Observational Burden of Illness Study in Patients With Crohn's Disease With and Without Perianal Fistulas in the United States

Perianal Crohn's disease: Still more questions than answers

In this editorial we comment on the article by Pacheco et al published in a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology. We focus specifically on the burden of illness associated with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD) and the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the management of this condition. Evolving evidence has shifted the diagnostic framework for PFCD from anatomical classification systems, to one that is more nuanced and patient-focused to drive ongoing decision making. This editorial aims to reflect on these aspects to help clinicians face the challenge of PFCD in day-to-day clinical practice.

Understanding the role of the primary care physician in the management of patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas

OBJECTIVES

To understand the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) and their referral patterns and treatment expectations.

METHODS

This survey-based study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2020. US-based PCPs managing at least one patient with Crohn's disease per week were included. Participants were presented with two case vignettes relevant to primary care practice; Case Vignette 1 comprised three parts and focused on initial CPF presentation and progression to partial response; Case Vignette 2 focused on recurrent CPF. Survey questions elicited the physician's clinical approach to each case. Data were presented as descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, 151 PCPs (median 23 years in practice) who saw about three patients per month with new/existing CPF responded. For Case Vignette 1, upon identification of a fistulous tract, 89% of respondents would refer the patient, mostly to a colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist. Most PCPs (69%) would begin the patient on medication; 46% would conduct a diagnostic/imaging study. Treatment expectations after referral varied: 55% of respondents believed surgeons would place a seton or use one prior to surgery; 23% expected medical management only; 23% were unsure. Case Vignette 2 revealed that 98% of PCPs preferred to be involved in patient care after referral; however, only 49% were. Of these, 76% considered reinforcing patient treatment adherence as their primary role. While 80% of PCPs were at least moderately satisfied with communication and care coordination with multidisciplinary teams, 52% considered lack of access to specialists as at least a moderate barrier to multidisciplinary team management.

CONCLUSION

PCPs want more involvement in multidisciplinary management of patients with CPF. Continuing education providing PCPs with up-to-date information on diagnostic modalities, treatment options, early diagnosis, the role of PCPs within a multidisciplinary team, and effective initial CPF care is required.