The influence of sagittal trunk posture on the magnitude and rate of patellofemoral joint stress during stair ascent in asymptomatic females

Sex and body height influences on patellofemoral joint reaction force during stair ascent

BACKGROUND

Females are at greater risk of developing patellofemoral pain (PFP) than males, and an excessive patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) may contribute to this discrepancy. It is unknown if the PFJRF differs between males and females during stair ascent. Additionally, body height may also influence the PFJRF. This study investigated PFJRF differences between males and females and explored relationships between body height and PFJRF during stair ascent.

METHODS

Thirty males (25.6 (2.7) yr) and thirty females (23.7 (2.2) yr) ascended stairs (96 steps/min). Three-dimensional kinematics (200 Hz) and kinetics (2000 Hz) were recorded and used to calculate biomechanical dependent variables.

RESULTS

Females experienced a greater PFJRF magnitude (mean difference (MD) = 3.2 N/kg; 95% CI = 0.5, 5.9; p = 0.022) and rate (MD = 23.8 N/kg/sec; 95% CI = 2.7, 45.1; p = 0.029), quadriceps muscle force (3.1 N/kg; 95% CI = 0.2, 6.0; p = 0.036), and knee flexion angle (MD = 2.3°; 95% CI = 0.3, 4.3; p = 0.026). Females exhibited shorter quadriceps lever arm length (MD = -0.1 cm; 95% CI = -0.2, 0.0; p = 0.024) and body height (MD = -16.9 cm; 95% CI = -20.5, -13.2, p < 0.001) compared to males. Body height was inversely correlated with PFJRF magnitude (r = -0.31; p = 0.017), rate (r = -0.28; p = 0.032), and knee flexion angle (r = -0.54; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Females experienced a greater PFJRF than males. Additionally, the PFJRF and body height were inversely correlated. This observed difference may contribute to the PFP sex discrepancy and be due, at least in part, to body height differences.

Women with patellofemoral pain show changes in trunk and lower limb sagittal movements during single-leg squat and step-down tasks

BACKGROUND

Changes in the trunk and lower limbs' sagittal movements may cause patellofemoral pain (PFP) because they influence the forces acting on this joint.

OBJECTIVES

To compare trunk and lower limb sagittal kinematics between women with and without PFP during functional tests and to verify whether sagittal trunk kinematics are correlated with those of the knees and ankles.

METHODS

A total of 30 women with PFP and 30 asymptomatic women performed single-leg squat (SLS) and step-down (SD) tests and were filmed by a camera in the sagittal plane. The trunk inclination angle, forward knee displacement, and ankle angle were calculated.

RESULTS

The PFP group exhibited less trunk flexion (SLS, p = .006; SD, p = .016) and greater forward knee displacement (SLS, p = .001; SD, p = .004) than the asymptomatic group; there was no significant difference in ankle angle (SLS, p = .074; SD, p = .278). Correlation analysis revealed that decreased trunk flexion was associated with increased forward knee displacement (SLS, r = -0.439, p = .000; SD, r = -0.365, p = .004) and ankle dorsiflexion (SLS, r = -0.339, p = .008; SD, r = -0.356, p = .005).

CONCLUSION

Women with PFP present kinematic alterations of the trunk and knee in the sagittal plane during unipodal activities. Furthermore, the trunk and lower limb sagittal movements were interdependent.

Three-dimensional kinematics of the trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee during the single-leg squat and hip torque in subjects with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis compared to individually matched controls: Preliminary results

