Partial wrist denervation versus total wrist denervation: A systematic review of the literature

Use of Wrist Denervation in the Treatment of SLAC and SNAC Wrist by ASSH Members

Background  Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) are common patterns of wrist arthritis, and surgical treatment options include partial and total wrist arthrodesis and wrist denervation, which maintains the current anatomy while relieving pain. Introduction  The purpose of this study is to elucidate current practices within the hand surgery community with respect to the use of anterior interosseous nerve/posterior interosseous nerve (AIN/PIN) denervation in the treatment of SLAC and SNAC wrists. Methods  An anonymous survey was distributed to 3,915 orthopaedic surgeons via the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) listserv. The survey collected information on conservative and operative management, indications, complications, diagnostic block, and coding of wrist denervation. Results  In total, 298 answered the survey. 46.3% ( N  = 138) of the respondents used denervation of AIN/PIN for every SNAC stage, and 47.7% ( N  = 142) of the respondents used denervation of AIN/PIN for every SLAC wrist stage. AIN and PIN combined denervation was the most common standalone procedure ( N  = 185, 62.1%). Surgeons were more likely to offer the procedure ( N  = 133, 55.4%) if motion preservation had to be maximized ( N  = 154, 64.4%). The majority of surgeons did not consider loss of proprioception ( N  = 224, 84.2%) or diminished protective reflex ( N  = 246, 92.1%) to be significant complications. 33.5%, 90 respondents reported never performing a diagnostic block prior to denervation. Conclusion  Both SLAC and SNAC patterns of wrist arthritis can result in debilitating wrist pain. There is a wide range of treatment for different stages of disease. Further investigation is required to identify ideal candidates and evaluate long-term outcomes.

The effects of partial wrist denervation in wrist osteoarthritis: patient-reported outcomes and objective function

This prospective longitudinal study aimed to analyse the effect of partial wrist denervation on patient-reported outcomes, quality of life and objective function in symptomatic wrist osteoarthritis during the first year after surgery. Sixty consecutive patients underwent an anterior and posterior interosseous neurectomy during 2018-2020. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, EuroQol-5D-3L, pain at rest and on load, and objective function were assessed preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyse the effect on the outcome variables. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and pain scores improved significantly postoperatively with no decline over time, but no patient reported outcome measure reached the minimal clinically important difference. Quality of life, strength and range of motion did not improve. We found no complications. Seventeen patients needed further surgery during the study period. More studies are needed to evaluate whether denervation is truly effective or not.Level of evidence: II.

Adaptive proximal scaphoid implant (APSI): a systematic review of the literature

Scapholunate advanced collapse collapse (SLAC) is a challenging topic for hand surgeons. The adaptative proximal scaphoid implant (APSI) (Bioprofile-Tornier) is a pyrocarbon ovoid shaped interpositional implant, that allows adaptive mobility during motion. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of APSI implants and possible complications. We performed a literature search combining the following key-words: "APSI", "Scaphoid's proximal pole", "implant", "scaphoid avascular necrosis", "SLAC", "SNAC", "pyrocarbon", "prosthesis", and "spacer" with no limitations for year of publication. We selected seven studies considered relevant to our systematic review. All studies described an improvement in the grip strength and the flexion extension arch compared to pre-operative values. The percentage of patients who reported progression of osteoarthritis (OA) with APSI was 17.3%, and implant's mobilization has a rate 5.1% (8/156). In conclusion the APSI implant is a reliable alternative for the treatment of SNAC wrist and SLAC wrist.