American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on management of post-liver transplant biliary strictures: methodology and review of evidence

Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplant recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver transplantation (LT) is a curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Anastomotic biliary strictures (ABSs) are more common in living donor LT (LDLT). However, the success rate of ERCP for ABSs remains unsatisfactory. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) for ABS treatment in LDLT recipients where standard ERCP failed to access the stricture.

METHODS

This prospective study included 40 LDLT patients undergoing ERCP with SOC (SpyGlass DS II; Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Mass, USA) to treat ABSs when guidewire placement across the ABS was difficult during conventional ERCP (cannulation time >10 minutes) between October 2021 and May 2023. Our primary endpoint was technical success, defined as successful guidewire placement across the ABS and/or subsequent treatment. Secondary endpoints were rates of clinical success, adverse events, and reintervention.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 59.7 ± 7.2 years, and the mean time from LDLT to the occurrence of ABS was 212 ± 230 days. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 92.5% (37/40) and 82.5% (33/40) of patients, respectively. The rates of post-ERCP cholangitis, pancreatitis, and bleeding were 10.0%, 15.0%, and 2.5%, respectively. Intestinal perforation did not occur, and all adverse events were mild in severity. Early stent migration within 1 month occurred in 2 patients (5.4%), and 4 patients (10.8%) required reintervention within 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the efficacy and safety of SOC-facilitated management for difficult ABSs in LDLT patients after failure of standard ERCP. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05065125.).

Endoscopic Management of Recurrent Anastomotic Biliary Stricture Following Deceased Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Background/Objectives: Data on the natural history and endoscopic treatment outcomes of recurrent anastomotic biliary stricture (RABS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of RABS after OLT. Methods: A retrospective single-center study on OLT patients who underwent successful endoscopic treatment of ABS was conducted. The incidence of RABS, risk factors for recurrence, and outcomes of repeat endoscopic therapy were recorded. Results: A total of 131 OLT patients with ABS underwent endoscopic treatment, of which 119 successfully completed an endoscopic treatment course. After a median follow-up of 51.5 months (IQR 18.5-86.25) from ABS resolution, 26/119 patients (22.7%) developed RABS. All patients with RABS underwent a second endoscopic treatment course; 24 patients received self-expandable metal stents and 2 received plastic stents. Re-treatment was successful in 21 patients (80.8%) after a median of 8.5 months (IQR 5.25-14.50) and a total of 62 ERCPs. Adverse events occurred in two patients (7.4%)-one bacteremia and one suprastenotic biliary stricture. After a median follow-up of 65.5 months (IQR 20.75-125.5) from stent removal, only one patient had a second recurrence, which was treated with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Multivariate analysis showed that older age at ABS diagnosis (OR 1.1; 95% CI: 1.1-1.2 p = 0.04) was the only independent risk factor for recurrence. Conclusions: RABS affects more than 20% of patients after successful endoscopic treatment. A second endoscopic therapy with covered self-expandable metal stents is a safe and effective option and should be considered before more invasive options.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on gastrostomy feeding tubes: methodology and review of evidence

This article from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides a full description of the methodology used to inform the final guidance outlined in the accompanying summary and recommendations article for strategies to manage endoscopically placed gastrostomy tubes. This article was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and specifically addresses the utility of PEG versus interventional radiology-guided gastrostomy (IR-G), the need for withholding antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications, appropriate timing to initiate tube feedings, and appropriate selection of the gastrostomy technique in patients with malignant dysphagia. In patients needing enteral access, the ASGE suggests PEG as the preferred technique for initial gastrostomy over IR-G. The ASGE recommends that tube feeding can be safely started within 4 hours of the gastrostomy without the need for an intentional delay. The ASGE suggests that a PEG can be performed without the need to withhold antiplatelet medications. In patients on anticoagulants who need to undergo PEG placement, the ASGE suggests that the periprocedural management of anticoagulants should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion with the patient regarding the risk of bleeding versus cardiovascular adverse events. In patients with malignant dysphagia, either transoral "Pull" PEG or transcutaneous "Direct" PEG can be performed for initial enteral access.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on gastrostomy feeding tubes: summary and recommendations

This clinical practice guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides an evidence-based approach for strategies to manage endoscopically placed gastrostomy tubes. This document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The guideline addresses the utility of PEG versus interventional radiology-guided gastrostomy (IR-G), need for withholding antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications before PEG tube placement, appropriate timing to initiate tube feeding after PEG, and selection of the appropriate technique of gastrostomy in patients with malignant dysphagia. In patients needing enteral access, the ASGE suggests PEG as the preferred technique for initial gastrotomy over IR-G. The ASGE recommends that tube feeding can be safely started within 4 hours of gastrostomy. The ASGE suggests that PEG can be performed without withholding antiplatelet medications. The ASGE suggests that the periprocedural management of anticoagulants should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion regarding the risk of bleeding versus cardiovascular events. In patients with malignant dysphagia, either transoral "pull" PEG or direct PEG can be performed for initial enteral access.

