Reliable interpretation of scapular kinematics depends on coordinate system definition

Evaluation of Glenohumeral Joint Kinematics Following the Latarjet and Eden-Hybinette Procedures a Dynamic Radiostereometric Cadaver Study

Anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone lesion can be treated with the Eden-Hybinette procedure utilizing a tricortical iliac crest bone graft or the Latarjet procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics throughout an external shoulder rotation following the Eden-Hybinette and Latarjet procedures. Nine human specimens were examined with dynamic radiostereometry during a GHJ external rotation with anteriorly directed loads from 0 to 30 N. In 30- and 60-degree GHJ abduction, the kinematics (measured as the humeral head center and contact point) was sequentially recorded for a 15% anterior glenoid bone lesion, the Eden-Hybinette, and the Latarjet procedure. The Latarjet and Eden-Hybinette procedures resulted in up to 9.7 mm (95%CI 0.5; 18.8) more posterior and a 7.4 mm (95%CI 0.3; 14.4) superior humeral head center location compared to the glenoid bone lesion. With 0-20 N anterior directed loads, the Latarjet procedure resulted in a more posterior humeral head center and contact point of up to 7.6 mm (95%CI 3.6; 11.5), especially in 60 degrees of GHJ abduction, compared to the Eden-Hybinette procedure. Opposite, at 30 N anterior-directed load, the Eden-Hybinette procedure resulted in a more posterior humeral head center of up to 7.6 mm (95%CI 0.3; 14.9) in 30 degrees GHJ abduction compared to the Latarjet procedure. The results support considering the Latarjet procedures in patients who need the stabilizing effect with the arm in the abducted and externally rotated position (e.g., throwers) and the Eden-Hybinette procedure in patients exposed to high anterior-directed loads with the arm at lower abduction angles (e.g., epilepsia).

A reproducible representation of healthy tibiofemoral kinematics during stair descent using REFRAME - part I: REFRAME foundations and validation

In clinical movement biomechanics, kinematic measurements are collected to characterise the motion of articulating joints and investigate how different factors influence movement patterns. Representative time-series signals are calculated to encapsulate (complex and multidimensional) kinematic datasets succinctly. Exacerbated by numerous difficulties to consistently define joint coordinate frames, the influence of local frame orientation and position on the characteristics of the resultant kinematic signals has been previously proven to be a major limitation. Consequently, for consistent interpretation of joint motion (especially direct comparison) to be possible, differences in local frame position and orientation must first be addressed. Here, building on previous work that introduced a frame orientation optimisation method and demonstrated its potential to induce convergence towards a consistent kinematic signal, we present the REference FRame Alignment MEthod (REFRAME) that addresses both rotational and translational kinematics, is validated here for a healthy tibiofemoral joint, and allows flexible selection of optimisation criteria to fittingly address specific research questions. While not claiming to improve the accuracy of joint kinematics or reference frame axes, REFRAME does enable a representation of knee kinematic signals that accounts for differences in local frames (regardless of how these differences were introduced, e.g. anatomical heterogeneity, use of different data capture modalities or joint axis approaches, intra- and inter-rater reliability, etc.), as evidenced by peak root-mean-square errors of 0.24° ± 0.17° and 0.03 mm ± 0.01 mm after its implementation. By using a self-contained optimisation approach to systematically re-align the position and orientation of reference frames, REFRAME allows researchers to better assess whether two kinematic signals represent fundamentally similar or different underlying knee motion. The openly available implementation of REFRAME could therefore allow the consistent interpretation and comparison of knee kinematic signals across trials, subjects, examiners, or even research institutes.

The Effect of Scapular Orientation on Measures of Rotator Cuff Tendon Impingement: A Simulation Study

Mechanical impingement of the rotator cuff tendons against the acromion (subacromial) and glenoid (internal) during shoulder motions has long been thought to contribute to tears. Clinically, the risk for impingement is thought to be influenced by scapular movement impairments. Therefore, our purpose was to determine the extent to which simulated changes in scapular orientation impact the proximity between the rotator cuff tendon footprint and the acromion and glenoid during scapular plane abduction. Specifically, shoulder kinematics were tracked in 25 participants using a high-speed biplane videoradiography system. Scapular movement impairments were simulated by rotating each participant's scapula from their in vivo orientation about the scapular axes (±2°, ±5°, and ±10°). Subacromial and internal proximities were described using minimum distances, proximity center locations, and prevalence of contact. Statistical parametric mapping was used to investigate the extent to which these measures were impacted by simulated changes in scapular orientation. Simulated changes in scapular orientation significantly altered proximity patterns in a complex manner that depended on the impingement mechanism, humerothoracic elevation angle, and magnitude of the simulated change. Clinicians should be mindful of these factors when interpreting the potential effects during a clinical examination.

