Two-in-one: A pooled analysis of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma combined/collided with hepatocellular carcinoma

Other Primary Epithelial Neoplasms of the Liver

Primary liver carcinoma (PLC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortalities. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of PLC, followed by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). In addition, there is a group of rarer PLCs that do not fit neatly into the HCC or iCCA categories. This review explores this heterogeneous group, including combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), intermediate cell carcinoma (ICC), mixed hepatocellular-neuroendocrine carcinoma, and undifferentiated primary liver carcinoma. cHCC-CCA is a rare subtype of PLC, characterized by both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation within the same tumor. The latest WHO classification (2019, fifth edition) redefined cHCC-CCA by eliminating the "stem cell subtypes" and emphasized that diagnosis should primarily rely on morphologic features, supported by immunohistochemical staining to better define subtypes. Intermediate cell carcinoma is a subtype of cHCC-CCA and is comprised of monomorphic tumor cells that exhibit characteristics intermediate between hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, with immunohistochemical expression of hepatocytic and cholangiocytic markers within the same cell. Another rare entity, combined HCC and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), contains an admixture of HCC and NEC components within the same tumor. Undifferentiated primary liver carcinoma, on the other hand, lacks definitive lineage differentiation beyond an epithelial phenotype. These heterogeneous PLCs pose diagnostic challenges owing to their mixed/unusual histologic features and overlapping immunohistochemical markers. They tend to have poor prognoses, highlighting the critical importance of accurate and timely diagnosis.

Combined Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma of the Liver: Systematic Literature Review Suggests Implementing Biological Characterization to Optimize Therapeutic Strategy

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumors (MINEN) of the liver are exceptionally rare, with limited data available regarding their clinical behavior, pathogenesis, and optimal management. The coexistence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) within the liver presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, identifying cases of primary mixed HCC and NEC in the liver. The search adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and relevant studies were critically analyzed. A total of 45 documented cases were reviewed, focusing on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Most patients (90%) were male, with a median age of 66.5 years. Hepatitis B or C infection was present in 74% of cases, and liver cirrhosis was reported in 38%. The combined type was the most frequently observed histological pattern (65%). Treatment modalities varied, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgery, and systemic therapies. The median overall survival was 10 months, highlighting the aggressive nature of these tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the rarity and poor prognosis of hepatic MINEN tumors, multidisciplinary management is essential. Advanced molecular profiling may offer insights into tumor biology and potential therapeutic targets. Future research should explore novel systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, to improve patient outcomes.

Synchronous Double Primary Tumors of Liver (Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Hepatocellular carcinoma): A Case Report

This study presents a case of dual primary liver cancer involving small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. The 58-year-old Chinese male patient, who has a medical history of viral hepatitis B, presented with right upper abdominal pain persisting for one month. Imaging studies indicated the presence of multiple liver masses in segments V and VII-VIII, as well as a mass in the left lung. Subsequent hepatic biopsy performed on both segments confirmed the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma in segment V and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in segment VII-VIII. After undergoing one cycle of chemotherapy, the lung mass exhibited a reduction in size, while the liver masses showed an inadequate response. Subsequently, the patient underwent Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy (HIAC), resulting in partial remission (PR). However, the patient was diagnosed with brain metastasis and subsequently treated with Sorafenib and Tirelizumab, a Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor. The efficacy evaluation indicated stability, and no severe adverse effects were observed at the time of writing. The patient's survival time was 16 months.

Mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is extremely rare, thus radiological features have not been fully clarified.

CASE

A male patient (age: 70 years) visited our hospital due to a tumor in the liver. Examination using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a tumor (diameter: 5.0 cm) in hepatic segment 5, with early enhancement of the peripheral area and slight internal heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial and delayed phases, respectively. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT revealed intratumoral heterogeneity, characterized by increased uptake (standardized uptake value, 12.10) in the corresponding low-density area detected using enhanced CT relative to the surrounding areas of the tumor. On magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging also showed high intensity in the corresponding low-density area detected using CT. Preoperatively, the patient was diagnosed with HCC and underwent anterior sectionectomy. Pathological findings revealed both HCC and NEC components, and the patient was diagnosed with mixed NEC and HCC. Comparison of component distribution with FDG-PET/CT revealed an increased uptake area was congruent with the NEC component in the tumor.

