1
|
Jayanna SH, Rana SS. EUS guided gastrojejunostomy: techniques and outcomes. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025:1-10. [PMID: 40411777 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2512168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2025] [Revised: 05/19/2025] [Accepted: 05/23/2025] [Indexed: 05/26/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical bypass, the traditional approach for managing gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), is effective but associated with increased morbidity and short-term complications. Enteral self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide a safe, effective, and minimally invasive alternative to surgical bypass, though they carry an increased risk of re-interventions due to stent blockage. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) is a recently developed, novel minimally invasive procedure that serves as an alternative to enteral SEMS placement. AREAS COVERED We performed an electronic search in PubMed and included all the types of articles on EUS-GJ written in English language till February 2025. This review discusses both the technical details and outcomes of EUS-GJ. EXPERT OPINION EUS-GJ involves creating an anastomosis between the stomach and the small intestine using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). There are three basic techniques for performing EUS-GJ: the direct technique, the balloon-assisted technique, and the EPASS (EUS-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass) technique. Among these, the free-hand direct approach is the most widely used due to its shorter procedure time and comparable technical outcomes to the other two techniques. Stent misdeployment is the most dreaded complication of EUS-GJ; however, fortunately, the majority of misdeployments can be successfully managed through rescue endoscopic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Hosahally Jayanna
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rizzo GEM, Facciorusso A, Binda C, Mazza S, Maida M, Rancatore G, Carrozza L, Ligresti D, Mauro A, Anderloni A, Fabbri C, Tarantino I. What is the benefit of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunal anastomosis for patients with benign gastric outlet obstruction? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2025:S1590-8658(25)00293-2. [PMID: 40246669 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2025] [Revised: 03/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric outlet obstruction for benign indications (bGOO) is an uncommon condition, typically treated with surgery when medical therapy or endoscopic treatments fail. At present, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gastrojejunostomy (GJ) may prove to be an effective alternative. AIMS We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis evaluating outcomes of EUS-GJ for bGOO. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted up to February 2025. Pooled estimates were obtained using a random-effects model. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 statistic. Technical success, clinical success, recurrence rate, and adverse events (AE) rate were the main outcomes. RESULTS Fifteen (15) studies, including a total of 376 patients, were identified. Pooled technical success was 95.8 % (CI 95 %, 93.8 %-97.8 %, I2 =0 %), while clinical success was 93.4 % (CI 95 %, 90.4 %-96.5 %, I2= 31.83 %). Pooled recurrence rate was 11.6 % (CI 95 %, 5.5 %-17.7 %, I2=32.36 %). The pooled rate of AE was 11.6 % (CI 95 %, 6.8-16.5 %, I2 = 57.18 %). Subgroup analyses found differences in safety when AE classification was used (17 % use vs. 6 % no use, p = 0.02) and based on quality of studies (low 22 % vs. moderate 10 % vs. high 3 %, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION In conclusion, our findings show that EUS-GJ is effective and safe in those patients with bGOO in whom other endoscopic treatments fail, and surgery is not an option or could be performed as bridge-to-surgery. Our results suggest that safety is influenced by the use of AE classification and the quality of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMCI), Palermo, Italy.
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazza
- Digestive Gastroenterology and Endoscopy unit, IRCCS Foundation, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Enna, Italy
| | - Gabriele Rancatore
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMCI), Palermo, Italy
| | - Lucio Carrozza
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMCI), Palermo, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Dario Ligresti
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMCI), Palermo, Italy
| | - Aurelio Mauro
- Digestive Gastroenterology and Endoscopy unit, IRCCS Foundation, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Gastroenterology and Endoscopy unit, IRCCS Foundation, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMCI), Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wannhoff A, Canakis A, Sharaiha RZ, Fayyaz F, Schlag C, Sharma N, Elsayed I, Khashab MA, Baron TH, Caca K, Irani SS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction secondary to acute pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2025; 57:249-254. [PMID: 39529322 DOI: 10.1055/a-2452-5307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a minimally invasive technique for treating gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of EUS-GE in managing benign GOO caused by duodenal stenosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. METHODS This international retrospective study analyzed patients treated with EUS-GE for GOO caused by acute pancreatitis until December 2023, evaluating technical and clinical success, adverse events, and reintervention. RESULTS 39 patients (median age 55 years, 15 women) were included. There was a 92.3% technical success rate, with only three patients unable to undergo EUS-GE owing to a long distance between the stomach and small bowel or an inadequate window for puncture. Clinical success was observed in 34 patients (87.2%). The median Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) improved from 0 before EUS-GE to 2 afterward (P <0.001). Follow-up (≥3 months) was available in 25 patients. During a median follow-up of 23 months, four patients required reintervention. It was possible to remove the lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 patients. The only adverse event was a gastrocolic fistula detected incidentally after 3 months. CONCLUSION EUS-GE is an effective and safe method for managing benign GOO in the setting of acute pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Wannhoff
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Canakis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Reem Z Sharaiha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
| | - Farimah Fayyaz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Christoph Schlag
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, United States
| | - Ismaeil Elsayed
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Shayan S Irani
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu P, Chen K, He J. Palliative management for malignant biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction from pancreatic cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2025; 9:218-225. [PMID: 40046529 PMCID: PMC11877337 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2025] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is among the leading causes of gastrointestinal cancer-related death, with a dismal prognosis. Over 80% of pancreatic cancer patients present with advanced disease, making curative resection unfeasible. These patients are often presented with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). In these cases, palliative management is aimed to alleviate symptoms, enhance quality of life, and facilitate subsequent chemotherapy. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is frequently used in both borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer, necessitating effective biliary and gastrointestinal drainage in a growing number of patients. Traditionally, surgical bypass was the gold standard, performed via either a minimally invasive or open approach. However, notable progress has emerged in developing endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) stenting for MBO and endoscopic enteral stenting for GOO. While these procedures provide rapid symptom relief, they are associated with higher stent dysfunction rates and more frequent re-intervention needs. When ERCP fails, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is a widely accepted alternative for MBO. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided techniques, including EUS-guided biliary drainage and EUS-guided gastroenterostomy, have recently gained prominence. Emerging clinical data suggest that these methods may be superior, potentially becoming the preferred first-line palliative treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer. This review will summarize the current evidence on managing MBO and GOO in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Wu
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Pancreas CenterThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Kai Chen
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryPeking University First HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Jin He
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|