Risk of post-sphincterotomy bleeding with antiplatelet and anticoagulant use: a propensity-matched analysis of the U.S. Collaborative Network

Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Up to 1 in 6 patients will experience an unplanned hospitalization after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), largely for the evaluation and management of adverse events. Therefore, a commitment to the prevention, early recognition, and effective rescue of complications related to ERCP is critical toward improving outcomes. ERCP is most often complicated by acute pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, or perforation, although myriad other adverse events may occur. The prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis has been the area of greatest interest and progress in the last decade, but the application of evidence-based prophylactic measures remains inconsistent. Innovations in stent, hemostasis, and perforation closure technology now allow effective and efficient endoscopic management of several important nonpancreatitis complications. Overall, our ability to prevent and treat ERCP-related adverse events has improved substantially, amplifying the importance of a high level of suspicion for and a thorough understanding of these events.

Delayed bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients receiving anticoagulants

Delayed bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) constitutes a significant adverse event, occurring in ~0.5-5% of patients. The number of patients receiving anticoagulants to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease has increased with the aging society worldwide; however, anticoagulants (direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs] and warfarin) are one of the most major risk factors for postprocedure bleeding. This review investigated post-EST bleeding in anticoagulant users, focusing on risk factors, clinical guidelines, pharmacological characteristics, and the future of post-EST bleeding. Several clinical guidelines for antithrombotic drug users have been established to prevent postprocedure bleeding; nevertheless, the risk of bleeding is believed to be several times higher than for nondrug users, regardless of clinical guideline compliance. The major problem in this field is that patients who experience delayed bleeding are often receiving multiple antithrombotic drugs, and no parameters that can accurately monitor the anticoagulant effect of DOACs have been identified. Therefore, identifying patients with a generally high-risk of postprocedure bleeding is crucial. Recently, the plasma level and antifactor Xa activity of factor Xa inhibitors have been investigated in relation to the risk of major bleeding in users. Similar to the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio for warfarin, plasma levels, and antifactor Xa activity may be useful parameters for monitoring the anticoagulant effect and identifying DOAC users at higher risk of postprocedure bleeding, including post-EST bleeding. Future studies should stratify the risk of post-EST delayed bleeding based on a scoring system to prevent this complication.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: no evidence that low-dose non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

BACKGROUND

Currently, many studies focus on the use of high-dose NSAIDs, showing significant effectiveness in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis after surgery. However, some studies suggest that low-dose NSAIDs can also have certain effects. Nevertheless, after using propensity score matching to balance potential biases, the results do not seem ideal and fail to demonstrate clear effectiveness.

AIM

This study investigates the effectiveness of NSAIDs in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis through a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant literature.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, covering literature up to September 2024. The search utilized keywords such as "ERCP," "NSAIDs," and "propensity score matching." A total of three studies employing propensity score matching were included, encompassing 857 patients-417 receiving NSAIDs before ERCP and 440 in the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3, applying a random-effects model for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in treatment outcomes between the NSAID and control groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.45-1.49, P = 0.74) and no observed heterogeneity (I²=0%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results, indicating minimal impact from the removal of any single study.

DISCUSSION

These findings challenge previous assertions that NSAIDs effectively reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence. The lack of consistent evidence raises concerns about the reliability of existing research. Additionally, the lower NSAID doses used in studies may contribute to the observed ineffectiveness. Future large-scale, well-designed clinical trials are essential to establish clear treatment guidelines and enhance patient outcomes.

Observation of symptomatic thromboembolic events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients with interruption of antithrombotic therapies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of patients with antithrombotic therapies are undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Interruption of antithrombotic therapies may be associated with a higher risk of symptomatic thromboembolic (TE) events. We aimed to investigate the risk of symptomatic TE events among patients undergoing ERCP.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on patients at risk for symptomatic TE events who had undergone ERCP from January 2016 to October 2023 was conducted. A total of 2,482 patients who had undergone ERCP were included in this study. We compared the risk of symptomatic TE events within 30 days after ERCP between the group treated with antithrombotic agent and the group not treated with antithrombotic agent using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients (0.60%, 15/2,482) developed symptomatic TE events within 30 days after ERCP. The symptomatic TE event rate in subjects on any antithrombotic drug was 1.46% with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.267 (n = 689, 95% CI 1.79-15.46, p = 0.002), compared with those not treated with antithrombotic drugs (n = 1,793). The symptomatic TE event rate in subjects on temporary interruption of antithrombotic drugs was 1.48% with an OR of 5.36 (n = 677, 95% CI 1.83-15.74, p = 0.002), compared with those not treated with antithrombotic drugs (n = 1,793). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that patients with high-risk conditions had a significantly higher risk of post-ERCP symptomatic TE events (adjusted OR 11.73, 95% CI 2.23-61.70).

CONCLUSION

Interruption of antithrombotic drugs is associated with higher post-ERCP symptomatic TE events, particularly in high-risk conditions.

Management and outcomes of antithrombotic therapy in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is increasingly used for the management of gallbladder disease in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy. These patients often have underlying medical comorbidities requiring anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. We evaluated the safety, management, and outcomes of EUS-GBD in patients being treated with antithrombotic therapy (ATT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-GBD between 2018 and 2023 within Geisinger Health System. Outcomes were analyzed between patients previously on ATT but held for the procedure compared with no ATT. Primary outcomes were bleeding within 48 hours and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were risk of thrombotic events, length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 177 patients undergoing EUS-GBD, 118 patients were on ATT. No statistical difference was found for EUS-GBD-related bleeding for patients on ATT compared with no ATT within 48 hours (.9% vs 0%, P > .999) or within 30 days (3.5% vs 0%, P = .302). Overall, 5 patients (2.9%) had bleeding related to the EUS-GBD procedure. There was no difference between the groups for secondary outcomes: thrombotic events (2.5% vs 3.4%), length of stay (7 days vs 5 days), and 30-day mortality (11% vs 10.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing EUS-GBD who require ATT did not have any immediate or delayed increased risk of bleeding, thrombotic events, length of stay, or mortality when the medication was appropriately held.

ERCP-related adverse events: incidence, mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed procedure for pancreaticobiliary disease. While ERCP is highly effective, it is also associated with the highest adverse event (AE) rates of all commonly performed endoscopic procedures. Thus, it is critical that endoscopists and caregivers of patients undergoing ERCP have clear understandings of ERCP-related AEs.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on ERCP-related AEs. For the purposes of this review, we subdivide the presentation of each ERCP-related AE according to the following clinically relevant domains: definitions and incidence, proposed mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and recognition and management. The evidence informing this review was derived in part from a search of the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, performed on 1 May 20231 May 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Knowledge of ERCP-related AEs is critical not only given potential improvements in peri-procedural quality and related care that can ensue but also given the importance of reviewing these considerations with patients during informed consent. The ERCP community and researchers should aim to apply standardized definitions of AEs. Evidence-based knowledge of ERCP risk factors should inform patient care decisions during training and beyond.