Objectives: This study aimed to compare three-dimensional kinematic of the trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee during the single-leg squat and hip torque in individuals with and without isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee kinematics at 30°, 45°, and 60° knee flexion during the single-leg squat using the Vicon motion capture and analysis system, the Nexus System 2.1.1, and 3D Motion Monitor software. Sixteen individuals (8 males, 8 females; mean age: 49.3±6.2 years; range 40 to 61 years) participated in the study, of which eight were PFOA patients and eight were healthy controls. Isometric hip abductor, extensor, and external rotator torques were evaluated using a handheld dynamometer. Results: The PFOA group exhibited greater hip adduction at 30° (p=0.008), 45° (p=0.005), and 60° (p=0.008) knee flexion in the descending phase of the single-leg squat, as well as at 60° (p=0.009) and 45° (p=0.03) knee flexion in the ascending phase. No significant differences were found between groups for other kinematic variables (p>0.05). The PFOA group exhibited lower isometric hip abductor (p=0.02), extensor (p <0.001), and external rotator (p=0.007) torques. Conclusion: Individuals with PFOA exhibited excessive hip adduction that could increase stress on the lateral patellofemoral joint at 30°, 45°, and 60° knee flexion during the single-leg squat and exhibited weakness of the hip abductors, extensors, and external rotators in comparison to healthy controls.

Activation, strength, and resistance: Which variables predict the kinematics of women with and without patellofemoral pain?

INTRODUCTION

Investigating the possible relationship between neuromuscular changes and movement alterations could help to describe the mechanisms underlying patellofemoral pain (PFP).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether activation and muscle strength of the trunk and lower limb and muscle resistance of the trunk predict the knee frontal and trunk sagittal kinematics in women with and without PFP.

METHOD

Sixty women (PFP, n = 30; asymptomatic, n = 30) underwent the single-leg squat test to collect electromyographic and kinematic data. Activation of transversus abdominis/internal oblique, gluteus medius (GMed), and vastus medialis oblique (VMO); knee frontal and trunk sagittal angles were analyzed. Participants also underwent maximal isometric tests to determine lateral trunk, hip abductor, and knee extensor torques and performed a lateral trunk resistance test. Multiple regression was used to determine predictive models.

RESULTS

In the PFP group, knee frontal angle (R2 = 0.39, p = 0.001) was predicted by GMed activation (β = 0.23, p = 0.000) and hip abductor torque (β = 0.08, p = 0.022). No variable was able to predict trunk sagittal kinematics in this group. In the asymptomatics, knee frontal angle (R2 = 0.16, p = 0.029) was predicted by hip abductor torque (β = 0.07, p = 0.029), while trunk sagittal angle (R2 = 0.24, p = 0.024) was predicted by VMO activation (β = 0.12, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Kinematics is predicted by the muscles acting in the respective planes, such that hip abductors capacities are related to the knee frontal alignment in both groups, and that of the VMO is related to the trunk sagittal alignment only in asymptomatic women.

The non-invasive evaluation technique of patellofemoral joint stress: a systematic literature review

Introduction: Patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS) is an important parameter for understanding the mechanism of patellofemoral joint pain, preventing patellofemoral joint injury, and evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of PFP rehabilitation programs. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and categorize the non-invasive technique to evaluate the PFJS. Methods: Literature searches were conducted from January 2000 to October 2022 in electronic databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO (Medline, SPORTDiscus). This review includes studies that evaluated the patellofemoral joint reaction force (PJRF) or PFJS, with participants including both healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral joint pain, as well as cadavers with no organic changes. The study design includes cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials. The JBI quality appraisal criteria tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Results: In total, 5016 articles were identified in the database research and the citation network, and 69 studies were included in the review. Discussion: Researchers are still working to improve the accuracy of evaluation for PFJS by using a personalized model and optimizing quadriceps muscle strength calculations. In theory, the evaluation method of combining advanced computational and biplane fluoroscopy techniques has high accuracy in evaluating PFJS. The method should be further developed to establish the "gold standard" for PFJS evaluation. In practical applications, selecting appropriate methods and approaches based on theoretical considerations and ecological validity is essential.

