[Alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: who is affected and what can we do for them?]

Analysis of the burden and variability in the management of NAFLD patients in the clinical practice: unifying the required criteria

AIM

to assess the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the gastroenterology outpatient clinic and describe the use of the resources accordingly.

METHODS

a prospective and observational study of 403 patients seen in the gastroenterology outpatient clinic to rule out liver disease during three randomized months in 2016. The overall prevalence of NAFLD, disease severity, heterogeneity of the final diagnosis, the use of medical resources and their respective cost were analyzed.

RESULTS

the main reason for consultation was hypertransaminasemia (42.9%, 173/403), followed by hepatitis C virus (HCV) (28.5%, 115/403). NAFLD was identified as the definitive diagnosis in 29.8% (120/403) of the cohort, 69.2% (83/120) derived by hypertransaminasemia and 24.2% (29/120) by steatosis. Laboratory tests were performed in 96.7% (116/120), abdominal ultrasound in 88.3% (106/120), viral serology in 79.2% (95/120) and autoimmunity in 70% (84/120) of patients with NAFLD. Liver fibrosis was not assessed in 87.5% of cases. In a post-hoc analysis, 12.1% (17/120) had advanced fibrosis by FIB-4. On ultrasound, 65% (73/106) had hepatic steatosis and 15% (17/106) chronic liver disease (significant fibrosis). The mean time for diagnosis was 2.23 ± 0.8 visits. The terminology used to define the clinical diagnosis was heterogeneous as follows: a) 48.3% (58/120) hepatic steatosis; b) 15% (18/120) non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; c) 15.8% (19/120) fatty liver; d) 13.3% (16/120) metabolic syndrome; and e) 7.5% (9/120) dual liver disease (fatty liver and alcohol). A pharmacological intervention was performed in six patients, a liver biopsy in two patients and another six were referred to another specialist. The average cost per patient until diagnosis was €570.78, which included analytical, autoantibodies, viral serology and abdominal ultrasound, with a mean of 2.5 consultations. Thus, the total expense in patients with NAFLD was €68,493.6.

CONCLUSION

NAFLD is a frequent cause of hypertransaminasemia. However, the heterogeneity in the management and terminology of the disease makes it necessary to initiate medical training actions in order to unify the criteria for disease control.

Epigenetic mechanisms in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An emerging field

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging health concern in both developed and non-developed world, encompassing from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and liver cancer. Incidence and prevalence of this disease are increasing due to the socioeconomic transition and change to harmful diet. Currently, gold standard method in NAFLD diagnosis is liver biopsy, despite complications and lack of accuracy due to sampling error. Further, pathogenesis of NAFLD is not fully understood, but is well-known that obesity, diabetes and metabolic derangements played a major role in disease development and progression. Besides, gut microbioma and host genetic and epigenetic background could explain considerable interindividual variability. Knowledge that epigenetics, heritable events not caused by changes in DNA sequence, contribute to development of diseases has been a revolution in the last few years. Recently, evidences are accumulating revealing the important role of epigenetics in NAFLD pathogenesis and in NASH genesis. Histone modifications, changes in DNA methylation and aberrant profiles or microRNAs could boost development of NAFLD and transition into clinical relevant status. PNPLA3 genotype GG has been associated with a more progressive disease and epigenetics could modulate this effect. The impact of epigenetic on NAFLD progression could deserve further applications on therapeutic targets together with future non-invasive methods useful for the diagnosis and staging of NAFLD.