Procedure-related readmissions following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a liver transplant cohort

Background and Aim

Data on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) adverse events and readmission rates in liver transplantation (LT) patients remain scarce. This study determined the 30-day procedure-related readmission rate following ERCP in an LT cohort at an Australian tertiary academic center.

Methods

All unplanned readmissions within 30 days following ERCP in orthotopic LT patients between December 2012 and August 2021 were retrospectively identified. Demographic data, procedure variables, and readmission characteristics were also collected.

Results

Forty-five procedure-related readmissions were identified (3.3%) from a total of 1369 ERCP procedures. This included 33 cases of cholangitis (2.4%), 7 cases of nonspecific abdominal pain (0.5%), 5 cases of mild post-ERCP pancreatitis (0.5%), and 3 cases of bleeding (0.2%). No procedure-related mortality was observed.

Conclusion

The procedure-related readmission rate following ERCP in this LT cohort was 3.3%, which is likely lower than comparable studies carried out on the overall population.

Managing a Prospective Liver Transplant Recipient on the Waiting List

The management of a patient in the peri-transplantation period is highly challenging, and it is even more difficult while the patient is on the transplantation waitlist. Keeping the patient alive during this period involves managing the complications of liver disease and preventing the disease's progression. Based on the pre-transplantation etiology and type of liver failure, there is a difference in the management protocol. The current review is divided into different sections, which include: the management of underlying cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension, treatment and identification of infections, portal vein thrombosis management, and particular emphasis on the management of patients of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute liver failure in the transplantation waitlist. The review highlights special concerns in the management of patients in the Asian subcontinent also. The review also addresses the issue of delisting from the transplant waitlist to see that futility does not overtake the utility of organs. The treatment modalities are primarily expressed in tabular format for quick reference. The following review integrates the vast issues in this period concisely so that the management during this crucial period is taken care of in the best possible way.

Bioequivalue of two mycophenolate sodium enteric-coated tablets and the drug monitoring based on limited sampling strategy: A single-center, randomized, open-label, three-period, reference-replicated, crossover study

OBJECTIVE

A mycophenolate sodium enteric-coated tablet has shown a satisfying anti-rejection effect in patients receiving solid organ transplantation. The current study evaluated the bioequivalence between the test (Ruiyirong®) vs. reference (Myfortic®) formulations by exploring equations for predicting their area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) using a limited sampling strategy in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Forty-eight healthy Chinese subjects were randomized into three administration sequences (test-reference-reference, reference-reference-test, and reference-test-reference) to receive the Ruiyirong or Myfortic treatment on days 1, 8, and 15.

RESULTS

The 90% confidential interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the AUC from time 0 to the last timepoint (AUC0-t), and the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 92.90%-110.57%, 96.91%- 101.80%, and 96.71%-101.84%, respectively. All these values fell into the bioequivalence criteria of 80.00%-125.00% (based on the criteria of the Food and Drug Administration). The adverse events were 10.4% in Ruiyirong test group and 14.6% in Myfortic reference group. Eight equations for estimating the AUC of the Ruiyirong test and Myfortic reference formulations were evaluated; most of them worked well with the R-value >0.8. Among the four chosen equations, the intragroup verification exhibited a high agreement with the R-value ranging from 0.857 to 0.971 and with the low predictive error (PE > 5% with absolute PE > 15%). Meanwhile, the intergroup verification indicated a high inter-agreement with the R-value ranging from 0.896 to 0.974 (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Ruiyirong test vs. Myfortic reference formulations meet the bioequivalent criteria and are well tolerated. The further linear regression analysis explores eight equations predicting the AUC value and the chosen four equations for the Ruiyirong test and Mayfortic reference formulations are interchangeable.

The utility of self-expanding metal stents in benign biliary strictures- a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Benign biliary strictures can have a significant negative impact on patient quality of life. There are several modalities which can be utilized with the goal of stricture resolution. These techniques include balloon dilatation, placement of multiple plastic stents and more recently, the use of metal stents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the local success of self-expanding metal stents in successfully resolving benign biliary strictures.

METHODS

This was a single institution, retrospective case series. Patients included in our study were patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with placement of self expanding metal stents for benign biliary strictures at our institution between 2016-2022. Patients were excluded for the following: malignant stricture, and inability to successfully place metal stent. Data was evaluated using two-sided t-test with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients underwent placement of 43 self-expanding metal stents and met inclusion criteria. Mean age of patients was 59 ± 10 years, and were largely male (74.2% vs. 25.8%). Most strictures were anastomotic stricture post liver transplant (87.1%), while the remainder were secondary to chronic pancreatitis (12.9%). Complications of stent placement included cholangitis (18.6%), pancreatitis (2.3%), stent migration (20.9%), and inability to retrieve stent (4.7%). There was successful stricture resolution in 73.5% of patients with anastomotic stricture and 33.3% of patients with stricture secondary to pancreatitis. Resolution was more likely if stent duration was > / = 180 days (73.3% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.05). There was no demonstrated added benefit when stent duration was > / = 365 days (75% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that self expanding metal stents are a safe and effective treatment for benign biliary strictures, with outcomes comparable to plastic stents with fewer interventions. This study indicates that the optimal duration to allow for stricture resolution is 180-365 days.