Evidence on the effectiveness of policies promoting price transparency - A systematic review

Pediatric Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider: Advances and Limitations

Despite >1 in 5 children taking prescription drugs in the United States, off-label drug use is common. To increase the study of drugs in children, regulatory bodies have enacted legislation to incentivize and require pediatric drug studies. As a result of this legislation, novel trial approaches, and an increase in personnel with pediatric expertise, there have been numerous advancements in pediatric drug development. With this review, we aim to highlight developments in pediatric pharmacology over the past 6 years for the most common disease processes that may be treated pharmacologically by the pediatric primary care provider. Using information extracted from label changes between 2018 and 2023, the published literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov, we discuss advances across multiple therapeutic areas relevant to the pediatric primary care provider, including asthma, obesity and related disorders, mental health disorders, infections, and dermatologic conditions. We highlight instances in which new drugs have been developed on the basis of a deeper mechanistic understanding of illness and instances in which labels have been expanded in older drugs on the basis of newly available data. We then consider additional factors that affect pediatric drug use, including cost and nonpharmacologic therapies. Although there is work to be done, efforts focused on pediatric-specific drug development will increase the availability of evidence-based, labeled guidance for commonly prescribed drugs and improve outcomes through the safe and effective use of drugs in children.

Drug pricing and transparency in Europe and the United States: what is it and how does it work?

INTRODUCTION

As drug prices are viewed to be opaque, there have been increasing societal demands on policy and decision makers to implement initiatives that promote drug price transparency.

AREAS COVERED

This Perspective discusses what drug price transparency is and how it works in theory and in practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Transparency on drug prices may target payers, patients and health care professionals; and may relate to prices at each stage in a drug's distribution system. Although proponents claim that drug price transparency will reduce prices and increase patient access, others expect the opposite effect. Nevertheless, a number of international organizations, countries and consumer groups have taken steps to enhance drug price transparency. This has occurred despite a lack of theoretical clarity and of evidence about its likely impact. Policy and decision makers need to consider how payers and pharmaceutical companies are likely to react to drug price transparency and need to be aware that transparency may produce different effects depending on the country to which it is applied. Even though we believe that full drug price transparency is elusive, various incremental measures can be taken to move toward it.

Pricing and reimbursement mechanisms for advanced therapy medicinal products in 20 countries

Introduction: Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products are a type of therapies that, in some cases, hold great potential for patients without an effective current therapeutic approach but they also present multiple challenges to payers. While there are many theoretical papers on pricing and reimbursement (P&R) options, original empirical research is very scarce. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive international review of regulatory and P&R decisions taken for all ATMPs with centralized European marketing authorization in March 2022. Methods: A survey was distributed in July 2022 to representatives of 46 countries. Results: Responses were received from 20 countries out of 46 (43.5%). 14 countries reimbursed at least one ATMP. Six countries in this survey reimbursed no ATMPs. Conclusion: Access to ATMPs is uneven across the countries included in this study. This arises from regulatory differences, commercial decisions by marketing authorization holders, and the divergent assessment processes and criteria applied by payers. Moving towards greater equality of access will require cooperation between countries and stakeholders, for example, through the WHO Regional Office for Europe's Access to Novel Medicines Platform.

India's Decision to Deny an Extension of Patent for Bedaquiline: A Public Health Imperative

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health concern, which has become worse in low- and middle-income nations due to the rise of drug-resistant strains of the disease. Bedaquiline, a groundbreaking anti-TB drug, shows great promise for addressing multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). However, the recent decision by India to reject the application for a patent extension on bedaquiline raises crucial questions regarding access to essential medicines and public health requirements. This article examines the significance of India's rejection of the patent extension for bedaquiline, outlining the global implications of this decision and its impact on intellectual property rights, access to medicines, and the future of drug development. India's stance serves as a model for other countries to prioritize public health in their patent-related decisions, underlining the need for a balanced approach to intellectual property rights, innovation, and affordability in the pharmaceutical sector. In the context of the ongoing battle against drug-resistant TB, India's decision on bedaquiline signifies the evolving landscape of pharmaceutical patent practices in the service of global public health.