Endoscopic submucosal dissection allows curative resection of locally recurrent early gastric cancer after prior endoscopic mucosal resection

Transgastric single-incision laparoscopic resection for a recurrent gastric adenoma at the prepyloric antrum: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic resection is suitable for most benign gastric or early stage cancerous polyps. Laparoscopic local resection is performed only for gastric polyps that are difficult to treat with endoscopic resection, such as recurrent or large polyps. However, when polyps are located in difficult regions, such as the gastric cardia and prepyloric antrum, wedge resection may damage the sphincter around the cardia or pylorus, resulting in postoperative deformity or stenosis.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 66-year-old gentleman found a 2.5 cm recurrent adenoma at pre-pyloric antrum when he repeated a esophagogastoscopy 1 year after a 2 cm polyp removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) at the same site. Owing to submucosal fibrosis, neither EMR nor endoscopic submucosal dissection is considered suitable for recurrent adenoma because of the increased risk of perforation. Pyloric stenosis or deformity was expected with traditional laparoscopic wedge resection for such a lesion located at the pre-pyloric antrum. Instead, we successfully performed a transgastric single-incision laparoscopic en bloc resection of the adenoma. Precise dissection was performed during surgery. The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful. A repeated esophagogasroscopy one year later showed no recurrence.

DISCUSSION

Transgastric single-incision laparoscopic resection for recurrent gastric mucosal lesions after previous endoscopic resection is technically feasible and safe.

CONCLUSION

This procedure can be an alternative choice for local resection of recurrent benign gastric mucosal lesions, especially for those located in special regions such as the prepyloric antrum or gastric cardia.

Conventional Versus Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal, Gastric, and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being utilized for the resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, the long procedure time poses a technical challenge for conventional ESD (C-ESD). Traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD) was developed to facilitate the procedure by reducing its duration. This study compares the efficacy and safety of C-ESD versus T-ESD in the treatment of esophageal, gastric, and colorectal neoplasms. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed. Traction-assisted ESD exhibited shorter mean dissection times for the esophagus and colorectal regions and lower perforation rates in colorectal cases. No significant differences were observed in en bloc resection or bleeding rates. Traction-assisted ESD proves to be more efficient in mean procedure time for esophageal and colorectal cases and safer in perforation rates for colorectal cases, but similar rates are noted for en bloc resection or bleeding.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Surgery or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Metachronous Early Gastric Cancer: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Resection options for early gastric cancer (EGC) include endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and surgery. In patients with metachronous EGC following previous resection, the optimal resection technique is not well elucidated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ESD to EMR, or ESD to surgery, in patients with metachronous EGC.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search of studies reporting on outcomes and AEs following ESD versus either EMR or surgery for patients with metachronous EGC. Pooled odds ratios (OR) of included studies were obtained using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Funnel plots were produced and visually inspected for evidence of publication bias. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

A total of 9367 abstracts were screened and 10 observational studies were included. The odds of complete resection were higher amongst patients undergoing ESD compared to EMR (OR 5.88, 95% confidence intervals, CI, 1.79-19.35), whereas the odds of complete resection were no different between ESD and surgery (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.04-8.24). There were no differences in the odds of local recurrence with ESD versus surgery (OR 5.01, 95% CI 0.86-29.13). Post-procedural bleeding did not differ significantly between ESD and EMR (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.16-3.00). There was no evidence of publication bias.

DISCUSSION

For metachronous EGC, ESD or surgery is preferred over EMR depending on local expertise and patient preferences, largely due to a higher risk of incomplete resection with EMR.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021270445.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers: methodology and review of evidence

This document from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides a full description of the methodology used in the review of the evidence used to inform the final guidance outlined in the accompanying Summary and Recommendations document regarding the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers. This guideline used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and specifically addresses the role of ESD versus EMR and/or surgery, where applicable, for the management of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and their corresponding precursor lesions. For ESCC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >15 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions ≤15 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for such patients with ESCC, whenever possible. For EAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >20 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions measuring ≤20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. For GAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well or moderately differentiated, nonulcerated intestinal type cancer measuring 20 to 30 mm, whereas for patients with similar lesions <20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for patients with such lesions measuring ≤30 mm, whereas for lesions that are poorly differentiated, regardless of size, the ASGE suggests surgical evaluation over endosic approaches.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers: summary and recommendations

This clinical practice guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers. It is accompanied by the document subtitled "Methodology and Review of Evidence," which provides a detailed account of the methodology used for the evidence review. This guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and specifically addresses the role of ESD versus EMR and/or surgery, where applicable, for the management of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and their corresponding precursor lesions. For ESCC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >15 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions ≤15 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for such patients with ESCC, whenever possible. For EAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >20 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions measuring ≤20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. For GAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well- or moderately differentiated, nonulcerated intestinal type cancer measuring 20 to 30 mm, whereas for patients with similar lesions <20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for patients with such lesions measuring ≤30 mm, whereas for lesions that are poorly differentiated, regardless of size, we suggest surgical evaluation over endoscopic approaches.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgical Submucosal Dissection for Recurrent Rectal Adenomas

BACKGROUND

The local resection of recurrent rectal adenomas is a technically challenging task associated with increased local recurrence rate. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD) uses traction to better expose the fibrotic submucosal layer, and therefore, is a valuable alternative for the treatment of such lesions. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of TEM-ESD for the resection of recurrent rectal adenomas.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all TEM-ESD procedures performed in the Karlsruhe Municipal Hospital between 2012 and 2021 and isolated all cases of recurrent adenomas. Subsequently, we matched these cases 1:1 to TEM-ESD cases for primary rectal adenomas according to the size, localization, and histological type of the lesions and compared the outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

We identified 19 cases matching our criteria. The median diameter of the lesions was 25 mm and the median operating time 39 min. Macroscopic en bloc resection was achieved in 100% of the cases and histological complete en bloc resection in 78.9%. There was 1 case of conservatively treated postoperative bleeding. After a median follow-up period of 36 months, there was one local recurrence. After comparing those findings to the outcomes of TEM-ESD for primary rectal lesions, we found no significant differences on total operating time, complete en bloc resection rates, adverse events, and local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

TEM-ESD is a feasible therapeutic option for the resection of recurrent rectal adenomas, offering short operating times as well as high en bloc resection and low recurrence rates.

Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is a technically demanding procedure with prolonged procedure times and higher risk of adverse events. To overcome the procedural difficulty of ESD, several traction-assisted techniques (T-ESD) have been developed to improve visualization of the submucosa in hopes to facilitate safe and effective dissection. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis that compares short-term outcomes (30-day) of T-ESD to C-ESD.

METHODS

Clinical studies published up to April 2020 comparing the efficacy and safety of T-ESD and C-ESD were identified using electronic bibliographic searches. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. Outcomes of interests were procedure time, rates of en bloc and R0 resection, and rates of adverse events. Fixed effect and random effect model were used to calculate pooled mean difference for continuous variables and risk differences (RDs) for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 2574 patients were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 2582 lesions (1292 T-ESD and 1290 C-ESD). Pooled estimates of T-ESD showed shorter procedure times (weighted mean difference = -20.35 min, 95% CI -27.51 to -13.19, p < 0.001), higher R0 resection rates (RD 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.06, p = 0.004) and lower perforation rates (RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.01, p =  < 0.0001). No significant differences were seen in en bloc rates and bleeding risk between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Traction-assisted ESD results in shorter procedure time, improved R0 resection rates and lower risk of perforation as compared to conventional ESD.

Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is gaining enormous popularity in the treatment of early gastric cancers (EGCs) in many institutions across the world. However, appropriate selection of candidates for endoscopic resection is crucial to sufficiently mitigate non-e-curative (NEC) resection. This study aims at identifying the various clinico-pathologic factors that independently predict the NEC outcome and depth of submucosal invasion following ESD procedure in patients with EGC.

Methods

Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate factors that independently predict both non-curability phenomenon and the level of submucosal invasion in patients with early gastric neoplasia. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences version 23 was used for analysis.

Results

A total of 153 patients (162 EGC lesions) underwent en-bloc ESD after which the rate of complete resection and non-e-curative outcome were 95% and 22.2%, correspondingly. Multivariate analysis depicted that tumor location in the upper two third of stomach (odds ratio [OR], 5.46; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.65–18.12; p = 0.006), tumor size > 2 cm (OR, 7.63; 95% CI, 2.29–25.42; p = 0.001), histologically undifferentiated tumor (OR, 15.54; 95% CI, 1.65–146.22; p = 0.001), and tumors with 0-IIa/0-IIc or their mixed variants with predominant 0-IIa/0-IIc (OR, 9.77; 95% CI, 1.23–77.65; p = 0.031) were all independent predictors of NEC resection for early gastric tumors. Additionally, location in the upper two third of the stomach (OR, 8.88; 95% CI, 2.90–27.17; p < 0.001), ulcerated lesions (OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.15–11.90; p = 0.028), lesions with > 2 cm (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.08–8.02; p = 0.036) and those with poor differentiation (OR, 6.51; 95% CI, 2.23–18.98; p = 0.001) were found to have significant association with submucosal invasion.

Conclusions

Tumors located in the upper two third of the stomach having a larger size (> 2 cm), poor histo-differentiation and a gross type of 0-IIa/0-IIc or their mixed variants with predominant 0-IIa/0-IIc were significantly associated with a risk of NEC after ESD procedure. Thus, early gastric tumors displaying these features need to be handled carefully during endoscopic resection. Our findings may shed light on the pre-procedural detection of clinicopathologic factors that determine non-e-curability in patients with EGC.

Comparison Between Redo Endoscopic Treatment and Surgery in Patients with Locally Recurrent Gastric Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Treatment of locally recurrent gastric neoplasms after endoscopic resection remains challenging. We investigated the efficacy and safety of treatment options for recurrent gastric neoplasms localized to the scar of previous endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

The clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who underwent endoscopic treatment or surgery for recurrent gastric neoplasms between June 2010 and May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients included, 74 underwent endoscopic treatment (51 redo ESD, 23 argon plasma coagulation [APC] ablation) and 18 underwent surgery. The redo ESD procedure time was significantly longer than that of the primary ESD (31.0 versus 22.0 min, p = 0.018). Overall, adverse events occurred in 11 patients (12.0%), with the incidence being significantly higher in the surgery group (27.8% versus 8.1% in the endoscopic treatment group, p = 0.036). Local recurrence-free survival rates were 81.1% for the endoscopic treatment group (86.3% and 69.6% for redo ESD and APC groups, respectively) and 100% for the surgery group (log rank p = 0.033). Logistic regression analysis showed that tumor size > 12.5 mm (odds ratio [OR] 5.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-26.9, p = 0.032) and tumors located in the upper two-thirds of the stomach (OR 4.43, 95% CI 1.27-16.8, p = 0.023) were associated with non-curative resection after redo ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment could be an effective and safe alternative to surgery for selected patients with gastric neoplasms recurring at the scar of previous ESD. Especially, patients having small lesions located in the distal part of the stomach could be a good candidate for redo ESD.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the treatment effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer (EGC).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched three electronic databases, including PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane library for studies published with inception to January 2018. The eligible studies should be evaluated for the efficacy and safety of ESD versus EMR for patients with EGC. The summary ORs and standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were employed as effect estimates. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of single study on overall analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed for investigated outcomes to evaluate the treatment effects of ESD versus EMR for patients with EGC with specific subsets.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, with a total of 6723 patients with EGC, were included in final analysis. The summary ORs indicated that patients with EGC who received ESD were associated with an increased incidence of en bloc resection (OR: 9.00; 95% CI: 6.66 to 12.17; p<0.001), complete resection (OR: 8.43; 95% CI: 5.04 to 14.09; p<0.001) and curative resection (OR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.85 to 4.61; p<0.001) when compared with EMR. Furthermore, ESD was associated with lower risk of local recurrence (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.34; p<0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference between ESD and EMR for the risk of bleeding (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.80; p=0.203). Though, ESD was correlated with greater risk of perforation (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.48 to 4.39; p=0.001), and longer operation time (SMD: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.13 to 2.10; p=0.026) as compared with EMR. Additionally, several different features observed in included studies and patients could bias the effectiveness of ESD versus EMR in patients with EGC.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is superior than EMR for en bloc resection, complete resection, curative resection and local recurrence, while it increased perforation risk and longer operation time.

