Residential mobility and chronic disease among World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees, 2004-2016

Residential mobility, neighborhood environment, and diabetes complications among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in the United States

Residential mobility can affect health through changes in available resources, social support, or continuity of healthcare. This study sought to understand whether residential mobility and/or change in neighborhood environment among patients with diabetes were associated with diabetes-related complications. This retrospective study used electronic health record data from 19,853 adults aged 18-64 with a diabetes diagnosis seen in 110 safety-net clinics across the United States. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression models estimated whether moving (pre/post) and change in neighborhood environment (improving, worsening, similar) were associated with diagnoses of chronic diabetes-related complications. Post-move versus pre-move was associated with significantly higher probability of diabetes-related chronic complications (predicted probability: 13.16 vs 6.00, respectively), but no association was found by change in neighborhood environment. Those who moved had lower probability of chronic complications than those who did not move which could have been driven by pre-move circumstances among patients who moved. Residential mobility plays an important role in understanding diabetes-related complications while changes in neighborhood environment may be less important among low-income patients served by safety-net clinics. Moving may not be directly responsible for the development of diabetes-related chronic complications, but it may be an indicator for other factors of instability.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Hypertension Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Despite ample evidence linking social determinants of health (SDoH) and hypertension outcomes, efforts to address SDoH in the context of hypertension prevention and self-management are not commensurate with the burden and impact of hypertension. To provide valuable insights into the development of targeted and effective strategies for preventing and managing hypertension, this systematic review, guided by the Healthy People 2030 SDoH framework, aims to summarize the inclusion, measurement, and evaluation of SDoH in studies examining hypertension outcomes, with a focus on characterizing SDoH constructs and summarizing the current evidence of their influence on hypertension outcomes. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of electronic databases identified 10 608 unique records, from which 57 articles meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. The studies, conducted nationally or regionally across the United States, revealed that higher educational attainment, health insurance coverage, income, and favorable neighborhood characteristics were associated with lower hypertension prevalence and better hypertension control among US adults. The findings underscore the importance of addressing SDoH such as education, health care access, economic stability, neighborhood environments, and social context to reduce hypertension disparities. Multilevel collaboration and community-engaged practices are necessary to tackle these disparities effectively.

Association of neighborhood gentrification and residential moves with hypertension and diabetes control in Los Angeles County, 2014-2019: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether gentrification exposure is associated with future hypertension and diabetes control.

METHODS

Linking records from an integrated health care system to census-tract characteristics, we identified adults with hypertension and/or diabetes residing in stably low-SES census tracts in 2014 (n = 69,524). We tested associations of census tract gentrification occurring between 2015 and 2019 with participants' disease control in 2019. Secondary analyses considered the role of residential moves (possible displacement), race and ethnicity, and age.

RESULTS

Gentrification exposure was associated with improved odds of hypertension control (aOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.17), especially among non-Hispanic Whites and adults >65 years. Gentrification was not associated with diabetes control overall, but control improved in the Hispanic subgroup. Disease control was similar regardless of residential moves in the overall sample, but disparate associations emerged in models stratified by race and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents of newly gentrifying neighborhoods may experience modestly improved odds of hypertension and/or diabetes control, but associations may differ across population subgroups.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Gentrification may support-or at least not harm-cardiometabolic health for some residents. City leaders and health systems could partner with impacted communities to ensure that neighborhood development meets the goals and health needs of all residents and does not exacerbate health disparities.

Compulsive immobility: Understanding the role of health on collective efficacy

Most health care approaches to understanding social ills are rooted in strain or ecological models. Strain models assume that the impact of poor physical health operates through the individual, that it is the individual suffering from poor health who engages in social ills as a means of adapting, and that the impact of poor health is rather direct and immediate. Meanwhile, ecological approaches of health acknowledge how poor health may impact others and the collective, but poorly account for the case in which this is not so, leaving unexplained the many instances of people who are in poor health but remain actively engaged with their communities and preserve relationships that nurture trust, shared norms, and cooperation. To rectify this problem, we introduce the concept of “compulsive immobility”: the situation in which those in poor health are compelled to stay indoors and refrain from community socialization. We argue that compulsive immobility mediates the relationship between poor physical health and collective efficacy, suggesting that illness, specifically to a point of physical immobility (e.g., bedridden), enables poor health to detract from collective efficacy. This allows scholars to both acknowledge how poor health may impact the individual and community, while specifying the mechanism through which it operates. To support our claim, we draw on GSS data to examine the relationship among poor health, health-related immobility, and collective efficacy. Our results provide empirical support for our argument, revealing that general health conditions influenced the level of generalized trust directly and indirectly through compulsive immobility. We conclude with suggestions on how compulsive immobility might impact neighborhood crime and propose ways through which subsequent research may refine and further test compulsive immobility as a mediator between poor health and collective efficacy.

•

Build upon health and social science research by examining the indirect relationship between health and collective efficacy.

•

Introduce the concept of “compulsive immobility” to elucidate the relationship between health and collective efficacy.

•

Draw on GSS data to examine this relationship.

•

Find support for compulsive immobility as a mediator in the relationship between health and collective efficacy.

•

Conclude with suggestions for future research and refinement of compulsive immobility.