Burden of caregivers who care for oldest-old parents with disability: A cross-sectional study

The trajectory of family caregiving for older adults with dementia: difficulties and challenges

INTRODUCTION

As the main source of informal care in China, family members bear a tremendous caregiving burden, particularly in relation to older people with dementia (PwDs). However, the continuous caregiving trajectory of family caregivers was unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the trajectory of PwDs' family caregivers' struggles from home care to institutional care, and identify the common tipping points leading to institutional care from their perspectives.

METHODS

An ethnographic study was conducted in a long-term care institution in Chengdu, China, from 2019 to 2020. Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 family members (i.e. 5 spouses and 8 adult children) of older PwDs during family caregivers' visits. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, after which the transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The family caregivers' experiences before and after the PwDs' institutionalization fell into two distinctive parts, and three subthemes about their caregiving experiences in each period were identified: the mental stress, the physical care burden, and the social and emotional pressure connected to home-based care; the moral pressure and emotional torment, the financial burden, and new worries after institutionalization. The tipping points in between the two stages were major changes or incidents related to the PwDs' status. Variations in the spouse and older children's care experiences also emerged.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a nuanced analysis of the trajectory of family caregiving for PwDs. The plight of family caregivers at all stages should be recognized and supported with adequate medical and social resources, with a further consideration of the caregivers' relationships with the older PwDs.

Validation of the Informal Caregiver Burden Assessment Questionnaire for Brazil - short version

OBJECTIVES

to cross-culturally adapt the short version of the Informal Caregiver Burden Assessment Questionnaire to the Brazilian culture and test its psychometric properties.

METHODS

the questionnaire was translated, adapted, and applied to a sample of 280 informal caregivers. The psychometric assessment was verified by estimating psychometric sensitivity and internal structure validity.

RESULTS

inter-rater agreement was satisfactory among specialists. In the seven-factor model, item (Q9) of the domain "Perception of Efficacy and Control Mechanisms" showed a factor loading less than 0.40 (ʎ = 0.26), and an alternative six-factor model was evaluated. However, both models showed excellent fit indices, and it was decided to keep the seven-factor reference model. Reliability was satisfactory for the seven subscales (α > 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

the questionnaire was adapted and showed adequate psychometric indices in the Brazilian context in which it was evaluated, preserving its original essence.

Dyadic Interdependence in Non-spousal Caregiving Dyads’ Wellbeing: A Systematic Review

Caregiving dyads (i.e., an informal caregiver and a care recipient) work as an interdependent emotional system, whereby it is assumed that what happens to one member of the dyad essentially happens to the other. For example, both members of the dyad are involved in care giving and care receiving experiences and therefore major life events, such as a serious illness affect the dyad and not only the individual. Consequently, informal caregiving may be considered an example of dyadic interdependence, which is “the process by which interacting people influence one another’s experience.” This systematic review aimed to synthesize studies of dyadic interdependence, specifically in non-spousal caregiving dyads (e.g., adult children—parents, siblings, other relatives, or friends). Electronic databases (PsycINFO, Pubmed, and CINAHL) were systematically searched for dyadic studies reporting on interdependence in the emotional and relational wellbeing of non-spousal caregiving dyads. A total of 239 full-text studies were reviewed, of which 14 quantitative and qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria with a majority of dyads consisting of adult daughters caring for their older mothers. A narrative synthesis suggested mutual influences between non-spousal caregiving dyad members based on: (1) associations between intrapersonal (e.g., psychological functioning) and interpersonal (e.g., relationship processes) variables and emotional and relational wellbeing of the dyad; (2) associations between care context variables (e.g., socio-demographics and care tasks) and emotional and relational wellbeing of the dyad; and (3) patterns of covariation between caregivers’ and care recipients’ wellbeing. Evidence supporting dyadic interdependence among non-spousal caregiving dyads shed light on the ways dyad members influence each other’s wellbeing while providing and receiving care (e.g., via the exchange of support). Future studies investigating mutual influences in dyads, should differentiate subsamples of caregivers based on relationship type, and adopt dyadic and longitudinal designs.

Validação do Questionário de Avaliação da Sobrecarga do Cuidador Informal para o Brasil – versão curta

RESUMO Objetivos: adaptar transculturalmente a versão curta do Questionário de Avaliação da Sobrecarga do Cuidador Informal para cultura brasileira e testar suas propriedades psicométricas. Métodos: o questionário foi traduzido, adaptado e aplicado em uma amostra de 280 cuidadores informais. A avaliação psicométrica foi verificada pela estimativa da sensibilidade psicométrica e validade da estrutura interna. Resultados: a concordância interavaliadores foi satisfatória entre os especialistas. No modelo de sete fatores, o item (Q9) do domínio “Percepção dos Mecanismos de Eficácia e Controle” apresentou carga fatorial menor do que 0,40 (ʎ = 0,26), e um modelo alternativo de seis fatores foi avaliado. No entanto, os dois modelos evidenciaram ótimos índices de ajustamento, e optou-se por manter o modelo-referência de sete fatores. A confiabilidade mostrou-se satisfatória para as sete subescalas (α > 0,70). Conclusões: o questionário foi adaptado e demonstrou índices psicométricos satisfatórios no contexto brasileiro em que foi avaliado, preservando sua essência original.