The optimal timing of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection to treat early gastric cancer: long-term follow-up study

Patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who undergo non-curative endoscopic resection (ER) require additional surgery. The aim of the study was to validate surgical and oncological outcomes according to the timing of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection. We retrospectively analyzed long-term follow-up data on the 302 patients enrolled between January 2007 and December 2014. We validated our earlier suggestion that the optimal time interval from non-curative ER to additional surgery was 29 days. All patients were divided into two groups by reference to time intervals from ER to additional surgery of ≤29days (n = 133; group A) and >29 days (n = 169; group B). The median follow-up duration was 41.98 ± 21.23 months. As in our previous study, group B exhibited better surgical outcomes. A total of 10 patients developed locoregional or distant recurrences during the follow-up period, but no significant difference was evident between the two groups. Interestingly, the survival rate was better in group B. Group B (>29 days) exhibited better surgical and oncological outcomes. Thus, additional gastrectomy after non-curative ER should be delayed for 1 month to ensure optimal surgical and oncological outcomes.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric-phenotype Adenoma on the Surface of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

We herein report a rare case of a gastric adenoma overlying a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) that was removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). A 78-year-old woman was referred to our hospital. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an elevated lesion of 15 mm in diameter overlying a submucosal mass in the gastric cardia. ESD was performed for the epithelial neoplasm, and biopsy specimens were obtained directly from the exposed surface of the submucosal tumor. The epithelial tumor was a tubular adenoma with focal severe atypia and a gastric phenotype. Biopsy specimens revealed a GIST, which was resected by laparoscopic intragastric surgery afterward.

Role of mucoprotective agents in endoscopic submucosal dissection-derived ulcers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Currently, it is still unclear whether adding a mucoprotective agent to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) results in better outcomes compared with using a PPI alone in patients with post-gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcers. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of PPI alone versus combination treatment in healing of post-gastric ESD ulcers, as well as on delayed bleeding and amount of blood transfused.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ISI Web of knowledge databases, up until May 2017, for randomized trials comparing PPI alone versus PPI plus a mucoprotective drug in achieving ulcer healing in patients undergoing gastric ESD was performed. The primary outcome is scarring stage on endoscopic assessment at 4 or 8 weeks after gastric ESD.

RESULTS

From an initial 3071 citations, eight articles (n = 953 lesions from 934 patients) were analyzed. Patients receiving combination treatment achieved a scarring stage significantly more often than those on a PPIs alone at 4 or 8 weeks after ESD, (risk ratio = 1.36, 95% CI; 1.06-1.75). No study reported amount of blood transfused. There were no significant between treatment-group differences in terms of delayed bleeding (risk ratio = 0.58, 95% CI; 0.17-1.99). Neither location of ulcer nor Helicobacter pylori infection was related to ulcer scarring stage.

CONCLUSION

The limited evidences suggested combination treatment may be more effective in accelerating the process of ulcer healing in patients undergoing gastric ESD than the use of PPI alone, but does not appear to alter delayed bleeding risk.

Optimal processing of ESD specimens to avoid pathological artifacts

BACKGROUND

En bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been recently introduced as a treatment for precancerous/neoplastic gastrointestinal conditions. The aim of the present study was histological assessment of en bloc ESD specimens.

METHODS

Fifty-three ESD specimens were positioned over a cellulose acetate support (40 specimens; 12 from the upper gastrointestinal tract and 28 from the lower gastrointestinal tract) or pinned with nails on polystyrene or cork (13 specimens; 7 from the upper gastrointestinal tract and 6 from the lower gastrointestinal tract). We cut consecutive 2 mm-thick sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. From the first and the last sections, we obtained a second slide, after a 180° rotation and re-embedding. The quality of ESD samples was scored as inadequate, suboptimal and adequate, based on the amount of crushing, shearing and stretching artifacts that were scored from 0 (absent) to 2 (diffuse or maximum). From the sum of these we obtained a global artifact score (GAS).

RESULTS

Removed lesions were: adenocarcinoma (5 cases), neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1 (1 case), premalignant conditions, including adenomatous polyps (41 cases) and hyperplastic lesions (6 cases). A positive deep surgical margin was found in 8/53 cases (15%): high- and low-grade dysplastic glands were detected in 5 cases, low-grade adenocarcinoma in 2, and NET cells in 1. Dysplastic glands were detected in the lateral surgical margins of 12 ESD specimens (23%). Among the ESD specimens positioned on the cellulose acetate support, apart from the modifications due to electrocoagulation, 2 (5%) showed shearing modifications. In the group of ESD specimens fixed with nails, 5 (38%) showed shearing, 10 (77%) crushing artifacts, 11 (85%) stretching and 11 (85%) multiple holes caused by the nails. On the basis of these data all histological specimens from ESD on cellulose acetate were adequate (GAS 0-1).However, in the group of ESD fixed with nails, 1 was adequate (GAS 0), 11 suboptimal (GAS 2-5) and 1 inadequate (GAS 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Specific devices including cellulose support and adequate sampling blocks can be helpful to perform accurate histological assessment of ESD specimens after en bloc ESD for precancerous/neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions, with complete analysis of the status of the margins and the entirely en bloc evaluation of the lesion.

Secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for locally recurrent or incompletely resected gastric neoplasms

AIM

To investigate the feasibility and safety of secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or locally recurrent gastric tumors.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2017, 1623 consecutive patients underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms at a single tertiary referral center. Among these, 28 patients underwent secondary ESD for a residual or locally recurrent tumor. Our analysis compared clinicopathologic factors between primary ESD and secondary ESD groups.

RESULTS

The en bloc resection and curative rate of resection of secondary ESD were 92.9% and 89.3%, respectively. The average procedure time of secondary ESD was significantly longer than primary ESD (78.2 min vs 55.1 min, P = 0.004), and the adverse events rate was not significantly different but trended slightly higher in the secondary ESD group compared to the primary ESD group (10.7% vs 3.8%, P = 0.095). Patients who received secondary ESD had favorable outcomes without severe adverse events. During a mean follow-up period, no local recurrence occurred in patients who received secondary ESD.

CONCLUSION

Secondary ESD of residual or locally recurrent gastric tumors appears to be a feasible and curative treatment though it requires greater technical efficiency and longer procedure time.

Long-Term Clinical Efficacy and Perioperative Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Early Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer (EGC).

METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to April 2017 and included studies that compared the outcomes of ESD with EMR for EGC. These eligible studies that met the inclusion criteria were screened out and were assessed by two independent investigators.

RESULT

In total, 18 retrospective cohort studies were eligible for analysis. Our results indicated that ESD is more beneficial than EMR in increasing the complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate and decreasing the local recurrence rate. However, ESD prolonged operative time and increased incidence of gastric perforation than EMR. No differences were found in postoperative bleeding rate between the two approaches.

