[Does persistent occiput posterior position increase the risk of severe perineal laceration?]

Internal manual rotation in intrapartal arrest of fetal head engagement

OBJECTIVE

The success of internal manual or digital rotation of the head in mechanical dystocia due to malpresentation, malposition or malrotation is presented in this paper on our own clinical material with reference of today's research and clinical recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN

Through a retrospective bicentric clinical study, we investigated the success of internal head rotation in two University Clinics for gynecology and obstetrics from year 2017 to 2023. In 152 singleton term (37-42 weeks) in cases of persistens intrapartum arrest of the fetal head. After palpatory and ultrasonographically verified arrest of fetal head engagement, a therapeutic manual (Liepmann) or digital rotation was performed.

RESULTS

In 152 cases, manual rotation was performed in 108 (71.05 %) and digital rotation in 44 (28.94 %) cases in 73 (48.02 %) primiparous and 79 (51.97 %) multiparous. Intrapartum identification by digital palpation was done in all cases, and the following are: persistent occipital posterior position in 68 (44.73%), persistent deep transverse head presentation in 12 (7.89%), persistent high (longitudinal) occipital presentation in 64 (42.10 %) and persistent anterior asynclitism in 8 (5.26 %) cases. Episiotomy was used in 36 (23.68%) cases. Vacuum extraction was completed in 14 (9.21 %) deliveries, and cesarean section due to unsuccessful internal rotation in 15 (9.8 %) cases (%) without other indication. We did not record any intrapartum complications or cardiotocographic abnormalities. Cervical lacerations were treated with sutures in 4 cases (2.63 %). Successful correction of internal rotation procedure with spontaneous vaginal delivery was found in 80.92 % of cases. If we exclude delivery assisted by vacuum extraction whose indications were fetal hypoxia or dystocia after successful internal head rotation procedure, then the success rate of this method was 90.13 %.

CONCLUSION

Internal head rotation is a simple, safe and successful obstetric manual intervention that directly increases the rate of vaginal deliveries after correction of the birth mechanism anomaly and directly reduces the percentage of cesarean section. Manual or digital head rotation is an established midwifery/obstetric skill in several centers which, based on numerous clinical researches and experience, should become protocolized and included in the guidelines of professional associations.

Delivery Mode After Manual Rotation of Occiput Posterior Fetal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether manual rotation of fetuses in occiput posterior positions at full dilation increases the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery.

METHODS

In an open, single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with a term, singleton gestation, epidural analgesia, and ultrasonogram-confirmed occiput posterior position at the start of the second stage of labor were randomized to either manual rotation or expectant management. Our primary endpoint was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Secondary endpoints were operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Analyses were based on an intention-to-treat method. A sample size of 107 patients per group (n=214) was planned to detect a 20% increase in the percent of patients with a spontaneous vaginal delivery (assuming 60% without manual rotation vs 80% with manual rotation) with 90% power and alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and January 2020, 236 patients were randomized to either manual rotation (n=117) or expectant management (n=119). The success rate of the manual rotation maneuver, defined by conversion to an anterior position as confirmed by ultrasonogram, was 68%. The rate of the primary endpoint did not differ between the groups (58.1% in manual rotation group vs 59.7% in expectant management group (risk difference -1.6; 95% CI -14.1 to 11.0). Manual rotation did not decrease the rate of operative vaginal delivery (29.9% in manual rotation group vs 33.6% in expectant management group (risk difference -3.7; 95% CI -16.6 to 8.2) nor the rate of cesarean delivery (12.0% in manual rotation group vs 6.7% in expectant management group (risk difference 5.3; 95% CI -2.2 to 12.6). Maternal and neonatal morbidity was also similar across the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Manual rotation of occiput posterior positions at the start of second stage of labor does not increase the rate of vaginal delivery without instrumental assistance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03009435.

Predictors of successful manual rotation for occiput posterior positions

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of the success of manual rotation of fetuses in an occiput posterior position.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, single-center study included all women with a singleton pregnancy at term with a fetus in an occiput posterior position for whom manual rotation was attempted from December 1, 2013, to April 30, 2015 at a tertiary care maternity unit in Nancy, France. Occiput posterior position was confirmed by ultrasonography, and success of manual rotation was defined by the occiput anterior position of the fetus after the attempt.

RESULTS

Occiput posterior position was diagnosed in 233 (9.2%) of the 2522 deliveries during the study period and the majority of cases were managed successfully by manual rotation (167 [71.7%]). Factors associated with successful rotation were fetal engagement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-4.56), spontaneous labor (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.01-3.43), and no failure to progress (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.02-3.94). Successful manual rotation was associated with lower rates of cesarean (P<0.001) and instrumental (P<0.001) deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Study findings suggested that manual rotation, especially after fetal engagement, succeeded more often when performed systematically than when it was attempted after failure to progress.

Outcome of forceps delivery in a teaching hospital: A 2 year experience

Introduction:

The art of forceps delivery though existing for centuries has earned a disreputation due to the possibility of poor maternal and fetal outcome. However, its safe use can reduce the rising cesarean section rates in the present times. This study is to see the outcome of its use in a teaching hospital over a 2 year period.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective observational study, 120 cases of forceps delivery were studied for maternal outcome such as injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, and fetal outcome such as Apgar score at birth, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, injury, and mortality.

Results:

The most common indication was fetal distress (47.5%). A total of 15 cases (12.5%) of maternal injuries occurred, with 2 uterine ruptures one of which was in a previous lower segment caesarean section case, 4 complete perineal tears and 9 minor cervical and vaginal lacerations. A total of 12 babies (10%) had poor Apgar scores who recovered after resuscitation and one out of them died, which was a case of multiple instrumentation.

Conclusion:

Forceps is a reasonable option for the obstetrician to reduce the caesarean section rates; however, extreme caution, proper expertise and judicial use of this instrument are required to prevent undue risk to mother and fetus.