[A prospective study to compare the efficiency of oocyte vitrification using closed or open devices]

Closed vitrification system and egg donation: Predictive factors of oocyte survival and pregnancy

Although many studies have demonstrated the superiority of ultra-fast freezing compared with slow freezing, the debate is still ongoing concerning the best type of vitrification method: direct exposure to liquid nitrogen (i.e., open systems), or sterile system without contact with liquid nitrogen (i.e., closed systems). The aims of this study were to share our experience on closed vitrification systems in the framework of our egg donation programme with fully asynchronous cycles, and to identify predictive factors of successful outcome in this context. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the number of vitrified oocytes was the only factor predictive of the oocyte survival rate and of clinical pregnancy. The addition of one vitrified oocyte increased by 15 % the odds of oocyte survival. When the oocyte survival rate was considered as a continuous variable, the following results were obtained: 7 % of clinical pregnancy probability for 50 % survival rate, 15 % for 75 % survival rate, and 32 % for 100 % survival rate. The rates of oocyte survival and fertilization, embryo implantation, and clinical pregnancy were in agreement with the recommended values established by ALPHA Scientists in Reproductive Medicine in 2012. On the basis of these results, and according to the European directives on safety, we validate the routine use of closed oocyte vitrification systems for egg donation programmes. These results must be confirmed in larger samples before extrapolation to all patient types.

Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes following open versus closed vitrification of human oocytes and embryos.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted in main electronic databases up to June 30, 2018 using the following key terms: 'oocyte', 'embryo', 'blastocyst', 'vitrification', 'cryopreservation', 'device', 'survival rate', 'pregnancy rate', etc. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model to estimate the value of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were carried out to further confirm the results.

RESULTS

Twelve (Eight prospective and four retrospective) studies comparing open versus closed vitrification of human oocytes or embryos were included. For prospective studies on oocytes, no evidence for a significant difference in cryosurvival rate (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.03, P = 0.14; n = 2048) or clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.80-2.06, P = 0.30; n = 150) was observed. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two methods concerning secondary endpoints included positive βHCG rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate, cancellation rate, babies born per transferred blastocysts, or multiple birth rate (P > 0.05). The results of the retrospective studies were similar as the prospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is still impossible to conclude that closed vitrification system could be a substitution for open system in human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation based on current evidence. Therefore, more well-designed prospective studies addressing these issues are still warranted.

Vitrification of human immature oocytes before and after in vitro maturation: a review

The use of immature oocytes subjected to in vitro maturation (IVM) opens interesting perspectives for fertility preservation where ovarian reserves are damaged by pathologies or therapies, as in PCO/PCOS and cancer patients. Human oocyte cryopreservation may offer some advantages compared to embryo freezing, such as fertility preservation in women at risk of losing fertility due to oncological treatment or chronic disease, egg donation and postponing childbirth. It also eliminates religious and/or other ethical, legal, and moral concerns of embryo freezing. In addition, a successful oocyte cryopreservation program could eliminate the need for donor and recipient menstrual cycle synchronization. Recent advances in vitrification technology have markedly improved the oocyte survival rate after warming, with fertilization and implantation rates comparable with those of fresh oocytes. Healthy live births can be achieved from the combination of IVM and vitrification, even if vitrification of in vivo matured oocytes is still more effective. Recently, attention is given to highlight whether vitrification procedures are more successful when performed before or after IVM, on immature GV-stage oocytes, or on in vitro matured MII-stage oocytes. In this review, we emphasize that, even if there are no differences in survival rates between oocytes vitrified prior to or post-IVM, reduced maturation rates of immature oocytes vitrified prior to IVM can be, at least in part, explained by underlying ultrastructural and biomolecular alterations.