CONCLUSION

Compared with EMR, ESD offers higher complete resection rate, higher en bloc resection rate, and lower local recurrence rate but has prolonged operative time and increased incidence of gastric perfusion. There is no statistical difference in the rate of postoperative bleeding between the two groups. However, the above conclusion needs further verification by well-designed, randomized trials with larger samples and long follow-up periods.

Endoscopic Management of Early Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Preinvasive Gastric Lesions

Early gastric cancer (ECG) can be difficult to diagnose endoscopically. Endoscopists should be familiar with subtle changes and endoscopic features of EGC. Chromoendoscopy and image-enhanced endoscopy improve diagnostic accuracy and facilitate endoscopic resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a preferred endoscopic technique for resection of EGC and offers a comparable overall survival to surgical resection. Endoscopic management of benign gastric epithelial polyps (fundic gland polyps, hyperplastic polyps, and gastric adenoma) depends on patient symptomatology, patient's comorbidities (eg, familial syndromes), lesions' characteristics, and risk of malignant transformation. This article provides an overview of endoscopic management of EGC and common premalignant gastric lesions.

Evaluation and Management of Gastric Superficial Neoplastic Lesions

Gastric cancer is one of the most common and lethal cancers in the world. In Portugal, it is a major health problem presenting one of the highest incidence rates among European countries. In most Western countries, gastric cancer is generally diagnosed in advanced stages. Nevertheless, with the widespread use of upper endoscopy, gastric superficial neoplastic lesions are being increasingly recognized and diagnosed. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding who should be screened for its presence and only recently guidelines concerning the evaluation and management of these lesions were published. In this review, we summarize the current scientific evidence regarding diagnosis and management of gastric superficial neoplastic lesions. Topics like screening, diagnosis, endoscopic evaluation, management, treatment, pathologic evaluation and follow-up of patients with these lesions are covered and areas of future research are discussed. Whenever possible, evidence-based recommendations are made, and on the other cases expert opinion is presented.

Postoperative bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is controversial whether antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of antithrombotic therapy on gastric ESD.

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastric ESD at Toranomon Hospital between April 2005 and July 2014 were enrolled. The risk of post-ESD bleeding was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1781 patients enrolled, 253 were taking an antithrombotic; 186 discontinued taking a single antithrombotic (n = 150) or multiple antithrombotics (n = 36) before ESD, whereas 15 continued taking a single antiplatelet agent and another 52 switched to heparin alternative therapy during the peri-ESD period. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 101 patients (5.7 %): 68 patients (3.8 %) who did not take an antithrombotic, 11 patients (7.3 %) who discontinued taking a single antithrombotic, six patients (16.7 %) who discontinued taking multiple antithrombotics, one patient (6.7 %) who continued taking a single antiplatelet agent, and 15 patients (28.8 %) who switched to heparin therapy. In multivariate analysis, heparin alternative therapy [odds ratio (OR) 10.04, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.35-23.16], discontinuation of the use of multiple antithrombotics before ESD (OR 5.44, 95 % CI 2.00-14.79), tumor location in the lower third of the stomach (OR 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.32-3.58), and a long procedure time (100 min or greater; OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.25-3.20) were independent risk factors for post-ESD bleeding. Among 52 subjects who switched to heparin therapy, one developed acute renal infarction and one developed cerebral bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Because heparin alternative therapy significantly increases the risk of post-ESD bleeding and may not decrease the risk of thromboembolic events, other options should be considered for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.

New devices and techniques for endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal perforations

Gastrointestinal perforations, which need to be managed quickly, are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatments used to close these perforations range from surgery to endoscopic therapy. Nowadays, with the development of new devices and techniques, endoscopic therapy is becoming more popular. However, there are different indications and clinical efficacies between different methods, because of the diverse properties of endoscopic devices and techniques. Successful management also depends on other factors, such as the precise location of the perforation, its size and the length of time between the occurrence and diagnosis. In this study, we performed a comprehensive review of various devices and introduced the different techniques that are considered effective to treat gastrointestinal perforations. In addition, we focused on the different methods used to achieve successful closure, based on the literature and our clinical experiences.

Feasibility study on expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection of intramucosal poorly differentiated early gastric cancer

AIM: To identify clinicopathological factors predictive of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in intramucosal poorly differentiated early gastric cancer (EGC), and further to expand the possibility of using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of intramucosal poorly differentiated EGC.

METHODS: Data for 81 surgically treated patients with intramucosal poorly differentiated EGC were collected, and the association between the clinicopathological factors and the presence of LNM was retrospectively analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Several clinicopathologic factors were investigated to identify predictive factors for lymph nodes metastasis, including gender, age, family history of gastric cancer, number of tumors, tumor location, ulceration, tumor size, macroscopic type, lymphatic vessel involvement, and signet-ring-cell component.

RESULTS: Tumor size (OR = 7.273, 95%CI: 1.246-29.918, P = 0.042), lymphatic vessel involvement (OR = 42.219, 95%CI: 1.923-97.052, P = 0.018) and signet-ring-cell component (OR = 17.513, 95%CI: 1.647-77.469, P = 0.034) that were significantly associated with LNM by univariate analysis, were found to be significant and independent risk factors for LNM by multivariate analysis. However, gender, age, family history of gastric cancer, number, location, ulceration and macroscopic type of tumor were found not to be associated with LNM. Of these 81 patients diagnosed with intramucosal poorly differentiated EGC, 7 (8.6%) had LNM. The LNM rates were 9.1%, 22.2% and 57.1%, respectively, in cases with one, two and three of the risk factors. There was no LNM in 54 patients without the three risk clinicopathological factors.

CONCLUSION: Tumor size, lymphatic vessel involvement and signet-ring-cell component are independently associated with the presence of LNM in intramucosal poorly differentiated EGC. Thus, these three risk factors may be used as a simple criterion to expand the possibility of using ESD for the treatment of intramucosal poorly differentiated EGC.