CONCLUSION

In this case, the difference in tumor components affected the uptake in FDG-PET/CT. Such heterogeneous uptake with an enhanced spot may be useful for suspecting the presence of mixed NEC and HCC in patients with atypical HCC.

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in Classification and Recognition of Primary Hepatic Carcinoma Images under Magnetic Resonance Imaging

This study aimed to discuss the application value of the bias field correction algorithm in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC). In total, 52 patients with PHC were selected as the experimental group and divided into three subgroups: mild (15 cases), moderate (19 cases), and severe (18 cases) according to pathological grading. Another 52 patients with hepatic nodules in the same period were included in the control group. All the patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI examination, and the image qualities of MRI before and after bias field correction were compared. The DCE-MRI perfusion parameters were measured, including the transport constant Ktrans, reverse rate constant Kep, extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve), plasma volume (Vp), microvascular density (MVD), hepatic artery perfusion index (HPI), mean transit time of contrast agent (MTT), time to peak (TTP), blood volume (BV), hepatic arterial perfusion (HAP), full perfusion (FP), and portal venous perfusion (PVP). It was found that the sensitivity (93.63%), specificity (71.62%), positive predictive value (95.63%), negative predictive value (71.62%), and accuracy (90.01%) of MRI examination processed by the bias field correction algorithm were all significantly greater than those before processing (P < 0.05). The Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp, and MVD of patients in the experimental group were significantly larger than those of the control group, and severe group> moderate group> mild group (P < 0.05). HPI, MTT, TTP, BV, and HAP of patients in the experimental group were also significantly greater than those of the control group, which was shown as severe group > moderate group > mild group (P < 0.05). FP and PVP of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and severe group < moderate group < mild group (P < 0.05). It was suggested that in MRI images of patients with PHC, the bias field correction algorithm could significantly improve the diagnosis rate. Each perfusion parameter was related to the pathological grading, which could be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients.

"A Tale of 2 Demons"-Concomitant Presence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor of Liver: A Case Report and Review of Literatures

Neuroendocrine tumors usually originate from the neuroendocrine cells of gastrointestinal tract and their presence in the liver is mostly in the form of metastases. A primary neuroendocrine tumor in the liver concomitantly with hepatocellular carcinoma is an infrequent phenomenon. We present a 66-year-old woman with a remote history of breast cancer coming with postprandial fullness, later found to have multiple liver masses. After a thorough investigation, she was found to have a combined type of hepatocellular and primary neuroendocrine tumor of liver with pulmonary metastases. She was not a surgical candidate due to distant metastases. She was treated with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies but continued to deteriorate clinically, and finally succumbed to her illness. The presence of this combined type of tumor in our patient is unique in many different ways: It is extremely rare, she did not have any risk factors for liver cancer, no genetic mutation till date could tie all these cancers (breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and hepatocellular carcinoma) together, and not a lot of literatures/studies performed on this illness.

Mixed Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background: Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous malignancies that originate from the neuroendocrine system. Previous studies show that this cancer type mainly localizes in the gastrointestinal tract and often metastasizes to the liver. Primary liver neuroendocrine tumors are very rare and primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNET) with concurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, only few PHNET cases have been identified, making their diagnosis difficult. Here, we report the biggest ever reported and “deceiving” lesion of a mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm in the liver, aiming to raise awareness and improve treatment of the disease.

Case Presentation: Here, we report a preoperative misdiagnosed case that presented with hepatocellular carcinoma clinical features and no extrahepatic tumors. Postoperative pathology confirmed that it was a mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm. The patient was then referred for etoposide and cisplatin-based chemotherapy. No disease recurrence was observed at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion: We report a very rare and easily misdiagnosed case and we speculate that there were “undifferentiated cells” undergoing neuroendocrine and hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation, during which some hepatocellular carcinoma cells express neuroendocrine features. We recommend proper surgery and postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy in the management of this disease.