Glenohumeral joint kinematics during apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss

Aims

This study aimed to quantify the shoulder kinematics during an apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability (ASI) and glenoid bone loss using the radiostereometric analysis (RSA) method. Kinematics were compared with the patient's contralateral healthy shoulder.

Methods

A total of 20 patients with ASI and > 10% glenoid bone loss and a healthy contralateral shoulder were included. RSA imaging of the patient's shoulders was performed during a repeated apprehension-relocation test. Bone volume models were generated from CT scans, marked with anatomical coordinate systems, and aligned with the digitally reconstructed bone projections on the RSA images. The glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics were evaluated in the anteroposterior and superoinferior direction of: the humeral head centre location relative to the glenoid centre; and the humeral head contact point location on the glenoid.

Results

During the apprehension test, the centre of the humeral head was 1.0 mm (95% CI 0.0 to 2.0) more inferior on the glenoid for the ASI shoulder compared with the healthy shoulder. Furthermore, the contact point of the ASI shoulder was 1.4 mm (95% CI 0.3 to 2.5) more anterior and 2.0 mm (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1) more inferior on the glenoid compared with the healthy shoulder. The contact point of the ASI shoulder was 1.2 mm (95% CI 0.2 to 2.6) more anterior during the apprehension test compared to the relocation test.

Conclusion

The humeral head centre was located more inferior, and the GHJ contact point was located both more anterior and inferior during the apprehension test for the ASI shoulders than the healthy shoulders. Furthermore, the contact point displacement between the apprehension and relocation test revealed increased joint laxity for the ASI shoulder than the healthy shoulders. These results contribute to existing knowledge that ASI shoulders with glenoid bone loss may also suffer from inferior shoulder instability.

Glenoid Concavity Affects Anterior Shoulder Stability in an Active-Assisted Biomechanical Model

Background

The treatment of bony glenoid defects after anteroinferior shoulder dislocation currently depends on the amount of glenoid bone loss (GBL). Recent studies have described the glenoid concavity as an essential factor for glenohumeral stability. The role of glenoid concavity in the presence of soft tissue and muscle forces is still unknown.

Hypothesis

Glenoid concavity would have a major impact on glenohumeral stability in an active-assisted biomechanical model including soft tissue and the rotator cuff's compression forces.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

In 8 human shoulder specimens, individual coordinate systems were calculated based on anatomic landmarks. The glenoid concavity was measured biomechanically and based on computed tomography. Static load was applied to the rotator cuff tendons and the deltoid muscle. In a robotic test setup, anteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head until translation of 5 mm (Nant) was achieved. Nant was used as a parameter indicating shoulder stability. This was performed in the following testing stages: (1) intact joint, (2) labral lesion, (3) 10% GBL, and (4) 20% GBL. The 8 specimens were divided equally into 2 subgroups (low concavity [LC] versus high concavity [HC]), with 4 specimens each, according to the previously measured concavity.

Results

Anterior glenohumeral stability was highly correlated with the native glenoid concavity (R 2 = 0.8). In the testing stages 1 to 3, we found a significantly higher mean stability in the HC subgroup compared with the LC subgroup (P≤ .0142). The HC subgroup still showed higher absolute Nant values with 20% GBL; however, there was no significant difference from the LC subgroup. The loss of stability in 20% GBL was correlated with the initial concavity (R 2 = 0.86). Thus, a higher loss of Nant in the HC subgroup was observed (P = .0049).

Conclusion

In an active-assisted model with intact soft tissue surrounding and muscular compression forces, the glenoid concavity correlates with shoulder stability. In bony defects, loss of concavity is an essential factor causing instability. Due to their significantly higher native stability, glenoids with HC can tolerate a higher amount of GBL.

Clinical Relevance

Glenoid concavity should be considered in an individualized treatment of bony glenoid defects. Further studies are required to establish reference values and develop therapeutic algorithms.

