Presacral schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA

Laparoscopic surgery combined with the double-J tube implantation for the rare cystic-solid schwannoma of seminal vesicle: A Case Report and Literature Review

RATIONALE

Schwannoma is common in young and middle-aged people and occurs in the head, neck, posterior mediastinum, and retroperitoneal. Schwannoma, on the other hand, is a rare occurrence in the seminal vesicle. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial since the disease can cause lower abdominal pain, nocturia, frequent urination, blood sperm, and other symptoms. There is no standard diagnostic or treatment guideline for seminal vesicle schwannomas currently. Therefore, the treatment experience relies on the few cases reported throughout the world.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 45-year-old male patient discovered that the tumor beside the right side spermatophore is bigger than 3 years ago.

DIAGNOSIS

Schwannoma of seminal vesicle.

INTERVENTIONS

Ureter double-J tube implantation and laparoscopic surgery for schwannoma of seminal vesicle.

OUTCOMES

The operation process went smoothly. And the patient was no discomfort after half a year.

CONCLUSION

Schwannoma of the seminal vesicle is very rare in the clinic, and the imaging examination was not conclusive. The diagnosis mainly depends on pathological results. Surgical resection is the best treatment method for schwannoma. In surgery for schwannoma of seminal vesicle, combined with the ureter double-J tube implantation are many benefits. This case is an excellent example of the seminal vesicle schwannomas.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for schwannoma: six cases of a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Schwannomas are difficult to diagnose using imaging alone. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an effective and safe tissue sampling technique. Nevertheless, few reports have described EUS-FNA for schwannoma.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the efficacy of EUS-FNA for diagnosing schwannoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined six consecutive schwannoma patients who were diagnosed as having schwannoma either from EUS-FNA results or from surgically resected specimens. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for schwannoma. The secondary endpoint was EUS-FNA safety.

RESULTS

Based on cytomorphologic features and immunocytochemistry results after EUS-FNA, 4 out of 6 patients (66.7%) were diagnosed with schwannoma. The diagnoses before EUS-FNA were the following: 3 cases of gastric subepithelial lesion (SEL, suspicious for gastrointestinal stromal tumor), 1 case of intraperitoneal tumor, 1 case of retroperitoneal tumor, and 1 case of pancreatic tumor, with sizes of 15-44 mm (median 36 mm). No case was diagnosed as schwannoma solely based on image findings. Two cases of gastric SELs could not be diagnosed as schwannoma by EUS-FNA before surgery. Inadequate sampling and a lack of additional material for immunohistochemical studies could have engendered less-definite diagnoses in those cases. No procedural adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy rate of EUS-FNA for schwannoma is somewhat low. However, tissue samples were obtained safely using this method. Moreover, it is an important procedure for diagnosing schwannoma, which cannot be diagnosed solely from image findings.