A novel basket catheter to facilitate endoscopic removal of pancreatic stones (with video)

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of basket catheters and balloon catheters for endoscopic pancreatic duct stone clearance

BACKGROUND

The choice of a basket or a balloon catheter during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the clearance of pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of these two devices for pancreatic duct stone extractions.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy and safety of basket and balloon catheters for pancreatic stone extractions. We enrolled CP patients who underwent ERCP for the first time at Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University between February 2012 and December 2021. After propensity score matching (1:1), 101 patients were included in each group. The primary outcome was the rate of pancreatic stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included the rate of adverse events during hospitalization, long-term pain relief, and quality of life after one year follow-up period.

RESULTS

The rate of complete clearance was comparable between the two groups (86.1% vs. 84.2%, P = 0.692). In patients with stones ≥ 2 cm before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), the rate of complete clearance was significantly higher in the balloon catheter group when compared to the basket catheter group [100% (19/19) vs. 70.0% (14/20), P = 0.031]. In the multivariate logistic analysis, ESWL prior to stone extraction was the only independent predictor of complete clearance [with ESWL 58.4% (264/452) vs. without ESWL 41.6% (188/452), odds ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-4.3; P = 0.013]. No significant differences between groups were found regarding the rates of adverse events during hospitalization, quality of life, and pain relief after one year of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacy and safety for pancreatic stone extractions. However, the balloon catheter was superior to the basket catheter if the pancreatic stone size was ≥ 2 cm before ESWL.

Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive disease characterized by irregular fibrosis, cellular infiltration, and parenchymal loss within the pancreas. Chronic pancreatitis treatment includes lifestyle modifications based on disease etiology, dietary adjustments appropriate for each stage and condition, drug therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgical treatments. Although surgical treatments of symptomatic chronic pancreatitis provide good pain relief, endoscopic therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment because they are minimally invasive. In recent years, endoscopic therapy has emerged as an alternative treatment method to surgery for managing local complications in patients with chronic pancreatitis. For pancreatic stone removal, a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic extraction is used. For refractory pancreatic duct stones, intracorporeal fragmentation techniques, such as pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy, offer additional options. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound has become the primary treatment modality for pancreatic pseudocysts, except in the absence of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. This review focuses on the current status of endoscopic therapies for common local complications of chronic pancreatitis, including updated information in the past few years.

Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter

Background and study aims Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are primary treatments for symptomatic main pancreatic duct (MPD) stones. However, incomplete clearance of residual/microstones post-treatment may cause symptom recurrence. We hypothesized that the 8-wire biliary basket catheter could be suitable for MPD stone extraction and aimed to analyze its ability to achieve more complete clearance of MPD residual/microstones. Patients and methods Patients suspected of having MPD residual/microstones ≤ 5 mm because of abdominal symptoms, computed tomography examination results, and pancreatography results after previous therapy, including ERCP, EHL, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with severe MPD stenosis/biliary obstruction requiring ERCP drainage were excluded. Extraction of residual/microstones was attempted using an 8-wire basket that is widely expandable in the narrow pancreatic duct and can capture and sweep stones in the narrow pancreatic duct. Technical success was defined as extraction of residual/microstones. The primary outcome was the technical success rate. Secondary outcomes were therapeutic details of stone extraction using the 8-wire basket catheter, including symptom improvements. Results The technical success rate was 100% for seven patients; 1 to 8 residual/microstones were extracted. An improvement was observed in five patients with symptoms after the previous therapy. Three patients underwent residual stone extraction after extraction using a dedicated basket. No patient experienced symptom recurrence during the 270-day follow-up period. Conclusions The 8-wire basket resulted in successful MPD residual/microstone extraction and pancreatic symptom improvement. This method may prevent symptom recurrence caused by incomplete residual/microstone clearance.

Pancreatic Stones: Clinical Outcomes With Nonsurgical Treatment in a Japanese Single-Center Study

OBJECTIVES

While chronic pancreatitis associated with pancreatolithiasis presents with pain, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions worsen with time. We examined outcomes of nonsurgical treatment.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2020, we treated pancreatolithiasis nonsurgically in 165 patients with chronic pancreatitis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone or followed by endoscopic procedures. The mean follow-up duration was 49 months (standard deviation, 56 months) and the age was 56 years (standard deviation, 13 years). The male:female ratio was 5.1:1 (138 men, 27 women). We followed treatment results including relief of abdominal pain, stone clearance and recurrence, and pancreatic exocrine function (bentiromide-p-aminobenzoic acid testing).

