1
|
Sameera S, Mohammad T, Liao K, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Tyberg A, Kahaleh M. Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Evidence-based Approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:346-361. [PMID: 36040932 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Managing pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains a challenge for many clinicians. Recently, significant progress has been made in the therapy of PFCs, including improvements in technology and devices, as well as in the development of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, many of which are proven less traumatic when compared with surgical options and more efficacious when compared with percutaneous techniques. This review will explore latest developments in the management of PFCs and how they incorporate into the current treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohini Sameera
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zeng Y, Yang J, Zhang JW. Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Progress and challenges. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:1888-1902. [PMID: 36998953 PMCID: PMC10044952 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) represents a severe condition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Invasive interventions are recommended in symptomatic INP. Growing evidence has suggested interventional strategies of INP evolving from traditional surgery to minimally invasive step-up endoscopic procedures. However, there is still no standardized protocol for endoscopic interventions. Recently, various studies have been published about the endoscopic management of INP. This article reviews published articles and guidelines to present the progress and challenges of endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy in INP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zeng
- Department of Psychology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Jun-Wen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
When Should We Perform Endoscopic Drainage and Necrosectomy for Walled-Off Necrosis? J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9124072. [PMID: 33348675 PMCID: PMC7767133 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy are now accepted treatment approaches for patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). The current recommendations advocate step-up approaches for the treatment of symptomatic WON. Previous recommendations stipulated that endoscopic intervention should be delayed until more than four weeks after the onset. Recent data on early drainage have been increasing and this option might be considered in well-encapsulated cases, but the percutaneous route is preferred if the drainage is performed within two weeks after onset or in nonencapsulated cases. Recently, additional drainage methods, such as the multiple gateway technique and multiple stent placement, have been developed to open up multiple dead spaces in the WON cavity. Endoscopic necrosectomy could be performed via the transluminal route or percutaneous route after failed initial and additional drainage procedures. The use of novel lumen-apposing stents is a promising treatment option that could reduce the number of steps, the procedure time, and the overall number of necrosectomies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Suggs P, NeCamp T, Carr JA. A Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Surgical Creation of a Cystogastrostomy to Drain Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis in 5500 Patients. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2020; 1:e024. [PMID: 37637446 PMCID: PMC10455460 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the success, morbidity, and mortality rates of endoscopic and surgical creation of pancreatic cystenterostomies for the drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, pseudocysts with necrotic debris, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Summary Background Data Endoscopic methods of cystenterostomy creation to drain pancreatic pseudocysts (with and without necrotic debris) and infected peripancreatic fluid collections are perceived to be less morbid than surgery. Contemporary reports document a very high complication rate with endoscopic methods. Methods A meta-analysis of 5500 patients. Results Open and laparoscopic surgical techniques to drain chronic pancreatic pseudocysts, infected pancreatic fluid collections, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis are more successful with less morbidity and mortality than endoscopic methods. Conclusions In regards to a surgical step-up approach to treat chronic infected pancreatic fluid collections or walled-off pancreatic necrosis, surgical creation of a cystenterostomy is more successful with fewer complications than endoscopic methods and should be given priority if less invasive or conservative methods fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Suggs
- From the The Department of General Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Timothy NeCamp
- The Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - John Alfred Carr
- The Department of Trauma Surgery, Mid-Michigan Medical Center, Midland, MI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carr JA. Comparing Open and Endoscopic Techniques of Debridement for Pancreatic Necrosis. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 231:403-405. [PMID: 32660735 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
6
|
Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC, Mallery S, Freeman M, Besselink MG. Current Concepts in Severe Acute and Necrotizing Pancreatitis: An Evidence-Based Approach. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:1994-2007.e3. [PMID: 30776347 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of acute pancreatitis continues to rise, inducing substantial medical and social burden, with annual costs exceeding $2 billion in the United States alone. Although most patients develop mild pancreatitis, 20% develop severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis, requiring advanced medical and interventional care. Morbidity resulting from local and systemic complications as well as invasive interventions result in mortality rates historically as high as 30%. There has been substantial evolution of strategies for interventions in recent years, from open surgery to minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic step-up approaches. In contrast to the advances in invasive procedures for complications, early management still lacks curative options and consists of adequate fluid resuscitation, analgesics, and monitoring. Many challenges remain, including comprehensive management of the entire spectrum of the disease, which requires close involvement of multiple disciplines at specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru Trikudanathan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | | | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, the University Medical Center Utrecht and the St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Shawn Mallery
