1
|
Effects of ovarian endometrioma aspiration on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 306:17-28. [PMID: 34746993 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06278-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of ovarian endometrioma aspiration on IVF/ICSI outcomes. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify studies related to the treatment of endometrioma up to October 1, 2020, and the data of 1207 patients from 10 studies were analyzed using STATA. RESULTS The 10 studies in our analysis included 7 comparing aspiration and surgery and 6 comparing aspiration with no intervention. In the aspiration versus surgery groups, live birth rate [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.51, 1.85), P = 0.925] and clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.30 (95% CI 0.95, 1.80), P = 0.105] showed no significant difference between the two groups. Abortion rate [OR 4.26 (95% CI 1.38, 13.08), P = 0.011], the number of oocytes retrieved [mean difference 1.95 (95% CI 0.10, 3.81), P = 0.039], and the estradiol peak on hCG day [mean difference 392.16 (95% CI 230.14, 554.18), P < 0.001] were significantly higher in the aspiration group compared to the surgical group. In the aspiration versus the no intervention group, live birth rate [OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.45, 1.59), P = 0.602] and clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.25 (95% CI 0.88, 1.77), P = 0.206] were not significantly different between the two groups. The abortion rate [OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.11, 0.88), P = 0.028] and the number of gonadotropin ampoules [mean difference - 3.13 ampoules (95% CI - 4.90, - 1.37), P < 0.001] were significantly lower in the aspiration group compared to the no intervention group. CONCLUSION Compared with surgical treatment or no intervention treatment, aspiration has less effect on ovarian response, ovarian reserve, and pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Robin C, Uk A, Decanter C, Behal H, Collinet P, Rubod C, Barbotin AL, Robin G. Impact of endometriosis on oocyte morphology in IVF-ICSI: retrospective study of a cohort of more than 6000 mature oocytes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021; 19:160. [PMID: 34656130 PMCID: PMC8522159 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infertility associated with endometriosis can be explained by several non-exclusive mechanisms. The oocyte plays a crucial role in determining embryonic competence and this is particularly relevant for in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. According to some authors, the morphology of oocytes could also be a non-invasive marker of oocyte quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between endometriosis and oocyte morphology after controlled ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on a large oocyte cohort. METHODS Single-center comparative retrospective study in the academic In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) unit of the Lille University Hospital. A total of 596 women treated for IVF-ICSI with ejaculated spermatozoa for sperm alterations were included. They were classified as endometriosis (n = 175) or control groups (n = 401). The morphological evaluation of 2,016 mature oocytes from 348 cycles of patients with endometriosis was compared with that of 4,073 mature oocytes from 576 control cycles. The main outcome measures were Average Oocyte Quality Index (AOQI) and metaphase II oocyte morphological scoring system (MOMS). Comparison of groups was carried out by a mixed linear model and by a generalized estimation equation model with a "patient" random effect to consider that a patient might have several attempts. RESULTS No difference in AOQI and MOMS scores was found between endometriosis and control women (adjusted p = 0.084 and 0.053, respectively). In case of endometriosis, there were significantly fewer metaphase II oocytes retrieved, embryos obtained, grade 1 embryos and number of cumulative clinical pregnancies compared to controls. In the endometriosis group, endometriosis surgery was associated with a reduced number of mature oocytes retrieved, and the presence of endometrioma(s) was associated with some abnormal oocyte shapes. Nevertheless, no difference concerning the AOQI and MOMS scores was found in these subgroups. CONCLUSION Endometriosis does not have a negative impact on oocytes' morphology in IVF-ICSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION On December 16, 2019, the Institutional Review Board of the Lille University Hospital gave unrestricted approval for the anonymous use of all patients' clinical, hormonal and ultrasound records (reference DEC20150715-0002).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Robin
- Service de Gynécologie Endocrinienne Et Médecine de La Reproduction, CHU Lille, Assistance Médicale À La Procréation Et Préservation de La Fertilité, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Service dAvenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
| | - Audrey Uk
- Institut de Biologie de La Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Et Universitaire, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Christine Decanter
- Service de Gynécologie Endocrinienne Et Médecine de La Reproduction, CHU Lille, Assistance Médicale À La Procréation Et Préservation de La Fertilité, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Service dAvenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France
- EA 4308 Gamètogenèse Et Qualité du Gamète, Faculté de Médecine Et CHU de Lille, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Hélène Behal
- EA 2694, Santé Publique : Épidémiologie Et Qualité Des Soins, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Unité de Biostatistiques, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Et Universitaire, 59000, Lille, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lille, 59045, Lille, France
| | - Chrystèle Rubod
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Et Universitaire, 59000, Lille, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lille, 59045, Lille, France
| | - Anne-Laure Barbotin
- Institut de Biologie de La Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Et Universitaire, 59000, Lille, France
- EA 4308 Gamètogenèse Et Qualité du Gamète, Faculté de Médecine Et CHU de Lille, F-59000, Lille, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lille, 59045, Lille, France
| | - Geoffroy Robin
- Service de Gynécologie Endocrinienne Et Médecine de La Reproduction, CHU Lille, Assistance Médicale À La Procréation Et Préservation de La Fertilité, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Service dAvenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France
- EA 4308 Gamètogenèse Et Qualité du Gamète, Faculté de Médecine Et CHU de Lille, F-59000, Lille, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lille, 59045, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|