Evaluation of a method to quantify posture and scapula position using biplanar radiography

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have stated the relevance of having new parameters to quantify the position and orientation of the scapula with patients standing upright. Although biplanar radiography can provide 3D reconstructions of the scapula and the spine, it is not yet possible to acquire these images with patients in the same position.

METHODS

Two pairs of images were acquired, one for the 3D reconstruction of the spine and ribcage and one for the 3D reconstruction of the scapula. Following 3D reconstructions, scapular alignment was performed in two stages, a coarse alignment based on manual annotations of landmarks on the clavicle and pelvis, and an adjusted alignment. Clinical parameters were computed: protraction, internal rotation, tilt and upward rotation. Reproducibility was assessed on an in vivo dataset of upright biplanar radiographs. Accuracy was assessed using supine cadaveric CT-scans and digitally reconstructed radiographs.

FINDINGS

The mean error was less than 2° for all clinical parameters, and the 95 % confidence interval for reproducibility ranged from 2.5° to 5.3°.

INTERPRETATION

The confidence intervals were lower than the variability measured between participants for the clinical parameters assessed, which indicates that this method has the potential to detect different patterns in pathological populations.

3D reconstruction of the scapula from biplanar X-rays for pose estimation and morphological analysis

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific scapular shape in functional posture can be highly relevant to clinical research. Biplanar radiography is a relevant modality for that purpose with already two existing assessment methods. However, they are either time-consuming or lack accuracy. The aim of this study was to propose a new, more user-friendly and accurate method to determine scapular shape.

METHODS

The proposed method relied on simplified manual inputs and an upgraded version of the first 3D estimate based on statistical inferences and Moving-Least Square (MLS) deformation of a template. Then, manual adjustments, with real-time MLS algorithm and contour matching adjustments with an adapted minimal path method, were added to improve the match between the projected 3D model and the radiographic contours. The accuracy and reproducibility of the method were assessed (with 6 and 12 subjects, respectively).

FINDINGS

The shape accuracy was in average under 2 mm (1.3 mm in the glenoid region). The reproducibility study on the clinical parameters found intra-observer 95% confidence intervals under 3 mm or 3° for all parameters, except for glenoid inclination and Critical Shoulder Angle, ranging between 3° and 6°.

INTERPRETATION

This method is a first step towards an accurate reconstruction of the scapula to assess clinical parameters in a functional posture. This can already be used in clinical research on non-pathologic bones to investigate the scapulothoracic joint in functional position.

Practical considerations for determination of scapular internal rotation and its relevance in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty planning

BACKGROUND

Scapulothoracic orientation, especially scapular internal rotation (SIR) may influence range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and is subjected to body posture. Clinical measurements of SIR rely on apical bony landmarks, which depend on changes in scapulothoracic orientation, while radiographic measurements are often limited by the restricted field of view (FOV) in CT scans. Therefore, the goal of this study was (1) to determine whether the use of CT scans with a limited FOV to measure SIR is reliable and (2) if a clinical measurement could be a valuable alternative.

METHODS

This anatomical study analyzed the whole-body CT scans of 100 shoulders in 50 patients (32 male and 18 female) with a mean age of 61.2 ± 20.1 years (range 18; 91). (1) CT scans were rendered into 3D models and SIR was determined as previously described. Results were compared to measurements taken in 2D CT scans with a limited FOV. (2) Three apical bony landmarks were defined: (the angulus acromii (AA), the midpoint between the AA and the coracoid process tip (C) and the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. The scapular axis was determined connecting the trigonum scapulae with these landmarks and referenced to the glenoid center. The measurements were repeated with 0°, 10°, 20°, 30° and 40° anterior scapular tilt.

RESULTS

Mean SIR was 44.8° ± 5.9° and 45.6° ± 6.6° in the 3D and 2D model, respectively (p < 0.371). Mean difference between the measurements was 0.8° ± 2.5° with a maximum of 10.5°. Midpoint AA/C showed no significant difference to the scapular axis at 0° (p = 0.203) as did the AC-joint at 10° anterior scapular tilt (p = 0.949). All other points showed a significant difference from the scapular axis at all degrees of tilt.

CONCLUSION

2D CT scans are reliable to determine SIR, even if the spine is not depicted. Clinical measurements using apical superficial scapula landmarks are a possible alternative; however, anterior tilt influenced by posture alters measured SIR.

