The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: A systematic review

The congenital hearing phenotype in GJB2 in Queensland, Australia: V37I and mild hearing loss predominates

GJB2 was originally identified in severe, non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), but was subsequently associated with mild and moderate SNHL. Given the increasing utilisation of genetic testing pre-conceptually, prenatally, and neonatally, it is crucial to understand genotype-phenotype correlations. This study evaluated the nature and frequency of GJB2 variants in an Australian paediatric population with varying degrees of SNHL ascertained through newborn hearing screening. Audiograms from individuals with GJB2 variants and/or a GJB6 deletion (GJB6-D13S11830) were retrospectively reviewed (n = 127). Two-thirds were biallelic (homozygous/compound heterozygous) for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of GJB2 and/or GJB6 (n = 80). The most frequent variant was c.109 G > A, followed by c.35delG and c.101 T > C. Compared to biallelic carriage of other GJB2 variants, c.109 G > A positive individuals (homozygous/compound heterozygous) were more likely to have mild HL at their initial and latest audiograms (p = 0.0004). Biallelic carriage of c.35delG was associated with moderately-severe or greater SNHL at both initial and latest audiograms (p = 0.007). The c.101 T > C variant presented with milder SNHL and U-shaped audiograms (p = 0.02). In this agnostically identified cohort, mild SNHL predominated in GJB2/GJB6 carriers in contrast to previous studies targeting individuals with significant loss. Consequently, c.109 G > A, associated with milder phenotypes, was the most frequent. This study provides valuable data to support prognostic confidence in genetic counselling.

Views of reproductive genetic carrier screening participants regarding screening for genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) panels often include genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) despite a lack of evidence of acceptability. Although some couples take steps to avoid having a child who is deaf, there are effective interventions for children who are deaf. There is no consensus whether deafness is considered a disabling condition.

METHOD

This study explored views of people who had RGCS, without genes for NSHL, about this topic. Online surveys were sent to 2186 people who had a low chance RGCS result and 655 completed the survey (participation rate 30%).

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent (N = 412) think deafness is a serious health condition. The majority agreed (60%, N = 391) that with support (i.e. hearing aids/cochlear implants) deafness is a minor condition in children. Most (84%, N = 545) agreed genes for NSHL should be included in RGCS. Thirty-five percent (N = 231) indicated they would make different reproductive decisions if they had an increased chance of having a child born deaf; 31% would not change their reproductive plans and 34% were unsure what they would do.

CONCLUSION

While the majority support inclusion of genes associated with NSHL in RGCS, there was uncertainty about the severity of deafness as a health condition and there was no consensus on whether it is a health condition that warrants changing reproductive decisions.