Endoscopic prediction of recurrence in patients with early gastric cancer after margin-negative endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although follow-up endoscopy is routinely performed after endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC), it remains unclear whether resection scar biopsies should also be taken. This study sought to predict local recurrence at the ER scar on the basis of endoscopic criteria after margin-negative EGC resection and to determine the necessity of taking scar biopsies.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with EGC who underwent margin-negative ER in June 1995 to December 2011 and developed recurrence at the scar were identified. Each case was matched by four controls with EGC and margin-negative ER but without local recurrence for age, sex, and en-bloc resectability (en-bloc vs. piecemeal resection). Endoscopic data were reviewed by consensus of two endoscopists. Key endoscopic criteria were gross morphology (evenly elevated, unevenly elevated, and flat), hyperemic change, mucosal defect, and spontaneous bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 3037 cases, which underwent margin-negative ER, 22 developed local recurrence (mean age, 63.8 years; 72.9% male). En-bloc resection was achieved in 20 of the 22 (90.9%). Flat endoscopic morphology without hyperemic changes predicted non-recurrence at the scar with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 95.5%, 68.2%, 2.6%, 99.94%, and 73.6%, respectively. For patients who underwent en-bloc resection for differentiated EGC, these values were 100%, 71.4%, 3.0%, 100%, and 75.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine follow-up biopsies may be unnecessary when follow-up endoscopy reveals flat mucosa without hyperemic changes at the scar, especially for en-bloc resected and differentiated EGCs.

Usefulness of a traction method using dental floss and a hemoclip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score matching analysis (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a significant advancement in therapeutic endoscopy, it is a complicated technique and requires considerable expertise. In this exploratory study, we evaluated the efficacy of a simple traction method that uses dental floss and a hemoclip (DFC) and was developed to overcome the technical difficulties of ESD.

METHODS

In total, 238 early gastric cancers treated by ESD between May 2012 and December 2014 at Tokyo Medical University were retrospectively reviewed. Lesions treated by conventional ESD (n = 185) and by ESD with DFC (ESD-DFC) (n = 53) were compared. Multivariable analyses and propensity score matching were used to compensate for the differences in age, sex, resected specimen size, lesion location, lesion position, presence of ulceration, and operator level. The procedure time, rate of en bloc and complete resection, and rates of adverse events were evaluated between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching analysis created 43 matched pairs. Adjusted comparisons between ESD-DFC and conventional ESD showed similar treatment outcomes (en bloc resection rate: 97.7% vs 100%, P = .315; complete resection rate: 90.7% vs 95.3%, P = .397; perforation during ESD rate: 2.3% vs 2.3%, P = 1.000; post-ESD bleeding rate: 4.7% vs 4.7%, P = 1.000) but a significantly shorter procedure time for ESD-DFC (82.2 ± 79.5 minutes vs 118.2 ± 71.6 minutes, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

ESD-DFC facilitated rapid ESD with good visualization and traction while ensuring high curability and safety.

Optimal management for patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The necessity of additional gastrectomy for patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after endoscopic submu cosal dissection (ESD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and residual cancer (RC) in patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after ESD and to determine additional treatment strategies.

METHODS

Of 1443 gastric cancer patients who underwent ESD between 2004 and 2013, 167 patients diagnosed as having a lesion not meeting the inclusion criteria after ESD were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 167 cases, 100 cases underwent additional gastrectomy, and 67 cases were observed without surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.0 % (9/100) and 9.0 % (9/100) of patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after ESD presented with LNM and RC, respectively, but neither was observed in 83 patients (83.0 %). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphovascular involvement (LVI) (OR 38.38; 95 % CI 1.94-761.43, p = 0.017) and undifferentiated type (OR 45.58; 95 % CI 2.88-720.94, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for LNM, and positive horizontal margin was an independent risk factor for RC (OR 9.48; 95 % CI 1.72-52.13, p = 0.010). In differentiated types without LVI, no cases had LNM (0/38) in the additional gastrectomy group, and there was no lymph node or distant recurrence (0/39) in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional treatment is necessary for patients with LVI, undifferentiated type, and positive horizontal margin. Careful follow-up may be acceptable for patients with the differentiated type without LVI, especially for the elderly or patients with severe comorbidities.

Defining a Subgroup Treatable for Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery in Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: the Role of Lymph Node Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Recently, the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) and the development of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) have enabled either the preservation of the stomach or the minimization of the extent of partial resection. ESD has recently been practiced on a differentiated type of EGC. However, there is no clear evidence for endoscopic treatments of undifferentiated EGC. The purposes of this study are to investigate predictive factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in undifferentiated EGC and expand the possibility of using LECS for the treatment of undifferentiated EGC.

METHODS

Data from 116 patients with undifferentiated EGC and surgically treated were collected, and the association between the clinicopathological factors and the presence of LNM was retrospectively analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

The tumor size (OR = 11.748, 95 % CI 2.034-62.213, P = 0.008), depth of invasion (OR = 13.928, 95 % CI 1.971-92.434, P = 0.016), and lymphatic vessel involvement (OR = 11.522, 95 % CI 2.645-59.172, P = 0.021) that were significantly associated with LNM by univariate analysis were found to be significant and independent risk factors for LNM by multivariate analysis. The LNM rate was 5.9 % (4/68) and 29.2 % (14/48) with intramucosal and submucosal undifferentiated EGC, respectively. LNM was observed in 66.7 % (2/3) of patients with both risk factors (tumor larger than or equal to 2.0 cm and the presence of lymphatic vessel involvement (LVI)), but in none of 36 patients without the two risk factors in intramucosal undifferentiated EGC. The 5-year survival rates were 88.9, 72.4, and 33.3 %, respectively, in cases with none, one, and two of the risk factors, respectively, in intramucosal undifferentiated EGC (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ESD alone may be a sufficient treatment for intramucosal undifferentiated EGC if the tumor is less than 2.0 cm in size and when LVI is absent upon postoperative histological examination. LECS is feasible and safe for patients with undifferentiated EGC.