High and low performers in internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biplane fluoroscopic study

BACKGROUND

Internal rotation in adduction is often limited after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the origins of this functional deficit are unclear. Few studies have directly compared individuals who can and cannot perform internal rotation in adduction. Little data on underlying 3D humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral joint relationships in these patients are available.

METHODS

Individuals >1-year postoperative to rTSA were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy in resting neutral and internal rotation in adduction poses. Subjects could either perform internal rotation in adduction with their hand at T12 or higher (high, N = 7), or below the hip pocket (low, N = 8). Demographics, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and scapular notching grade were recorded. Joint orientation angles were derived from model-based markerless tracking of the scapula and humerus relative to the torso. The 3D implant models were aligned to preoperative computed tomography models to evaluate bone-implant impingement.

RESULTS

The Simple Shoulder Test was highest in the high group (11 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 2, P = .019). Two subjects per group had scapular notching (grades 1 and 2), and 3 high group and 4 low group subjects had impingement below the glenoid. In the neutral pose, the scapula had 7° more upward rotation in the high group (P = .100), and the low group demonstrated 9° more posterior tilt (P = .017) and 14° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .047). In the internal rotation pose, axial rotation was >45° higher in the high group (P ≤ .008) and the low group again had 11° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .058). Large rotational differences within subject groups arose from a combination of differences in the resting neutral and maximum internal rotation in adduction poses, not only the terminal arm position.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals who were able to perform high internal rotation in adduction after rTSA demonstrated differences in joint orientation and anatomic biases versus patients with low internal rotation. The high rotation group had 7° more resting scapular upward rotation and used a 15°-30° change in scapular tilt to perform internal rotation in adduction versus patients in the low group. The combination of altered resting scapular posture and restricted scapulothoracic range of motion could prohibit glenohumeral rotation required to reach internal rotation in adduction. In addition, inter-patient variation in humeral torsion may contribute substantially to postoperative internal rotation differences. These data point toward modifiable implant design and placement factors, as well as foci for physical therapy to strengthen and mobilize the scapula and glenohumeral joint in response to rTSA surgery.

Correspondence between scapular anatomical coordinate systems and the 3D axis of motion: A new perspective on an old challenge

Several scapular anatomical coordinate systems have been reported in the literature to describe shoulder kinematics. Unfortunately, the use of different conventions hinders comparison across studies. Further, inconsistencies between a coordinate system and the scapula's 3D axis of motion means that scapular motion will be incorrectly attributed to axes about which it did not rotate. The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine the extent to which the axes of four common scapular coordinate system conventions correspond to the 3D axis of scapular motion (i.e., instantaneous helical axis, IHA), and 2) report the prevalence of scapulothoracic gimbal lock for each convention. Shoulder kinematics were tracked during scapular plane abduction in 45 participants using biplane videoradiography. Scapulothoracic kinematics were described using the original convention proposed by van der Helm, the convention recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), a glenoid-based coordinate system, and a glenoid-oriented coordinate system. The 3D angle was calculated between the IHA and each axis of the four conventions (IHA-axis angular deviations). A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare IHA-axis angular deviations between conventions. The glenoid-oriented and ISB conventions resulted in the smallest and largest IHA-axis angular deviations, respectively (21.7°±3.6° vs. 30.5°±5.2°, p < 0.01). Gimbal lock was approached in 17.8% of participants when using the original convention, 2.2% when using the ISB convention, and 0% when using the glenoid-based or -oriented conventions. These findings suggest the glenoid-oriented coordinate system may be worthy of further consideration when investigating shoulder kinematics during scapular plane abduction.

Does the osteoarthritic shoulder have altered rotator cuff vectors with increasing glenoid deformity? An in silico analysis

BACKGROUND

A transverse force couple (TFC) functional imbalance has been demonstrated in osteoarthritic shoulders by recent 3-dimensional (3D) muscle volumetric studies. Altered rotator cuff vectors may be an additional factor contributing to a muscle imbalance and the propagation of glenoid deformity.

METHODS

Computed tomography images of 33 Walch type A and 60 Walch type B shoulders were evaluated. The 3D volumes of the entire subscapularis, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus-teres minor (ISP-Tm) and scapula were manually segmented. The volume masks and scapular landmarks were imported into MATLAB to create a coordinate system, enabling calculation of muscle force vectors. The direction of each muscle force vector was described in the transverse and vertical plane, calculated with respect to the glenoid. Each muscle vector was then resolved into compression and shear force across the glenoid face. The relationship between muscle force vectors, glenoid retroversion or inclination, compression/shear forces on the glenoid, and Walch type was determined using linear regression.

