Change in the natural head-neck orientation momentarily altered sensorimotor control during sensory transition

Less Vibrotactile Feedback Is Effective to Improve Human Balance Control during Sensory Cues Alteration

For individuals with altered sensory cues, vibrotactile feedback improves their balance control. However, should vibrotactile feedback be provided every time balance control is compromised, or only one-third of the time their balance is compromised? We hypothesized that vibrotactile feedback would improve balance control more when provided every time their balance is compromised. Healthy young adults were randomly assigned to two groups: group 33% feedback (6 males and 6 females) and group 100% feedback (6 males and 6 females). Vibrotactile feedbacks related to the body's sway angle amplitude and direction were provided, while participants stood upright on a foam surface with their eyes closed. Then, we assessed if balance control improvement lasted when the vibrotactile feedback was removed (i.e., post-vibration condition). Finally, we verified whether or not vibrotactile feedback unrelated to the body's sway angle and direction (sham condition) altered balance control. The results revealed no significant group difference in balance control improvement during vibrotactile feedback. Immediately following vibrotactile feedback, both groups reduced their balance control commands; body sway velocity and the ground reaction forces variability decreased. For both groups, unrelated vibrotactile feedback worsened balance control. These results confirmed that participants processed and implemented vibrotactile feedback to control their body sways. Less vibrotactile feedback was effective in improving balance control.

Parkinson's disease versus ageing: different postural responses to soleus muscle vibration

BACKGROUND

Impairments of postural stability occur with increasing age and in neurodegenerative diseases like the Parkinson's disease (PD). While changes in balance have been described in many studies under steady-state conditions, less is known about the dynamic changes in balance following sudden transition to different sensory inputs.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim was to clarify different effects of age and Parkinson's disease on dynamic postural responses immediately after lower leg muscle stimulation offset. Sudden removing of active sensory input represents a transient period in balance control.

METHODS

Postural responses of 13 young, 13 healthy elderly and 13 PD patients to proprioceptive bilateral vibration of soleus muscles during stance were assessed by a force platform and two accelerometers attached on the upper and the lower trunk. The experimental protocol consisted of 2 conditions of soleus muscle vibration with 1) eyes open and 2) eyes closed randomly repeated four times.

RESULTS

During vibration period before stimulus offset, postural responses were similar in elderly and PD patients. Contrary, immediately after vibration offset significantly larger backward amplitude of centre of foot pressure (CoP) displacement and trunk tilts were observed in PD patients compared to healthy peers. In returning to vertical position, peak-to-peak amplitudes, maximal velocity of CoP and trunk tilts significantly increased in PD patients. Without vision, their postural responses were more enhanced. The differences between young and elderly were found in most parameters in transient period after vibration offset and also during vibration.

SIGNIFICANCE

The PD patients showed more unstable transient postural responses to selective sensory stimulation switch off, which may reflect impairment of sensory reweighting in balance control. Understanding how early stages PD patients differ in balance control from neurologically intact peers may help researchers and clinicians to refine their intervention and fall prevention programs.