Sentinel lymph node biopsy in anal cancer: a review

Is elective inguinal or external iliac irradiation during neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy necessary for locally advanced lower rectal cancer with anal sphincter invasion?

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of excluding irradiation of inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) and external iliac lymph nodes (ELNs) during neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in a locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC) with anal sphincter invasion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 214 LALRC patients with anal sphincter invasion according to pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging who underwent neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery between September 2010 and May 2019 were enrolled. ILNs and ELNs were clinically negative pre-treatment and were excluded from irradiation. Failure rates and patterns of ILNs and ELNs and survival were analyzed. Nomograms for predicting ILN and ELN failure risk were also constructed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 53.3 months. The three-year failure rates were 3.7% for ILNs and 3.3% for ELNs. Only one patient developed isolated ILN failure, and no patient experienced isolated ELN failure. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that lower edge of tumors invaded or located below the dentate line (odds ratio [OR] 7.513, P = 0.013), high histological grade (OR 6.892, P = 0.017), and perineural invasion (OR 7.111, P = 0.023) were significantly related to ILN failure. Both perineural invasion (OR 8.923, P = 0.011) and high histological grade (OR 8.129, P = 0.011) showed a strong correlation with ELN failure. The concordance index of nomograms for predicting ILN and ELN failure risk were 0.842 and 0.880, respectively. The three-year local recurrence free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3%‒97.9%), 77.7% (95% CI, 71.8%‒83.6%), and 91.9% (95% CI, 87.8%‒96.0%), respectively, for the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Excluding ILNs and ELNs from irradiation was associated with an acceptably low failure risk for LALRC invading the anal sphincter. These findings help to refine existing guidelines for clinical target volume delineation of ILNs and ELNs during neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

A novel biomarker-based analysis reliably predicts nodal metastases in anal carcinoma: preliminary evidence of therapeutic impact

AIM

Routine prophylactic inguinal irradiation in anal cancer may cause significant toxicity associated with overtreatment bias. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of regional node metastases in anal carcinoma by identifying predictive molecular biomarkers.

METHOD

Clinicohistopathological data from 50 pretreatment anal carcinoma biopsies were collected. Immunohistochemical analyses with antibodies against Ki67, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and YKL-40 were performed. Statistical correlations between biomarkers and clinicopathological features and outcomes were studied. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in a subset of 36 patients.

RESULTS

All patients had undergone synchronous radiochemotherapy; tumour recurrence had developed in 26%, and 16% had died. YKL-40 tumour expression correlated with lymph node metastasis, whereas no inguinal node metastases were found in any of the (14%) patients presenting with a YKL-40/EGFR-negative tumour. YKL-40 expression and node metastasis were both significantly associated with shorter overall and disease-free survival. Tumour grade significantly correlated with disease-free survival only. HIV, tumour histological type, Ki67, p53 and EGFR were not associated with outcome.

CONCLUSION

YKL-40 expression in anal carcinoma is correlated with a poor outcome and can predict lymph node metastases. The combined absence of YKL-40 and EGFR expression in a first biopsy of anal carcinoma reliably selects a subset of patients without inguinal metastases. Such patients could be spared sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or inguinal radiotherapy.

Value of staging squamous cell carcinoma of the anal margin and canal using the sentinel lymph node procedure: an update of the series and a review of the literature

Background:

Inguinal metastases in patients affected by anal cancer are an independent prognostic factor for local failure and overall mortality. Since 2001, sentinel lymph node biopsy was applied in these patients. This original study reports an update of personal and previous published series, which were compared with Literature to value the incidence of inguinal metastases T-stage related and the overall incidence of false negative inguinal metastases at sentinel node.

Methods:

In all, 63 patients diagnosed with anal cancer submitted to inguinal sentinel node. Furthermore a research in the Pub Med database was performed to find papers regarding this technique.

Results:

In our series, detection rate was 98.4%. Inguinal metastases were evidentiated in 13 patients (20.6%). Our median follow-up was 35 months. In our series, no false negative nodes were observed.

Conclusion:

Sentinel node technique in the detection of inguinal metastases in patients affected by anal cancer should be considered as a standard of care. It is indicated for all T stages in order to select patients to be submitted to inguinal radiotherapy, avoiding related morbidity in negative ones. An overall 3.7% rate of false negative must be considered acceptable.

New approach to anal cancer: Individualized therapy based on sentinel lymph node biopsy

Oncological treatment is currently directed toward a tailored therapy concept. Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal could be considered a suitable platform to test new therapeutic strategies to minimize treatment morbidity. Standard of care for patients with anal canal cancer consists of a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This treatment has led to a high rate of local control and a 60% cure rate with preservation of the anal sphincter, thus replacing surgical abdominoperineal resection. Lymph node metastases represent a critical independent prognostic factor for local recurrence and survival. Mesorectal and iliac lymph nodes are usually included in the radiation field, whereas the inclusion of inguinal regions still remains controversial because of the subsequent adverse side effects. Sentinel lymph node biopsies could clearly identify inguinal node-positive patients eligible for therapeutic groin irradiation. A sentinel lymph node navigation procedure is reported here to be a feasible and effective method for establishing the true inguinal node status in patients suffering from anal canal cancer. Based on the results of sentinel node biopsies, a selective approach could be proposed where node-positive patients could be selected for inguinal node irradiation while node-negative patients could take advantage of inguinal sparing irradiation, thus avoiding toxic side effects.

[Colorectal melanoma: review of two distinct forms of presentation]

Malignant melanoma of the colon and rectum is an infrequent disease. Primary anorectal melanoma accounts for 0.1-4.6% of all malignant neoplasms of the anal canal. Melanoma metastatic to the colon is symptomatic only in 4.4% of patients with a primary melanoma at another site and most of these tumors are diagnosed postmortem. We report two cases of colorrectal malignant melanoma. The first case concerned a patient with rectal bleeding who was diagnosed with a rectal lesion compatible with melanoma. Abdominoperineal resection was performed due to positivity of the sentinel lymph node. We discuss the utility of sentinel lymph node detection in this kind of tumor. In the second case, we discovered a polyp compatible with metastatic melanoma in the transverse colon in a patient with a previous diagnosis of melanoma. In both surgical specimens, the diagnosis of melanoma was confirmed by positivity for protein S-100, Melan-A and HMB-45.

Sentinel lymph node in patients with rectal cancer invading the anal canal

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with rectal cancer extending to the anal canal.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and April 2008, 15 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum with direct invasion of the anal canal and no clinical evidence of inguinal involvement were prospectively enrolled in the study. The sentinel node procedure consisted of a combination of preoperative radiocolloid lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative detection of the inguinal sentinel node with a gamma probe. Patent blue dye was also used to facilitate direct identification of the blue-stained lymph node. After removal, the sentinel node was studied by hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Detection and removal of inguinal sentinel nodes was possible in all patients. Four patients (26.7%) had sentinel nodes identified as positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. All positive cases also had metastases detected in perirectal lymph nodes; three of them developed hepatic or pulmonary metastases within 6 months after surgery. Of the 11 patients with negative sentinel nodes, only four (36.4%) also presented metastatic perirectal lymph nodes. Although none of the negative cases developed late inguinal metastases, three developed systemic or pelvic recurrence within 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The standardized procedure was highly effective in sampling inguinal sentinel nodes in very low rectal cancers, allowing the detection of subclinical metastatic disease. Although this technique can be potentially useful for a subgroup of patients with isolated inguinal metastases, it cannot be routinely recommended for patients with rectal tumors invading the anal canal at this moment.