The Effects of Increasing Trunk Flexion During Stair Ascent on the Rate and Magnitude of Achilles Tendon Force in Asymptomatic Females

Research indicates that increasing trunk flexion may optimize patellofemoral joint loading. However, this postural change could cause an excessive Achilles tendon force (ATF) and injury risk during movement. This study aimed to examine the effects of increasing trunk flexion during stair ascent on ATF, ankle biomechanics, and vertical ground reaction force in females. Twenty asymptomatic females (age: 23.4 [2.5] y; height: 1.6 [0.8] m; mass: 63.0 [12.2] kg) ascended stairs using their self-selected and flexed trunk postures. Compared with the self-selected trunk condition, decreases were observed for peak ATF (mean differences [MD] = 0.14 N/kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.23; Cohen d = -1.2; P = .003), average rate of ATF development (MD = 0.25 N/kg/s; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.43; Cohen d = -0.9; P = .010), ankle plantar flexion moment (MD = 0.08 N·m/kg; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.13; Cohen d = -1.1; P = .005), and vertical ground reaction force (MD = 38.6 N/kg; 95% CI, 20.3 to 56.90; Cohen d = -1.8; P < .001). Increasing trunk flexion did not increase ATF. Instead, this postural change was associated with a decreased ATF rate and magnitude and may benefit individuals with painful Achilles tendinopathy.

The effects of increased forward trunk lean during stair ascent on hip adduction and internal rotation in asymptomatic females

BACKGROUND

Increased hip adduction and internal rotation can lead to excessive patellofemoral joint stress and contribute to patellofemoral pain development. The gluteus maximus acts as a hip extensor, abductor, and external rotator. Improving hip extensor use by increasing one's forward trunk lean in the sagittal plane may improve frontal and transverse plane hip kinematics during stair ascent.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does increasing forward trunk lean during stair ascent affect peak hip adduction and internal rotation?

METHODS

Twenty asymptomatic females performed five stair ascent trials (96 steps/min) on an instrumented stair using their self-selected and forward trunk lean postures. Three-dimensional kinematics (200 Hz) and kinetics (2000 Hz) were recorded during the stance phase of stair ascent. Biomechanical dependent variables were calculated during the stance phase of stair ascent and included peak forward trunk lean, hip flexion, hip adduction, hip internal rotation angles, and the average hip extensor moment.

RESULTS

During the forward trunk lean condition, decreases were observed for peak hip adduction (MD = 2.8˚; 95% CI = 1.9, 3.8; p < 0.001) and peak hip internal rotation (MD = 1.1˚; 95% CI = 0.1, 2.2; p = 0.04). In contrast, increases were observed during the forward trunk lean condition for the peak forward trunk lean angle (MD = -34.7˚; 95% CI = -39.1, -30.3; p < 0.001), average hip extensor moment (MD = -0.5 N·m/kg; 95% CI = -0.5, -0.4; p < 0.001), and stance time duration (MD = -0.02 s; 95% CI = -0.04, 0.00; p = 0.017).

SIGNIFICANCE

Increasing forward trunk lean and hip extensor use during stair ascent decreased peak hip adduction and internal rotation in asymptomatic females. Future studies should examine the effects of increasing forward trunk lean on hip kinematics, self-reported pain, and function in individuals with patellofemoral pain.

May the force be with you: understanding how patellofemoral joint reaction force compares across different activities and physical interventions-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and synthesise patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) in healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (OA), during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises and with physical interventions (eg, foot orthotics, footwear, taping, bracing).

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SportDiscus and Cochrane Library databases were searched.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational and interventional studies reporting PFJRF during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises, and physical interventions.

RESULTS

In healthy individuals, the weighted average of mean (±SD) peak PFJRF for everyday activities were: walking 0.9±0.4 body weight (BW), stair ascent 3.2±0.7 BW, stair descent 2.8±0.5 BW and running 5.2±1.2 BW. In those with patellofemoral pain, peak PFJRF were: walking 0.8±0.2 BW, stair ascent 2.5±0.5 BW, stair descent 2.6±0.5 BW, running 4.1±0.9 BW. Only single studies reported peak PFJRF during everyday activities in individuals with patellofemoral OA/articular cartilage defects (walking 1.3±0.5 BW, stair ascent 1.6±0.4 BW, stair descent 1.0±0.5 BW). The PFJRF was reported for many different exercises and physical interventions; however, considerable variability precluded any pooled estimates.