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Martin Freeman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoon SB, Chang JH, Lee IS. [Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2018; 72:97-103. [PMID: 30270591 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2018.72.3.97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) develops as a result of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, trauma, and postoperation. Although percutaneous drainage, surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Panceatogram are used as conventional treatments in complicated PFC, the clinical course of PFC is unsatisfactory due to its clinical success rate and the risk of procedure-related complications. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage of PFC is a safe and effective modality for the management of PFC, particularly in patients with pancreas necrosis. A range of techniques and stents have been introduced and a newly designed metal stent is now available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Bae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyuck Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The lumen-apposing metal stent is the first stent specifically designed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage of extraintestinal fluid collections. With the "hot" electrocautery-enhanced delivery system, this platform marks the most recent evolutionary stage of endoscopic therapy of pancreatic fluid collections. The lumen-apposing metal stent platform has made endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections easier and safer, while serving as a port for safe entry into the cyst cavity to extend the reach of endoscopic diagnosis and therapy. Tools conceived for endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal intervention have emerged and are opening the door to new frontiers of endoscopic transluminal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth F Binmoeller
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, 2351 Clay Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
| | - Andrew Nett
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, 2351 Clay Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Cappendijk VC, Consten EC, Dejong CH, van Eijck CH, Erkelens WG, van Goor H, van Grevenstein WMU, Haveman JW, Hofker SH, Jansen JM, Laméris JS, van Lienden KP, Meijssen MA, Mulder CJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Poley JW, Quispel R, de Ridder RJ, Römkens TE, Scheepers JJ, Schepers NJ, Schwartz MP, Seerden T, Spanier BWM, Straathof JWA, Strijker M, Timmer R, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, Voermans RP, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P. Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2018; 391:51-58. [PMID: 29108721 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32404-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 400] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease and an indication for invasive intervention. The surgical step-up approach is the standard treatment. A promising alternative is the endoscopic step-up approach. We compared both approaches to see whether the endoscopic step-up approach was superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS In this multicentre, randomised, superiority trial, we recruited adult patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis and an indication for invasive intervention from 19 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned to either the endoscopic or the surgical step-up approach. The endoscopic approach consisted of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic necrosectomy. The surgical approach consisted of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement. The primary endpoint was a composite of major complications or death during 6-month follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN09186711. FINDINGS Between Sept 20, 2011, and Jan 29, 2015, we screened 418 patients with pancreatic or extrapancreatic necrosis, of which 98 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the endoscopic step-up approach (n=51) or the surgical step-up approach (n=47). The primary endpoint occurred in 22 (43%) of 51 patients in the endoscopy group and in 21 (45%) of 47 patients in the surgery group (risk ratio [RR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·62-1·51; p=0·88). Mortality did not differ between groups (nine [18%] patients in the endoscopy group vs six [13%] patients in the surgery group; RR 1·38, 95% CI 0·53-3·59, p=0·50), nor did any of the major complications included in the primary endpoint. INTERPRETATION In patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis, the endoscopic step-up approach was not superior to the surgical step-up approach in reducing major complications or death. The rate of pancreatic fistulas and length of hospital stay were lower in the endoscopy group. The outcome of this trial will probably result in a shift to the endoscopic step-up approach as treatment preference. FUNDING The Dutch Digestive Disease Foundation, Fonds NutsOhra, and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van Brunschot
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Janneke van Grinsven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Olaf J Bakker
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Stefan A Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H Dejong
- Department of Surgery and NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Sijbrand H Hofker
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johan S Laméris
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Chris J Mulder
- Department of Gastroenterology, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Tessa E Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicolien J Schepers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Tom Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robin Timmer
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ben J Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, Netherlands
| | - Hein G Gooszen