Hwang JH, Konda V, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chauhan SS, Enestvedt BK, Fujii-Lau LL, Komanduri S, Maple JT, Murad FM, Pannala R, Thosani NC, Banerjee S. Endoscopic mucosal resection

EMR has become an established therapeutic option for premalignant and early-stage GI malignancies, particularly in the esophagus and colon. EMR can also aid in the diagnosis and therapy of subepithelial lesions localized to the muscularis mucosa or submucosa. Several dedicated EMR devices are available to facilitate these procedures. Adverse event rates, particularly bleeding and perforation, are higher after EMR relative to other basic endoscopic interventions but lower than adverse event rates for ESD. Endoscopists performing EMR should be knowledgeable and skilled in managing potential adverse events resulting from EMR.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the safety and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) in elderly patients ≥75 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy-one patients (187 lesions) treated with ESD from January 2010 to September 2013 were enrolled in our study. Subjects were classified into two groups: elderly (age ≥75 years) or non-elderly (age <75 years). Clinicopathological characteristics, resectability, curability, complications, rates of local recurrence, and residual disease were evaluated. Association of clinicopathological characteristics of the lesions with immediate bleeding was analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed. The incidences of comorbidity were significantly different between the elderly group and the non-elderly group (P<.001). Of the elderly patients, 54.3% had two or more underlying diseases compared with 18.4% of the non-elderly patients (P<.001). Of the 98.0% of elderly patients and 97.1% of younger patients who received en bloc resection, curative resection reached 94.1% and 96.3%, respectively. Immediate bleeding occurred in 15.2% of the elderly group and 4.8% of the non-elderly group (P=.044). Operation time differed significantly (P=.039). No apparent discrepancy was observed in perforation and delayed bleeding. The differences in the invasion depth were considered between the two groups (P=.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the rate of immediate bleeding was associated with invasion depth (P=.003). There were no differences in the follow-up period and rates of local recurrence and residual disease.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is safe and feasible for elderly patients in the era of a graying population. Higher risk of immediate bleeding and longer operation time should be concerned.

Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent superficial colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection

OBJECTIVE

Superficial colorectal tumors can be treated effectively by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Few data are available on using ESD for residual or recurrent tumors after the first endoscopic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ESD for these lesions.

METHODS

In all, 28 patients with residual or recurrent superficial colorectal tumors were referred to the Kobe University Hospital for ESD. The therapeutic outcomes and the possible factors predictive of procedure difficulties for ESD were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 27 (96.4%) patients were successfully treated using ESD. There was no related immediate complication. One patient had a delayed perforation which was then treated surgically. En bloc R0 resection was possible in all the patients and curative resection in 26 patients (92.9%). One invasive cancer was treated surgically. More than one previous endoscopic resection was the only significant predictive factor for the difficulty in performing ESD. None of the patients experienced recurrence during a follow-up of 22 months (range 3-41 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ESD allowed a high rate of en bloc resection for residual or locally recurrent colorectal tumors. Furthermore, these lesions should be treated by ESD as a first-line treatment.

Future perspective of gastric cancer endotherapy

Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC) has proven safety and efficacy, and is the established standard of care in Japan. In the past decade, it is increasingly established worldwide. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is superior to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique as it is designed to provide adequate staging and long-term curative therapy-based on the en bloc R0 specimen irrespective of the size and/or location of the tumor coupled with the reliable pathological specimen. However, ESD is still requiring skilled and experienced endoscopist to perform because of complex procedures, higher complication and causing long-time consuming. The learning and application of these relatively complex endoscopic techniques for EGC has been shown across the world. Thus, a standardized ESD training system is urgently needed to disseminate safe and effective ESD technique to practices with limited ESD experience. In recent years, several innovations providing solutions to easier and safer performance of ESD have emerged. Those increase control of surgical effectors manipulating the target tissue, and enhance performance in complex surgical tasks. Very recently, the use of the laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) procedure is indicated for EGC that would be difficult to treat with ESD. As an ultimate gastric cancer endotherapy with a reasonable surgical time, LECS might be promising method at this stage. The indications for LECS for EGC could be expanded in the future, which could result in increasingly successful gastric cancer treatment.

Secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent tumors after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted technique for the management of gastric tumors. However, residual or recurrent tumors can occur after ESD; currently, there is no adequate management strategy for these tumors. Thus, the aim of the present study was to establish a strategy of secondary ESD (sESD) for cases with positive lateral margins (LM+), which cause post-ESD residual or recurrent tumors.

METHODS

Fifty-three lesions that were subjected to ESD were diagnosed as LM+ with suspected local residual tumor. The short- and long-term outcomes of early sESD (performed shortly after the initial ESD in LM+ cases to prevent local recurrence) were retrospectively compared with those of late sESD (performed after the detection of recurrent tumors).

RESULTS

Of the 53 LM+ cases, the local residual positive rate was 38.5 % (10/26) in those undergoing early sESD or additional surgery and the local recurrence rate was 29.6 % (8/27) in those that were not treated. Thus, the overall incidence of residual or recurrent tumors in LM+ cases was 34.0 % (18/53). Both early and late sESD had favorable outcomes with no severe complications: 100 % of early sESD resections were curative, compared with 86.7 % of late sESD resections, over the course of a mean (±SD) observation period of 50.8 ± 16.7 months. The performance of early sESD was significantly greater than that of late sESD (in terms of dissection speed).

CONCLUSIONS

Early sESD is more reliable than late sESD as a therapeutic strategy for salvaging residual tumors and for preventing recurrence. However, if a tumor has already recurred, late sESD remains useful.

Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (EGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2005 through 2011, 961 patients with EGC were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Patients were grouped as standard and expanded criteria, while those who did not meet the expanded criteria were regarded as the group beyond the expanded criteria. Complete resection rate and the long-term clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

Complete resection rate was significantly higher in the standard group than in expanded and beyond the expanded group; 96.1% for standard, 92.5% for expanded, 55.5% for beyond the expanded indication group. During a mean follow-up of 42 months, local tumor recurrence developed more frequently in beyond the expanded group (7.8%) than in the standard and expanded group (1.8%). Metachronous cancer incidence (6.5%) did not differ significantly between the three groups. Two-thirds of recurred or metachronous tumors were treated with additional ESD. Lymph node metastasis developed in 0.6%. Five-year overall survival rate was 94.8% (96.6% for standard, 94.2% for expanded, 84.4% for beyond expanded, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival rate was 99.1% (100, 99.3, 92.8%, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection for EGC showed favorable long-term clinical outcomes in the patients within the standard and expanded criteria, whereas less favorable clinical outcomes in the patients beyond the expanded criteria.

[Endolifter, a new tool for safe and rapid submucosal endoscopic dissection]

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is similar to that of surgery in the treatment of early lesions. The technique requires a high level of technical skill. Training on biologic models and the mastering of accessories facilitate ESD.

AIMS

The aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the Endolifter in facilitating tissue exposure during ESD in an in vivo porcine model performed at the experimental surgery laboratory of the School of Medicine at the Universidad de São Paulo in Brazil.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A study with an experimental design employing an in vivo porcine model was conducted on 5 Yorkshire pigs weighing 20-25kg. ESDs were performed using the Endolifter. Mucosal layer dissection was carried out with a dual knife and IT knife and all the endoscopic procedures were performed by a single expert endoscopist.

