Microwave ablation of hepatic tumors using dual-loop probes: results of a phase I clinical trial

Histological Correlation for Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation in the Local Control of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) before Liver Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Liver cancer is a growing problem around the world. Drugs for liver cancer have limited effect, there are not enough donors for liver transplants and many patients are not candidates for surgery to remove the tumor. In many of these cases, hyperthermia can destroy the tumor in situ with minimally invasive methods such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation. In this paper we review the literature evaluating success rates for complete ablation as judged by actual examination of treated tumors that were removed when patients received a liver transplant. While notable successes can be achieved with ablation, the published studies indicate both that complete treatment is not as common as thought and that imaging methods such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans do not completely identify residual cancer. There is therefore an important opportunity for improvement in the treatment of this disease.

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are the most widely studied and applied ablation techniques for treating primary and secondary liver tumors. These techniques are considered curative for small hepatic tumors, with post-ablation outcomes most commonly assessed by an imaging follow up. However, there is increasing evidence of a discrepancy between radiological and pathological findings when ablated lesions are evaluated following liver resection or liver transplantation. A comprehensive review of the available literature reporting the complete pathological response (cPR) following RFA and MWA was performed to estimate the success rate and identify the factors associated with treatment failure. Following RFA, cPR is reported in 26–96% of tumors compared to 57–95% with MWA. Larger tumor size and vessels larger than 3 mm adjacent to the treated tumor are the most important factors identified by previous studies associated with viable residual tumors after RFA. Correlating post-ablation radiological studies with pathological findings shows that computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting residual viable or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors. There are promising recent reports combining multiprobe ablation techniques with three-dimensional treatment planning software and stereotactic-aiming instrumentation to achieve more than 90% cPR in both small and large HCC tumors. In conclusion, the reported success for achieving cPR in HCC following RFA and MWA is highly variable in different studies and decreases with increasing lesion size and unfavorable tumor characteristics. Very few studies have reported a high rate of cPR. As these studies are single-center and retrospective, they need to be further validated and reproduced in other clinical settings.

Antenna Designs for Microwave Tissue Ablation

Microwave (MW) ablation has emerged as a minimally invasive therapeutic modality and is in clinical use for treatment of unresectable tumors and cardiac arrhythmias, neuromodulation, endometrial ablation, and other applications. Components of image-guided MW ablation systems include high-power MW sources, ablation applicators that deliver power from the generator to the target tissue, cooling systems, energy-delivery control algorithms, and imaging guidance systems tailored to specific clinical indications. The applicator incorporates a MW antenna that radiates MW power into the surrounding tissue. A variety of antenna designs have been developed for MW ablation with the objective of efficiently transferring MW power to tissue, with a radiation pattern well matched to the size and shape of the targeted tissue. Here, we survey advances in percutaneous, endocavitary, and endoscopic antenna designs as an integral element of MW ablation applicators for a diverse set of clinical applications.

Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation in Liver Tumors: An Update

