A retrospective evaluation of informed consent for tissue donation within a year of the donor's death

Effekte des Organspendeskandals 2012 auf die Gewebespende am Institut für Rechtsmedizin München

Hintergrund

Der Organspendeskandal (OSS) 2012 führte zu einem dramatischen Einbruch der Spendebereitschaft. Im Zeitraum nach dem OSS verantwortete die Rechtsmedizin München 2013–2015 mit 51 muskuloskeletalen, 145 Cornea- und 38 Herzklappenentnahmen zahlreiche Gewebespenden im süddeutschen Raum.

Fragestellung

Die Ziele dieser Studie waren die Bestimmung des Einflusses des OSS auf die Gewebespende sowie die Auswirkung des ärztlichen Aufklärungsgespräches auf das Entscheidungsverhalten der Angehörigen.

Material und Methoden

Die Protokolle der Aufklärungsgespräche mit den Angehörigen im Zeitraum von Juli 2012 bis Dezember 2015 wurden auf Diskussionen, Erwähnungen sowie Entscheidungsverhalten im Zusammenhang mit dem OSS evaluiert. Zudem erfolgte im Jahresabstand nach der Spende eine retrospektive Evaluation des Aufklärungsgespräches durch die Angehörigen anhand eines Fragenkatalogs mit 9 Items.

Ergebnisse

Bei 388 potenziellen Spendern lag die Zustimmung bei 54,9 %. In 40 Fällen war der OSS Diskussionspunkt und resultierte in 15 Fällen in Ablehnung. Davon wurde in 6 Fällen ein Spendeausweis zuvor vom Verstorbenen aufgrund des OSS vernichtet, wobei in 4 Fällen nach Diskussion mit den Angehörigen eine Zustimmung erreicht wurde. Insgesamt bewerteten 142 Angehörige das Aufklärungsgespräch als positiv und die Spende als sinnstiftend. Die Entscheidungen waren zu 100 % stabil.

Diskussion

Die guten Resultate der Evaluation sowie der dieses Spendeprojekt nur gering beeinflussende OSS beruhen vor allem auf der mit Empathie und Erfahrung durchgeführten Aufklärung. Zum Vertrauensaufbau der Bevölkerung benötigt es ärztlicherseits ein aktives Informationsangebot und lückenlose Transparenz.

[Attitude towards organ and tissue donation in Europe : Prerequisite for osteochondral allograft treatment]

BACKGROUND

The biggest obstacle to overcome for routine treatment of various pathologies with fresh osteochondral allograft is the availability of tissue for transplantation. Large fresh osteochondral allografts are usually harvested from organ donors, but in contrast to organs, tissues can be procured after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE

Medical staff as well the general public are much less aware of the possibilities and requirements of tissue donation compared to organ donation. This review aims to highlight the current situation of organ and tissue donation in Europe and to raise this much needed awareness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this research, PubMed database was scanned using the terms "tissue/organ donation", "bone donation/transplantation", "cartilage transplantation/allografts" and "osteochrondral allografts".

RESULTS

Relatives of potential donors are often not approached because physicians and nurses do not feel sufficiently prepared for this task and, thus, are reluctant to address this topic. Different options could alleviate the pressure medical staff is feeling. Furthermore, there are different factors influencing consent that can be addressed to increase donation rates.

CONCLUSION

Currently, a lot of potential concerning musculoskeletal tissue grafts remains unused. Most importantly, families should be encouraged to speak about their potenzial will to donate and educational programs should be established to increase trust in organ and tissue donation and the allocation system and to increase knowledge about the importance of transplantation medicine. But joined efforts of different parts of the medical systems and different organizations involved in tissue transplantation should improve the situation for patients waiting for much needed transplants.

"Effective" Requesting: A Scoping Review of the Literature on Asking Families to Consent to Organ and Tissue Donation

BACKGROUND

Families are often asked to consent to the donation of their deceased relative's organs or tissues. These end-of-life conversations are important because they affect consent rates as well as the psychological impact of the decision for families. This scoping review of the literature on requesting family consent was prepared to support of the development of leading practice recommendations for end-of-life conversations with families of potential donors. A scoping review maps research activity in a field across a range of commentary and empirical study designs but does not attempt meta-synthesis of empirical data or quality assessment.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to February 2015 on the questions of what constitutes an "effective" request and the factors that affect consent rates and family satisfaction with their decision and the process. This review includes a final set of 168 articles addressing (a) whether, when, and how to ask families for consent to donation or (b) characteristics of families or decedents that affect families' decisions or family satisfaction with their decisions.

RESULTS

Six main themes were identified: (1) the objectives of requesting and encouraging family consent to donation, (2) the effect of the donation decision on family well-being, (3) the process of requesting family consent, (4) the impact of the quality of the care for the deceased and for the family, (5) the content and manner of the request for family consent, and (6) the characteristics of the family and deceased that affect the request for family consent.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review found that there is a large literature on how to modify the process and manner of the request to increase family consent rates. Another important line of inquiry focuses on the psychological impact of the decision on the family. Although a scoping review does not attempt to synthesize results or draw evidence-based conclusions, the literature generally supports the intuitive expectations that compassionate and respectful care for the deceased and family, listening for and addressing family concerns, and an attitude to donation that is positive (but not solely procurement-focused) and is best for both consent rates and family well-being. Although the presumption is often that the primary objective of asking for family consent is to secure consent and donation, some ethical commentary on requesting consent emphasizes that this objective must be balanced with the parallel obligation to protect the psychological well-being of families. This places some constraints on the approaches used in family consent discussions.

Fresh osteochondral allografts-procurement and tissue donation in Europe

Fresh osteochondral allografts are a well-established treatment for large, full-thickness cartilage defects. The clinical outcome for carefully selected patients is very favorable, especially for the young and active and graft survival up to 25 years has been described in the literature. Furthermore, a high patient satisfaction rate has been reported, but the biggest obstacle to overcome is the availability of tissue for transplantation. Large fresh bone allografts for cartilage damage repair only can be harvested from organ donors following organ removal or cadaveric donors, preferably in the setting of an operation room to minimize possible contamination of the tissue. Apart from the logistic challenges this entails, an experienced recovery team is needed. Furthermore, the public as well as medical staff is much less aware of the possibility and requirements of tissue donation than organ donation and families of deceased are rarely approached for bone and cartilage donation. This review aims to highlight the current situation of organ and tissue donation in Europe with special focus on the processing of bones and possible safety and quality concerns. We analyze what may prevent consent and what might be done to improve the situation of tissue donation.