A novel method for endoscopic perforation management by using abdominal exploration and full-thickness sutured closure

Success of different closure modalities of gastrogastric or jejunal-gastric fistulas after EUS-directed transgastric intervention

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI) involves the creation of a temporary tract between the gastric pouch or proximal jejunum and excluded stomach by deploying a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) between the adjacent lumens. Once the intended intervention is completed, the LAMS is removed. Practices for closure of the resulting gastrogastric or jejunal-gastric fistula vary widely. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of different closure modalities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study across 6 different medical centers of patients who had undergone EDGI with subsequent LAMS removal. Patients without a follow-up study with either an upper GI series or repeat endoscopy to assess fistula closure were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 106 included patients, 22 patients (21%) had persistent fistulas on follow-up study. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) combined with OverStitch (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) was the most common modality used for fistula closure, with a persistent fistula found in 8 of 45 patients (17.8%). By comparison, a persistent fistula was found in 4 of 15 patients (26.7%) whose fistulas were not closed. APC combined with through-the-scope (TTS) clips had a high success rate in closing fistulas with a persistent fistula in 1 of 18 patients (5.6%). Patients with persistent fistulas had longer LAMS dwell times than those without fistulas (median, 100.5 days [IQR, 40-182.5] vs 30.5 days [IQR, 22-41.75], respectively; P < .001). When adjusting for LAMS dwell times, closures with APC + OverStitch, APC + TTS clips, or OverStitch were not associated with a decreased fistula rate compared with no closure.

CONCLUSIONS

A long LAMS dwell time, independent of closure technique, is associated with a high rate of persistent fistula. Based on the available data, minimizing LAMS dwell times should be recommended after EDGI. Whether primary closure helps decrease the risk of persistent fistula needs further investigation.

Hierarchical task analysis of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive endoscopic weight loss procedure used to treat obesity. The long-term goal of this project is to develop a Virtual Bariatric Endoscopy (ViBE) simulator for training and assessment of the ESG procedure. The objectives of this current work are to: (a) perform a task analysis of ESG and (b) create metrics to be validated in the created simulator.

METHODS

We performed a hierarchical task analysis (HTA) by identifying the significant tasks of the ESG procedure. We created the HTA to show the breakdown and connection of the tasks of the procedure. Utilizing the HTA and input from ESG experts, performance metrics were derived for objective measurement of the ESG procedure. Three blinded video raters analyzed seven recorded ESG procedures according to the proposed performance metrics.

RESULTS

Based on the seven videos, there was a positive correlation between total task times and total performance scores (R = 0.886, P = 0.008). Endoscopists expert were found to be more skilled in reducing the area of the stomach compared to endoscopists novice (34.6% reduction versus 9.4% reduction, P = 0.01). The mean novice performance score was significantly lower than the mean expert performance score (34.7 vs. 23.8, P = 0.047). The inter-rater reliability test showed a perfect agreement among three raters for all tasks except for the suturing task. The suturing task had a significant agreement (Inter-rater Correlation = 0.84, Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Suturing was determined to be a critical task that is positively correlated with the total score (R = 0.962, P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

The task analysis and metrics development are critical for the development of the ViBE simulator. This preliminary assessment demonstrates that the performance metrics provide an accurate assessment of the endoscopist's performance. Further validation testing and refinement of the performance metrics are anticipated.

OverStitch Sx Endoscopic suturing system in minimally invasive endoscopic procedures: overview of its safety and efficacy and comparison to oversticthTM

INTRODUCTION

OverStitch endoscopic suturing enables advanced closure by tissue approximation via endoscopically placed sutures with the ability to customize suture patterns. Newer OverStitch generation also known as OverStitch Sx overcame the limitation of the previous generation and is compatible with 20 single channel scopes over four platforms with greater maneuverability and visibility.

AREAS COVERED

In this article we will focus on the differences between three generations of OverStitch. In addition, we will review existing literature on the efficacy of OverStitch in the management of full thickness defect closure, fistula and leaks repair, stent fixation, and bariatric surgeries along with its complications and limitations.

EXPERT OPINION

Assembling overstitch takes less than five minutes and the correct sequence of system assembly is the key for a successful procedure. Transition from the second-generation OverStitch to OverStitch Sx may require three to five cases for learning curve.

