Collection of evidence from the reverse side of self-adhesive stamps: A combined approach to obtain dactyloscopic and DNA evidence

Secondary and tertiary transfer of latent fingermarks using a sticky note - A feasibility study

Latent fingermarks are enhanced in order to be visible and available for comparison to determine source. Once a fingermark has been identified to a source, the activity that led to it being left on a particular surface may need to be determined. It has been previously shown that under certain conditions fingermarks initially deposited onto a surface (the primary transfer) can be transferred on to another substrate through direct contact - secondary transfer. This study investigates the possibility of secondary and subsequent tertiary transfer using sticky notes. To explore secondary transfer, fingermarks were deposited directly onto two different brands of sticky notes, spanning the adhesive and non-adhesive areas, and then placed in direct contact with paper for up to 72 h under a 5 kg weight. For some donors, there was transfer of fingermarks from the sticky note to the paper, with better results for the adhesive areas. The quality of the transferred fingermarks was dependent on initial fingermark quality and the transferred fingermark was a mirror image of the original. The type of paper used as the secondary substrate was also shown to have an effect. Given the adhesive nature of sticky notes tertiary transfer was also investigated and the potential to lift fingermarks from a glass slide and transfer them onto paper or a second glass slide. In the case of transfer to paper, there were only tertiary transferred fingermarks considered to be of useful quality (score 3 or 4) in 6% of samples and a further 33% of samples were detected but provided evidence of contact only (score 1 or 2) (n = 120). For transfer to glass, tertiary transferred samples were of poorer quality with no useful fingermarks and only 3% of samples scoring 1 or 2 (n = 120). The latter was in part due to the deposition of sticky note adhesive traces obscuring the fingermarks. In the case of tertiary transfer, fingermarks on the final tertiary surface were in the correct orientation. This work demonstrates that whilst tertiary transfer of fingermarks is possible under the laboratory conditions used, the likelihood of the effective transfer of a useful and potentially identifiable fingermark is in reality low.

Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA

The combined approach of classical fingerprinting and DNA profiling is a powerful tool in forensic investigations of latent "touch" traces. However, little attention has been paid to the organic solvents frequently used in dactyloscopic laboratories to facilitate the separation of adhesive evidence prior to fingerprint development and downstream effects on subsequent DNA profiling. In the present study, we tested a selection of adhesive removers (n = 9) and assessed their potential impact on DNA recovery and amplification by PCR. Thereby, we identified and characterized novel PCR inhibitors. All investigated chemicals contain volatile organic compounds that evaporate under normal indoor atmospheric conditions. Exposure to certain solvents resulted in increased DNA degradation, but only if evaporation was prevented. A series of adhesive-removal experiments were conducted with prepared mock evidence (self-adhesive postage stamps affixed to paper envelope) to investigate the impact of treatment time and the location of applied traces on DNA recovery and dactyloscopy, respectively. Due to the early onset of print decomposition, we found that only a short treatment time was compatible with the development of fingerprints on the adhesive side of a stamp. Solvents also removed DNA from the adhesive surface, thus resulting in a marked shift in the substrate distribution of recovered DNA from the stamp to the envelope, but not in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we observed that treatment with conventional fingerprint reagents lead to a significant reduction in the amounts of DNA recovered from stamps, while the additional use of adhesive removers did not significantly enhance this effect.

Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022

This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in biological sciences from 2019 to 2022 as a part of the 20th INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. Topics reviewed include rapid DNA testing, using law enforcement DNA databases plus investigative genetic genealogy DNA databases along with privacy/ethical issues, forensic biology and body fluid identification, DNA extraction and typing methods, mixture interpretation involving probabilistic genotyping software (PGS), DNA transfer and activity-level evaluations, next-generation sequencing (NGS), DNA phenotyping, lineage markers (Y-chromosome, mitochondrial DNA, X-chromosome), new markers and approaches (microhaplotypes, proteomics, and microbial DNA), kinship analysis and human identification with disaster victim identification (DVI), and non-human DNA testing including wildlife forensics. Available books and review articles are summarized as well as 70 guidance documents to assist in quality control that were published in the past three years by various groups within the United States and around the world.