- Department of OR/Evidence Based Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:30-42.e15. [PMID: 28867073 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic transluminal drainage of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) is a good management option, although the optimal choice of drainage site stent is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) in terms of WON resolution, likelihood of resolution after 1 procedure, and adverse events. METHODS An expert librarian queried several databases to identify studies that assessed WON management, and selection was according to a priori criteria. Publication bias, heterogeneity, and study quality were evaluated with the appropriate tools. We performed single and 2-arm meta-analyses for noncomparative and comparative studies using event rate random-effects model and odds ratio (OR)/difference in means, respectively. RESULTS We included 41 studies involving 2213 patients. In 2-arm study meta-analysis, WON resolution was more likely with MSs compared with PSs (OR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.6; P < .001). Resolution with a single endoscopic procedure was similar between stents (47% vs 44%), although for those cases requiring more than 1 intervention, the MS group had fewer interventions, favored by a mean difference of -.9 procedures (95% CI, -1.283 to -.561). In single-arm study meta-analysis, when compared with PSs, MS use was associated with lower bleeding (5.6% vs 12.6%; P = .02), a trend toward lower perforation and stent occlusion (2.8% vs 4.3%, P = .2, and 9.5% vs 17.4%, P = .07), although with higher migration (8.1% vs 5.1%; P = .1). CONCLUSION Evidence suggests that MSs are superior for WON resolution, with fewer bleeding events, trend toward less occlusion and perforation rate, but increased migration rate compared with PSs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Law R, Baron TH. Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Drainage of Pancreatic Collections, Including the Role of Necrosectomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2017; 27:715-726. [PMID: 28918807 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2017.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, the management of symptoms of pancreatic fluid collections has shifted from surgical and percutaneous interventions to endoscopic techniques. Available data show that endoscopic drainage can be achieved with minimal morbidity and procedural-related mortality, a high degree of technical and clinical success, and acceptable risk of adverse events. Although endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis provides a durable, minimally invasive treatment option, it is still generally performed only in tertiary care medical centers because of the overall complexity of this clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 3912 Taubman Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5362, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Road, CB 7080, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-0001, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Endoscopic "step-up approach" using a dedicated biflanged metal stent reduces the need for direct necrosectomy in walled-off necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:1243-1252. [PMID: 27845053 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided drainage using plastic stents may be inadequate for treatment of walled-off necrosis (WON). Recent studies report variable outcomes even when using covered metal stents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a dedicated covered biflanged metal stent (BFMS) when adopting an endoscopic "step-up approach" for drainage of symptomatic WON. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage using BFMSs over a 3-year period. Reassessment was done between 48 and 72 hours for resolution. Endoscopic reinterventions were tailored in nonresponders in a stepwise manner. Step 1 encompassed declogging the blocked lumen of the BFMS. In step 2, a nasocystic tube was placed via BFMSs with intermittent irrigation. Step 3 involved direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN). BFMSs were removed between 4 and 8 weeks of follow-up. The main outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and need for DEN. RESULTS Two hundred five WON patients underwent EUS-guided drainage using BFMSs. Technical success was achieved in 203 patients (99%). Periprocedure adverse events occurred in 8 patients (bleeding in 6, perforation in 2). Clinical success with BFMSs alone was seen in 153 patients (74.6%). Reintervention adopting the step-up approach was required in 49 patients (23.9%). Incremental success was achieved in 10 patients with step 1, 16 patients with step 2, and 19 patients with step 3. Overall clinical success was achieved in 198 patients (96.5%), with DEN required in 9.2%. Four patients failed treatment and required surgery (2) or percutaneous drainage (2). CONCLUSIONS The endoscopic step-up approach using BFMSs was safe, effective, and yielded successful outcomes in most patients, reducing the need for DEN.
Collapse
|
13
|
Boumitri C, Brown E, Kahaleh M. Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Current Management and Therapies. Clin Endosc 2017; 50:357-365. [PMID: 28516758 PMCID: PMC5565044 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2016.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis accounts for 10% of acute pancreatitis (AP) cases and is associated with a higher mortality and morbidity. Necrosis within the first 4 weeks of disease onset is defined as an acute necrotic collection (ANC), while walled off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) develops after 4 weeks of disease onset. An infected or symptomatic WOPN requires drainage. The management of pancreatic necrosis has shifted away from open necrosectomy, as it is associated with a high morbidity, to less invasive techniques. In this review, we summarize the current management and therapies for acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Boumitri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Elizabeth Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nabi Z, Basha J, Reddy DN. Endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections-revisited. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:2660-2672. [PMID: 28487603 PMCID: PMC5403745 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2016] [Revised: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) is one of the most common complications of acute severe pancreatitis. Most of the acute pancreatic fluid collections resolve and do not require endoscopic drainage. However, a substantial proportion of acute necrotic collections get walled off and may require drainage. Endoscopic drainage of PFC is now the preferred mode of drainage due to reduced morbidity and mortality as compared to surgical or percutaneous drainage. With the introduction of new metal stents, the efficiency of endoscopic drainage has improved and the task of direct endoscopic necrosectomy has become easier. The requirement of re-intervention is less with new metal stents as compared to plastic stents. However, endoscopic drainage is not free of adverse events. Severe complications including bleeding, perforation, sepsis and embolism have been described with endoscopic approach to PFC. Therefore, the endoscopic management of PFC is a multidisciplinary affair and involves interventional radiologists as well as GI surgeons to deal with unplanned adverse events and failures. In this review we discuss the recent advances and controversies in the endoscopic management of PFC.
