Malpractice and system of expertise in anaesthetic procedures in Turkey

Surgical interventions with fatal outcome: utility of multi-phase postmortem CT angiography

Cases of fatal outcome after surgical intervention are autopsied to determine the cause of death and to investigate whether medical error caused or contributed to the death. For medico-legal purposes, it is imperative that autopsy findings are documented clearly. Modern imaging techniques such as multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and postmortem CT angiography, which is used for vascular system imaging, are useful tools for determining cause of death. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of postmortem CT angiography for the medico-legal death investigation. This study investigated 10 medico-legal cases with a fatal outcome after surgical intervention using multi-phase postmortem whole body CT angiography. A native CT scan was performed as well as three angiographic phases (arterial, venous, and dynamic) using a Virtangio(®) perfusion device and the oily contrast agent, Angiofil(®). The results of conventional autopsy were compared to those from the radiological investigations. We also investigated whether the radiological findings affected the final interpretation of cause-of-death. Causes of death were hemorrhagic shock, intracerebral hemorrhage, septic shock, and a combination of hemorrhage and blood aspiration. The diagnoses were made by conventional autopsy as well as by postmortem CT angiography. Hemorrhage played an important role in eight of ten cases. The radiological exam revealed the exact source of bleeding in seven of the eight cases, whereas conventional autopsy localized the source of bleeding only generally in five of the seven cases. In one case, neither conventional autopsy nor CT angiography identified the source of hemorrhage. We conclude that postmortem CT angiography is extremely useful for investigating deaths following surgical interventions. This technique helps document autopsy findings and allows a second examination if it is needed; specifically, it detects and visualizes the sources of hemorrhages in detail, which is often of particular interest in such cases.

Retrospective analysis of anaesthesia-related deaths during a 12-year period: looking at the data from a forensic point of view

Anaesthesia-related death is one of the most complex events to be studied in forensic pathology because of its rarity and its doubtful presentation. Particularly, the difficulties in assessing the cause of deaths in such circumstances are underlined. A scale must be considered in order to determine the causal role of anaesthesia in the process leading to death. Indeed, beyond deaths exclusively explained by anaesthetic care, there are deaths that are not anaesthesia-related and deaths explained by surgery and co-morbidities in which the role of anaesthetic care has to be carefully investigated. A retrospective analysis of 3138 autopsies is presented with the aim of better understanding the patho-physiological process of anaesthesia-related mortality and to determine the causal role of anaesthesiological care in the process leading to death, thus assessing the real incidence of deaths due to anaesthesia (0.16%). In the present study, the number of deaths generically anaesthesia-related (33 cases) accounts for 2.06% of autopsies due to medical malpractice claims and 1.05% of all autopsies. The number of deaths totally related to anaesthesic care is rather low with 0.32% of autopsies due to medical malpractice claims and 0.16% of all autopsies. Anaesthesia-related deaths were due to lack of or delay in intubation (2 cases), acute cardio-respiratory failure (2 cases) and anaesthetic-induced hepatotoxicity (1 case). The importance of a careful forensic investigation (clinical and familial history, medical records, complete autopsy and toxicology), which can lead to a clear understanding of anaesthesia-related deaths, is also stressed.