Endoscopic versus surgical gastrojejunal revision for weight regain in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients: 5-year safety and efficacy comparison

Tissue Remodeling for a More Homogenous Ablation in Transoral Outlet Reduction Using Suturing and Noncontact Argon Plasma Coagulation

The study is the first to assess the argon-plasma coagulation ArC Smart linear beam for mucosal ablation in transoral outlet reduction for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The noncontact design of the linear beam can enhance tissue healing and remodeling of gastrojejunal anastomosis by causing a uniform scarring with minimal tissue injury. We followed patients for 45 days, during which none experienced gastrointestinal bleeding, stenosis, or ulcers, reporting 9.8% average of total body weight loss. The ArC Smart beam may offer a safer, more effective alternative to traditional argon-plasma coagulation for transoral outlet reduction, with better reduction in weight loss, although comparative studies are needed.

Strategies to Manage Obesity: Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies

Over the past two decades, numerous endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have been developed with the goal of providing additional effective and safe tools for the treatment of obesity. These treatments are an ultra-minimally invasive option for patients with class I, class II, and class III obesity. Many of these EBMTs can be utilized as primary therapies for treatment-naïve patients or as a treatment for weight regain after bariatric surgery. While the role of EBMTs is not to compete with bariatric surgery, which provides the most effective treatment of obesity, they provide greater weight loss than lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy; additionally, when combined with pharmacotherapy, they may help achieve surgical weight loss without the risk of invasive surgery. This review summarizes the most currently available EBMTs, including intragastric balloons (IGBs), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), and endoscopic surgical revision procedures for treating obesity.

Current State of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies

The obesity epidemic poses a significant global health challenge. Despite proven efficacy, accessibility to bariatric surgery is limited. Endoscopic bariatric therapies offer less invasive alternatives. Reversible space-occupying devices like intragastric balloons are suitable for both primary obesity treatment and bridging to surgery. Restrictive therapies that reduce gastric volume like the primary obesity surgery endoluminal and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty have shown promising short-term results. Diverting devices such as intestinal liners/barriers or magnet-assisted anastomoses aim to replicate surgical effects with lower risks, though efficacy varies. Finally, endoscopic revisional procedures like transoral outlet reduction address weight regain post-bariatric surgery.

Therapeutic Options for Recurrence of Weight and Obesity Related Complications After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: An IFSO Position Statement

Obesity is a chronic disease that may require multiple interventions and escalation of therapy throughout the years. Until recently, no universal definition existed for recurrent weight gain and insufficient weight loss. Standardization of reporting is key so outcomes can be compared and data can be pooled. The recent IFSO consensus provided standard terminology and definitions that will likely resolve this in the future, and publishers will need to enforce for authors to use these definitions. This current IFSO position statement provides guidance for the management of recurrent weight gain after bariatric surgery.

Endoscopic Management of Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery

Weight regain, also known as recurrent weight gain, is common following bariatric surgeries. While anti-obesity medications and surgical revisions offer effective treatment options, they are not without their challenges and limitations. Over the last few decades, there have been significant advancements in endoscopic interventions to address weight regain following bariatric surgery. These procedures have demonstrated feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability, offering minimally invasive treatment options for this patient population.

Long-term results after transoral outlet reduction (TORe) of the gastrojejunal anastomosis for secondary weight regain and dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective therapy for obesity and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most commonly performed procedure. However, weight regain and dumping syndrome occur over time. The transoral outlet reduction (TORe) procedure using an endoscopic suturing device may be an option to treat these conditions. We aimed to analyze outcome parameters and long-term results for this endoscopic technique.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis of patients who underwent TORe using an endoscopic suturing system at our institution from January 2015 to December 2020 was performed. A total of 71 subjects were included. Forty-five patients received the intervention for weight regain, 9 for dumping syndrome and 17 for both. The primary endpoint was weight stabilization or weight loss for subjects with weight regain, and resolution of symptoms for those with dumping syndrome. Secondary endpoints were intraoperative complications, procedure time, length of hospital stay and diameter of gastrojejunal anastomosis 1 year post-intervention.

RESULTS

The median size of the gastrojejunal anastomosis was estimated at 30 mm before intervention, and after performing a median of 3 endoscopic sutures, the median estimated gastrojejunal anastomosis width was reduced to 9.5 mm. Eight perioperative complications occurred. Overall mean follow-up was 26.5 months. All interventions achieved weight stabilization or weight loss or resolution of dumping symptoms within the first 3 months, 98.2% at 12 months, 91.4% at 24 months and 75.0% at 48 months. In 22/26 subjects a persisting improvement of dumping syndrome was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

TORe is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of patients with dumping syndrome after laparoscopic RYGB, the effect on weight stabilization is less significant. A prospective randomized trial should be conducted to compare the effects of TORe with other surgical methods like banding the gastrojejunal anastomosis.

