The context of transcription start site regions is crucial for transcription of a plant tRNALys(UUU) gene group both in vitro and in vivo

Elucidation of transfer RNAs as stress regulating agents and the experimental strategies to conceive the functional role of tRNA-derived fragments in plants

In plants, the transfer RNAs (tRNAs) exhibit their profound influence in orchestrating diverse physiological activities like cell growth, development, and response to several surrounding stimuli. The tRNAs, which were known to restrict their function solely in deciphering the codons, are now emerging as frontline defenders in stress biology. The plants that are constantly confronted with a huge panoply of stresses rely on tRNA-mediated stress regulation by altering the tRNA abundance, curbing the transport of tRNAs, fragmenting the mature tRNAs during stress. Among them, the studies on the generation of transfer RNA-derived fragments (tRFs) and their biological implication in stress response have attained huge interest. In plants, the tRFs hold stable expression patterns and regulate biological functions under diverse environmental conditions. In this review, we discuss the fate of plant tRNAs upon stress and thereafter how the tRFs are metamorphosed into sharp ammunition to wrestle with stress. We also address the various methods developed to date for uncovering the role of tRFs and their function in plants.

PltRNAdb: Plant transfer RNA database

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are intermediate-sized non-coding RNAs found in all organisms that help translate messenger RNA into protein. Recently, the number of sequenced plant genomes has increased dramatically. The availability of this extensive data greatly accelerates the study of tRNAs on a large scale. Here, 8,768,261 scaffolds/chromosomes containing 229,093 giga-base pairs representing whole-genome sequences of 256 plant species were analyzed to identify tRNA genes. As a result, 331,242 nuclear, 3,216 chloroplast, and 1,467 mitochondrial tRNA genes were identified. The nuclear tRNA genes include 275,134 tRNAs decoding 20 standard amino acids, 1,325 suppressor tRNAs, 6,273 tRNAs with unknown isotypes, 48,475 predicted pseudogenes, and 37,873 tRNAs with introns. Efforts also extended to the creation of PltRNAdb (https://bioinformatics.um6p.ma/PltRNAdb/index.php), a data source for tRNA genes from 256 plant species. PltRNAdb website allows researchers to search, browse, visualize, BLAST, and download predicted tRNA genes. PltRNAdb will help improve our understanding of plant tRNAs and open the door to discovering the unknown regulatory roles of tRNAs in plant genomes.

Novel in vivo system to monitor tRNA expression based on the recovery of GFP fluorescence and its application for the determination of plant tRNA expression

We developed a novel assay system to quantitatively detect amber codon suppression by tRNAs expressed in plant cells. The assay was based on recovery of the expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter, in which a fourth Lys codon (AAG) was changed to a premature amber codon TAG, designated as GFP/amber. Plasmids carrying GFP/amber, suppressor tRNA, and red fluorescent protein (RFF) as an internal control, respectively, were introduced into onion epidermal cells to monitor cell numbers with GFP and RFP fluorescence. First, an amber suppressor tRNA^Ser from tobacco (NtS2) to suppress a TAG codon in GFP mRNA was examined, leading to the recovery of GFP fluorescence. Second, we used two different tRNAs (i.e., AtY3II-am and AtY3II-amiG7), both of which are intron-containing amber suppressor tRNAs^Tyr, the former impaired precursor-tRNA splicing but the latter did not, as confirmed previously using two different approaches (Szeykowska-Kulinska and Beier, 1991; Akama and Beier, 2003). As expected, coexpression of GFP/amber with AtY3II-am gave no green fluorescence, but significant fluorescence was observed with AtY3II-amiG7. Then, we applied this system for the analysis of 5'-regulatory sequences of the tRNA^Gln gene family from Arabidopsis. A 5'-flanking sequence of each of the 17 tRNA^Gln genes was fused to a coding region of an amber suppressor tRNA^Ser gene (NtS2/amber) and its 3'-flanking sequence. Chimeric tRNA^Ser gene, GFP/amber, and RFP were coexpressed, and the GFP or RFP fluorescence intensity was determined in cells using laser-scanning microscopy. In parallel, 17 kinds of original Arabidopsis tRNA^Gln genes and their chimeric genes with NtS2/amber were all analyzed in cell-free nuclear extract (Yukawa et al., 1997). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo expression of these chimeric tRNA genes displayed generally similar results, accompanied by a wide range of variance in the expression of each gene. Nevertheless, the expression patterns of several genes were clearly the opposite of each other comparing between the two different system, demonstrating the importance of in vivo systems in the study on tRNA expression in plants.

Regulation of tRNA biogenesis in plants and its link to plant growth and response to pathogens

The field of tRNA biology, encompassing the functional and structural complexity of tRNAs, has fascinated scientists over the years and is continuously growing. Besides their fundamental role in protein translation, new evidence indicates that tRNA-derived molecules also regulate gene expression and protein synthesis in all domains of life. This review highlights some of the recent findings linking tRNA transcription and modification with plant cell growth and response to pathogens. In fact, mutations in proteins directly involved in tRNA synthesis and modification most often lead to pleiotropic effects on plant growth and immunity. As plants need to optimize and balance their energy and nutrient resources towards growth and defense, regulatory pathways that play a central role in integrating tRNA transcription and protein translation with cell growth control and organ development, such as the auxin-TOR signaling pathway, also influence the plant immune response against pathogens. As a consequence, distinct pathogens employ an array of effector molecules including tRNA fragments to target such regulatory pathways to exploit the plant's translational capacity, gain access to nutrients and evade defenses. An example includes the RNA polymerase III repressor MAF1, a conserved component of the TOR signaling pathway that controls ribosome biogenesis and tRNA synthesis required for plant growth and which is targeted by a pathogen effector molecule to promote disease. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SI: Regulation of tRNA synthesis and modification in physiological conditions and disease edited by Dr. Boguta Magdalena.

Arabidopsis Pol II-Dependent in Vitro Transcription System Reveals Role of Chromatin for Light-Inducible rbcS Gene Transcription

In vitro transcription is an essential tool to study the molecular mechanisms of transcription. For over a decade, we have developed an in vitro transcription system from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)-cultured cells (BY-2), and this system supported the basic activities of the three RNA polymerases (Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III). However, it was not suitable to study photosynthetic genes, because BY-2 cells have lost their photosynthetic activity. Therefore, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) in vitro transcription systems were developed from green and etiolated suspension cells. Sufficient in vitro Pol II activity was detected after the minor modification of the nuclear soluble extracts preparation method; removal of vacuoles from protoplasts and L-ascorbic acid supplementation in the extraction buffer were particularly effective. Surprisingly, all four Arabidopsis Rubisco small subunit (rbcS-1A, rbcS-1B, rbcS-2B, and rbcS-3B) gene members were in vitro transcribed from the naked DNA templates without any light-dependent manner. However, clear light-inducible transcriptions were observed using chromatin template of rbcS-1A gene, which was prepared with a human nucleosome assembly protein 1 (hNAP1) and HeLa histones. This suggested that a key determinant of light-dependency through the rbcS gene transcription was a higher order of DNA structure (i.e. chromatin).