This article provides an overview of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for treatment of primary liver tumors and hepatic metastasis. Only studies reporting RFA and MWA safety and efficacy on liver were retained. We found 40 clinical studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. RFA has become an established treatment modality because of its efficacy, reproducibility, low complication rates, and availability. MWA has several advantages over RFA, which may make it more attractive to treat hepatic tumors. According to the literature, the overall survival, local recurrence, complication rates, disease-free survival, and mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with RFA vary between 53.2 ± 3.0 months and 66 months, between 59.8% and 63.1%, between 2% and 10.5%, between 22.0 ± 2.6 months and 39 months, and between 0% and 1.2%, respectively. According to the literature, overall survival, local recurrence, complication rates, disease-free survival, and mortality in patients with HCC treated with MWA (compared with RFA) vary between 22 months for focal lesion >3 cm (vs. 21 months) and 50 months for focal lesion ≤3 cm (vs. 27 months), between 5% (vs. 46.6%) and 17.8% (vs. 18.2%), between 2.2% (vs. 0%) and 61.5% (vs. 45.4%), between 14 months (vs. 10.5 months) and 22 months (vs. no data reported), and between 0% (vs. 0%) and 15% (vs. 36%), respectively. According to the literature, the overall survival, local recurrence, complication rates, and mortality in liver metastases patients treated with RFA (vs. MWA) are not statistically different for both the survival times from primary tumor diagnosis and survival times from ablation, between 10% (vs. 6%) and 35.7% (vs. 39.6), between 1.1% (vs. 3.1%) and 24% (vs. 27%), and between 0% (vs. 0%) and 2% (vs. 0.3%). MWA should be considered the technique of choice in selected patients, when the tumor is ≥3 cm in diameter or is close to large vessels, independent of its size. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although technical features of the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are similar, the differences arise from the physical phenomenon used to generate heat. RFA has become an established treatment modality because of its efficacy, reproducibility, low complication rates, and availability. MWA has several advantages over RFA, which may make it more attractive than RFA to treat hepatic tumors. The benefits of MWA are an improved convection profile, higher constant intratumoral temperatures, faster ablation times, and the ability to use multiple probes to treat multiple lesions simultaneously. MWA should be considered the technique of choice when the tumor is ≥3 cm in diameter or is close to large vessels, independent of its size.

Microwave ablation of focal hepatic malignancies regardless of size: A 9-year retrospective study of 64 patients

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) as treatment for single, focal hepatic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. From December 2003 to May 2012, 64 patients were treated with MWA for a single hepatic lesion, in 64 sessions. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was treated in 25 patients (geometric mean tumor size, 3.33-cm; 95% CI, 2.65-4.18-cm; range, 1.0-12.0-cm), metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) was treated in 27 patients (geometric mean tumor size, 2.7-cm; 95% CI, 2.20-3.40-cm; range, 0.8-6.0-cm), and other histological-types were treated in 12 patients (geometric mean tumor size, 3.79-cm; 95% CI, 2.72-5.26-cm; range, 1.7-8.0-cm). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to analyze time event data. Chi-square and correlation evaluated the relationship between tumor size and treatment parameters.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 95.3% (61/64). Treatment parameters were tailored to tumor size; as size increased more antennae were used (p<0.001), treatment with multiple activations increased (p<0.028), and treatment time increased (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between time to recurrence and tumor size, number of activations, number of antennae, and treatment time. At one-year, K-M analysis predicted a likelihood of local recurrence of 39.8% in HCC patients, 45.7% in CRC metastases patients, and 70.8% in patients with other metastases. Median cancer specific survivals for patients were 38.3 months for HCC patients, 36.3 months for CRC metastases, and 13.9 months for other histological-types. Complications occurred in 23.4% (15/64) of sessions.

CONCLUSION

In our sample, tumor size did not appear to impact complete ablation rates or local recurrence rates for focal hepatic malignancies treated with MWA.

Microwave ablation devices for interventional oncology

Microwave ablation is one of the several options in the ablation armamentarium for the treatment of malignancy, offering several potential benefits when compared with other ablation, radiation, surgical and medical treatment modalities. The basic microwave system consists of the generator, power distribution system and antennas. Often under image (computed tomography or ultrasound) guidance, a needle-like antenna is inserted percutaneously into the tumor, where local microwave electromagnetic radiation is emitted from the probe's active tip, producing frictional tissue heating, capable of causing cell death by coagulation necrosis. Half of the microwave ablation systems use a 915 MHz generator and the other half use a 2450 MHz generator. To date, there are no completed clinical trials comparing microwave devices head-to-head. Prospective comparisons of microwave technology with other treatment alternatives, as well as head-to-head comparison with each microwave device, is needed if this promising field will garner more widespread support and use in the oncology community.

