Screening for cervical cancer: What are the determinants among adults with disabilities living in institutions? Findings from a National Survey in France

Population-based cancer screening access needs of disabled people: A qualitative evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Cancer is one of the most common causes of mortality among disabled people, and population-based screening is an effective method to identify some cancers early; however, its uptake is lower among the disabled population. There is a lack of evidence regarding why they access less, and their need to access population-based screening programmes.

AIM

To synthesise evidence of the experience of accessing population-based screening programmes for disabled people.

METHOD

A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) was carried out by searching electronic databases including Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus. Grey literature was also searched for. The search yielded 32 relevant publications.

RESULTS

The findings are based on Levesque's conceptual framework. Several factors affect the accessibility of screening services, including people's perceptions, family support, affordability, literacy, and accessibility.

CONCLUSION

Screening services need to acknowledge the needs of disabled people and integrate reasonable accommodations to facilitate their needs.

Working together with people with intellectual disability to make a difference: a protocol for a mixed-method co-production study to address inequities in cervical screening participation

Introduction

Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers yet remains a disease of inequity for people with intellectual disability, in part due to low screening rates. The ScreenEQUAL project will use an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) model to co-produce and evaluate accessible cervical screening resources with and for this group.

Methods

Stage 1 will qualitatively explore facilitators and barriers to screening participation for people with intellectual disability, families and support people, healthcare providers and disability sector stakeholders (n ≈ 20 in each group). An accessible multimodal screening resource, accompanying supporting materials for families and support people, and trauma-informed healthcare provider training materials will then be co-produced through a series of workshops. Stage 2 will recruit people with intellectual disability aged 25 to 74 who are due or overdue for screening into a single-arm trial (n = 48). Trained support people will provide them with the co-produced resource in accessible workshops (intervention) and support them in completing pre-post questions to assess informed decision-making. A subset will participate in qualitative post-intervention interviews including optional body-mapping (n ≈ 20). Screening uptake in the 9-months following the intervention will be measured through data linkage. Family members and support people (n = 48) and healthcare providers (n = 433) will be recruited into single-arm sub-studies. Over a 4-month period they will, respectively, receive the accompanying supporting materials, and the trauma-informed training materials. Both groups will complete pre-post online surveys. A subset of each group (n ≈ 20) will be invited to participate in post-intervention semi-structured interviews.

Outcomes and analysis

Our primary outcome is a change in informed decision-making by people with intellectual disability across the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and screening intention. Secondary outcomes include: (i) uptake of screening in the 9-months following the intervention workshops, (ii) changes in health literacy, attitudes and self-efficacy of family members and support people, and (iii) changes in knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and preparedness of screening providers. Each participant group will evaluate acceptability, feasibility and usability of the resources.

Discussion

If found to be effective and acceptable, the co-produced cervical screening resources and training materials will be made freely available through the ScreenEQUAL website to support national, and potentially international, scale-up.

Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Used between Individuals with Disabilities and Individuals without Disabilities

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. It is vital to achieve a high cervical cancer screening rate among women. We compared the Pap smear test (PST) used between individuals with disabilities and those without disabilities in Taiwan.

METHODS

Individuals registered in the Taiwan Disability Registration File and the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) were screened for this nationally representative retrospective cohort study. Women aged 30 and above in 2016 and who were still alive in 2016 were matched in a 1:1 ratio via propensity score matching (PSM); 186,717 individuals with disabilities and 186,717 individuals without disabilities were included. Controlling for relevant variables, the odds of receiving PST were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A lower percentage of individuals with disabilities (16.93%) received PST than those without disabilities (21.82%). The odds of individuals with disabilities receiving PST were 0.74 times that of individuals without disabilities (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.73-0.76). Compared to individuals without disabilities, individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities had the lower odds of receiving PST (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.36-0.40), followed by individuals with dementia (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33-0.48) or multiple disabilities (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.49-0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

We highly recommend that healthcare practitioners recognize the unique needs of individuals with different types of disabilities, especially those with cognitive impairments.