RESULTS

Treatment relieved pain in 117 of 124 patients (94%). The overall stone clearance was achieved in 130 of 165 patients (79%). Stones recurred during follow-up in 50 of 130 patients (38%). One fifth of recurrences were early, often involving stricture of the main pancreatic duct. After 1 year, 65% of the patients had improved or stable exocrine function.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsurgical stone removal usually improved symptoms and preserved pancreatic exocrine function. Nonsurgical treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy followed by endoscopic treatment if needed is useful as initial management for pancreatolithiasis.

Long-term outcome of endotherapy for pancreatic stones by using a dedicated pancreatic basket catheter

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although endotherapy for pancreatic stones is less invasive compared with surgical interventions, its recurrence rate is high and residual pancreatic stones can be a cause of recurrence. We previously reported usefulness of a novel basket catheter with nitinol fine reticular structure for pancreatic stone retraction. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of endotherapy for pancreatic stones with and without the use of this dedicated basket catheter.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared patients with symptomatic pancreatic stones who underwent the initial endotherapy between 2008 and 2019. The primary outcome was the symptomatic recurrence after complete stone clearance. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complete stone clearance, complications, risk factors for recurrences, and the treatment cost.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients who underwent endotherapy for pancreatic stones were analyzed: 41 patients by using the dedicated basket catheter and 60 patients by only the conventional devices. The complete stone clearance was achieved in 87.8% in the dedicated basket group and 88.3% in the conventional device group. Symptomatic recurrence was observed in 16.7% of the dedicated basket group and 47.2% of the conventional device group (P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the use of the dedicated basket catheter was significantly associated with the reduced risk of symptomatic recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.92, P = 0.031). The complication rate and the cost were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of this dedicated pancreatic basket catheter significantly reduced symptomatic recurrence after complete pancreatic stone removal.

A randomized-controlled trial of early endotherapy versus wait-and-see policy for mild symptomatic pancreatic stones in chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Although surgical or endoscopic treatment is effective for pain control in symptomatic calcified chronic pancreatitis, it is still unknown whether early intervention in mild symptomatic pancreatic stones would reduce the frequency of acute exacerbation and improve long-term outcomes. The aim of this randomized-controlled trial was to explore the efficacy of early endotherapy for mild symptomatic pancreatic stones in comparison with the wait-and-see policy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mild symptoms because of pancreatic stones were assigned randomly to the endotherapy or the wait-and-see group. The wait-and-see group received endotherapy only when they developed refractory exacerbation or intractable pain. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of intolerable pain attacks and acute exacerbation. The secondary outcomes were the development of pancreatic insufficiency and the progression of pancreatic atrophy.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were enrolled between March 2008 and March 2011. The study was terminated prematurely because of the poor patient enrollment. Early endotherapy tended to reduce the cumulative incidence of pain attacks and exacerbation, (P=0.17) with the composite incidence of pain attacks and exacerbation of 30% in the endotherapy group and 60% in the wait-and-see group. There were no significant differences in terms of diabetic status and the presence of steatorrhea. The thickness of the pancreas decreased significantly in the wait-and-see group (9.2-6.8 mm, P=0.041), but not in the endotherapy group (8.7-9.0 mm, P=0.60).

CONCLUSION

In a small group of patients, early endotherapy in mild symptomatic chronic pancreatitis was associated with a trend toward a minor number of acute attacks and atrophy progression of the pancreas.

Efficacy of stone density on noncontrast computed tomography in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with pancreatic stones

OBJECTIVES

Patients with chronic pancreatitis are managed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for pancreatic stones. Stone density on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) is used to predict stone composition and fragility, but no report investigating the pancreatic stone density has been documented. We aimed to assess the usefulness of pancreatic stone density on NCCT in predicting the ESWL outcome.

METHODS

We evaluated 128 consecutive patients with pancreatic stones who underwent ESWL. Pancreatic stone density on NCCT was measured in Hounsfield units. Patients with complete stone removal were compared with those with incomplete stone removal. Patient characteristics; imaging findings, including stone density; and interventions were evaluated as potential predictors. The optimal cutoff value of variables to differentiate complete removal from incomplete removal was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Complete stone removal was achieved in 66 patients (51.6%). When the density threshold was set at 820.5 Hounsfield units, complete stone removal was achieved in 52 patients (78.8%) with lower-density stones. In multivariate analysis, single stone (P = 0.007) and lower-density stone (P < 0.001) revealed significant association with complete stone removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of pancreatic stone density before therapy can help predict therapeutic outcomes.