RESULTS

In the transverse plane with all rotator cuff muscles combined, increasing retroversion was significantly associated with increasing posterior drag (P < .001). Type B glenoids had significantly more posterior drag than type A (P < .001). In the vertical plane for each individual muscle group and in combination, superior drag increases as superior inclination increases (P < .001). Analysis of individual muscle groups showed that the anterior thrust of ISP-Tm and supraspinatus switched to a posterior drag at 8° and 10° of retroversion respectively. The compression force on the glenoid face by ISP-Tm and supraspinatus did not change with increasing retroversion for type A shoulders (P = .592 and P = .715, respectively), but they did for type B shoulders (P < .001 for both). The glenoid shear force ratio in the transverse plane for the ISP-Tm and supraspinatus moved from anterior to posterior shear with increasing glenoid retroversion, crossing zero at 8° and 10° of retroversion, whereas the subscapularis exerted a posterior shear force for every retroversion angle.

CONCLUSION

Increased glenoid retroversion is associated with increased posterior shear and decreased compression forces on the glenoid face, explaining some of the pathognomonic bone morphometrics that characterize the osteoarthritic shoulder. Although the subscapularis always maintains a posterior thrust, the ISP-Tm and supraspinatus together showed an inflection at 8° and 10° of retroversion, changing from an anterior thrust to a posterior drag. This finding highlights the importance that in anatomic TSA the rotator cuff functional balance might be better restored by correcting glenoid retroversion to less than 8°.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Alters Humerothoracic, Scapulothoracic, and Glenohumeral Motion During Weighted Scaption

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) typically restores active arm elevation. Prior studies in patients with rTSA during tasks that load the arm had limitations that obscured underlying three-dimensional (3D) kinematic changes and the origins of motion restrictions. Understanding the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to loaded arm elevation will uncover where functional deficits arise and inform strategies to improve rTSA outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a cohort of patients who had undergone rTSA and a control cohort, we asked: (1) Is there a difference in maximum humerothoracic elevation when scapular plane elevation (scaption) is performed with and without a handheld weight? (2) Is maximum humerothoracic elevation related to factors like demographics, patient-reported outcome scores, isometric strength, and scapular notching (in the rTSA group only)? (3) Are there differences in underlying 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion during scaption with and without a handheld weight?

METHODS

Ten participants who underwent rTSA (six males, four females; age 73 ± 8 years) were recruited at follow-up visits if they were more than 1 year postoperative (24 ± 11 months), had a BMI less than 35 kg/m 2 (29 ± 4 kg/m 2 ), had a preoperative CT scan, and could perform pain-free scaption. Data from 10 participants with a nonpathologic shoulder, collected previously (five males, five females; age 58 ± 7 years; BMI 26 ± 3 kg/m 2 ), were a control group with the same high-resolution quantitative metrics available for comparison. Participants in both groups performed scaption with and without a 2.2-kg handheld weight while being imaged with biplane fluoroscopy. Maximum humerothoracic elevation and 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics across their achievable ROM were collected via dynamic imaging. In the same session the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and isometric strength were collected. Data were compared between weighted and unweighted scaption using paired t-tests and linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

When compared with unweighted scaption, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption for patients who underwent rTSA (-25° ± 30°; p = 0.03) but not for the control group (-2° ± 5°; p = 0.35). In the rTSA group, maximum elevation correlated with the ASES score (r = 0.72; p = 0.02), and weighted scaption correlated with BMI (r = 0.72; p = 0.02) and the SST (r = 0.76; p = 0.01). Scapular notching was observed in three patients after rTSA (Grades 1 and 2). Four of 10 patients who underwent rTSA performed weighted scaption to less than 90° humerothoracic elevation using almost exclusively scapulothoracic motion, with little glenohumeral contribution. This manifested as changes in the estimated coefficient representing mean differences in slopes in the humerothoracic plane of elevation (-12° ± 2°; p < 0.001) and true axial rotation (-16° ± 2°; p < 0.001), scapulothoracic upward rotation (7° ± 1°; p < 0.001), and glenohumeral elevation (-12° ± 1°; p < 0.001), plane of elevation (-8° ± 3°; p = 0.002), and true axial rotation (-11° ± 2°; p < 0.001). The control group demonstrated small differences between scaption activities (< |2°|), but a 10° increase in humerothoracic and glenohumeral axial rotation (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After rTSA surgery, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption by up to 88° compared with unweighted scaption, whereas 4 of 10 patients could not achieve more than 90° of elevation. These patients exhibited appreciable changes in nearly all scapulothoracic and glenohumeral degrees of freedom, most notably a near absence of glenohumeral elevation during weighted scaption. Patients with rTSA have unique strategies to elevate their arms, often with decreased glenohumeral motion and resultant compensation in scapulothoracic motion. In contrast, the control group showed few differences when lifting a handheld weight.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Functional deficiency in activities that load the shoulder after rTSA surgery can affect patient independence, and they may be prevalent but not captured in clinical studies. Pre- or postoperative rehabilitation to strengthen scapular stabilizers and the deltoid should be evaluated against postoperative shoulder function. Further study is required to determine the etiology of deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA, and the most effective surgical and/or rehabilitative strategies to restore deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA.