Access and accessibility to cancer screening for Brazilian women with spinal cord injury

Abstract Objective to identify and analyze the accessibility and accessibility of Brazilian women with spinal cord injury to preventive examinations for breast and cervical cancer. Method quantitative and cross-sectional study developed in a virtual platform. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, as well as association analysis between qualitative variables using Fisher's exact test. When identified the association (p<0.05), logistic regression was performed. Results a total of 120 Brazilian women with spinal cord injury, aged between 25 and 67 years participated in the study; 85.83% visited a gynecologist after the spinal cord injury, 79.17% underwent cytology and 52.50% underwent mammography. It was observed that women who used the supplementary health plan were more likely to have visited a gynecologist than those who used the public service. Those who had a partner and were older were more likely to have undergone the cytology exam. For mammography, those who were older and who used supplementary health care were more likely to have had mammography exams after the spinal cord injury. Conclusion women with spinal cord injury seek screening tests. However, they encounter difficulties related to the physical structure, equipment, transportation, health professionals, as well as socio-demographic difficulties and difficulties regarding the health service used.

Acesso e acessibilidade ao rastreamento de câncer em mulheres brasileiras com lesão medular

Resumo Objetivo identificar e analisar a acessibilidade e o acesso de mulheres brasileiras com lesão medular para a realização de exames preventivos do câncer de mama e colo de útero. Método estudo quantitativo e transversal desenvolvido em plataforma virtual. Realizadas análises estatísticas descritivas e de associação entre as variáveis qualitativas por meio do teste exato de Fisher. Quando identificada a associação (p<0,05), foi realizada a regressão logística. Resultados participaram 120 mulheres brasileiras com lesão medular com idades entre 25 e 67 anos; 85,83% foram ao ginecologista após a lesão medular, 79,17% realizaram a citologia e 52,50%, a mamografia. Observou-se que as mulheres que utilizavam a saúde suplementar apresentaram maior probabilidade de terem ido ao ginecologista do que as usuárias do serviço público. Aquelas com companheiro e as de maior idade apresentaram maior probabilidade de terem realizado o exame de citologia. Para a mamografia, aquelas de maior idade e que utilizavam a saúde suplementar apresentaram maiores chances de terem realizado o exame de mamografia após a lesão medular. Conclusão mulheres com lesão medular buscam a realização de exames de rastreamento. Entretanto, encontram dificuldades relacionadas à estrutura física, aos equipamentos, transporte, profissionais da saúde, assim como dificuldades sociodemográficas e quanto ao serviço de saúde utilizado.

Trajectories and individual determinants of regular cancer screening use over a long period based on data from the French E3N cohort

Despite several incentive policies for cancer screenings over the last two decades, the overall and regular use of cancer screenings remains insufficient in France. While the individual determinants of cancer screening uptake have been fairly well studied, the literature has rarely focused on the regularity of screening uptake, which is key to early cancer detection. We aimed to address this issue by studying cancer screening behaviors over 15 years, emphasizing the regularity and diversity of use. Using data from 40,021 women in the French E3N cohort, we studied the individual trajectories of screenings for breast, colorectal and cervical cancer between 2000 and 2014. We employed optimal matching methods to identify typical behaviors of use for each cancer screening. Then, we determined the associations between the identified behavior screening patterns for the different cancer screenings and, finally, assessed the associated individual determinants with logistical and multinomial models. We found that screening behaviors were fairly stable over time, with few typical screening patterns for each cancer. Overall, once a woman starts screening, she continues, and once she stops, she no longer returns. Cancer screening behaviors appear consistent; in particular, insufficient use of mammography appears to be associated with long-term nonuse of other cancer screenings. Factors associated with low or nonuse of screening are overall common between cancer screenings and are similar to those identified in the literature of screening use at a single point in time. Ultimately, these barriers prevent some women from entering a screening process in the long run, ultimately reinforcing social inequalities in health. Targeting women with insufficient mammography uptake may reach women outside of cancer screening settings more generally and, thus, both increase the overall uptake of cancer screening and reduce social inequalities in cancer screening.

