Educational Inequalities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor and Blood Pressure Control in the Elderly: Comparison of MESA Cohort and Chilean NHS Survey Outcome Measures

Structural and social determinants of health: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Researchers have increasingly recognized the importance of structural and social determinants of health (SSDOH) as key drivers of a multitude of diseases and health outcomes. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is an ongoing, longitudinal cohort study of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) that has followed geographically and racially/ethnically diverse participants starting in 2000. Since its inception, MESA has incorporated numerous SSDOH assessments and instruments to study in relation to CVD and aging outcomes. In this paper, we describe the SSDOH data available in MESA, systematically review published papers using MESA that were focused on SSDOH and provide a roadmap for future SSDOH-related studies.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The study team reviewed all published papers using MESA data (n = 2,125) through January 23, 2023. Two individuals systematically reviewed titles, abstracts, and full text to determine the final number of papers (n = 431) that focused on at least one SSDOH variable as an exposure, outcome, or stratifying/effect modifier variable of main interest (discrepancies resolved by a third individual). Fifty-seven percent of the papers focused on racialized/ethnic groups or other macrosocial/structural factors (e.g., segregation), 16% focused on individual-level inequalities (e.g. income), 14% focused on the built environment (e.g., walking destinations), 10% focused on social context (e.g., neighborhood socioeconomic status), 34% focused on stressors (e.g., discrimination, air pollution), and 4% focused on social support/integration (e.g., social participation). Forty-seven (11%) of the papers combined MESA with other cohorts for cross-cohort comparisons and replication/validation (e.g., validating algorithms).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, MESA has made significant contributions to the field and the published literature, with 20% of its published papers focused on SSDOH. Future SSDOH studies using MESA would benefit by using recently added instruments/data (e.g., early life educational quality), linking SSDOH to biomarkers to determine underlying causal mechanisms linking SSDOH to CVD and aging outcomes, and by focusing on intersectionality, understudied SSDOH (i.e., social support, social context), and understudied outcomes in relation to SSDOH (i.e., sleep, respiratory health, cognition/dementia).

Hidden educational inequalities in high blood pressure and high blood glucose levels in Kerala: evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2019-2021)

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses educational inequalities in measured as well as self-reported high blood pressure (BP) and high blood glucose (BG) in the southern Indian state of Kerala, which is known to have high chronic disease morbidity.

DESIGN

The present findings are drawn from a large-scale, nationally representative cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

India's Demographic and Health Survey (conducted in 2019-2021) had data on 36 526 individuals aged 15 years and above in the state of Kerala, India.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES

Measured high BP and BG; self-reported high BP and BG; as well as self-reported BP and BG testing. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, along with multivariate statistics, were used. Educational inequalities were assessed through absolute and relative complex measures of inequality, namely the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Concentration Index (RCI), respectively, with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The largest margin of inequality in Kerala, between the least and the most educated groups, was observed for measured high BP (57.7% and 17.6%). Measured high BP (SII -45.4% (95% CI -47.3% to -43.4%); RCI -26.6% (95% CI -27.9% to -25.3%)), self-reported high BP (SII -34.5% (95% CI -36.3% to -32.7%); RCI -19.0% (95% CI -20.1% to -17.9%)). High BG levels were concentrated among those with lower educational attainment (SII -26.6% (95% CI -28.6% to -24.7%); RCI -15.7% (95% CI -16.9% to -14.5%)), represented by negative SII and RCI values.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that research and programme efforts need to be redoubled to determine what is driving greater vulnerability to non-communicable diseases among population with lower educational attainment on the one hand and the possible role that improving education access can be on health outcomes, on the other hand. Further research should explore relevant intersections with low education.