Microwave thermal ablation for hepatocarcinoma: six liver transplantation cases

Surgical resection for malignant hepatic tumors, especially hepatocarcinoma (HCC), has been demonstrated to increase overall survival; however, the majority of patients are not suitable for resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most widely used modality for radical treatment of small HCC (<3 cm). It improves 5-year survival compared with standard chemotherapy and chemical ablation, allowing down-staging of unresectable hepatic masses. Microwave ablation (MWA) has been extensively applied in Asia and was recently introduced in the United States of America and Europe with excellent results, especially with regard to large unresectable HCC. Our single-center experience between May 2009 and October 2010 included application of MWA to 154 patients of median age ± standard deviation of 63.5 ± 8.5 years, 6 males, and 1 female, of mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (10.1 ± 3.8). The HCC included, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related (n=70; 45.5%); alcool (ETOH)-related (n=42; 27%), hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related (n=16; 10.5%); and cryptogenic cases (n=26; 17%). The cases were performed for radical treatment down-staging for multifocal pathology or bridging liver transplantation to orthotopic (OLT) in selected patients with single nodules. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed at 1 month after the surgical procedure to evalue responses to treatment. Among 6 selected patients who underwent OLT; 5 (83.3%) showed disease-free survival at one-year follow-up. The radical treatment achieved no intraoperative evidence of tumor spread or of pathological signs of active HCC among the explanted liver specimens. In conclusion, a MWA seemed to be a safe novel approach to treat HCC and could serve as a "bridge" to OLT and down-staging for patients with HCC.

Microwave tumor ablation: mechanism of action, clinical results, and devices

Microwave ablation uses dielectric hysteresis to produce direct volume heating of tissue. Microwaves are capable of propagating through many tissue types, even those with high impedance such as lung or bone, with less susceptibility to "heat-sink" effects along vessels. Microwaves are highly conducive to the use of multiple applicators, showing the synergy seen with other energies, but also the potential capability for phasing of the electromagnetic field. As a result, larger, more customizable ablation zones may be created in less time. Although multiple microwave ablation systems are currently available, further study and continued development are needed.

Microwaves create larger ablations than radiofrequency when controlled for power in ex vivo tissue

PURPOSE

To compare ablation zones created with equal amounts of 2.45 GHz microwave and 480 kHz radiofrequency (RF) energy in ex vivo liver and lung.

METHODS

A total of 38 ablations were performed in ex vivo liver and lung for 10 min each. Nineteen RF ablations (nine liver, ten lung) were performed with a 480 kHz system (200 W max, impedance-based pulsing) and cooled electrode while measuring the average RF power applied. Nineteen microwave ablations (nine liver, ten lung) were then created using a cooled triaxial antenna to deliver 2.45 GHz at the same power level as in RF experiments. Ablation zones were then sectioned and measured for minimum, maximum and mean diameters, and circularity. Measurements were compared using t-tests, with P < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

RESULTS

Mean diameters of microwave ablations were greater than RF ablations in both liver and lung (4.4 +/- 0.3 vs 3.3 +/- 0.2 cm in liver; 2.45 +/- 0.3 vs 1.6 +/- 0.5 cm in lungs; P < 0.0005 all comparisons). There was no significant difference in the mean power applied during microwave or RF ablations in either organ (54.44 +/- 1.71 W vs 56.4 +/- 6.7 W in liver, P > 0.05; 40 +/- 0.95 W vs 44.9 +/- 7.1 W in lung, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a single cooled applicator, microwave energy at 2.45 GHz produces larger ablations than an equivalent amount of 480 kHz RF energy in normal liver and lung. This was more apparent in lung, likely due to the high baseline impedance which limits RF, but not microwave power delivery.

Results of single-probe microwave ablation of metastatic liver cancer

AIMS

Microwave ablation (MWA) is the most recent development in the field of local ablative therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability and reproducibility of single-probe MWA vs. radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases smaller than 3cm in patients without underlying liver disease.