Barriers to, and facilitators of, access to cancer services and experiences of cancer care for adults with a physical disability: A mixed methods systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cancer services need to be inclusive and accessible to everybody, including people with disabilities. However, there is evidence suggesting that people with disabilities experience poorer access to cancer services, compared to people without disabilities.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the barriers and facilitators of access to cancer services for people with physical disabilities and their experiences of cancer care.

METHODS

A mixed-method systematic review was conducted following the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre approach. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT -Version 11) to assess the quality of the included studies. We employed thematic synthesis to bring together data from across both qualitative and quantitative studies and we assessed the strength of synthesised findings using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) approach.

RESULTS

Seven quantitative studies and 10 qualitative studies (across 18 publications) were included. The findings highlighted a dearth of research on the experiences of men with disabilities. Furthermore, only one study explored experiences of cancer treatment, with all other studies focusing on cancer screening. Five synthesised findings were identified that reflected barriers and facilitators, highlighting both what makes access to services difficult and what are the strategies that could improve it.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowing what works for people with disabilities can enable the delivery of appropriate services. The findings of this review suggest that the mere existence of services does not guarantee their usability. Services need to be relevant, flexible, and accessible, and offered in a respectful manner.

Uptake of cancer screening among adults with disabilities in Flanders (Belgium)

Objective

To explore the association between disability and participation in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in Flanders (Belgium).

Methods

Data from the Centre for Cancer Detection were linked to data of the Flemish Agency for disabled persons by the Crossroads Bank for Social Security, using National Social Security Numbers.

Results

The study population consisted of 92,334 invited individuals registered as disabled in 2013–2015. For breast cancer screening (including both opportunistic screening and participation in the screening program), 51.7% of disabled women had undergone mammography in the last two years, compared with the Flemish uptake of 61.8%. In cervical screening, 45% of the women with a disability had undergone a PAP smear in the last three years (overall Flemish uptake was 60.7%). For colorectal cancer screening, 40.7% of individuals with a disability had undergone a fecal immunochemical test in the last two years (overall Flemish uptake was 51.5%). Participation in breast and colorectal cancer screening among persons with a disability was 10% points less than the Flemish average during the same period. In the cervical cancer screening program, the difference between the participation of disabled women and the Flemish average was 10% points. Persons with any type of disability had a lower uptake of cancer screening than the Flemish average, except for individuals with a hearing impairment.

Conclusions

Participation disparities in the Flemish cancer screening programs between persons with and without disabilities require specific efforts to increase cancer screening among people with a disability.

Rates of Screening for Breast, Colorectal, and Cervical Cancers in Older People With Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Cancer screening may not be appropriate for some older people. We compare the likelihood of screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers in older people with versus without cognitive impairment or dementia. Method: Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO (to March 9, 2018) for articles reporting screening for colon, breast, and cervical cancers in patients with and without cognitive impairment or dementia. Studies were summarized quantitatively (random effects meta-analysis), according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Studies reported data 1989-2008. The rate of screening for breast cancer by mammography was lower in women with cognitive impairment or dementia compared with those without (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.71, 0.91], p = .0007, six studies, N = 18,562). The rates of screening for cervical cancer by Pap smear (pooled OR = 0.88, 95% CI = [0.71, 1.08], p = 0.22, five studies, N = 409,131) and colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood test (pooled OR = 0.87, 95% CI = [0.55, 1.38], p = .55, two studies, N = 2,718) were not significantly lower in people with cognitive impairment or dementia. Conclusion: These historical rates provide a baseline for discussions around the need for more specific guidance to assist with decisions to discontinue screening. The study also identifies a gap in reported knowledge with respect to screening under current guidelines.

Review of gynecologic and reproductive care for women with developmental disabilities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Care for women with developmental disabilities requires special consideration for unique needs related to their cognitive and physical abilities. These women and their caregivers require more support and guidance during reproductive health care. We review the literature and provide expert opinion surrounding gynecological issues for women with developmental disabilities to support healthcare providers better understand and care for this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Women with developmental disabilities are more vulnerable to abuse and experience poorer gynecological healthcare outcomes. Many women with developmental disabilities are fertile and participate in sexual activity without adequate knowledge. They are at higher risk of pregnancy and birth complications. They are less likely to receive appropriate preventive screening.