Collapse
|
15
|
Saumoy M, Arvanitakis M, Kahaleh M. Pancreatic fluid collections and necrosectomy with plastic stents versus lumen-apposing stents. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6:S132-S137. [PMID: 29387710 PMCID: PMC5774071 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_80_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Saumoy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ren YC, Chen SM, Cai XB, Li BW, Wan XJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with trans-duodenoscope cyclic irrigation technique for walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49:38-44. [PMID: 27665262 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.08.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2016] [Revised: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage has been established as a good treatment modality in the management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis, but the unmanageable infection of postoperation is still a thorny problem due to the poor drainage ability for solid necrotic debris only through transmural stent and nasocystic catheter. AIMS Introduce a novel therapeutic method, namely endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation technique in managing patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis. METHODS 18 patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated with walled-off pancreatic necrosis received treatment with endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation were involved in this retrospective study. RESULTS 17 of 18 patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis were treated by this new therapeutic method. Subsequent surgery was performed in 1 case due to uncontrolled infection, complications such as perforation, bleeding or multiple organ failure were not observed. Treatment success rate was high (16 in 17, 94.12%). CONCLUSION Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation is an effective treatment option for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis to facilitate drainage and obviate the need for subsequent surgery or endoscopic necrosectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Chun Ren
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Su-Min Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Bo Cai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bai-Wen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xin-Jian Wan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sharaiha RZ, Tyberg A, Khashab MA, Kumta NA, Karia K, Nieto J, Siddiqui UD, Waxman I, Joshi V, Benias PC, Darwin P, DiMaio CJ, Mulder CJ, Friedland S, Forcione DG, Sejpal DV, Gonda TA, Gress FG, Gaidhane M, Koons A, DeFilippis EM, Salgado S, Weaver KR, Poneros JM, Sethi A, Ho S, Kumbhari V, Singh VK, Tieu AH, Parra V, Likhitsup A, Womeldorph C, Casey B, Jonnalagadda SS, Desai AP, Carr-Locke DL, Kahaleh M, Siddiqui AA. Endoscopic Therapy With Lumen-apposing Metal Stents Is Safe and Effective for Patients With Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:1797-1803. [PMID: 27189914 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage and necrosectomy have become the standard treatment for patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have shown success in the management of pancreatic fluid collections. However, there are few data on their specific roles in management of WON. We investigated the efficacy and safety of LAMS in treatment of WON. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicenter case series of 124 patients with WON who underwent endoscopic transmural drainage by using LAMS at 17 tertiary care centers from January 2014 through May 2015. Patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided cystogastrostomy or cystoenterostomy with placement of an LAMS into the WON collection. At the discretion of the endoscopist, we performed direct endoscopic necrosectomy, irrigation with hydrogen peroxide, and/or nasocystic drain placement. We performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with pancreatic duct stent placement when indicated. Concomitant therapies included direct endoscopic debridement (n = 78), pancreatic duct stent placement for leak (n = 19), hydrogen peroxide-assisted necrosectomy (n = 38), and nasocystic irrigation (n = 22). We collected data for a median time of 4 months (range, 1-34 months) after the LAMS placement. The primary outcomes were rates of technical success (successful placement of the LAMS), clinical success (resolution of WON, on the basis of image analysis, without need for further intervention via surgery or interventional radiology), and adverse events. RESULTS The median size of the WON was 9.5 cm (range, 4-30 cm). Eight patients had 2 LAMS placed for multiport access, all with technical success (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 107 patients (86.3%) after 3 months of follow-up. Thirteen patients required a percutaneous drain, and 3 required a surgical intervention to manage their WON. The stents remained patent in 94% of patients (117 of 124) and migrated in 5.6% of patients (7 of 124). The median number of endoscopic interventions was 2 (range, 1-9 interventions). CONCLUSIONS On the basis of a retrospective analysis of 124 patients, endoscopic therapy of WON by using LAMS is safe and effective. Creation of a large and sustained cystogastrostomy or cystoenterostomy tract is effective in the drainage and treatment of WON.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Z Sharaiha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | - Amy Tyberg
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kunal Karia
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jose Nieto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Borland Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Irving Waxman
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Virendra Joshi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Petros C Benias
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Mt Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Peter Darwin
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Christopher J Mulder
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Shai Friedland
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Palo Alto, California
| | - David G Forcione
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Divyesh V Sejpal
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, New York, New York
| | - Tamas A Gonda
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Frank G Gress
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Monica Gaidhane
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ann Koons