Valuing innovative endoscopic techniques: endoscopic suturing to prevent stent migration for benign esophageal disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Reimbursement often presents a significant barrier to widespread adoption of innovative endoscopic devices. We aimed to determine the value (defined as cost savings to a payer) of endoscopic suturing devices in preventing the migration of esophageal stents placed for benign esophageal diseases.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was constructed from a payer perspective evaluating fully covered metal stent placement for benign esophageal diseases (fistula, leak, perforation, or stricture) in a hospital outpatient setting. The model compared 2 strategies: endoscopic suturing to anchor the stent or no suture. Health care outcomes and costs were derived from published systematic reviews and national databases (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience [MAUDE] for safety data; 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Provider Utilization and Payment Data databases for reimbursement data).

RESULTS

From a payer perspective, reimbursement for care increased by US$1487.98 without endoscopic suturing per patient, compared with US$621.06 with endoscopic suturing, to cover the risk of stent migration in addition to usual professional and facility reimbursement for stent placement. Thus, an average cost saving of US$866.92 per patient was achieved with endoscopic suturing to reduce stent migration risks. Cost savings associated with suturing ranged from US$147.48 to US$1586.36 per patient, based on the indication for the procedure in sensitivity analysis. Cost savings increased with higher rates of technical success in suture placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Creating a defined reimbursement pathway for endoscopic suture fixation of a stent for the treatment of benign esophageal diseases appears to be justified from a payer perspective.

The Use of the Overstitch to Close Perforations and Fistulas

Endoscopic suturing allows for select patients with perforations, leaks, and fistulas to be managed endoscopically. Experience with the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device suggests it may be superior to endoclips in the management of perforations, because of its ability to achieve full-thickness suturing and create an airtight closure. Although successful closure of leaks and fistulas using the Overstitch device has been described, additional therapy with a multimodality approach is often required because of inherent challenges with fistula recurrence. This article reviews the existing literature on the Overstitch endoscopic suturing system specifically in the management of gastrointestinal perforations, leaks, and fistulas.

The Development of the Overstitch System and Its Potentials

Endoscopic suturing device for flexible endoscopy was conceptualized by Apollo Group in collaboration with Olympus Optical Ltd. The first modification of suturing device for flexible endoscopy (Eagle Claw) was manufactured by Olympus engineers and extensively used by members of Apollo Group in numerous bench-top experiments on isolated pig stomachs and in live porcine model. The suturing system for flexible endoscopy in humans (Overstitch) was cleared for general clinical use in the United States in 2008. The latest model is compatible with more than 20 single-channel flexible endoscopes with diameters ranging from 8.8 mm to 9.8 mm made by major endoscope manufacturers.

Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects

A gastrointestinal (GI) transmural defect is defined as total rupture of the GI wall, and these defects can be divided into three categories: perforations, leaks, and fistulas. Surgical management of these defects is usually challenging and may be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, several novel endoscopic techniques have been developed, and endoscopy has become a first-line approach for therapy of these conditions. The use of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is increasing with favorable results. This technique involves endoscopic placement of a sponge connected to a nasogastric tube into the defect cavity or lumen. This promotes healing via five mechanisms, including macrodeformation, microdeformation, changes in perfusion, exudate control, and bacterial clearance, which is similar to the mechanisms in which skin wounds are treated with commonly employed wound vacuums. EVT can be used in the upper GI tract, small bowel, biliopancreatic regions, and lower GI tract, with variable success rates and a satisfactory safety profile. In this article, we review and discuss the mechanism of action, materials, techniques, efficacy, and safety of EVT in the management of patients with GI transmural defects.

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Defects and Closure Techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal transmural defects are defined as total rupture of the gastrointestinal wall and can be divided into three main categories: perforations, leaks, and fistulas. Due to an increase in the number of therapeutic endoscopic procedures including full-thickness resections and the increase incidence of complications related to bariatric surgeries, there has been an increase in the number of transmural defects seen in clinical practice and the number of non-invasive endoscopic treatment procedures used to treat these defects.

RECENT FINDINGS

The variety of endoscopic approaches and devices, including closure techniques using clips, endoloop, and endoscopic sutures; covering techniques such as the cardiac septal occluder device, luminal stents, and tissue sealants; and drainage techniques including endoscopic vacuum therapy, pigtail, and septotomy with balloon dilation are transforming endoscopy as the first-line approach for therapy of these conditions. In this review, we describe the various transmural defects and the endoscopic techniques and devices used in their closure.