SUMMARY

The review highlights important issues and practice suggestions related to the reproductive health care of women with developmental disabilities. Topics include clinic visits, menstruation, sexuality, sexual abuse, sexual health education, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy, labor and delivery, and cancer screening/prevention. We emphasize the need for an individualized, comprehensive approach for these patients and review perceived and actual barriers to care. More education is needed on the aforementioned topics for women with developmental disabilities, their caregivers, and their providers.

What Are the Determinants of Dental Care Expenditures in Institutions for Adults With Disabilities? Findings From a National Survey

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the determinants of dental care expenditures in institutions for adults with disabilities.

DESIGN

Health and disability survey and insurance database.

SETTING

Institutional setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (N=2222) living in institutions for people with cognitive, sensory, and mobility disabilities.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We used a Heckman selection model to correct for potential sample selection bias due to the high percentage of non-dental care users. The Heckman selection model is a 2-step statistical approach based on the simultaneous estimation of 2 multiple regression models-a selection equation (step 1) and an outcome equation (step 2)-offering a means of correcting for nonrandomly selected samples. The selection equation modeled whether the individual had consulted a dentist at least once, whereas the outcome equation explained the dental care expenditures. Disability severity was assessed by scoring mobility and cognitive functional limitations. Regressions also included sociodemographic characteristics and other health-related variables.

RESULTS

Individuals with the highest cognitive limitation scores, without family visits, without supplementary health insurance, and with poor oral health status were less likely to consult a dentist. After controlling for potential selection bias, the only variable that remained statistically significant in the outcome equation was the oral health status: when individuals with poor health status had consulted at least once, they had a higher level of dental care expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional limitations were barriers to accessing dental care even in institutions for adult with disabilities. These barriers should be overcome because they may worsen their oral health status and well-being. Given the lack of literature on this specific topic, our results are important from a policy perspective. Health authorities should be alerted by these findings.

Seasonal influenza vaccine uptake among people with disabilities: A nationwide population study of disparities by type of disability and socioeconomic status in France

People with disabilities use various preventive health services less frequently than others, notably because of a lower socioeconomic status (SES). We examined variations of seasonal influenza vaccine uptake according to type/severity of disability and SES. We analyzed (in 2016) data from the 2008 French national cross-sectional survey on health and disability (n=12,396 adults living in the community and belonging to target groups for seasonal influenza vaccination). We defined seasonal influenza vaccine uptake during the 2007-2008 season by the self-reporting of a flu shot between September 2007 and March 2008. We built scores of mobility, cognitive, and sensory limitations, and an SES score based on education, occupation, and income. We performed bivariate analyses and then multiple log-binomial regressions. The prevalence of vaccine uptake was 23% in the 18-64 group and 63% in the ≥65 group. In bivariate analyses, it was higher among people in both age groups who had mobility and/or cognitive limitations and in the ≥65 group among those with sensory limitations. In the multiple regression analyses, only the presence of major mobility limitations in the18-64 group remained significant. The probability of vaccine uptake was higher in the highest SES category than in the lowest. Among at-risk groups, people with disabilities were more frequently vaccinated than others, mainly because of their higher levels of morbidity and healthcare use. Socioeconomic inequalities in access to vaccination persist in France. Future research is needed to monitor the trend in vaccine uptake in institutions.

World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review examines research and practical applications of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a basis for establishing specific criteria for evaluating relevant international scientific literature. The aims were to establish the extent of international dissemination and use of WHODAS 2.0 and analyze psychometric research on its various translations and adaptations. In particular, we wanted to highlight which psychometric features have been investigated, focusing on the factor structure, reliability, and validity of this instrument.

METHOD

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a search for publications focused on "whodas" using the ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar electronic databases.

RESULTS

We identified 810 studies from 94 countries published between 1999 and 2015. WHODAS 2.0 has been translated into 47 languages and dialects and used in 27 areas of research (40% in psychiatry).