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Sanjay Salgado
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kristen R Weaver
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - John M Poneros
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Sammy Ho
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Montefiore, New York, New York
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alan H Tieu
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Viviana Parra
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Alisa Likhitsup
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Craig Womeldorph
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Brenna Casey
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sreeni S Jonnalagadda
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Amit P Desai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David L Carr-Locke
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Mt Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ali A Siddiqui
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lakhtakia S. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30:807-823. [PMID: 27931638 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Revised: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) provides the unique opportunity to visualize, interrogate and intervene gastrointestinal (GI) luminal, mural or peri-luminal structures and pathology with negligible adverse effects. Diagnostic, upper GI and rectal EUS is feasible, extremely safe, and efficacious. Most EUS guided interventions are safe, effective and minimally invasive, compared to peers in the percutaneous radiological or surgical procedures. As with any endoscopic procedure, EUS and its guided interventions may be accompanied by adverse events. EUS related complications are generally infrequent in expert hands, and mainly include bleeding and perforation. However, the nature and severity of adverse events associated with each EUS guided procedure are unique. Hence, it is paramount for endosonographer to have sufficient knowledge of the indications, techniques, and potential risks involved before contemplating any given procedure. Most common intervention with EUS is transmural fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is an extremely safe procedure. EUS guided drainage procedures are rapidly evolving with newer devices and methods being employed. Among them, EUS guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection-pseudocyst or walled off necrosis (WON), has largely replaced other methods (surgical, percutaneous or non-EUS endoscopic) with acceptable complications. Currently, dedicated metal stents are more widely used compared to plastic stents for drainage of PFC, especially WON. EUS has made a definite impact in biliary access and drainage of obstructed biliary system, in patients where ERCP has failed or is technically not possible, closely competing with percutaneous biliary drainage. In spite of some complications, recent improvement in devices for bilio-enteric fistula creation and stent designs, has added to its safety and efficacy. EUS guided pancreatic duct drainage remains the most challenging of EUS guided interventions where in-roads are being made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tyberg A, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: the inevitable shift to metal. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84:458-9. [PMID: 27530479 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Tyberg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Minaga K, Kitano M, Imai H, Yamao K, Kamata K, Miyata T, Matsuda T, Omoto S, Kadosaka K, Yoshikawa T, Kudo M. Modified single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage technique for a huge infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: A case report. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:5132-5136. [PMID: 27275106 PMCID: PMC4886389 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.5132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We report a successful endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of a huge infected multilocular walled-off necrosis (WON) that was treated by a modified single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage (SGTMD) technique. After placing a wide-caliber fully covered metal stent, follow-up computed tomography revealed an undrained subcavity of WON. A large fistula that was created by the wide-caliber metal stent enabled the insertion of a forward-viewing upper endoscope directly into the main cavity, and the narrow connection route within the main cavity to the subcavity was identified with a direct view, leading to the successful drainage of the subcavity. This modified SGTMD technique appears to be useful for seeking connection routes between subcavities of WON in some cases.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tyberg A, Karia K, Gabr M, Desai A, Doshi R, Gaidhane M, Sharaiha RZ, Kahaleh M. Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:2256-2270. [PMID: 26900288 PMCID: PMC4735000 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis. It is important to classify PFCs to guide management. The revised Atlanta criteria classifies PFCs as acute or chronic, with chronic fluid collections subdivided into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Establishing adequate nutritional support is an essential step in the management of PFCs. Early attempts at oral feeding can be trialed in patients with mild pancreatitis. Enteral feeding should be implemented in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis. Jejunal feeding remains the preferred route of enteral nutrition. Symptomatic PFCs require drainage; options include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, and an associated reduction in health care costs, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has become the preferable approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach using a seldinger technique is the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WOPN. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WOPN. Lumen apposing metal stents that allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen are preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography with pancreatic duct (PD) exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Any pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.
Collapse
|
22
|
Weilert F, Binmoeller KF. Specially designed stents for translumenal drainage. GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gii.2015.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
23
|
|