1
|
Gerber JS, Ray DK, Makowski D, Butler EE, Mueller ND, West PC, Johnson JA, Polasky S, Samberg LH, Siebert S, Sloat L. Global spatially explicit yield gap time trends reveal regions at risk of future crop yield stagnation. NATURE FOOD 2024; 5:125-135. [PMID: 38279050 PMCID: PMC10896731 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00913-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Yield gaps, here defined as the difference between actual and attainable yields, provide a framework for assessing opportunities to increase agricultural productivity. Previous global assessments, centred on a single year, were unable to identify temporal variation. Here we provide a spatially and temporally comprehensive analysis of yield gaps for ten major crops from 1975 to 2010. Yield gaps have widened steadily over most areas for the eight annual crops and remained static for sugar cane and oil palm. We developed a three-category typology to differentiate regions of 'steady growth' in actual and attainable yields, 'stalled floor' where yield is stagnated and 'ceiling pressure' where yield gaps are closing. Over 60% of maize area is experiencing 'steady growth', in contrast to ∼12% for rice. Rice and wheat have 84% and 56% of area, respectively, experiencing 'ceiling pressure'. We show that 'ceiling pressure' correlates with subsequent yield stagnation, signalling risks for multiple countries currently realizing gains from yield growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S Gerber
- Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.
- Project Drawdown, .
| | - Deepak K Ray
- Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA
| | - David Makowski
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Palaiseau, France
| | - Ethan E Butler
- Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA
| | - Nathaniel D Mueller
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Paul C West
- Project Drawdown
- Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA
| | - Justin A Johnson
- Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA
| | - Stephen Polasky
- Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Stefan Siebert
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davis KF, Abou Ali H, Kebede E, Khan B, Sarwar A. Where global crop yields may falter next. NATURE FOOD 2024; 5:98-99. [PMID: 38279049 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00911-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Frankel Davis
- Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
| | - Hanan Abou Ali
- Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Endalkachew Kebede
- Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Bhoktear Khan
- Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Afia Sarwar
- Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson JM, Ibrahim A, Dossou-Yovo ER, Senthilkumar K, Tsujimoto Y, Asai H, Saito K. Inorganic fertilizer use and its association with rice yield gaps in sub-Saharan Africa. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY 2023; 38:100708. [PMID: 37752897 PMCID: PMC10518462 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Where and which countries should receive higher priority for improving inorganic fertilizer use in rice fields in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)? This study addressed this question by assessing the spatial variation in fertilizer use and its association with rice yield and yield gap in 24 SSA countries through a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed papers, theses, and grey literature published between 1995 and 2021. The results showed a large variation in N, P, and K fertilizer application rates and rice yield and an opportunity for narrowing the yield gap by increasing N and P rates, especially in irrigated rice systems. We identified clusters of sites/countries based on nutrient input and yield and suggested research and development strategies for improving yields and optimizing nutrient use efficiencies. Further research is essential to identify the factors causing low fertilizer use and the poor association between its use and yield in rainfed systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Martial Johnson
- Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouaké 01, Cote d'Ivoire
- Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, D-53115, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ali Ibrahim
- Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), PMB 82, 901101, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | - Yasuhiro Tsujimoto
- Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), 1-1 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3058686, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Asai
- Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), 1-1 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3058686, Japan
| | - Kazuki Saito
- Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouaké 01, Cote d'Ivoire
- International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila 1301, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yuan S, Stuart AM, Laborte AG, Rattalino Edreira JI, Dobermann A, Kien LVN, Thúy LT, Paothong K, Traesang P, Tint KM, San SS, Villafuerte MQ, Quicho ED, Pame ARP, Then R, Flor RJ, Thon N, Agus F, Agustiani N, Deng N, Li T, Grassini P. Southeast Asia must narrow down the yield gap to continue to be a major rice bowl. NATURE FOOD 2022; 3:217-226. [PMID: 37117641 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00477-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Southeast Asia is a major rice-producing region with a high level of internal consumption and accounting for 40% of global rice exports. Limited land resources, climate change and yield stagnation during recent years have once again raised concerns about the capacity of the region to remain as a large net exporter. Here we use a modelling approach to map rice yield gaps and assess production potential and net exports by 2040. We find that the average yield gap represents 48% of the yield potential estimate for the region, but there are substantial differences among countries. Exploitable yield gaps are relatively large in Cambodia, Myanmar, Philippines and Thailand but comparably smaller in Indonesia and Vietnam. Continuation of current yield trends will not allow Indonesia and Philippines to meet their domestic rice demand. In contrast, closing the exploitable yield gap by half would drastically reduce the need for rice imports with an aggregated annual rice surplus of 54 million tons available for export. Our study provides insights for increasing regional production on existing cropland by narrowing existing yield gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shen Yuan
