Salvage Operations for Wrist Ligament Injuries with Secondary Arthrosis

Management of Complex Hand and Wrist Ligament Injuries

Ligamentous injuries in the hand and wrist are often underdiagnosed and can present with significant functional limitations if there is untimely recognition of injury. Adequate repair or reconstruction is critical in restoring joint stability and mobility. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the metacarpophalangeal joint, scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL), and non-SLIL carpal ligament anatomy, diagnosis, imaging, treatment consideration and options, as well as surgical techniques encompassing repair, reconstruction, and fusion.

Four-Year Outcomes of Midcarpal Hemiarthroplasty for Wrist Arthritis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review the average 4-year outcomes of a cohort of patients with wrist arthritis, treated by a single surgeon with a novel prosthetic hemiarthroplasty of the midcarpal joint. We hypothesized that midcarpal hemiarthroplasty would improve range of motion and grip strength of patients with wrist arthritis, with a complication profile comparable with that of alternative solutions for wrist arthritis.

METHODS

We reviewed a series of 20 patients treated with a midcarpal hemiarthroplasty at an average of 4 years following surgery. Patients were evaluated objectively with grip strength, wrist range of motion, serial radiographs, and subjectively surveyed with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores.

RESULTS

Range of motion increased by a mean 33° in flexion-extension and 10° in radial-ulnar deviation compared with preoperative range of motion. Mean grip strength improved to 20.8 kg from 14.1 kg, and Mayo and DASH scores also significantly improved. Three patients had a manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness. One patient required open reduction internal fixation of an unstable fourth carpometacarpal joint after falling. Two patients were revised to a total wrist arthroplasty and 1 to a wrist fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty provides improved wrist range of motion, grip strength, and patient-reported outcome scores compared with preoperative values, with a complication profile comparable with that of other surgical options for patients with wrist arthritis. Advantages of midcarpal arthroplasty include retention of the native distal carpal row, preservation of midcarpal motion, as well as the option for conversion to a total wrist arthroplasty should revision be required.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Update on the operative treatment of scapholunate instability for radiologists. II. Salvage procedures, total wrist arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty

Scapholunate (SL) instability is the most common form of carpal instability. Imaging (especially radiography) plays an important role in the staging, management, and postoperative follow-up of SL instability. In the final stage of SL instability, known as scapholunate advanced collapse, progressive degenerative changes occur at the carpal level. The goals of this article are to review the surgical options available for addressing the different stages of scapholunate advanced collapse, along with an emphasis on normal postoperative imaging and complications associated with each surgical option.

Changes in Wrist Motion After Simulated Scapholunate Arthrodesis: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

A high incidence of nonunion and relatively poor outcomes with prior fixation techniques has precluded scapholunate (SL) arthrodesis as a standard treatment for SL instability. Our purpose was to determine the impact on range of motion (ROM) of simulated SL arthrodesis via headless screw fixation.

METHODS

We performed baseline wrist ROM for 10 cadaveric wrists using a standardized mounting-and-weights system. Extension, flexion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, dart-thrower's extension, and dart-thrower's flexion were assessed. Two 3.0-mm headless compression screws were inserted across the SL joint to simulate SL arthrodesis. Goniometric measurements and fluoroscopic imaging were repeated to assess ROM differences after simulated SL arthrodesis. We assessed SL angle and gap during testing to ensure there was no significant motion between the scaphoid and lunate, thus confirming stable simulated fusion. Differences in ROM were compared between baseline and simulated SL arthrodesis using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Mean SL angle remained constant between pre- and post-arthrodesis imaging (47° ± 6° vs 46° ± 4°) and did not change during post-arthrodesis ROM testing, indicating a stable simulated fusion. Compared with baseline, SL arthrodesis had a statistically significant reduction in maximum flexion of 6° and 9° based on fluoroscopy and goniometry, respectively, in dart-thrower's extension of 5° and 9° based on fluoroscopy and goniometry, respectively, and in dart-thrower's flexion of 6° for both fluoroscopy and goniometry. No other ROMs after simulated SL arthrodesis were significantly different compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of simulated SL arthrodesis on radiocarpal and midcarpal motion compare favorably with motion after SL soft tissue repair and other reconstructive techniques that have been previously reported. The statistically significant decreases in wrist flexion and dart-thrower's extension-flexion after simulated SL arthrodesis are of questionable clinical importance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results may support reconsidering SL arthrodesis as a viable treatment option for acute or chronic SL instability with regard to apparent minimal adverse effects on functional wrist ROM.