Clinical presentation of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: A case series

Brain Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) from endometrial cancer (EC) are rare and challenging to treat, with limited standardized guidelines. This systematic review aims to evaluate the incidence, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes associated with brain metastases in EC patients, offering insights for clinical practice and future research.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, including PUBMED up to October 2024. Reports reporting individual or aggregate data on EC brain metastases were included. Descriptive and quantitative analyses were performed on incidence, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Three reports that used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and National Cancer Database were used only to assess the incidence of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma.

RESULTS

From 911 reports identified, we included 99 reports, identifying 594 cases; these and the case of a patient with brain metastasis from endometrial carcinoma followed at our center were used for analysis of disease characteristics; incidence; and treatment modalities, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and combinations. Survival outcomes were influenced by treatment type and disease characteristics, with multimodal approaches showing improved outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This review underscores the rarity of EC brain metastases and highlights the need for tailored, multimodal treatment strategies. Future research should focus on prospective trials and molecular profiling to optimize management.

Unusual pontine metastasis of endometrial papillary serous carcinoma: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Endometrial papillary serous carcinoma (EPSC) is a rare gynecological malignancy that often metastasizes before the presentation of symptoms or diagnosis of the primary disease. The most common locations of metastases for this malignancy are the lungs, liver, and bones. Metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) are rare. Solitary CNS metastases without other anatomical site spread are exceedingly rare.

OBSERVATIONS

A 65-year-old female with a past medical history of EPSC presented with right-sided weakness, gait instability, and progressive dysarthria. Neurological evaluation revealed right hemiparesis and dysarthria. Head computed tomography showed an ovoid area of hypoattenuation in the left pons. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a 2.6-cm pontine lesion. A biopsy revealed histomorphology and immunophenotype consistent with metastasis of previously diagnosed serous carcinoma of the endometrium.

LESSONS

Gynecological malignancies, in particular EPSC, can metastasize to atypical locations even without evidence of systemic disease. The authors hypothesize that this may be due to hematogenous spread through the Batson venous plexus. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24513.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for gynecologic metastases to the brain: Analysis of pathology, survival, and tumor control

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in improving health outcomes of patients with gynecologic brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients with gynecologic metastases treated with SRS from 2008 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The median age at SRS was 63 years old (cervical 45.5, endometrial 65.5, ovarian 61). The median number of tumors was 3 (range 1-27), and cumulative tumor volume was 2.33 cc (range 0.03-45.63). Median margin dose prescribed was 16 Gy (range 14 Gy - 20 Gy). The median 12 Gy volume was 7.30 cc (range 0.21-74.14 cc). Outcome variables included overall survival (OS) after SRS, local tumor control (LTC), distant tumor control, and adverse radiation effect (ARE).

RESULTS

Fifty patients (4 cervical, 25 endometrial, and 21 ovarian cancer) were identified. The OS at 6 and 12 months after SRS was 48%, and 44%, respectively. Eight patients (16%) died from CNS disease progression. The number of brain metastases (p = 0.011) and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥ 70 (p = 0.020) were significant predictors of OS. LTC rate at 6 and 12 months were 92%, and 87%, respectively. Margin dose ≥16Gy correlated with significantly better local tumor control (p = 0.0001) without increased risk of ARE (p = 0.055). The risk of developing new metastases at 6 and 12 months were 12% and 24% respectively. SRS-induced ARE events occurred in 7 patients.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial metastases from gynecologic malignancy can be effectively treated using SRS with low risk of neurotoxicity. Margin dose ≥16Gy can provide significantly better tumor control. Repeat SRS can be utilized to treat new metastases while avoiding the potential cognitive symptoms associated with WBRT.

Prognostic features of endometrial cancer metastasis to the central nervous system

Objectives

Central nervous system metastases (CNSm) secondary to endometrial cancer (EC) are rare. As a result, prognostic factors for this patient population are not well described.

Methods

EC patients with CNSm were identified retrospectively from two academic centers. EC patients without CNSm (non-CNSm) were used as controls. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for analysis of categorial variables. Wilcoxon tests were used for quantitative measures. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for OS.

Results

22 EC patients with CNSm and 354 non-CNSm patients were included. Compared to non-CNSm EC, the CNSm cohort was younger (58.5 vs 62.0 years, p = 0.018) with lower BMI (27.7 vs. 33.7 kg/m², p = 0.005), and had more advanced stages (p = ≤ 0.001), grade 3 tumors (81.8% CNSm vs 25.1% non CNSm, p≤0.001) and serous histology (22.7% vs 8.5%, p = 0.010). Median survival after CNSm diagnosis was 9 months (95% CI 4, NA). CNSm was a strong poor prognostic factor (HR death 4.96, p = 0.022). Improved OS was seen with CNS as the only disease site (83m CNSm only vs 30m additional sites, p = 0.007) and less than five CNSm (49m <5 vs. 23m ≥5, p = 0.004). Surgical resection of CNSm (OS 83m surgery vs 33m no surgery, p = 0.003) or multimodal therapy (83m multimodal vs 33m single therapy, p = 0.027) resulted in longer OS.

Conclusions

CNSm is a poor prognostic factor in EC, however, low volume disease with aggressive treatment may result in more favorable survival outcomes.

Pineal gland metastasis from uterine serous carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

•

UPSC has a higher tendency for distant metastasis compared to other histologies.

•

Intracranial metastasis occurs in less than 1% of endometrial cancer cases.

•

Multimodal therapy is associated with improved outcomes for intracranial UPSC.

