Vink MC, van Steenbergen LN, de Hartog B, Zijlstra WP, van Raaij TM, Peters RM. Lower risk of revision in fixed-bearing compared to mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasties: A register based evaluation of 1246 patients in the Netherlands.
Foot Ankle Surg 2025;
31:352-357. [PMID:
39721856 DOI:
10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been developed as treatment for disabling tibiotalar osteoarthritis. TAAs are divided into mobile- and fixed-bearings. The aim was to determine the incidence and trends of fixed- and mobile bearings over time and investigate the association of bearing type and risk of revision after primary TAA in the Netherlands.
METHODS
Using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) (2014-2023), we analyzed trends in use of bearing type, reasons for revision and implant survival (n = 1246).
RESULTS
Fixed bearings were more often used than mobile bearings (67 % versus 33 %). Revision risk at 3, 5 and 7 years was respectively 2.8 %, 3.3 %, and 5.4 % for fixed bearings, versus 6.5 %, 10.4 %, and 11.3 % for mobile bearings. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.5 (95 %CI 1.4-4.4) for mobile bearings.
CONCLUSION
Fixed bearings were associated with a lower revision risk than mobile bearings in total ankle arthroplasties based on Dutch registry data.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
II.
Collapse