A primary care first (PCP-first) model to screen and treat depression: A VitalSign6 report from a second cohort of 32,106 patients

Treatment of Adolescent Depression: Comparison of Psychiatric and Pediatric Settings at an Academic Medical Center Using the VitalSign6 Application

Background: Similar outcomes and remission rates have been found for the treatment of depression in adults in primary and psychiatric care settings. However, comparatively little is known about how pediatric depression is managed across different settings. This study aims to address this gap by comparing depression treatment in pediatric and psychiatric settings. We hypothesized that pediatric care settings would be more likely to treat individuals with lower depression severity and would select pharmacotherapy less frequently as a treatment option. Methods: Patients (n = 3498) were screened for depression at a children's hospital from May 2017 to May 2022 as part of the VitalSign6 project, a web-based application for depression management. The two-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ) was used for screening, and the data set contains patient-reported measures and provider-reported diagnoses and treatment selections at each clinic visit. Patients with nine-item PHQ (PHQ-9) scores ≥10 at baseline were included in the analysis to compare diagnosis and treatment recommendations between pediatric and psychiatric settings. Results: Among the 1323 patients who screened positive for depression, those in psychiatric settings had higher PHQ-9 scores (15.9 ± 5.0 vs. 12.1 ± 5.5; p < 0.0001). Patients with PHQ-9 ≥ 10 in psychiatric settings were more likely to be diagnosed with major depressive disorder (60.6% vs. 24.7%, p < 0.0001) and receive pharmacotherapy (54.8% vs. 6.6%) than those in pediatric settings. Pediatric setting patients were more likely to receive nonpharmacological treatment alone (36.3% vs. 4.3%) or an outside referral (27.7% vs. 5.7%). Remission rates did not significantly differ between the two settings. Conclusions: Youth in psychiatric settings are more likely to screen positive for depression and to have greater depression severity than those in pediatric settings. Both settings provide treatment recommendations for moderate-to-severe depression, but treatment types vary substantially. Yet, remission rates remain similar. Further research is needed to understand the nuances of treatment differences and their implications.

Integration of Measurement-Based Care for Youth Depression and Suicidality Using VitalSign6

Depression and suicidality are prevalent in youth and are associated with a range of negative outcomes. The current study aimed to evaluate a measurement-based care (MBC) software (VitalSign6) tool to improve the screening and treatment of depression and suicidality in youth aged 8-17 years within a rural, underserved population. To assess for depression and suicidality, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 was administered as an initial screen, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified for Adolescents (PHQ-9-A) was administered if the initial screen was positive. Data were collected at medical clinics over one year, and descriptive statistics and t-tests or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were conducted. A total of 1,984 youth were initially screened (mean age of 13 years; 51.6% female); 24.2% screened positive for depression, and 14.9% endorsed suicidality. Of those who screened positive, the mean PHQ-9-A score was 12.8; 66.9% had PHQ-9-A scores in the moderate to severe range, and 44.2% endorsed suicidality. Almost half of the youth who screened positive for depression had at least one follow-up assessment, and about one quarter achieved remission 4 months after initial screening. Adolescents (12-17 years) had higher PHQ-9-A scores, higher suicidality, and more follow-up assessments than younger youth (8-11 years). Younger youth had higher rates of remission. The widespread use of MBC was feasible in this setting. It is important to utilize MBC to identify and treat youth with depression and suicidality and to do so in younger populations to improve their trajectory over time; VitalSign6 is one tool to help achieve these goals.

Psychometric properties of the GAD-7 and PROMIS-Anxiety-4a among youth with depression and suicidality: Results from the Texas youth depression and suicide research network

There is a tremendous need for brief, valid, and free assessments of anxiety in child mental healthcare. The goal of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of two such measures, the GAD-7 and PROMIS-Anxiety-4a, in 1000 children, adolescents, and young adults (8-20 years-old) with depression and/or suicidality. The GAD-7, the PROMIS-Anxiety-4a, and other validated assessments of anxiety, physical functioning, and psychiatric diagnoses were completed. Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable fit for a single factor in both measures via all indices but the RMSEA. They demonstrated measurement invariance across pre-adolescents (8-12 years-old) and adolescents and emerging adults (13-20 years-old), though scalar invariance was not observed for the GAD-7. Both measures showed strong convergent validity, GAD-7: r = 0.68; PROMIS-Anxiety-4a: r = 0.75, divergent validity with a measure of physical function, GAD-7: r = -0.24; PROMIS-Anxiety-4a: r = -0.28, good internal consistency, ω = 0.89 for both, and high test-retest reliability, GAD-7: r = 0.69; PROMIS-Anxiety-4a: r = 0.71. Both measures also showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity in detecting the presence of any anxiety disorder, GAD-7 cut-off score of 10: AUC = 0.75; PROMIS-Anxiety-4a cutoff score of 12: AUC = 0.79. The GAD-7 correlated similarly with the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders total score and generalized anxiety subscale, and also showed similar diagnostic sensitivity and specificity when used to detect the presence of any anxiety disorder vs. generalized anxiety disorder specifically. Results suggest that both of these brief, publicly available instruments are valid and reliable assessments of anxiety among youth in treatment for depression and/or suicidality.

Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression

Major depressive disorder is a chronic and recurrent illness that affects 20% of adults during their lifetime and is one of the leading causes of suicide in the United States. A systematic measurement-based care approach is the essential first step in the diagnosis and management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) by promptly identifying individuals with depression and avoiding delays in treatment initiation. As comorbidities may be associated with poorer outcomes to commonly used antidepressants and increase risk of drug-drug interactions, their recognition and treatment is an essential component of management of TRD.

Improving Identification and Treatment Outcomes of Treatment-Resistant Depression Through Measurement-Based Care

Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic screening and ongoing assessment of symptoms, side effects, and adherence to adjust treatments as needed based on these factors. Studies show MBC leads to improved outcomes for depression and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). In fact, MBC may reduce the chances of developing TRD, as it leads to optimized treatment strategies based on symptom changes and compliance. There are many rating scales available for monitoring depressive symptoms, side effects, and adherence. These rating scales can be used in a variety of clinical settings to help guide treatment decisions, including depression treatment decisions.