METHODS

Sixteen liver metastases were treated using MWA, and matched for size and localisation with 13 metastases treated by RFA. Tumour diameters and postoperative ablation diameters were recorded (D1 transverse; D2 antero-posterior; D3 cranio-caudal; mm) on computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

Median D1, D2, and D3 ablation diameters after MWA vs. RFA were 18.5 (12-64) vs. 34 (16-41)mm (p=0.003), 26 (14-60) vs. 35 (28-40)mm (p=0.046), and 20 (10-73) vs. 32 (20-45)mm (p=0.025), respectively. As compared to RFA, the variability between the lesions after MWA was significantly higher for D2 (p<0.0001) and D3 (p=0.002) but not for D1 (p=0.15). The ablation diameters were less uniform after MWA than after RFA (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ablation diameters after single-probe MWA of metastatic liver tumours are highly variable and suboptimal. Improvements are needed before MWA can be implemented routinely.

Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for primary and secondary liver malignancies: a systematic review

This article reviews the therapeutic efficacy and complications of microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies. A PubMed search using keywords 'microwave', 'liver', 'malignancy', 'cancer' and 'tumour' was performed to identify articles related to MWA of liver malignancies published in English from 1975 to February 2008. MWA is an effective treatment options for both primary and secondary liver malignancies with survivals comparable with those of liver resections. Local recurrences can be managed with further ablation. Small tumour size, well-differentiated tumour and a reduced number of lesions are factors associated with good prognosis. Temporary occlusion of the portal venous and hepatic arterial flow may increase the size of ablation but the safety aspect requires further validation. MWA is a minimally invasive technique that has broadened the therapeutic option for patients with conventionally unresectable liver tumours with promising survival data. Future advances in the applicator design and treatment monitoring may further improve its efficacy and widen the indications.

Microwave hepatic ablation: initial experience of safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Microwave (MW) ablation is a new treatment modality for hepatic tumors in the United States. Past concerns had been related to small ablation size and efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, operative time, rate of complete ablation, and local recurrence.

METHODS

A prospective Phase II study of MW of hepatic tumors from 1/2004 to 10/2004.

RESULTS

MW ablation was utilized to treat 67 hepatic tumors in 20 patients, with 13 men, 7 women, with a median age of 65 years (range 46-83 years). Tumor types, metastatic colorectal cancer (n = 9), hepatocellular (n = 5), metastatic carcinoid (n = 2), and one patient each with metastatic ovarian, breast, and gastric. MW treated a median of two tumors (range 1-13) per patient, median size of 3 cm (range 1.5-4.5 cm). Total median ablation time was 10 min (range 5-40 min). The overall ablation success at the discharge CT of the abdomen was 100%. Nine patients underwent additional procedures, including partial hepatectomy, colectomy, and gastrectomy. There were no perioperative deaths, while perioperative complications occurred in five patients-none of them related to hepatic ablation. After median follow-up of 19 months there has been one ablation recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

MW ablation represents a reliable, efficient, and safe technique to perform hepatic tumor ablation. The ability to perform multiple ablations simultaneously allows for a more efficient surgical procedure.

Focal tumor ablation: a new era in cancer therapy

This article describes an approach to image-guided tumor ablation, a major tool for cancer treatment in interventional oncology. An overview of the discipline of tumor ablation is followed by a review of the diseases affecting the liver; then, more in-depth discussion of percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and microwave ablation is offered. Inasmuch as ultrasound is usually the best imaging modality for applicator placement in the liver and kidney, particular attention will be given to the merits and techniques of this guidance method.