Currently Available Non-Balloon Devices

Obesity and metabolic syndrome are known to have an impact on the economy. Obesity and metabolic syndrome affect about 40% population in the America alone, and with about 400 million obese adults in the world, obesity is a global concern. Moreover, the prevalence of overweight children is increasing. Bariatric surgery remains the gold standard for the treatment of obesity; however, endoscopic approaches may have a significant role in the management of metabolic syndrome and obesity. Until recently, many endoscopic methods have been introduced; however, few methods are used in practice, whereas others are under experimental research. Endoscopists have an important role in the treatment of obesity because endoscopic therapies have demonstrated their safety and efficacy over the past few years. Endoscopic bariatric therapies can be categorized as follows: space occupying, malabsorption, and gastric volume reduction. In this review, we summarize the currently available non-balloon type endoscopic procedure.

Endoscopic management of colonic perforations: clips versus suturing closure (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perforation during colonoscopy remains the most worrisome adverse event and usually requires urgent surgical rescue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic closure of full-thickness colonic perforations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with endoscopically closed colonic perforations over the past 6 years (2009-2014). Colonic perforations were closed by using endoscopic clips or an endoscopic suturing device. Most patients were admitted for treatment with intravenous antibiotics and kept on bowel rest. If their clinical condition deteriorated, urgent surgery was performed. If patients remained stable, oral feeding was resumed, and patients were discharged with subsequent clinical and endoscopic follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients had iatrogenic colonic perforations closed with an endoscopic suturing device or endoscopic clips during the study period. Primary closure of a colonic perforation was performed with endoscopic clips in 5 patients and sutured with an endoscopic suturing device in 16 patients. All 5 patients after clip closure had worsening of abdominal pain and required laparoscopy (4 patients) or rescue colonoscopy with endoscopic suturing closure (1 patient). Two patients had abdominal pain after endoscopic suturing closure, but diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed complete and adequate endoscopic closure of the perforations. The other 15 patients did not require any rescue surgery or laparoscopy after endoscopic suturing. The main limitation of our study is its retrospective, single-center design and relatively small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic suturing closure of colonic perforations is technically feasible, eliminates the need for rescue surgery, and appears more effective than closure with hemostatic endoscopic clips.

Weight loss endoscopy: Development, applications, and current status

Obesity and its comorbidities - including diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea - have taken a large and increasing toll on the United States and the rest of the world. The availability of commercial, clinical, and operative therapies for weight management have not been effective at a societal level. Endoscopic bariatric therapy is gaining acceptance as more effective than diet and lifestyle measures, and less invasive than bariatric surgery. Various endoscopic therapies are analogues of the restrictive or bypass components of bariatric surgery, utilizing gastric remodeling or intestinal anastomosis to achieve proven weight loss and metabolic benefits. Others, such as aspiration therapy, employ novel mechanisms of action. Intragastric balloons have recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, and a number of other technologies have completed large multicenter trials (such as AspireAssist aspiration therapy and Primary Obesity Surgery Endolumenal). Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty and transoral outlet reduction for endoscopic revision of gastric bypass have proven safe and effective in a number of studies. As devices are approved for use, data will continue to accumulate for safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness. Bariatric endoscopists should be prepared to appropriately target and apply various endoscopic bariatric therapies in the context of a comprehensive long-term weight management program.

Recent Advanced Endoscopic Management of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Related Duodenal Perforations

The management strategy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforation can be determined based on the site and extent of injury, the patient’s condition, and time to diagnosis. Most cases of perivaterian or bile duct perforation can be managed with a biliary stent or nasobiliary drainage. Duodenal wall perforations had been treated with immediate surgical repair. However, with the development of endoscopic devices and techniques, endoscopic closure has been reported to be a safe and effective treatment that uses through-the-scope clips, ligation band, fibrin glue, endoclips and endoloops, an over-the-scope clipping device, suturing devices, covering luminal stents, and open-pore film drainage. Endoscopic therapy could be instituted in selected patients in whom perforation was identified early or during the procedure. Early diagnosis, proper conservative management, and effective endoscopic closure are required for favorable outcomes of non-surgical management. If endoscopic treatment fails, or in the cases of clinical deterioration, prompt surgical management should be considered.