- MARA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | | | - Alice G Laborte
- International Rice Research Institute, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | | | | | - Le Vu Ngoc Kien
- Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Lưu Thị Thúy
- Conventional Rice Research and Development Center, Field Crops Research Institute, Lienhong, Vietnam
| | - Kritkamol Paothong
- Ayutthaya Rice Research Center, Division of Rice Research and Development, Rice Department, Ayutthaya, Thailand
| | | | - Khin Myo Tint
- Marine Science Department, Mawlamyine University, Mawlamyine, Myanmar
| | - Su Su San
- International Rice Research Institute, Seed Division Compound, Department of Agriculture, Gyogone, Myanmar
| | - Marcelino Q Villafuerte
- Climatology and Agrometeorology Division, Department of Science and Technology (DOST), Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA), Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Emma D Quicho
- International Rice Research Institute, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Anny Ruth P Pame
- International Rice Research Institute, Metro Manila, Philippines
| | - Rathmuny Then
- International Rice Research Institute, IRRI-Cambodia Office, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Rica Joy Flor
- International Rice Research Institute, IRRI-Cambodia Office, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Neak Thon
- Rice Seed Development and Management Office, Department of Rice Crop, General Directorate of Agriculture, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Fahmuddin Agus
- Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Nurwulan Agustiani
- Indonesian Center for Rice Research, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development, Sukamandi, Indonesia
| | - Nanyan Deng
- MARA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Li
- Applied GeoSolutions, DNDC Applications Research and Training, Durham, NH, USA
| | - Patricio Grassini
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Future rice systems must produce more grain while minimizing the negative environmental impacts. A key question is how to orient agricultural research & development (R&D) programs at national to global scales to maximize the return on investment. Here we assess yield gap and resource-use efficiency (including water, pesticides, nitrogen, labor, energy, and associated global warming potential) across 32 rice cropping systems covering half of global rice harvested area. We show that achieving high yields and high resource-use efficiencies are not conflicting goals. Most cropping systems have room for increasing yield, resource-use efficiency, or both. In aggregate, current total rice production could be increased by 32%, and excess nitrogen almost eliminated, by focusing on a relatively small number of cropping systems with either large yield gaps or poor resource-use efficiencies. This study provides essential strategic insight on yield gap and resource-use efficiency for prioritizing national and global agricultural R&D investments to ensure adequate rice supply while minimizing negative environmental impact in coming decades.
Collapse
|
6
|
Saito K, Six J, Komatsu S, Snapp S, Rosenstock T, Arouna A, Cole S, Taulya G, Vanlauwe B. Agronomic gain: Definition, approach, and application. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH 2021; 270:108193. [PMID: 34366552 PMCID: PMC8326246 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Meeting future global staple crop demand requires continual productivity improvement. Many performance indicators have been proposed to track and measure the increase in productivity while minimizing environmental degradation. However, their use has lagged behind theory, and has not been uniform across crops in different geographies. The consequence is an uneven understanding of opportunities for sustainable intensification. Simple but robust key performance indicators (KPIs) are needed to standardize knowledge across crops and geographies. This paper defines a new term 'agronomic gain' based on an improvement in KPIs, including productivity, resource use efficiencies, and soil health that a specific single or combination of agronomic practices delivers under certain environmental conditions. We apply the concept of agronomic gain to the different stages of science-based agronomic innovations and provide a description of different approaches used to assess agronomic gain including yield gap assessment, meta-data analysis, on-station and on-farm studies, impact assessment, panel studies, and use of subnational and national statistics for assessing KPIs at different stages. We mainly focus on studies on rice in sub-Saharan Africa, where large yield gaps exist. Rice is one of the most important staple food crops and plays an essential role in food security in this region. Our analysis identifies major challenges in the assessment of agronomic gain, including differentiating agronomic gain from genetic gain, unreliable in-person interviews, and assessment of some KPIs at a larger scale. To overcome these challenges, we suggest to (i) conduct multi-environment trials for assessing variety × agronomic practice × environment interaction on KPIs, and (ii) develop novel approaches for assessing KPIs, through development of indirect methods using remote-sensing technology, mobile devices for systematized site characterization, and establishment of empirical relationships among KPIs or between agronomic practices and KPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuki Saito
- Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouaké 01, Cote d’Ivoire
| | - Johan Six
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Shota Komatsu
- Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouaké 01, Cote d’Ivoire
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Japan
| | - Sieglinde Snapp
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Todd Rosenstock
- Center for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry, P.O. Box 30677-00100, UN Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Aminou Arouna
- Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouaké 01, Cote d’Ivoire
| | - Steven Cole
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 34441, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Godfrey Taulya
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 7878, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Bernard Vanlauwe
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, c/o Icipe, Kasarani, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cooper M, Voss-Fels KP, Messina CD, Tang T, Hammer GL. Tackling G × E × M interactions to close on-farm yield-gaps: creating novel pathways for crop improvement by predicting contributions of genetics and management to crop productivity. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2021; 134:1625-1644. [PMID: 33738512 PMCID: PMC8206060 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03812-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE Climate change and Genotype-by-Environment-by-Management interactions together challenge our strategies for crop improvement. Research to advance prediction methods for breeding and agronomy is opening new opportunities to tackle these challenges and overcome on-farm crop productivity yield-gaps through design of responsive crop improvement strategies. Genotype-by-Environment-by-Management (G × E × M) interactions underpin many aspects of crop productivity. An important question for crop improvement is "How can breeders and agronomists effectively explore the diverse opportunities within the high dimensionality of the complex G × E × M factorial to achieve sustainable improvements in crop productivity?" Whenever G × E × M interactions make important contributions to attainment of crop productivity, we should consider how to design crop improvement strategies that can explore the potential space of G × E × M possibilities, reveal the interesting Genotype-Management (G-M) technology opportunities for the Target Population of Environments (TPE), and enable the practical exploitation of the associated improved levels of crop productivity under on-farm conditions. Climate change adds additional layers of complexity and uncertainty to this challenge, by introducing directional changes in the environmental dimension of the G × E × M factorial. These directional changes have the potential to create further conditional changes in the contributions of the genetic and management dimensions to future crop productivity. Therefore, in the presence of G × E × M interactions and climate change, the challenge for both breeders and agronomists is to co-design new G-M technologies for a non-stationary TPE. Understanding these conditional changes in crop productivity through the relevant sciences for each dimension, Genotype, Environment, and Management, creates opportunities to predict novel G-M technology combinations suitable to achieve sustainable crop productivity and global food security targets for the likely climate change scenarios. Here we consider critical foundations required for any prediction framework that aims to move us from the current unprepared state of describing G × E × M outcomes to a future responsive state equipped to predict the crop productivity consequences of G-M technology combinations for the range of environmental conditions expected for a complex, non-stationary TPE under the influences of climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Cooper
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | - Kai P Voss-Fels
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Carlos D Messina
- Corteva Agriscience, Research and Development, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Tom Tang
- Corteva Agriscience, Research and Development, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Graeme L Hammer
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Sustainable soil carbon sequestration practices need to be rapidly scaled up and implemented to contribute to climate change mitigation. We highlight that the major potential for carbon sequestration is in cropland soils, especially those with large yield gaps and/or large historic soil organic carbon losses. The implementation of soil carbon sequestration measures requires a diverse set of options, each adapted to local soil conditions and management opportunities, and accounting for site-specific trade-offs. We propose the establishment of a soil information system containing localised information on soil group, degradation status, crop yield gap, and the associated carbon-sequestration potentials, as well as the provision of incentives and policies to translate management options into region- and soil-specific practices. Reducing soil degradation and improving soil management could make an important contribute to climate change mitigation. Here the authors discuss opportunities and challenges towards implementing a global climate mitigation strategy focused on carbon sequestration in agricultural soils, and propose a framework for guiding region- and soil-specific management options.
