Surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): Highlighting Diagnosis, Treatment, and Lifestyle Changes

Millions of people worldwide are affected by the prevalent clinical issue, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Both conventional and unusual symptoms can identify patients. Many people with GERD benefit from symptomatic relief and are shielded from consequences by acid suppression medication. Our capacity to recognise and manage disease consequences has improved thanks to developments in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. One of the biggest typical gastrointestinal problems treated by physicians and primary care doctors is GERD, which is characterised by heartburn and regurgitation symptoms. GERD prevalence has increased, especially in North America and East Asia. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the cornerstone of medical treatment for GERD for the past thirty years. However, clinicians and patients are becoming more aware of the adverse effects of the PPI class of medications recently.

Additionally, surgical fundoplication has significantly decreased, while the evolution of non-medical therapeutic methodologies for GERD has increased. In the treatment of GERD, lifestyle changes are crucial. Individual variances can be seen in how GERD symptoms change in response to different diets. The study implies that there may be a connection between reflux occurrence and salty foods, chocolates, fat-rich foods, and aerated beverages, even if there is insufficient data to support this theory. In lifestyle modifications, other factors involved are the head of the bed, patients' lying down position, smoking, fat or obesity, and physical exercise. The number of reviews focusing on various diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities is very less, so this review puts emphasis on these areas. This review also covers GERD and its symptoms, epidemiology, and pathophysiology, but significantly focuses on diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle modification effects. 

Nissen Fundoplication–Preserving Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is significantly more prevalent in obese patients. Nissen fundoplication alleviates symptoms in those refractory to dietary changes and optimal medical management. The need for concomitant treatment of GERD and obesity is becoming more prevalent. The objective of this study was to determine whether Nissen-preserving laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a safe and effective weight loss option for patients with pre-existing Nissen fundoplication. The study was conducted at the Hospital Corporation of America, Memorial Health, Savannah, Georgia, academic institution. We retrospectively reviewed five patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen-preserving SG between 2011 and 2017. We compared pre- and postoperative subjective GERD symptoms, occurrence of any immediate postoperative complications, change in BMI, and excess weight loss. Of the five patients, four were female and one was male. The mean age was 50.6 years. The mean preoperative BMI was 44.8 ± 5.4, one-month postoperative BMI was 41.2 ± 6.1 (P < 0.001), and six-month postoperative BMI was 37.5 ± 8.1 (P < 0.009), with mean excess weight loss at six months of 33.9 ± 23 per cent. There were no immediate postoperative complications. Subjective GERD symptoms were unchanged in two patients and improved in the other three. We demonstrate the early feasibility of Nissen-preserving SG for surgical weight loss in patients with existing Nissen fundoplication. Although our results are early, we feel encouraged by mean excess weight loss to date and control of GERD symptoms.

The use of autologous fascia lata graft in the laparoscopic reinforcement of large hiatal defect: initial observations of the surgical technique

Background

Even though there is no consensus, many authors believe that in the cases of large hiatal defects, structurally altered crura and/or absence of peritoneal lining, a crural reinforcement should be performed. Reinforcement could be performed with different techniques and different type of mesh, either synthetic or biologic. The disadvantages of mesh repair include the possibility of serious complications and increased costs especially in the usage of composite or biologic mesh.

Methods

The study includes 10 cases of reinforced primary suture line of the pillars with autologous fascia lata, in elective laparoscopic repair of the giant PEH with a large hiatal defect and friable crura. After intraopreative confirmation of the large hiatal defect (hiatal surface area of more than 8 cm²) and friable crura, an autologous fascia lata graft was harvested in the usual manner and placed in on-lay fashion to reinforce the pillar suture line. We analyzed surgical technique, complications, and initial follow-up of the patients.

Results

Average hiatal surface area (HSA) in our series was 10.6 cm² (range 8.1 to 14.4 cm²). The average duration of operation was 203.9 min/3.4 hours (range 160–250 min). Except for a mild hematoma in the harvesting region that resolved spontaneously, there were no procedure related complications and 30 days mortality rate was zero. The average postoperative length of stay was 6.5 days (5–8 days). Out of 10 patients, 5 completed the annual follow-up visit, while 8 completed a 6- month follow-up visit. So far there is no hernia recurrence and/or problems with swallowing function. However, one patient has felt a mild discomfort in the harvested region that does not influence normal daily activities.

Conclusions

Autologous fascia lata graft hiatal reinforcement represents a technically feasible, easy, and available option for the on-lay reinforcement of large hiatal defects with friable crura in the laparoscopic repair of giant PEHs.

Improvement in quality-of-life after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

CONTEXT

Evaluating quality of life after surgery for gastroesophageal reflux is fundamental, since improvement of symptoms is the main goal of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the satisfaction of patients operated for GERD, interviewed at the office, with patients interviewed by telephone.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-eight patients were submitted to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ninety patients were found, and 45 agreed to come to the hospital's office. The other 45 patients were interviewed by telephone. Quality of life was evaluated using three methods: The GERD-HRQL questionnaire, translated to Portuguese; question "If you could choose it today, would you do surgery again?"; and question "If you could classify your symptom improvement between 0 and 10, which grade would you give?" Patients were divided in group A (office interview) and B (telephone interview). Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The average GERD-HRQL score in group A was 6.29, while in group B was 14.09(P = 0.002). There was no statistical difference between groups A and B regarding patients choice of doing the surgery again(P = 0.714) and their grade of postoperative symptom improvement (P = 0.642).

CONCLUSION

The overall postoperative satisfaction was high. The GERD-HRQL questionnaire might not be suitable for application by telephone in our population, and based on other analyzes, the satisfaction and quality of life of patients interviewed at the office or by telephone was similar.