RESULTS

A total of 25 ESDs were performed, with a technical success rate of 100%. The mean dissection time was 12.34min (range: 10.40-14.50 min) and the mean lesion size was 2.7cm (range: 2.3-3.2cm). There were no episodes of bleeding or perforations during the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The Endolifter enables rapid and effective ESDs to be carried out. It is an applicable and easy-to-use device that can be manipulated by a single operator.

Gastric ESD: current status and future directions of devices and training

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early gastric cancer, which has been proved to be safe and effective and is the established standard of care in Japan, has become increasingly established worldwide in the past decade. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is superior to EMR, as it is designed to provide precise pathologic staging and long-term curative therapy based on an en bloc R0 specimen irrespective of the size and/or location of the tumor. However, ESD requires highly skilled and experienced endoscopists. The introduction of ESD to the Western world necessitates collaborations between Eastern and Western endoscopists, pathologists, and surgeons.

Is gastric cancer different in Korea and the United States? Impact of tumor location on prognosis

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics and prognoses of gastric cancers by tumor location in Korean and U.S. subjects after curative-intent (R0) resection for gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Data were collected for all patients who had undergone R0 resection at one U.S. institution (n = 567) and one South Korean institution (n = 1,620). Patients with gastroesophageal junction tumors or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Patient, surgical, and pathologic variables were compared by tumor location. Factors associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined via multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

In the Korean cohort, significantly more upper third GC (UTG) patients had undifferentiated, diffuse type, and advanced stage cancers compared to lower third GC (LTG) and middle third GC (MTG) patients. In the U.S. cohort, however, T stage was relatively evenly distributed among UTG, MTG, and LTG patients. The independent predictors of DSS in the Korean cohort were T stage, tumor size, retrieved and positive lymph node counts, and age, but in the U.S. cohort, the only independent predictors were T stage and positive lymph node count. Tumor size significantly affected DSS of Korean UTG patients but not U.S. UTG patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in tumor characteristics by tumor location within and between both national cohorts. On the basis of these findings, further study to investigate the biological difference between the two countries is needed.

Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Histologic discrepancies among specimens obtained by forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection (ER) between the differentiated and undifferentiated types often occur in early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical implications of histologic discrepancies in EGC.

METHODS

From August 2005 to March 2012, 596 lesions from 579 patients underwent ER for EGC. The lesions studied were diagnosed as the differentiated histologic type from forceps biopsy specimens. The lesions were grouped according to the occurrence of histologic discrepancy between the differentiated and undifferentiated types in specimens obtained by ER as concordant (n = 570) or discordant (n = 26). The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, and curative resection rates.

RESULTS

The histologic discrepancy rate was 4.4% among the studied lesions. Larger size, lesion location in the mid third of the stomach, easy friability, exudates, and submucosal invasion shown on endoscopic ultrasound were significantly related to histologic discrepancy in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, lesion location in the mid third of the stomach [odds ratio (OR) 5.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-19.13] and easy friability (OR 29.26, 95% CI 2.30 to >999.9) were significant factors associated with histologic discrepancy. The complete resection and curative resection rates were significantly lower and the additional operation rates after ER were significantly higher in the discordant group.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGCs with histologic discrepancy between the differentiated and undifferentiated types changed the therapeutic outcomes of ER. Easily friable lesions located in the mid third of the stomach carry a significant risk for histologic discrepancy in undifferentiated histology when ER of EGCs is performed.

Early and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in a large patient series

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early gastric cancer (EGC); however, little information is available on the long-term outcomes of ESD. This study was conducted to clarify the clinical outcomes of a large number of patients with EGC who underwent ESD. The early outcomes were assessed in 1,209 patients and the long-term outcomes were assessed in 300 patients at a follow-up >5 years after the ESD procedure. The overall survival rates were compared between indication and expanded-indication groups, and between the patients who did or did not undergo additional surgery in an out-of-indication group. Overall survival rates were also compared among different age groups. In total, 617 lesions were classed as the indication group, 507 as the expanded-indication group and 208 as the out-of-indication group. Curative resection rates were 96.6% and 91.5% in the indication and expanded-indication groups, respectively. In terms of the long-term outcomes, 20 of the 146 patients in the indication group, 15 of the 105 patients in the expanded-indication group and one of the 23 patients who underwent additional surgery in the out-of-indication group succumbed due to causes other than gastric cancer. Among the 26 patients who did not undergo additional surgery in the out-of-indication group, 10 mortalities occurred, including one due to gastric cancer. The five-year survival rates were not significantly different between the indication and expanded-indication groups. In the out-of-indication group, the five-year survival rate for the patients who did not undergo additional surgery (65.0%) was significantly lower than that for those who did undergo additional surgery (100%) (P<0.01). The five-year survival rate of patients aged >80 years (67.1%) was significantly lower than that of the younger patients (<60 years, 91.6%; sixties, 93.0%; seventies, 84.5%) (P<0.0001). In conclusion, although expanded-indication of ESD for EGC is appropriate, comorbidities require consideration in elderly patients.

Endoscopic clip closure of gastrointestinal perforations, fistulae, and leaks

Development of endoscopic devices to close perforations has certainly revolutionized endoscopy. Immediate closure of perforations eliminates the need for surgery, which allows us to push the limits of endoscopic surgery from the mucosal plane to deep submucosal layers and eventually transmurally. The present article focuses on endoscopic closure devices, closure techniques, followed by a review of animal and clinical studies on endoscopic closure of perforations.

Collaboration between laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic resection: an evidence-based review

Developments in endoscopy and laparoscopy have made monumental changes to the way gastrointestinal diseases are being managed. Many diseases that were traditionally managed by open surgical resection could now be treated by endoscopy alone. However, there are still instances where endoscopic treatment alone is inadequate for disease control and laparoscopic surgery is required. In addition, the collaboration between laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection or other endoscopic resectional techniques represents a new frontier for further research. The present manuscript aims to discuss the complementary role of laparoscopic surgery to endoscopic resection in the traditional context and also its future development.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

In Korea, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted for the treatment of early gastric cancers (EGCs). However, the understanding of the long-term clinical outcome of ESD for EGC remains insufficient. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term clinical outcome and efficacy of ESD for the treatment of EGCs, including the clinical application of the expanded criteria for ESD.