Collapse
|
9
|
Laajaj R, Macours K, Masso C, Thuita M, Vanlauwe B. Reconciling yield gains in agronomic trials with returns under African smallholder conditions. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14286. [PMID: 32868856 PMCID: PMC7459313 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71155-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased adoption of improved agricultural technologies is considered an essential step to address global poverty and hunger, and agronomic trials suggest intensification in developing countries could result in large yield gains. Yet the promise of new technologies does not always carry over from trials to real-life conditions, and diffusion of many technologies remains limited. We show how parcel and farmer selection, together with behavioural responses in agronomic trials, can explain why yield gain estimates from trials may differ from the yield gains of smallholders using the same inputs under real-life conditions. We provide quantitative evidence by exploiting variation in farmer selection and detailed data collection from research trials in Western Kenya on which large yield increments were observed from improved input packages for maize and soybean. After adjusting for selection, behavioural responses, and other corrections, estimates of yield gains fall to being not significantly different from zero for the input package tested on one of the crops (soybean), but remain high for the other (maize). These results suggest that testing new agricultural technologies in real-world conditions and without researcher interference early in the agricultural research and development process might help with identifying which innovations are more likely to be taken up at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachid Laajaj
- Universidad de Los Andes, Calle 19A No. 1-37 Este, Edificio W, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Karen Macours
- Paris School of Economics, INRAE, 48 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Cargele Masso
- IITA, c/o ICIPE, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Moses Thuita
- IITA, c/o ICIPE, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Low JW, Ortiz R, Vandamme E, Andrade M, Biazin B, Grüneberg WJ. Nutrient-Dense Orange-Fleshed Sweetpotato: Advances in Drought-Tolerance Breeding and Understanding of Management Practices for Sustainable Next-Generation Cropping Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
11
|
Senapati N, Semenov MA. Large genetic yield potential and genetic yield gap estimated for wheat in Europe. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY 2020; 24:100340. [PMID: 32190539 PMCID: PMC7063691 DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Improving yield potential and closing the yield gap are important to achieve global food security. Europe is the largest wheat producer, delivering about 35% of wheat globally, but European wheat's yield potential from genetic improvements is as yet unknown. We estimated wheat 'genetic yield potential', i.e. the yield of optimal or ideal genotypes in a target environment, across major wheat growing regions in Europe by designing in silico ideotypes. These ideotypes were optimised for current climatic conditions and based on optimal physiology, constrained by available genetic variation in target traits. A 'genetic yield gap' in a location was estimated as the difference between the yield potential of the optimal ideotype compared with a current, well-adapted cultivar. A large mean genetic yield potential (11-13 t ha-1) and genetic yield gap (3.5-5.2 t ha-1) were estimated under rainfed conditions in Europe. In other words, despite intensive wheat breeding efforts, current local cultivars were found to be far from their optimum, meaning that a large genetic yield gap still exists in European wheat. Heat and drought tolerance around flowering, optimal canopy structure and phenology, improved root water uptake and reduced leaf senescence under drought were identified as key traits for improvement. Closing this unexploited genetic yield gap in Europe through crop improvements and genetic adaptations could contribute towards global food security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mikhail A. Semenov
- Department of Plant Sciences, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aggarwal P, Vyas S, Thornton P, Campbell BM, Kropff M. Importance of considering technology growth in impact assessments of climate change on agriculture. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
13
|
Andrade JF, Rattalino Edreira JI, Farrow A, van Loon MP, Craufurd PQ, Rurinda J, Zingore S, Chamberlin J, Claessens L, Adewopo J, van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P. A spatial framework for ex-ante impact assessment of agricultural technologies. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
14
|
Role of Modelling in International Crop Research: Overview and Some Case Studies. AGRONOMY-BASEL 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8120291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Crop modelling has the potential to contribute to global food and nutrition security. This paper briefly examines the history of crop modelling by international crop research centres of the CGIAR (formerly Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research but now known simply as CGIAR), whose primary focus is on less developed countries. Basic principles of crop modelling building up to a Genotype × Environment × Management × Socioeconomic (G × E × M × S) paradigm, are explained. Modelling has contributed to better understanding of crop performance and yield gaps, better prediction of pest and insect outbreaks, and improving the efficiency of crop management including irrigation systems and optimization of planting dates. New developments include, for example, use of remote sensed data and mobile phone technology linked to crop management decision support models, data sharing in the new era of big data, and the use of genomic selection and crop simulation models linked to environmental data to help make crop breeding decisions. Socio-economic applications include foresight analysis of agricultural systems under global change scenarios, and the consequences of potential food system shocks are also described. These approaches are discussed in this paper which also calls for closer collaboration among disciplines in order to better serve the crop research and development communities by providing model based recommendations ranging from policy development at the level of governmental agencies to direct crop management support for resource poor farmers.
Collapse
|