[Does rupture of membranes have an impact on the fetal heart rate during spontaneous labor?]

Breech presentation induction compared to cephalic presentation: Effectiveness and characteristics

INTRODUCTION

The objective of our study was to compare the effectiveness of induction in cephalic presentations to that of breech presentations as well as the characteristics of the latter and the maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study carried out at the Lille University Hospital in the Jeanne de Flandre Maternity Hospital including all patients with a breech fetus for whom an induction was indicated beyond 37 weeks of gestation between January 2014 and December 2020. A matching was performed to include 2 cephalic presentations for one breech presentation. The primary outcome was successful induction defined by two things: passage into the active phase (cervical dilatation > 5 cm) and vaginal delivery.

RESULTS

101 inductions of breech presentations were included and matched to 202 cephalic presentations. After adjustment by BISHOP score, there was no significant difference in the caesarean section rate between the two groups (25.7% in cephalic vs 33.7% in breech, OR 0.67 [CI95% 0.38-1.18]) or in the rate of transition to active phase (80.7% in cephalic vs 82.2% in breech, OR 1.26 [CI95% 0.65-2.44]). Post-partum blood loss was not significantly different between the two groups (14.4% in cephalic vs 12.9% in breech, OR 1.22 [CI95% 0.57-2.57]). Moderate neonatal acidosis was more frequent in the breech group (6,4% in cephalic vs 15,8% in breech, OR 3.04 [CI95% 1.38-6.71]).

CONCLUSION

Induction of breech births beyond 37 weeks of gestation appeared to be as effective as induction of cephalic presentations. There was no difference in the rate of caesarean section and transition to active labor. Maternal morbidity was not increased.

Labor risk factors for fetal heart rate abnormality after combined spinal-epidural analgesia

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between obstetric factors or outcomes and fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities after combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA).

METHODS

Women with singleton term deliveries who received CSEA at our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2017, were analyzed using medical records. We performed a logistic regression analysis to compare factors and outcomes between cases with and without new FHR abnormalities within 1 h after CSEA.

RESULTS

Of the 393 women, 163 showed the new occurrence of FHR abnormality after CSEA. Rupture of the membrane (odds ratio [OR] 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-4.09; P < 0.01) and dilatation of the cervix (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.07-1.44; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with FHR abnormalities. There were significant differences in FHR abnormality rates between women with cervical dilatation of 2 cm or less and 3 cm or more (OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.01-4.81; P = 0.047) and 6 cm or less and 7 cm or more (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.01-6.01; P = 0.048). FHR abnormalities were not significantly associated with cesarean delivery during labor, instrumental delivery, APGAR score below 7 at 1 or 5 min, or umbilical arterial blood gas pH less than 7.2.

CONCLUSION

Rupture of the membrane and an advanced dilated cervix were risk factors for FHR abnormality when CSEA was initiated.