SUMMARY

Everyday activities and exercises involving larger knee flexion (eg, squatting) expose the patellofemoral joint to higher PFJRF than those involving smaller knee flexion (eg, walking). There were no discernable differences in peak PFJRF during everyday activities between healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain/OA. The information on PFJRF may be used to select appropriate variations of exercises and physical interventions.

Optimizing Rehabilitation and Return to Sport in Athletes With Anterior Knee Pain Using a Biomechanical Perspective

Anterior knee pain represents one of the most common athletic knee conditions and arguably also one of the most complex. The patellofemoral joint is at the center of several forces, and alterations in any of these force vectors due to muscular imbalance, soft-tissue tightness or laxity, and altered functional movement patterns can all combine to create a painful anterior knee. While typically anterior knee pain is not a surgical entity, the orthopaedic surgeon with an understanding of these biomechanical intricacies is best positioned to provide comprehensive evidence-based care for the patient with anterior knee pain.

Level of Evidence

V, expert opinion.

Biomechanics Differ for Individuals With Similar Self-Reported Characteristics of Patellofemoral Pain During a High-Demand Multiplanar Movement Task

CONTEXT

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is often categorized by researchers and clinicians using subjective self-reported PFP characteristics; however, this practice might mask important differences in movement biomechanics between PFP patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether biomechanical differences exist during a high-demand multiplanar movement task for PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics but different quadriceps activation levels.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design.

SETTING

Biomechanics laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 15 quadriceps deficient and 15 quadriceps functional (QF) PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics.

INTERVENTION

In total, 5 trials of a high-demand multiplanar land, cut, and jump movement task were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biomechanics were compared at each percentile of the ground contact phase of the movement task (α = .05) between the quadriceps deficient and QF groups. Biomechanical variables included (1) whole-body center of mass, trunk, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics; (2) hip, knee, and ankle kinetics; and (3) ground reaction forces.

RESULTS

The QF patients exhibited increased ground reaction force, joint torque, and movement, relative to the quadriceps deficient patients. The QF patients exhibited: (1) up to 90, 60, and 35 N more vertical, posterior, and medial ground reaction force at various times of the ground contact phase; (2) up to 4° more knee flexion during ground contact and up to 4° more plantarflexion and hip extension during the latter parts of ground contact; and (3) up to 26, 21, and 48 N·m more plantarflexion, knee extension, and hip extension torque, respectively, at various times of ground contact.

CONCLUSIONS

PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics exhibit different movement biomechanics, and these differences depend upon quadriceps activation levels. These differences are important because movement biomechanics affect injury risk and athletic performance. In addition, these biomechanical differences indicate that different therapeutic interventions may be needed for PFP patients with similar self-reported PFP characteristics.

Influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation

BACKGROUND

Although it is assumed that the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) may result in compensatory behaviors that can alter trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics, the influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation has not been established.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the exacerbation of PFP symptoms lead to altered trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation?

METHODS

Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were obtained from 45 women with PFP during stair descent and ascent. Data were obtained before and after a pain exacerbation protocol. The variables of interest were peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion; peak hip, and knee extensor, and ankle plantarflexor moments. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables of interest before and after pain exacerbation.

RESULTS

Following pain exacerbation, there was a decrease in peak knee extensor moment during stair descent (Effect size = -0.68; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = -0.56; p = 0.02); as well as in peak ankle dorsiflexion during stair descent (Effect size = -0.33; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = -0.30; p = 0.01). An increase in ankle plantarflexor moment during stair descent (Effect size = 0.79; p < 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = 0.89; p < 0.01) was also observed. No significant differences were observed for peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment (p > 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings show compensatory strategies used by people with PFP in response to symptoms exacerbation that may have a negative impact on knee and ankle mechanics. Our findings also suggest that people with PFP do not seem to change their trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment during stair negotiation in response to symptom exacerbation.