vs. 46.3, p = 0.017) and mental (78.5 vs. 58.2, p = 0.034) components in favor of the intervention group. In 16% of patients who initially showed stable fractures on radiographic imaging, joint dislocation was identified on weightbearing radiographs prior to randomization, leading to exclusion.

CONCLUSION

Weightbearing and mobilization using a walking boot may be a safe treatment for patients with stable Weber B fractures.

Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score.

RESULTS

Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) - 6.64 (95% CI - 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD - 6.91 (95% CI - 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD - 2.63 (95% CI - 5.01 to - 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.

[Injuries of the foot and ankle in winter sports]

Winter sports injuries of the foot and ankle are a relevant entity due to the high enthusiasm for alpine skiing and snowboarding. The condition of the footwear and rigidity of the binding have a significant influence on the pathobiomechanics of fracture development and have been shown to influence the frequency of knee and ankle injuries. Foot injuries are rare due to the sport-specific footwear with good padding and frequent hard shell casings.