Pathologic correlation study of microwave coagulation therapy for hepatic malignancies using a three-ring probe

Microwave coagulation therapy (MCT) for the ablation of unresectable hepatic malignancies is a promising alternative to radiofrequency and cryoablation techniques. There are few data on the clinical effectiveness of MCT. In vivo pathologic evaluation of ablated tumor tissue is not well described for the three-ring microwave probe. The study design was a prospective trial enrolling patients with resectable hepatic malignancies. Lesions underwent in vivo MCT with the three-ring probe prior to liver resection. Gross and histologic evaluations of the tumor were performed, including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) vital staining. A total of nine patients with metastatic colon cancer were enrolled and had NADH stains performed of their pathologic specimens. The median size of the metastasis being ablated was 3.5 cm (range, 1.5-12.3). Fifty-six percent of the tumors demonstrated evidence of spontaneous coagulative necrosis on immediate histologic examination. The median dimensions of the ablation zones were 5 cm (range, 3-7) x 4.5 cm (range, 2.5-5.2) x 4.2 cm (range, 2-5) with a 5-min ablation at 60 W. The median ablation volume was 50.6 cm3 (range, 9-78). NADH vital staining was performed of the ablation zones with 100% absence of staining in the tumor tissue and in benign hepatic parenchyma, which is consistent with irreversible cellular damage. In conclusion, in vivo MCT of hepatic malignancies with the three-ring probe produces nonviable tumor cells after a 5-min ablation. The ablation time is significantly shorter than other available ablative techniques. Immediate histologic exam produces some evidence of coagulative necrosis. Further study of this promising technology is warranted.

Hepatic tumor ablation with clustered microwave antennae: the US Phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation techniques have become important treatment options for patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies. Microwave ablation (MWA) is a new thermal ablative technique that uses electromagnetic energy to produce coagulation necrosis. We report outcomes from the first clinical trial in the United States using MWA and a 915 MHz generator.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable primary or metastatic liver cancer were enrolled in a multi-institutional trial from March 2004 through May 2006. Demographic information, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were documented.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients underwent 94 ablation procedures for 224 hepatic tumors. Forty-two ablations (45%) were performed open, 7 (7%) laparoscopically, and 45 (48%) percutaneously. The average tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 0.5-9.0 cm). Single antenna ablation volumes were 10.0 ml (range 7.8-14.0 ml), and clustered antennae ablation volumes were 50.5 ml (range 21.1-146.5 ml). Outcome variables were measured with a mean follow-up of 19 months. Local recurrence at the ablation site occurred in 6 (2.7%) tumors, and regional recurrence occurred in 37 (43%) patients. With a mean follow-up of 19 months, 41 (47%) patients were alive with no evidence of disease. There were no procedure-related deaths. The overall mortality rate was 2.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave ablation is a safe and effective technology for hepatic tumor ablation. In our study, clustered antennae resulted in larger ablation volumes. Further studies with histological confirmation are needed to verify clinical results.

Microwave ablation in a hepatic porcine model: correlation of CT and histopathologic findings

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablative techniques have gained increasing popularity in recent years as safe and effective options for patients with unresectable solid malignancies. Microwave ablation has emerged as a relatively new technique with the promise of larger and faster burns without some of the limitations of radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Here we study a new microwave ablation device in a living porcine model using gross, histologic, and radiographic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The size and shape of ablated lesions were assessed using six pigs in a non-survival study. Liver tissue was ablated using 2, 4, and 8 min burns, in both peripheral and central locations, with and without vascular inflow occlusion. To characterize the post-ablation appearance, three additional pigs underwent several 4 min ablations each followed by serial computed tomography (CT) imaging at 7, 14, and 28 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The 2 and 4 min ablations resulted in lesions that were similar in size, 33.5 cm(3) and 37.5 cm(3), respectively. Ablations lasting 8 min produced lesions that were significantly larger, 92.0 cm(3) on average. Proximity to hepatic vasculature and inflow occlusion did not significantly change lesion size or shape. In follow-up studies, CT imaging showed a gradual reduction in lesion volume over 28 days to 25-50% of the original volume.

DISCUSSION

Microwave ablation with a novel device results in consistently sized and shaped lesions. Importantly, we did not observe any significant heat-sink effect using this device, a major difference from RFA techniques. This system offers a viable alternative for creating fast, large ablation volumes for treatment in liver cancer.