The future of academic endoscopy units: challenges and opportunities

Gastrointestinal endoscopy training in general surgery residency: what has changed since 2009?

BACKGROUND

The Residency Review Committee for Surgery increased the endoscopy requirement for general surgery residents graduating in 2009 and thereafter. These changes led to the release of a position paper from 4 major gastroenterology societies claiming that the brief exposure of general surgery residents to endoscopy is not sufficient to gain competency. The societies also stated that these increased requirements will place an undue burden on gastroenterologists to supervise surgical residents in endoscopy training.

METHODS

We designed a retrospective study to see if general surgery residents at our university-based training program were able to meet the 2009 requirements, and if reliance on nonsurgical faculty has increased. The case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from our institution during seven consecutive years were reviewed.

SETTING

All endoscopic procedures were carried out at our main university hospital and at our two affiliated university hospitals. Residents spend two thirds of the year at the main campus and the remaining time at the affiliates.

RESULTS

We found that our surgical residents have met the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements. In our program, surgeons continue to provide most of the resident supervision for endoscopic procedures. Although there was an initial increased utilization of nonsurgical faculty for upper endoscopy, reliance on nonsurgical faculty for endoscopy training has declined every year since the guidelines were revised.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible for general surgery residents to meet the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements in endoscopy without placing an undue burden on gastroenterologists.

Automated before-procedure electronic health record screening to assess appropriateness for GI endoscopy and sedation

BACKGROUND

Endoscopists are performing greater numbers of procedures, often on patients with complex conditions, in ambulatory settings because of changing patient demographics and referral patterns. To assist with the pre-procedure assessment of such patients, we deployed an advanced electronic health record tool, the Queriable Patient Inference Dossier (QPID), to review clinical histories and generate e-mail alerts to providers, based on clinical guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

Study the feasibility of an automated pre-procedure alert system for outpatient endoscopy.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed 5 physicians' use of the application and their responses to the alerts.

SETTING

A hospital-based endoscopy unit and its two satellite outpatient clinics, Boston area, Massachusetts.

PATIENTS

Adult outpatients referred for endoscopy with moderate sedation.

INTERVENTION

Pre-procedure alerts automatically sent 7 days before the procedure, highlighting any conditions/clinical history that may affect management of the patient.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Physician use of the pre-procedure alert system and its effect on patient management.

RESULTS

We studied 1682 procedures that met inclusion criteria for review by QPID and 364 alerts (1.6% of the eligible procedures). Nearly 80% of the alerts were reviewed and responded to by the physicians, and 70 total alerts resulted in a change in patient management (4.2% of eligible procedures).

LIMITATIONS

The small size of the study group and the low rate of adverse events during the study period limit our findings. We thus plan to conduct a larger follow-up study to demonstrate changes in safety and efficiency.

CONCLUSION

Use of advanced electronic health record technologies, such as QPID, may improve provider efficiency and patient outcomes in endoscopy units.