In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics

In vitro simulation of three-dimensional (3D) shoulder motion using in vivo kinematics obtained from human subjects allows investigation of clinical conditions in the context of physiologically relevant biomechanics. Herein, we present a framework for laboratory simulation of subject-specific kinematics that combines individual 3D scapular and humeral control in cadavers. The objectives were to: (1) robotically simulate seven healthy subject-specific 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematic trajectories in six cadavers, (2) characterize system performance using kinematic orientation accuracy and repeatability, and muscle force repeatability metrics, and (3) analyze effects of input kinematics and cadaver specimen variability. Using an industrial robot to orient the scapula range of motion (ROM), errors with repeatability of ±0.1 mm and <0.5 deg were achieved. Using a custom robot and a trajectory prediction algorithm to orient the humerus relative to the scapula, orientation accuracy for glenohumeral elevation, plane of elevation, and axial rotation of <3 deg mean absolute error (MAE) was achieved. Kinematic accuracy was not affected by varying input kinematics or cadaver specimens. Muscle forces over five repeated setups showed variability typically <33% relative to the overall simulations. Varying cadaver specimens and subject-specific human motions showed effects on muscle forces, illustrating that the system was capable of differentiating changes in forces due to input conditions. The anterior and middle deltoid, specifically, showed notable variations in patterns across the ROM that were affected by subject-specific motion. This machine provides a platform for future laboratory studies to investigate shoulder biomechanics and consider the impacts of variable input kinematics from populations of interest, as they can significantly impact study outputs and resultant conclusions.

Kinematic coupling of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints generates humeral axial rotation

Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion combine to generate humerothoracic motion, but their discrete contributions towards humerothoracic axial rotation have not been investigated. Understanding their contributions to axial rotation is important to judge the effects of pathology, surgical intervention, and physiotherapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the kinematic coupling between glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion and determine their relative contributions towards axial rotation. Twenty healthy subjects (10 M/10F, ages 22-66) were previously recorded using biplane fluoroscopy while performing arm elevation in the coronal, scapular, and sagittal planes, and external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic contributions towards axial rotation were computed by integrating the projection of glenohumeral and scapulothoracic angular velocity onto the humeral longitudinal axis, and analyzed using one dimensional statistical parametric mapping and linear regression. During arm elevation, scapulothoracic motion supplied 13-20° (76-94%) of axial rotation, mainly via scapulothoracic upward rotation. The contribution of scapulothoracic motion towards axial rotation was strongly correlated with glenohumeral plane of elevation during arm elevation. During external rotation, scapulothoracic motion contributed 10° (8%) towards axial rotation in 0° of abduction and 15° (15%) in 90° of abduction. The contribution of scapulothoracic motion towards humerothoracic axial rotation could explain the simultaneous changes in glenohumeral plane of elevation and axial rotation associated with some pathologies and surgeries. Understanding how humerothoracic motion results from the functional coupling of scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motions may inform diagnostic and treatment strategies by targeting the source of movement impairments in clinical populations.

Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system

BACKGROUND

Clinical imaging often excludes the distal humerus, confounding definition of common whole-bone coordinate systems. While proximal anatomy coordinate systems exist, no simple method transforms them to whole-bone systems. Their influence on humeral kinematics is unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How do humeral kinematics vary based on proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems, and can average rotation matrices accurately convert kinematics between them?

