Successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest secondary to carboplatin infusion: A case report

Cardiac arrest caused by anaphylaxis refractory to prompt management: A case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition that occurs in the emergency department (ED). Although anaphylaxis is rapidly recognized and treated in the hospital compared with that in the community, in some cases, it does not respond to proper management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe our experience of cases of refractory anaphylaxis leading to cardiac arrest in hospital, to review their characteristics compared with those seen in the community, and to discuss the best management practices for anaphylaxis-induced cardiac arrest with a literature review.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients referred to the ED with possible in-hospital anaphylaxis between January 2017 and May 2021. According to the anaphylaxis protocol, epinephrine, corticosteroid, and antihistamine were administered immediately on-site at our institution before the study period. Refractory anaphylaxis was defined as the development of anaphylaxis-induced cardiac arrest even after following the anaphylaxis protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 246 cases were evaluated for possible anaphylaxis, with 236 cases meeting the criteria for a diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Among them, 178 patients showed the signs and symptoms of shock, and cardiac arrest occurred in 6 patients (2.5%). Of the six patients, three had a return of spontaneous circulation before admission to the ED, while two died due to refractory cardiac arrest despite resuscitation in the ED. Following post-cardiac arrest care, including temperature management, one patient who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation survived neurologically intact.

CONCLUSION

We present our case series to highlight the risk of developing refractory anaphylaxis with subsequent in-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients may progress to cardiac arrest within minutes despite prompt recognition and management. If patients present with potentially fatal symptoms, a more aggressive approach, including intravenous adrenaline infusion, should be taken.

Severe anaphylaxis caused by intravenous anti-cancer drugs

Background

The incidence and risk factors of severe anaphylaxis by intravenous anti‐cancer drugs are unclear, whereas those of milder reactions have been reported.

Study Design

Electronic medical charts of cancer patients who have undergone intravenous chemotherapy between January 2013 and October 2020 in a university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Non‐epithelial malignancies were also included in the analysis. "Severe anaphylaxis" was judged using Brown's criteria: typical presentation of anaphylaxis and one or more of hypoxia, shock, and neurologic compromise. (UMIN000042887).

Results

Among 5584 patients (2964 males [53.1%], 2620 females [46.9%], median age 66 years), 88,200 person‐day anti‐cancer drug administrations were performed intravenously, and 27 severe anaphylaxes were observed. The causative drugs included carboplatin (14 cases), paclitaxel (9 cases), and cisplatin, docetaxel, trastuzumab, and cetuximab (1 case each). The person‐based lifetime incidence of severe anaphylaxis for patients who received at least one intravenous chemotherapy was 0.48% (27/5584, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30%–0.67%) and the administration‐based incidence was 0.031% (27/88,200, 95% CI 0.019%–0.043%). Among 124 patients who received at least 10 carboplatin administrations, 10 patients experienced carboplatin‐induced severe anaphylaxis (10/124, 8.1%, 95% CI 3.0%–13.1%). Carboplatin caused severe anaphylaxis after at least 9‐min interval since the drip started. Thirteen out of 14 patients experienced carboplatin‐induced severe anaphylaxis within a 75‐day interval from the previous treatment. Paclitaxel infusion caused severe anaphylaxis after a median of 5 min after the first drip of the day at a life‐long incidence of 0.93% (9/968, 95% CI 0.27%–1.59%).

Conclusion

We elucidated the high‐risk settings of chemotherapy‐induced severe anaphylaxis.

Emerging serine-threonine kinase inhibitors for treating ovarian cancer

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death, owing to high rates of incurable, recurrent disease after initial treatment. Serine threonine kinases (STKs) have been proposed as potential therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer because of their role in the initiation and progression of cancers. Experience in non-ovarian cancers suggests that STK inhibitors are active against tumors with specific molecular alterations.Areas covered: This review discusses STK inhibitors in active development in phase II/III clinical trials for ovarian cancer. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify STK inhibitor trials for ovarian cancer; active development was confirmed via Pharmaprojects. Available data regarding the efficacy and safety of these compounds are explored.Expert opinion: STK inhibitors currently in development have modest activity as single agents and are unlikely to achieve approval as monotherapy for unselected ovarian cancer patients. Combination trials of STK inhibitors with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies have suggested an acceptable efficacy/toxicity ratio for certain combinations but confirmatory studies are needed. Carefully designed trials, especially those including somatic molecular analysis, may help identify the subsets of patients most likely to benefit from these therapeutic strategies and determine the role of STK inhibitors in the evolving landscape of precision oncology.