Algorithm for the management of ERCP-related perforations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perforation is a rare but serious adverse event of ERCP. There is no consensus to guide the clinician on the management of ERCP-related perforations, with particular controversy surrounding the immediate surgical management of postprocedurally detected duodenal perforation because of overextension of a sphincterotomy. Our aim was to assess patient outcomes using a predetermined algorithm based on managing ERCP-related duodenal perforations according to the mechanism of injury.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of all consecutive patients with Stapfer type I and II perforations between 2000 and 2014 were included. Our institutional algorithm since 2000 dictated that Stapfer type I perforations (duodenal wall perforation, endoscope related) should be managed surgically unless prohibited by underlying comorbidities and Stapfer type II perforations (periampullary, sphincterotomy related) managed nonsurgically unless a deterioration in clinical status necessitated surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (mean age, 51 years; 80% women) were analyzed with Stapfer type I perforations diagnosed in 7 (11%) and type II in 54 (89%). A postprocedural diagnosis of perforation was made in 55 patients (90%). Four patients (7%) had Stapfer type II perforations that failed medical management and required surgery. The mean length of stay (LOS) in the entire cohort was 9.6 days with a low mortality rate of 3%. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was observed in 18 patients (33%) with Stapfer type II perforations and was not associated with the need for surgery. Concurrent post-ERCP pancreatitis was diagnosed in 26 patients (43%) and was associated with an increased LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapfer type II perforations have excellent outcomes when managed medically. We validate an algorithm for the management of ERCP-related perforations and propose that it should function as a guide.

Endoscopic Suturing, an Essential Enabling Technology for New NOTES Interventions

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) was developed as a new, minimally invasive approach for various interventions inside the peritoneal cavity. Since the first reports of NOTES animal interventions, various devices have been used for closure of the transluminal entrance site. This article reviews the most commonly used endoscopic closure devices and advantages of the latest generation of endoscopic suturing devices enabling reliable, surgical-quality closure of the full-thickness gastrointestinal wall defects.

A standardized method for endoscopic necrosectomy improves complication and mortality rates

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic necrosectomy is effective in the treatment of walled-off necrosis (WON), and is preferred to surgical approaches, however complication and mortality rates remain high with few centers regularly employing the technique. Lack of a standardized approach may also contribute to these limitations.

METHODS

Prior to the study, a multidisciplinary team applied standardized care assessment and management plan principles to develop and optimize a systematic approach for the management of WON. Preoperative, postoperative, and endoscopic management were standardized. Patient preparation, room set-up, technical features (EUS-guidance, cold-access with balloon dilation, fragmentation of necrosis on the initial procedure, antibiotic lavage, double pigtail stents), and discontinuation of PPIs to encourage auto-digestion of necrosis were included. This study employed a consecutive prospective clinical registry to assess the clinical outcomes of this standardized approach.

RESULTS

60 consecutive patients underwent 1.58 ± 0.1 necrosectomies, with debridement accomplished on the initial procedure in 98.3%. 39 patients (65%) required only one session. Clinical resolution occurred in 86.7%, with radiologic confirmation. Percutaneous drainage was required in 8 patients during follow-up, and 4 of these later required surgery. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.3% of patients, and there was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The standardized technique employed in this series was associated with lower rates of adverse events, morbidity, and mortality than prior large series. Use of a systematic approach, and integrating elements of this method may improve the risk profile of endoscopic necrosectomy and allow broader adoption.

Endoscopic Treatment of Gastrointestinal Perforations, Leaks, and Fistulae

Gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae are common postoperative complications, whereas intestinal perforation more commonly complicates advanced endoscopic procedures. Although these complications have classically been managed surgically, there exists an ever-expanding role for endoscopic therapy and the involvement of advanced endoscopists as part of a multidisciplinary team including surgeons and interventional radiologists. This review will serve to highlight the innovative endoscopic interventions that provide an expanding range of viable endoscopic approaches to the management and therapy of gastrointestinal perforation, leaks, and fistulae.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events: general overview

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents a monumental advance in the management of patients with pancreaticobiliary diseases, but is a complex and technically demanding procedure with the highest inherent risk of adverse events of all routine endoscopic procedures. Overall adverse event rates for ERCP are typically reported as 5-10%. The most commonly reported adverse events include post-ERCP pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, infection (cholangitis), and cardiopulomary or "sedation related" events. This article evaluates patient-related and procedure-related risk factors for ERCP-related adverse events, and discusses strategies for the prevention, diagnosis and management of these events.

Endoscopic Management of Gastrointestinal Fistulae

A gastrointestinal fistula is a common occurrence, especially after surgery. Patients who develop a fistula may have an infection, surgically altered anatomy, nutritional deficiency, or organ failure, making surgical revision more difficult. With advancements in flexible endoscopic devices and technology, new endoscopic options are available for the management of gastrointestinal fistulae. Endoscopically deployable stents, endoscopic suturing devices, through-the-scope and over-the-scope clips, sealants, and fistula plugs can be used to treat fistulae. These therapies are even more effective in combination. Despite the inherent challenges in patients with fistulae, endoscopic therapies for treatment of fistulae have demonstrated safety and efficacy, allowing many patients to avoid surgical fistula repair. In this paper, we review the emerging role of endoscopy in the management of gastrointestinal fistulae.