METHODS

Three proximal coordinate systems were defined by the lesser and greater tuberosities (LT, GT), Crest of the greater tuberosity, and humeral shaft. Average rotation matrices derived from anatomic landmarks on cadaver humeri were generated between the proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems. Absolute angle of rotation was used to determine if anatomical variability within the cadaver population influenced the matrices. The matrices were applied to humerothoracic and glenohumeral motion (collected previously) and analyzed using the proximal coordinate systems, then expressed in the whole-bone system. RMSE was used to compare kinematics from the proximal and whole-bone systems.

RESULTS

A single average rotation matrix between a given proximal and whole-bone coordinate system achieved consistent error, regardless of landmarks. Elevation and plane of elevation had <2° mean error when proximal coordinate systems were transformed to whole-bone kinematics. Axial rotation had a mean 7° error, primarily due to variable humeral head retroversion. Absolute angles of rotation did not statistically differ between subgroups. The average rotation matrices were independent of sex, side, and motion.

SIGNIFICANCE

Proximal humerus coordinate systems can accurately predict whole-bone kinematics, with most error concentrated in axial rotation due to anatomic twist along the bone. These results enhance interpretability and reproducibility in expressing humerothoracic and glenohumeral motion data between laboratories by providing a simple means to convert data between common coordinate systems. This is necessitated by the lack of distal humerus anatomy present in most clinical imaging.

Beyond Euler/Cardan analysis: True glenohumeral axial rotation during arm elevation and rotation

BACKGROUND

Based on Euler/Cardan analysis, prior investigations have reported up to 80° of glenohumeral (GH) external rotation during arm elevation, dependent on the plane of elevation (PoE). However, the subtraction of Euler/Cardan angles does not compute the rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis (i.e. axial rotation). Clinicians want to understand the true rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis and rely on laboratories to inform their understanding of underlying shoulder biomechanics, especially for the GH joint since its motion cannot be visually ascertained. True GH axial rotation has not been previously measured in vivo, and its difference from Euler/Cardan (apparent) axial rotation is unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the true GH axial rotation during arm elevation and external rotation, and does it vary from apparent axial rotation and by PoE?

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (10 M/10 F, ages 22-66) were recorded using biplane fluoroscopy while performing arm elevation in the coronal, scapular and sagittal planes, and external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. Apparent GH axial rotation was computed using the xz'y'' and yx'y'' sequences. True GH axial rotation was computed by integrating the projection of GH angular velocity onto the humerus' longitudinal axis. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to compare apparent versus true axial rotation, axial rotation versus 0°, and detect differences in axial rotation by PoE.

RESULTS

In contrast to apparent axial rotation, true GH axial rotation does not differ by PoE and is not different than 0° during arm elevation at higher elevation angles. The spherical area between the sequence-specific and actual humeral trajectory explains the difference between apparent and true axial rotation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Proper quantification of axial rotation is important because biomechanics literature informs clinical understanding of shoulder biomechanics. Clinicians care about true axial rotation, which should be reported in future studies of shoulder kinematics.

Age-related differences in humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral kinematics during elevation and rotation motions

Age affects gross shoulder range of motion (ROM), but biomechanical changes over a lifetime are typically only characterized for the humerothoracic joint. Suitable age-related baselines for the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to humerothoracic motion are needed to advance understanding of shoulder injuries and pathology. Notably, biomechanical comparisons between younger or older populations may obscure detected differences in underlying shoulder motion. Herein, biplane fluoroscopy and skin-marker motion analysis quantified humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral motion during 3 static poses (resting neutral, internal rotation to L4-L5, and internal rotation to maximum reach) and 2 dynamic activities (scapular plane abduction and external rotation in adduction). Orientations during static poses and rotations during active ROM were compared between subjects <35 years and >45 years of age (N=10 subjects per group). Numerous age-related kinematic differences were measured, ranging 5–25°, where variations in scapular orientation and motion were consistently observed. These disparities are on par with or exceed mean clinically important differences and standard error of measurement of clinical ROM, which indicates that high resolution techniques and appropriately matched controls are required to avoid confounding results of studies that investigate shoulder kinematics. Understanding these dissimilarities will help clinicians manage expectations and treatment protocols where indications and prevalence between age groups tend to differ. Where possible, it is advised to select age-matched control cohorts when studying the kinematics of shoulder injury, pathology, or surgical/physical therapy interventions to ensure clinically important differences are not overlooked.