CONCLUSIONS

The growing number of studies indicates increasing interest in the WHODAS 2.0 for assessing individual functioning and disability in different settings and individual health conditions. The WHODAS 2.0 shows strong correlations with several other measures of activity limitations; probably due to the fact that it shares the same disability latent variable with them. Implications for Rehabilitation WHODAS 2.0 seems to be a valid, reliable self-report instrument for the assessment of disability. The increasing interest in use of the WHODAS 2.0 extends to rehabilitation and life sciences rather than being limited to psychiatry. WHODAS 2.0 is suitable for assessing health status and disability in a variety of settings and populations. A critical issue for rehabilitation is that a single "minimal clinically important .difference" score for the WHODAS 2.0 has not yet been established.

[Access to care and prevention for people with disabilities in France: Analysis based on data from the 2008 French health and disabilities households surveys (Handicap-Santé-Ménages)]

BACKGROUND

Using data from the 2008 French health and disabilities households surveys, this study examines the use of three types of routine medical care (dental, ophthalmological and gynecological care) and four preventive services (cervical cancer screening, breast cancer screening, colon cancer screening and vaccination against hepatitis B) both for people with disabilities and for those without. Two definitions of disability were retained: (1) functional limitations (motor, cognitive, visual or hearing limitations) and (2) administrative recognition of disability.

METHODS

For each type of care, binary logistic regression was used to test whether access to care is influenced by any of the disability indicators as well as by other explanatory variables. Two set of explanatory variables were included successively: (1) sociodemographic variables such as age, gender as well as a proxy variable representing medical needs and (2) socioeconomic variables such as level of education, household income per consumption unit, supplementary health insurance coverage, co-payment exemption and geographic variables.

RESULTS

Persons reporting functional limitations are less likely to access to all types of care, in a proportion that varies between 5 to 27 points, compared to persons without functional limitations, except for eye care for which no gap is observed. The same results are obtained for persons reporting an administrative recognition of disability, and more precisely for those who benefit from the Disability allowance for adults (Allocation adulte handicapé [AAH]). After adding the social variables to the model, problems of access to health care decrease significantly, showing that disabled persons' social situation tends to reduce their access to care.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals, for a broad range of care, a negative differential access to care for persons reporting functional limitations compared to those without limitations which is confirmed when identifying disability through administrative recognition. Furthermore, it also discusses factors explaining these differentials. It highlights the role of the social situation of disabled people as an additional barrier to already limited access to healthcare.

What Are the Determinants of Specialized Outpatient and Dental Care Use in Adults With Disabilities Living in Institutions: Findings From a National Survey in France

OBJECTIVE

To explore the determinants of specialized outpatient care use (general practitioners excluded) in people with disabilities living in institutions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

National health and disability survey.

PARTICIPANTS

People (N=2528) living in institutions for adults with cognitive, sensory, and mobility disabilities.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We used different measures of disability severity available in the survey: (1) the continuous score of limitations based on a measure we constructed according to self-reported level of difficulty performing 18 tasks without aid; (2) the Katz Index; and (3) the respondent's self-reported perception of functional limitations. Logistic regressions were performed to examine the determinants of the likelihood of having consulted a specialized outpatient care physician or a dentist at least once in the previous year.

RESULTS

Of the 2528 individuals, 45% (1141) and 28% (697) had respectively consulted a specialized outpatient care physician or a dentist at least once in the previous year. After adjusting for health care needs, higher functional limitation scores, dependency in all 6 activities of daily living, and self-reported perceptions of severe functional limitations were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of having consulted a specialized outpatient care physician (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], .95 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .94-.96]; AOR, .29 [95% CI, .23-.38]; and AOR, .51 [95% CI, .42-.62], respectively) or a dentist (AOR, .95 [95% CI, .94-.96]; AOR, .29 [95% CI, .21-.39]; AOR, .55 [95% CI, .44-.67], respectively) at least once in the previous year. Being a man, reporting a lack of family support, and having a low socioeconomic status also significantly affected specialized outpatient care use.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the method used to define and measure disability, a high degree of disability negatively affects specialized outpatient care use after adjusting for health care need. Further studies are needed to better understand the reasons why this association between the degree of functional limitation and unmet medical needs is also a reality for people with disabilities living in institutions.