Surgical Management of Bariatric Complications and Weight Regain

The history and evolution of bariatric/metabolic surgical procedures allows for only a brief introduction to complications and surgical approaches for improved weight loss. Our specialty lacks standardization of our operations such as gastric pouch size, intestinal bypass lengths, and consensus on which procedure is best for each individual patient. Anatomic construct as well as adherence to lifestyle modifications can affect short- and long-term outcomes.

Combining transoral outlet reduction with pharmacotherapy yields similar 1-year efficacy with improved safety compared with surgical revision for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) and antiobesity medication (AOM) are effective treatments for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study aims to assess the efficacy of combination therapy (TORe + AOM) for treating weight regain and to compare the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with AOM alone, TORe alone, and surgical revision of RYGB.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of RYGB patients with weight regain who underwent combination therapy, defined as initiation of at least 1 AOM within 6 months before or after TORe. Outcomes were weight loss after combination therapy and comparison of combination therapy with AOM alone, TORe alone, and surgical revision.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five RYGB patients underwent combination therapy. Most commonly prescribed AOMs were topiramate, phentermine/topiramate, phentermine, and liraglutide. At 12 months, patients experienced 15.2% ± 7.4% total weight loss (TWL). Ninety percent of patients achieved ≥5% TWL at 12 months. Combination therapy was associated with greater weight loss than AOM alone (15.2% ± 7.4% vs 6.8% ± 8.2% TWL, P < .0001) or TORe alone (15.2% ± 7.4% vs 8.7% ± 8.3% TWL, P < .0001), with similar serious adverse event rates (2.1% vs 4.7% vs .6% for combination therapy vs AOM alone vs TORe alone, P > .05). Combination therapy yielded similar weight loss to surgical revision (15.2% ± 7.4% vs 16.4% ± 13.1% TWL, P = .34), with a lower serious adverse event rate (2.1% vs 14.3%, P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of TORe with AOM is superior to either therapy alone, providing similar efficacy to surgical revision with a better safety profile for the treatment of weight regain after RYGB.

Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy: A Mini-Review

We are currently in a worldwide obesity pandemic, which is one of the most significant health problems of the 21st century. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, new and innovate treatments are becoming available. Metabolic and bariatric endoscopic procedures are exciting new areas of gastroenterology that have been developed as a direct response to the obesity crisis. These novel interventions offer a potentially reversible, less invasive, safer, and more cost-effective method of tackling obesity compared to traditional bariatric surgery. Minimally invasive endoscopic treatments are not entirely novel, but as technology has rapidly improved, many of the procedures have been proven to be extremely effective for weight loss and metabolic health, based on high-quality clinical trial data. This mini-review examines the existing evidence for the most prominent metabolic and bariatric procedures, followed by a discussion on the future trajectory of this emerging subspecialty.

Revision Endoscopic Gastroplasty: An Overview and Review of Literature

The main aim of this paper was to examine the efficacy and safety of revision endoscopic gastroplasty and some of the adverse events likely to arise from the procedure, as well as the implications for future scholarly research. The study is a systematic review in which the PRISMA protocol was used to govern the article's inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies include those on revising endoscopic gastroplasty's effectiveness and safety. The studies were selected based on multiple parameters. The outcome included weight recidivism, excessive BMI loss, and absolute, total, or percentage weight loss. The outcome of this review confirmed that revision endoscopic gastroplasty is effective and safe. Mainly, revision endoscopic gastroplasty (R-EG) was found to counter-weight recidivism, especially short-term and mid-term. However, there is a need for additional scholarly investigations that would last several years to decades to inform the long-term efficacy of R-EG with precision.

Endoscopic Gastric Bypass Revision

This article describes endoscopic revision of gastric bypass to address weight regain.

Evaluation of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of dumping syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrojejunostomy stomal dilation is a frequent cause of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and may be a contributing cause of dumping syndrome. This study aims to evaluate the long-term durability of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (EGJR) to resolve dumping syndrome.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing EGJR at a single institution from January 1, 2013 to December 1, 2018. The primary endpoint, dumping symptom resolution, was measured at 1 month and at the most recent postoperative follow-up. Continuous data are reported as mean and standard deviations and categorical data as percentages. The Fisher exact test was used to assess associations between categorical variables.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients underwent EGJR for dumping syndrome. Mean patient age was 51 years (standard deviation [SD], 9.9), and mean body mass index (BMI) was 36.2 kg/m² (SD, 7.1), with most patients (53%) presenting with BMIs ≥35 kg/m². Thirty-two patients (32%) reported severe dumping (≥3 symptoms). All patients were followed-up for 1 month, and 83% had a long-term follow-up at a mean of 3.45 years (SD, 1.7) after EGJR. In addition, 88% had initial symptom resolution at 1 month, and 85% reported symptom resolution 3 years postoperatively. Patients with GERD had a statistically significant improvement in dumping syndrome at 3 years compared with those without GERD (69% vs 62%, P = .03). Long-term weight loss averaged 2.1 pounds after EGJR.

CONCLUSIONS

EGJR is associated with effective and durable resolution of dumping syndrome at 3 years postoperatively, with a minimal long-term impact on weight loss. The presence of GERD preoperatively correlates with a statistically significant resolution of dumping syndrome.