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a highly aggressive endometrial cancer histology with a propensity for distant metastasis. Despite the aggressive nature of UPSC, central nervous system metastasis is a rare occurrence with few cases reported in the literature. We present a case of a 58-year-old woman with a history of Stage IIIA UPSC who was diagnosed with recurrent, metastatic disease in the pineal gland more than 6 years after her initial diagnosis.

Brain Metastases from Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer

Simple Summary

This review investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with brain metastases from uterine cervical carcinoma (CC) and uterine endometrial carcinoma (EC). The findings of this review indicate the factors that can facilitate better treatment selection and, consequently, better outcomes in patients with CC and EC.

Abstract

Reports on brain metastases (BMs) from uterine cervical carcinoma (CC) and uterine endometrial carcinoma (EC) have recently increased due to the development of massive databases and improvements in diagnostic procedures. This review separately investigates the prevalence, clinical characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of BMs from CC and uterine endometrial carcinoma EC. For patients with CC, early-stage disease and poorly differentiated carcinoma lead to BMs, and elderly age, poor performance status, and multiple BMs are listed as poor prognostic factors. Advanced-stage disease and high-grade carcinoma are high-risk factors for BMs from EC, and multiple metastases and extracranial metastases, or unimodal therapies, are possibly factors indicating poor prognosis. There is no “most effective” therapy that has gained consensus for the treatment of BMs. Treatment decisions are based on clinical status, number of the metastases, tumor size, and metastases at distant organs. Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy appears to be the best treatment approach to date. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy has been increasingly associated with good outcomes in preserving cognitive functions. Despite treatment, patients died within 1 year after the BM diagnosis. BMs from uterine cancer remain quite rare, and the current evidence is limited; thus, further studies are needed.

Brain metastases in endometrial cancer: A systematic review of the surgical prognostic factors

CONTEXT

Although endometrial cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women, dissemination to the brain is an exceptional event in the course of the disease. The aim of this review is to determine the important surgical prognostic factors for patients with endometrial cancer metastatic to the brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Report of two cases. Medline database was used to conduct a systematic literature review from inception to December 2020 looking for English-language articles focused on brain metastases from endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

The research yielded 108 articles, among which 23 articles were retained for a total of 87 patients. Mean age was 60 years-old ±11 at the time of diagnosis of endometrial cancer, and most of the tumors were aggressive (grade 3) with an advanced-stage disease (FIGO III-IV). At the time of diagnosis of cerebral disease, a single brain metastasis (p < 0.0001) and no extra-cerebral metastatic site (p = 0.0011) were significant good prognostic factors for the median overall survival. Surgical excision of brain metastasis followed by radiotherapy provided the longest median overall survival compared to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, and surgery alone (respectively 32, 5.4 and 4.8 months, p < 0.0001). An age of 60-year-old or less was not associated with a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

This review confirms that surgical excision followed by radiotherapy is a reliable option in patients with a single brain metastasis from endometrial cancer and no extra-cerebral metastatic site. This work could help to adapt the Graded Prognostic Assessment for brain metastases in endometrial cancer.

Brain Metastases from Endometrial Cancer: Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases from endometrial cancer are rare and poorly described. We aimed to estimate the proportion of brain metastases at our institution that arose from endometrial cancer, and to detail clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified and reviewed the charts of 30 patients with brain metastases from endometrial cancer seen at Stanford Hospital from 2008 to 2018.

RESULTS

Among all patients with brain metastases, the proportion arising from endometrial cancer was 0.84%. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 39-79 years), and the median overall survival from brain metastasis diagnosis was 6.8 months (range, 1.0-58.2 months). Most patients harbored endometrioid histology (53.3%), and some had concurrent metastases to lung (50.0%), bone (36.7%), and liver (20.0%). The median time from endometrial cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis development was 20.8 months (range, 1.4 months to 11.2 years), and the median number of brain metastases was 2 (range, 1-20). Patients with non-endometrioid histologies had more brain metastases than those with endometrioid histology (6.21 vs. 2.44, P = 0.029). There was no difference in overall survival by histology.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the largest cohort to date of patients with brain metastases originating from endometrial cancer. These patients represent a small fraction of all patients with brain metastases and have poor prognoses. These data enable providers caring for patients with brain metastases from endometrial cancer to appropriately counsel their patients.

Clinical characteristics of CNS metastases from primary gynecologic cancers

•

Most common symptoms for patients with CNS metastases are headaches and ataxia.

•

Multiple foci are more common than solitary lesions on initial brain imaging.

•

The frontal lobe is most likely to be involved.

•

GTN is diagnosed at a younger age when compared to other gynecologic cancers.

•

More aggressive histologic subtypes confer an increased risk of CNS metastasis.

The development of brain and central nervous system (CNS) metastases from primary gynecologic cancers is an extremely uncommon but deadly process. Through this retrospective case series of patients treated at a single institution from 2004 to 2018, we aim to explore potential clinical patterns of this phenomenon with respect to primary tumor type, histology, and symptomatology.

A total of 42 patients were identified with CNS metastases, with 24 patients having endometrial cancer, 9 patients with ovarian cancer, 5 patients with cervical cancer, and 4 patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). The two most common presenting complaints were headache and ataxia. Most patients (67%) presented with more than one lesion on imaging and the frontal lobe was most likely to be involved. The median age of diagnosis for both primary cancer and CNS metastasis were significantly younger in the GTN group when compared to other cancers. Meningeal involvement was more prevalent in patients with cervical cancer. Over 83% of endometrial cancer patients in this cohort had type II histologies, a significantly higher percentage than that in the general population.

While the rarity of CNS metastases in primary gynecologic malignancies precludes routine screening, patients diagnosed with more aggressive histologic subtypes of endometrial and uterine cancers may benefit from a lowered threshold of brain imaging in the context of new onset neurological symptoms.