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2010, a total of 515 patients with 522 EGCs were treated by ESD in our hospital; study enrollment was based on the expanded criteria. Comparisons of resectability (en bloc or piecemeal resection), curability (curative or non-curative), and complications (bleeding and perforation) between the standard and expanded groups were assessed. Thereafter, 336 patients with 342 EGCs were finally included in a long-term analysis of local tumor recurrence, development of synchronous and metachronous cancers, and overall and disease-specific survival rates.

RESULTS

En bloc and curative resection rates of 96.7 % and 88.3 %, respectively, were achieved. The curative resection rate was significantly lower in the expanded group than in the standard group (82.1 % vs. 91.5 %, p = 0.001). During a median follow-up of 24 months, the local tumor recurrence rate was also higher in the expanded group than in the standard group (7.0 % vs. 1.8 %, p = 0.025). Local recurrence was more frequent in lesions with non-curative resection than in those with curative resection (20.0 % vs. 1.3 %, p < 0.001). The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 88 % and 100 %, respectively; the difference between the standard and expanded groups was not significant (p = 0.834).

CONCLUSIONS

ESD appears to be a feasible and effective method for treating EGCs, based on the standard and expanded criteria. Close follow-up surveillance, after ESD, should be standard for all patients.

Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.

Antithrombotic drugs are risk factors for delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The discontinuation of antithrombotic drugs is recommended during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms; however, controversy remains as to whether antithrombotic drugs are risk factors for postoperative bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding.

DESIGN

Single-institution, retrospective review.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

From June 2000 to December 2010, we treated 1192 gastric neoplasms in 1032 consecutive patients.

INTERVENTION

The ESD procedures were performed by using the standard techniques. Antithrombotic drug therapy was principally interrupted preoperatively and was restarted when hemostasis was confirmed by second-look endoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Risk factors for postoperative bleeding after ESD (early, delayed, and overall [combined] occurrence of bleeding during the first 5 postoperative days or thereafter) were analyzed by using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1166 ESD-induced ulcer lesions, overall postoperative bleeding was evident in 62 lesions (5.3%); early and delayed bleeding occurred in 30 and 32 lesions (2.6% and 2.7%), respectively. Based on a multivariate analysis, a specimen size of >40 mm was the sole independent risk factor for overall bleeding. Moreover, oral antithrombotic drug therapy was selected as independent risk factor for delayed but not early bleeding, according to the multivariate analysis. The delayed bleeding rate in patients who had a specimen size of >40 mm and who used antithrombotic drugs was 11.6%.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and single-site data collection.

CONCLUSION

Interruption of antithrombotic drug therapy may be adequate for preventing early post-ESD bleeding; however, reinitiating antithrombotic drug therapy is a significant independent risk factor for delayed post-ESD bleeding.

Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents an important advancement in the therapy of early neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions by providing higher en-bloc curative resection rate with lower recurrence compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and by sparing the involved organ and protecting patient’s quality of life. Despite these advantages ESD is associated with long procedure times and a higher rate of complications, making ESD a challenging procedure which requires advanced endoscopic skills. Thus, there has been a recognized need for structured training system for ESD to enhance trainee experience and, to reduce the risks of complications and inadequate treatment. ESD has a very flat learning curve. However, we do not have uniformly accepted benchmarks for competency. Nevertheless, it appears that, in Japan, more than 30 supervised gastric ESD procedures are required to achieve technical proficiency and minimize complications. A number of training algorithms have been proposed in Japan with the aim to standardize ESD training. These algorithms cannot be directly applied in the West due to substantial differences including the availability of highly qualified mentors, the type of pathology seen, choice of devices, and trainee’s background. We propose a training algorithm for Western physicians which integrates both hands-on training courses, animal model work as well as visits to expert centers. No specific preceptor training programs have been yet developed but there is a consensus that these programs are important for permeation of ESD worldwide.

Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents an important advancement in the therapy of early neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions by providing higher en-bloc curative resection rate with lower recurrence compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and by sparing the involved organ and protecting patient's quality of life. Despite these advantages ESD is associated with long procedure times and a higher rate of complications, making ESD a challenging procedure which requires advanced endoscopic skills. Thus, there has been a recognized need for structured training system for ESD to enhance trainee experience and, to reduce the risks of complications and inadequate treatment. ESD has a very flat learning curve. However, we do not have uniformly accepted benchmarks for competency. Nevertheless, it appears that, in Japan, more than 30 supervised gastric ESD procedures are required to achieve technical proficiency and minimize complications. A number of training algorithms have been proposed in Japan with the aim to standardize ESD training. These algorithms cannot be directly applied in the West due to substantial differences including the availability of highly qualified mentors, the type of pathology seen, choice of devices, and trainee's background. We propose a training algorithm for Western physicians which integrates both hands-on training courses, animal model work as well as visits to expert centers. No specific preceptor training programs have been yet developed but there is a consensus that these programs are important for permeation of ESD worldwide.

Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm in relationship to endoscopic classification of submucosal fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Whether submucosal fibrosis is related to ulceration and affects the outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) is unknown. This study aimed to determine ESD outcome in relationship to degree of submucosal fibrosis of gastric epithelial neoplasms and to identify factors predictive of submucosal fibrosis.

METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-one patients with 1,027 gastric epithelial neoplasms were treated by ESD from April 2005 to January 2011. Complete en bloc resection and perforation rates in relationship to degree of submucosal fibrosis (F0, no fibrosis; F1; mild fibrosis; F2, severe fibrosis) were determined during ESD, as well as degree of concordance between endoscopically observed ulceration and pathologically determined ulceration and pathological fibrosis stained with Masson's trichrome.

RESULTS

The complete en bloc resection rate was significantly low and the perforation rate was high for F2 versus F0/F1 tumors. Ulceration, tumor size ≥30 mm, and depressed histological type were independent risk factors for severe (F2) fibrosis. No fibrosis (F0) was observed in 77% (732/951) of endoscopically negative ulceration cases, whereas fibrosis was observed in 100% (76/76) of endoscopically positive cases. Masson trichrome staining was weak in 97% (710/732) of F0, moderate in 85% (181/214) of F1, and strong in 100% (81/81) of F2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological type of submucosal fibrosis predicts outcome of ESD for EGC. Endoscopic indications of F2 submucosal fibrosis are ulceration, tumor ≥30 mm, and macroscopic depression.